Early Gastric CancerNCT04083573
Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of Medical Monitor and Medical Augmented Reality Glasses in Endoscopy: Observation Study
An observational study of Early Gastric Cancer, run by National Cancer Center, Korea.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of medical augmented reality glasses and general monitors when distinguishing mucosal lesions from submucosal lesions in endoscopic diagnosis for early gastric cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Early Gastric Cancer
- What is being tested?
- application of medical augmented reality glasses
- How many people
- 25 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Sep 2019to Sep 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with early gastric cancer who are scheduled for endoscopic submucosal dissection will be the study population
Who may be able to join
- Patients with early gastric cancer who are scheduled for endoscopic submucosal dissection
- Age 19 or more
- Patients who voluntarily participated in this clinical study and signed a written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Patients with poor general medical condition which does not allow them to understand and submit a informed consent
- Patients who do not agree with this study
About this study
The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of medical augmented reality glasses and general monitors when distinguishing mucosal lesions from submucosal lesions in endoscopic diagnosis for early gastric cancer.
- Conditions
- Early Gastric Cancer
- Being tested
- application of medical augmented reality glasses
- Medical subject headings
- Stomach Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
application of medical augmented reality glassesOther
Endoscopic images from medical monitor and medical augmented reality glasses will be collected and reviewed. Outcomes from both series of images will be compared
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Consistency between the result from medical monitor and that from medical augmented reality glass
All series of images will be reviewed by several endoscopists by evaluation of several endoscopic findings.
Then, concordance rate between the result from medical monitor and that from medical augmented reality glass will be assessed.
More specifically, % of patients that does not show the same results (m cancer, sm cancer, or indeterminate) between medical monitor and medical augmented reality will be assessed.
Measured: Image review will be conducted after full collection of both series of images. Review process will be done within 3 months after acquision of images. The time for study completion is aimed at 1 year from the start date.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Sep 2019
- Study startSep 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completionDec 2019 (estimated)
- Study completionSep 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Early Gastric CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Cancer Center, Korea
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Chan Gyoo Kim, National Cancer Center, Korea
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04083573
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NCC2019-0153
- Status last verified
- Sep 2019
- First submitted
- 26 Aug 2019
- Last updated
- 10 Sep 2019
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Yoon JW, Chen RE, Kim EJ, Akinduro OO, Kerezoudis P, Han PK, Si P, Freeman WD, Diaz RJ, Komotar RJ, Pirris SM, Brown BL, Bydon M, Wang MY, Wharen RE Jr, Quinones-Hinojosa A. Augmented reality for the surgeon: Systematic review. Int J Med Robot. 2018 Aug;14(4):e1914. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1914. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
PubMed 29708640Takeshita H, Kihara K, Yoshida S, Higuchi S, Ito M, Nakanishi Y, Kijima T, Ishioka J, Matsuoka Y, Numao N, Saito K, Fujii Y. Clinical application of a modern high-definition head-mounted display in sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2014 Aug;33(8):1499-504. doi: 10.7863/ultra.33.8.1499.
PubMed 25063416Eckardt C, Paulo EB. HEADS-UP SURGERY FOR VITREORETINAL PROCEDURES: An Experimental and Clinical Study. Retina. 2016 Jan;36(1):137-47. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000689.
PubMed 26200516Choi J, Kim SG, Im JP, Kim JS, Jung HC, Song IS. Endoscopic prediction of tumor invasion depth in early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 May;73(5):917-27. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.11.053. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
PubMed 21316050
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Sep 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of Medical Monitor and Medical Augmented Reality Glasses in Endoscopy: Observation Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04083573
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NCC2019-0153
- Conditions
- Early Gastric Cancer
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- National Cancer Center, KoreaOther government
- Study start
- Sep 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Sep 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of medical augmented reality glasses and general monitors when distinguishing mucosal lesions from submucosal lesions in endoscopic diagnosis for early gastric cancer.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with early gastric cancer who are scheduled for endoscopic submucosal dissection will be the study population
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with early gastric cancer who are scheduled for endoscopic submucosal dissection
- Age 19 or more
- Patients who voluntarily participated in this clinical study and signed a written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients with poor general medical condition which does not allow them to understand and submit a informed consent
- Patients who do not agree with this study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| application of medical augmented reality glassesEndoscopic images from medical monitor and medical augmented reality glasses will be collected and reviewed. Outcomes from both series of images will be compared | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Consistency between the result from medical monitor and that from medical augmented reality glass
Time frame: Image review will be conducted after full collection of both series of images. Review process will be done within 3 months after acquision of images. The time for study completion is aimed at 1 year from the start date.
All series of images will be reviewed by several endoscopists by evaluation of several endoscopic findings. Then, concordance rate between the result from medical monitor and that from medical augmented reality glass will be assessed. More specifically, % of patients that does not show the same results (m cancer, sm cancer, or indeterminate) between medical monitor and medical augmented reality will be assessed.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Sep 2019.
- Background: PubMed 29708640Yoon JW, Chen RE, Kim EJ, Akinduro OO, Kerezoudis P, Han PK, Si P, Freeman WD, Diaz RJ, Komotar RJ, Pirris SM, Brown BL, Bydon M, Wang MY, Wharen RE Jr, Quinones-Hinojosa A. Augmented reality for the surgeon: Systematic review. Int J Med Robot. 2018 Aug;14(4):e1914. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1914. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
- Background: PubMed 25063416Takeshita H, Kihara K, Yoshida S, Higuchi S, Ito M, Nakanishi Y, Kijima T, Ishioka J, Matsuoka Y, Numao N, Saito K, Fujii Y. Clinical application of a modern high-definition head-mounted display in sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2014 Aug;33(8):1499-504. doi: 10.7863/ultra.33.8.1499.
- Background: PubMed 26200516Eckardt C, Paulo EB. HEADS-UP SURGERY FOR VITREORETINAL PROCEDURES: An Experimental and Clinical Study. Retina. 2016 Jan;36(1):137-47. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000689.
- Background: PubMed 21316050Choi J, Kim SG, Im JP, Kim JS, Jung HC, Song IS. Endoscopic prediction of tumor invasion depth in early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 May;73(5):917-27. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.11.053. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Early Gastric Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Collecting Blood Samples From Patients With and Without Cancer to Evaluate Tests for Early Cancer Detection
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingObservational study
cfDNA Assay Prospective Observational Validation for Early Cancer Detection and Minimal Residual Disease
Brain Cancer, Breast Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
68Ga-labeled Cholecystokinin Receptor (CCK2R) Targeted Molecular Probes in Early Tumor Diagnosis
Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma, Small Cell Lung Cancer ( SCLC )
Recruiting
SPADE Clinical Trial.
Early Gastric Cancer, Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Early Recovery After Surgery Protocol in Improving Quality of Life in Participants With Stage 0-IIIC Gastric Cancer Undergoing Surgery
Clinical Stage 0 Gastric Cancer AJCC v8, Clinical Stage I Gastric Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Early Gastric Cancer, run by National Cancer Center, Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Consistency between the result from medical monitor and that from medical augmented reality glass (time frame: Image review will be conducted after full collection of both series of images. Review process will be done within 3 months after acquision of images. The time for study completion is aimed at 1 year from the start date.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04083573, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2019.