AzTrials
AzTrials

Mechanical Ventilation ComplicationPEEPNCT04081155

Effect of PEEP on Lung Regional Ventilation and Perfusion

An observational study of Mechanical Ventilation Complication and Respiratory Failure, run by Yun Long at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Investigate effects of PEEP on pulmonary regional ventilation and perfusion assessed by EIT Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
How many people
33 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Jan 2019to 1 Jun 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: adult patients within 7 days, who were sequentially admitted to the Department of Critical Care Medicine and required central venous catheters and mechanically ventilation were eligible for the study

Who may be able to join

  • have been placed central venous catheter based on patient's condition
  • Under mechanically ventilation
  • Under sedation and control ventilation mode
  • Year>18

Who cannot join

  • Pneumothorax
  • pregnancy
  • Severe chest wall wound
  • Severe hypernatremia

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Effect of Positive End-expiratory Pressure(PEEP) on Regional Ventilation and Perfusion Estimated by Indicator-based Electrical Impedance Tomography(EIT) Method in Critically Ill Patients With Mechanical Ventilation

Investigate effects of PEEP on pulmonary regional ventilation and perfusion assessed by EIT

Read the detailed description
  1. When the research team was available, adult patients within 7days who were sequentially admitted to the Department of Critical Care Medicine and required central venous catheters and mechanically ventilation were eligible for the study.
  2. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients or next of kin before data were included in the study.
  3. Information collected at enrollment included demographic characteristics, such as age, sex.
  4. The blood pressure(BP),heart rate(HR), pulse O2(SpO2),tidal volume and lung regional ventilation and perfusion were collected at PEEP 0 centimeter H2O column and PEEP 12-15 centimeter H2O column.
  5. Indicator-based EIT method: rapidly inject 10ml 10% Sodium chloride(NaCL) through central venous catheter during a 8s respiratory hold, and the curve of impedence change was collected by EIT machine
Keywords
EIT, pulmonary perfusion, ventilation
Medical subject headings
Respiratory Insufficiency, Hypoxia, Respiratory Aspiration

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. lung regional ventilation distribution

    lung regional ventilation distribution measured by EIT

    Measured: Hour 1

  2. lung regional perfusion distribution

    lung regional perfusion distribution measured by EIT

    Measured: Hour 1

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Sep 2019
  2. Study start1 Jan 2019
  3. Primary completion28 May 2020
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
33 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04081155
Sponsor's protocol ID
PEEP-lung perfusion
Acronym
PEEP
Status last verified
Jan 2019
First submitted
3 Sep 2019
Last updated
14 Jul 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • He H, Chi Y, Long Y, Yuan S, Frerichs I, Moller K, Fu F, Zhao Z. Influence of overdistension/recruitment induced by high positive end-expiratory pressure on ventilation-perfusion matching assessed by electrical impedance tomography with saline bolus. Crit Care. 2020 Sep 29;24(1):586. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03301-x.

    PubMed 32993811

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Mechanical Ventilation Complication and Respiratory Failure, run by Yun Long at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

lung regional ventilation distribution (time frame: Hour 1). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04081155, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jul 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in