AzTrials
AzTrials

Alzheimer DiseasePhase 2NCT04080544

Cognitive Decline and Alzheimer's Disease in the Dallas Lifespan Brain Study

A Phase 2 study testing [18F]AV-1451 and Positron Emission Tomography in people with Alzheimer Disease and Cognitive Decline, run by Neil M Rofsky, MD, MHA at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators will conduct tau positron emission tomography (PET) scans on 125 adults using the radiopharmaceutical Flortaucipir F18 ([18F]AV-1451). This will allow the investigators to determine tau deposition across adults of different ages and assess the relationship of current tau burden to cognitive function… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 38 to 96 years
Conditions the study is for
Alzheimer Disease, Cognitive Decline
What is being tested?
[18F]AV-1451 and Positron Emission Tomography
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
125 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
15 Jan 2019to 30 Jun 2022
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 38 to 96 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participated in Wave 1 or 2 of the DLBS study.
  • Subjects must indicate that they are not currently pregnant if they are women of child-bearing potential. Women of child-bearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control; abstinence) prior to study entry, for the duration of study participation, and for 90 days following completion of therapy. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately. A female of child-bearing potential is any woman (regardless of sexual orientation, having undergone a tubal ligation, or remaining celibate by choice) who meets the following criteria: 1) Has not undergone a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy; or 2) Has not been naturally post-menopausal for at least 12 consecutive months (i.e., has had menses at any time in the preceding 12 consecutive months).
  • Volumetric Brain MRI Image (T-1 Weighted MPRage) collected as part of DLBS Wave 1, 2, or 3 protocol.
  • Completed at least 9 years of formal education, or the equivalent of freshman year of high school.
  • Fluent English speakers.
  • Tolerate laying 20 minutes on a flat table for the PET scan.
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score lower than 22; all DLBS participants at the time of initial Wave 1 enrollment between 2008 - 2014 had an MMSE score of 26 or above, indicating normal cognitive function. However, in the time interval between Wave 1 and Wave 3, it is possible that mental capacity may have deteriorated. The investigators will exclude all participants in Wave 3 testing who have an MMSE lower than 22.
  • Taking some types of sedatives, benzodiazepines, or anti-psychotics.
  • Currently undergoing chemotherapy or radiation for cancer.
  • New history of substance abuse.
  • Has a history of drug or alcohol dependence within the last year, or prior prolonged history of dependence.
  • Recreational drug use in past six months.
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Central nervous systems disease or brain injury that would preclude participation in the study.
  • Psychiatric or neurological disorder that would preclude participation in this study.
  • Has clinically significant hepatic, renal, pulmonary, metabolic or endocrine disturbances which pose safety risk.
  • Has a current clinically significant cardiovascular disease that poses a safety risk.
  • Has a current clinically significant infectious disease or a medical comorbidity which poses a safety risk.
  • Has either: 1) Screening electrocardiogram (ECG) with corrected QT Interval (QTc) > 450 millisecond (msec) if male, or QTc > 470 msec if female; or 2) A history of additional risk factors for Torsades de Pointes (TdP) (e.g., hypokalemia, family history of Long QT syndrome) or are taking drugs that are known to cause QT prolongation (a list of prohibited and discouraged medications is provided by the Sponsor); Patients with a prolonged QTc interval in the setting of intraventricular conduction block (examples right bundle branch block or left bundle branch block), may be enrolled with sponsor approval.
  • Has received or will receive investigational medication within the 30 days of PET/CT scan.
  • Has received or will receive a radiopharmaceutical for imaging or therapy within 24 hours of PET/CT scan.
  • Is a participant who, in the opinion of the investigator(s), is otherwise unsuitable for a study of this type.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • UT Southwestern Medical Center

    Dallas, Texas, 75390

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Cause or Effect: Untangling the Relationship With Amyloid and Tau Deposits to Cognitive Decline and Alzheimer's Disease in the Dallas Lifespan Brain Study

The investigators will conduct tau positron emission tomography (PET) scans on 125 adults using the radiopharmaceutical Flortaucipir F18 ([18F]AV-1451). This will allow the investigators to determine tau deposition across adults of different ages and assess the relationship of current tau burden to cognitive function and amyloid deposition collected over the previous 10-year interval.

Read the detailed description

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a highly prevalent disorder of dementia in older adults. AD neuropathology is marked by the presence of amyloid plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles. Autopsy studies, as well as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies in living persons, have established that the neurodegenerative changes in AD begin in medial temporal lobe structures and later progress to adjacent temporal, parietal and frontal neocortical regions. Magnetic resonance image studies of AD consistently reveal volumetric loss in the hippocampus using both cross-sectional and longitudinal approaches. The primary symptom of early-stage AD is memory impairment possibly accompanied by deficits in attentional control. Normal aging, however, is also marked by cognitive decline, as well as structural brain changes. Autopsy data had shown in the past that about 30% of older adults with no obvious cognitive impairment show some degree of the neuropathology typically associated with dementia at autopsy.

Importantly, the recent ability to image beta-amyloid and tau deposits in vivo using positron emission tomography (PET) scanning has revolutionized our understanding of early stages of AD. Evidence suggests that amyloid deposits may be detected 10 - 15 years before memory symptoms appear. These findings are leading to the ability to diagnose AD years before symptoms begin. Much less is known about the impact and developmental course of tau deposition as compared to beta-amyloid because the ligand to image tau was only recently invented. There is increasing evidence that tau is particularly toxic to the brain and is a later precursor of AD than amyloid deposits. Additional research on beta-amyloid and tau deposition in aging is crucial, as much work suggests that treatment of AD may be most effective when implemented early in the time course of the disease. Understanding the impact of tau deposits and its interactions with amyloid deposition allows the investigators to see the development of early markers of AD, which are important in understanding the trajectory of the disease. An important approach to understand the amyloid/tau puzzle and its relationship to AD is a large-scale longitudinal study of normal aging that integrates extensive neuroimaging and cognitive assessments along with tau imaging. A key aspect in understanding pathological aging is the need to be able to clearly differentiate normal aging from early pathology. The present Tau imaging study described here is an important component of the Dallas Lifetime Brain Study (DLBS).

The Dallas Lifespan Brain Study (DLBS) began in 2008 and was designed to utilize the new in vivo imaging techniques to address uncertainty regarding how AD pathology relates to the developmental process of aging and cognition, fueled in part by the partial overlap of pathological markers and decline in mnemonic function observed in a substantial proportion of 'normal' aged individuals. A total of 296 participants were recruited for Wave 1 from 2008 to 2014 to the DLBS and they received cognitive testing, structural and functional MRI, as well as a scan for beta amyloid using the radioligand AV-45 Florbetapir F 18 (also known as "[18F]AV-45"). A total of 183 returning participants were tested four years later in Wave 2, and they received the same battery as in Wave 1. In addition, 60 of these were also scanned with Flortaucipir F 18 (also known as "[18F]AV-1451"). [18F]AV-1451 is a newly-developed Phase II ligand that measures tau deposit in the human brain and this drug was provided to the DLBS by Avid Radiopharmaceuticals.

The objective of the current study is to test 125 DLBS participants with [18F]AV-1451 (Flortaucipir F 18) at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (UTSW). The inclusion of tau imaging in Wave 3 will allow the investigators to relate tau deposition in the brain to the 10-year history of amyloid deposition and cognitive decline in the DLBS participants and understand the independent and joint contributions of tau to cognitive decline and early AD at different ages.

Being tested
[18F]AV-1451, Positron Emission Tomography
Keywords
Positron Emission Tomography
Medical subject headings
Alzheimer Disease, Cognitive Dysfunction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • [18F]AV-1451Drug

    Also called Flortaucipir F18

    The subject will receive up to a target dose of 370 megabecquerel (MBq) as a single IV bolus of [18F]AV-1451.

  • Positron Emission TomographyProcedure or surgery

    Also called PET

    Approximately 80 minutes after injection subjects will be placed in the UTSW PET/CT scanner for a 20-minute brain scan.

Study groups in NCT04080544
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Follow up DLBS participantsExperimentalEight to ten year follow-up DLBS participants who were cognitively normal at the time of enrollment from 2008 to 2014.
Receives: Drug: [18F]AV-1451; Procedure: Positron Emission Tomography

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Standardized Uptake Value Ratios (SUVrs) Calculated From [18F]AV-1451 PET Scans

    Tau accumulation in the temporal lobe will be measured as the standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) computed from each participant's [18F]AV-1451 PET scans averaged across six bilateral regions of interest (ROls) by normalizing regional counts to the whole cerebellum. The 6 ROls are: inferior temporal gyrus, middle temporal gyrus, superior temporal gyrus, entorhinal cortex, parahippocampal gyrus, and fusiform gyrus. Each participant's PET scan and the six bilateral ROIs will be coregistered to their T1-weighted MRI (MP-RAGE). Finally, the mean observed tracer count from each region will be extracted and normalized using whole cerebellum as the reference. Observed tau SUVR scores in humans range from 0.5 to 2.5, with higher scores being indicative of greater tau accumulation. Unless otherwise specified, all subsequent analyses will use this temporal tau SUVR and will involve examination of cross-sectional relationships between tau SUVR and key outcome measures at Wave 3 of the DLBS.

    Measured: An average of 3-months post-PET study visit

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Relationship of Tau Burden to Episodic Memory Function

    Episodic memory is a construct that measures how well individuals can store, maintain, and retrieve detailed information in long-term memory. Episodic memory will be a composite score using the Hopkins Verbal Learning test with 3 subcomponents (immediate recall: range 0-12, delayed recall: range 0-12, and recognition: range 0-24) and the immediate recall of the CANTAB Verbal Recognition Memory task (range 0-12). Scores from the tasks will be converted to Z-scores and averaged to form an episodic memory composite, and then this final value with be converted to a Z-score. A higher composite Z-score indicates better episodic memory, a Z-score of 0 represents the population mean, and all Z-scores have a standard deviation of 1. Values in this table represent this Episodic Memory Z-score.

    Measured: 1-year post study completion

  2. Relationship of Amyloid Accumulation to Tau Burden

    Amyloid accumulation throughout the Dallas Lifespan Brain Study (6-9.8 years) will be measured with Florbetapir F18 and calculated as an Amyloid Standard Uptake Value ratio (SUVR) by normalizing regional counts to the whole cerebellum. Amyloid SUVR scores will be averaged across eight cortical regions spanning most of the cortex: dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, lateral parietal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, precuneus, lateral temporal cortex, and lateral occipital lobe. Amyloid SUVR scores observed in this study have ranged from 0.88 to 1.74, with higher scores being indicative of greater amyloid accumulation. Finally, annualized change scores for these amyloid SUVRs across the full study duration (6-9.8 years) will be calculated to determine the extent that the rate of amyloid accumulation relates to tau burden at the end of the study.

    Measured: 1-year post study completion

  3. Relationship of Tau Burden to Speed of Processing

    Speed of processing is a construct that measures how rapidly individuals can process information. To assess speed of processing, a composite score will be created using the Digit Comparison task and the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) Digit Symbol task. Observed DLBS raw scores range from 27 to 116 for Digit Comparison task and 20 to 90 for Digit Symbol task. Participants' raw scores are converted to Z-scores and averaged to form a speed of processing composite, and then this final value with be converted to a Z-score. A higher composite Z-score indicates better speed of processing, a Z-score of 0 represents the population mean, and all Z-scores have a standard deviation of 1. Values in this table represent this Speed of Processing Z-score.

    Measured: 1-year post study completion

  4. Relationship of Tau Burden to Reasoning

    The construct of reasoning measures an individual's ability to recognize novel patterns and the conceptual relationship among objects and effectively apply these patterns to solve similar problems. To assess reasoning, a composite score will be created using the Raven's Progressive Matrices task and Educational Testing Service (ETS) Letters Sets task. Observed DLBS raw scores range from 9 to 30 for Raven's Progressive Matrices task and from 0.5 to 30 for ETS Letters Sets task. Raven's Progress Matrices and ETS Letter Sets will be converted to Z-scores and averaged to form a reasoning composite, and then this final value with be converted to a Z-score. A higher composite Z-score indicates higher reasoning ability, a Z-score of 0 represents the population mean, and all Z-scores have a standard deviation of 1. Values in this table represent this Reasoning Z-score.

    Measured: 1-year post study completion

  5. Relationship of Tau Burden to Working Memory

    Working memory is a construct that measures the ability of individuals to simultaneously manipulate and store information. To assess working memory, a composite score will be created using the CANTAB Spatial Working Memory task (reverse scored) and the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-III) Letter Number Sequencing task. Observed DLBS raw scores range from 0 to 86 total errors for the CANTAB Spatial Working Memory task and 2 to 20 for the WAIS-III Letter Number Sequencing task. Participants' raw scores are converted to Z-scores and averaged to form a working memory composite, and then this final value with be converted to a Z-score. A higher working memory composite Z-score indicates better working memory, a Z-score of 0 represents the population mean, and all Z-scores have a standard deviation of 1. Values in this table represent this Working Memory Z-score.

    Measured: 1-year post study completion

  6. Relationship of Tau Burden to Participants' Age

    Linear regressions between the AV-1451 SUVR in each of the temporal regions of interest with participant age will be calculated, and in additional analyses, non-linear effects of age will be examined via quadratic and growth modeling. Observed AV-1451 SUVR scores in humans have ranged from 0.5 to 2.5, with higher scores being indicative of greater tau accumulation. The investigators predict that tau accumulation will accelerate in old age, thus supporting a non-linear rate of deposition.

    Measured: 1-year post study completion

  7. Relationship of Tau Burden to Cortical Thickness

    Regional cortical thickness will be estimated from previously acquired T1-weighted structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRl) scans using FreeSurfer (ver. 5.3), with surface parcellation manually edited when necessary by our team of experts. The regions selected for analyses of cortical thickness were the ROIs used to estimate temporal tau SUVR: inferior temporal gyrus, middle temporal gyrus, superior temporal gyrus, entorhinal cortex, parahippocampal gyrus, and fusiform gyrus. Observed cortical thickness in these regions range from 1.38 to 3.83 mm with higher scores indicating greater thickness.

    Measured: 1-year post study completion

  8. Relationship of Tau Burden to Hippocampal Volume

    Hippocampal volume will be estimated from previously acquired T1-weighted structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRl) scans using FreeSurfer (ver. 5.3), with surface parcellation manually edited when necessary by our team of experts. This region was selected for analysis as it was one of the ROIs used to estimate temporal tau SUVR. Observed DLBS hippocampal volume ranged from 1843 to 5342 mm^3 with higher scores indicating greater volume.

    Measured: 1-year post study completion

  9. Relationship of Tau Burden to White Matter Integrity

    White matter integrity will be assessed using the estimated volume of white matter hypointensities from previously acquired T1-weighted structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRl) scans using FreeSurfer (ver. 5.3). Observed DLBS white matter hypointensities range from 796 to 35,037 mm^3 with higher scores indicating greater volume of hypointensities and reflecting worse white matter integrity.

    Measured: 1-year post study completion

  10. Relationship of Tau Burden to Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

    For functional measures, blood oxygenation level dependent signal from contrasts of interest using selected ROls will be created. For the semantic judgment task (easy judgments - fixation), the investigators will focus on ROIs associated with processing meaning, including inferior frontal gyrus, precuneus, and middle temporal gyrus. Observed BOLD activation values (betas) ranged from -1.00 to 1.30 with higher values indicating greater activation.

    Measured: 1-year post study completion

  11. Relationship of Tau Burden to Resting-State Brain System Segregation

    Resting-state brain system segregation was computed on data collected from a separate resting-state scan using graph theory. System segregation is calculated as (Zw - Zb) / Zw, where Zw is the mean Fisher z-transformed r between nodes with the same system and Zb is the mean Fisher z-transformed r between nodes of one system to all nodes in other systems. Higher values indicate reduced node-node connectivity between systems relative to within-system connectivity. A score of 0 would reflect equal resting-state connectivity between nodes within the same functional system and between nodes of separate systems. Like all Z-scores, these scores typically range from -3 to 3. Higher scores are observed in younger adults than in older adults and may suggest a more youth-like brain, though higher scores are not objectively better. Systems were defined based on Power et al., (2011, Neuron) and more details on this measure are described in Chan et al. (2014, PNAS).

    Measured: 1-year post study completion

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Sep 2019
  2. Study start15 Jan 2019
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2022
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
125 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04080544
Sponsor's protocol ID
STU 092015-003
Status last verified
Aug 2023
First submitted
3 Sep 2019
Last updated
28 Sep 2023
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Balota D.A., Faust M.E. (2001). Attention in dementia of the Alzheimer's type. In: Boller F, Cappa S, editors. Handbook of Neuropsychology. 2nd Ed. NY: Elsevier Science; pp. 51-80.

  • Bennett DA, Schneider JA, Tang Y, Arnold SE, Wilson RS. The effect of social networks on the relation between Alzheimer's disease pathology and level of cognitive function in old people: a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2006 May;5(5):406-12. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70417-3.

    PubMed 16632311
  • Braak H, Braak E. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol. 1991;82(4):239-59. doi: 10.1007/BF00308809.

    PubMed 1759558
  • Convit A, de Leon MJ, Golomb J, George AE, Tarshish CY, Bobinski M, Tsui W, De Santi S, Wegiel J, Wisniewski H. Hippocampal atrophy in early Alzheimer's disease: anatomic specificity and validation. Psychiatr Q. 1993 Winter;64(4):371-87. doi: 10.1007/BF01064929.

    PubMed 8234547
  • Holm S: A Simple Sequentially Rejective Bonferroni Test. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics. 1979, 65 -670.

  • Kemper S, Anagnopoulos C, Lyons K, Heberlein W. Speech accommodations to dementia. J Gerontol. 1994 Sep;49(5):P223-9. doi: 10.1093/geronj/49.5.p223.

    PubMed 8056947
  • Khachaturian ZS. Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Arch Neurol. 1985 Nov;42(11):1097-105. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1985.04060100083029. No abstract available.

    PubMed 2864910
  • Killiany RJ, Moss MB, Albert MS, Sandor T, Tieman J, Jolesz F. Temporal lobe regions on magnetic resonance imaging identify patients with early Alzheimer's disease. Arch Neurol. 1993 Sep;50(9):949-54. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1993.00540090052010.

    PubMed 8363449
  • Jack, C., Knopman, D., Jagust, W., Petersen, R., Weiner, M., Aisen, P., … Trojanowski, J. (2013). Update on hypothetical model of Alzheimer's disease biomarkers. Alzheimer's & Dementia, 9(4), 521-522.

  • Jack CR Jr, Petersen RC, Xu YC, Waring SC, O'Brien PC, Tangalos EG, Smith GE, Ivnik RJ, Kokmen E. Medial temporal atrophy on MRI in normal aging and very mild Alzheimer's disease. Neurology. 1997 Sep;49(3):786-94. doi: 10.1212/wnl.49.3.786.

    PubMed 9305341
  • Mohs RC, Ashman TA, Jantzen K, Albert M, Brandt J, Gordon B, Rasmusson X, Grossman M, Jacobs D, Stern Y. A study of the efficacy of a comprehensive memory enhancement program in healthy elderly persons. Psychiatry Res. 1998 Feb 27;77(3):183-95. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1781(98)00003-1.

    PubMed 9707301
  • Park DC, Reuter-Lorenz P. The adaptive brain: aging and neurocognitive scaffolding. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:173-96. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093656.

    PubMed 19035823
  • Price JL, Ko AI, Wade MJ, Tsou SK, McKeel DW, Morris JC. Neuron number in the entorhinal cortex and CA1 in preclinical Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2001 Sep;58(9):1395-402. doi: 10.1001/archneur.58.9.1395.

    PubMed 11559310
  • Reuter-Lorenz PA, Park DC. How does it STAC up? Revisiting the scaffolding theory of aging and cognition. Neuropsychol Rev. 2014 Sep;24(3):355-70. doi: 10.1007/s11065-014-9270-9. Epub 2014 Aug 21.

    PubMed 25143069
  • Sperling RA, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, Bennett DA, Craft S, Fagan AM, Iwatsubo T, Jack CR Jr, Kaye J, Montine TJ, Park DC, Reiman EM, Rowe CC, Siemers E, Stern Y, Yaffe K, Carrillo MC, Thies B, Morrison-Bogorad M, Wagster MV, Phelps CH. Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):280-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.003. Epub 2011 Apr 21.

    PubMed 21514248

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing [18F]AV-1451 and Positron Emission Tomography in people with Alzheimer Disease and Cognitive Decline, run by Neil M Rofsky, MD, MHA at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Sep 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Standardized Uptake Value Ratios (SUVrs) Calculated From [18F]AV-1451 PET Scans (time frame: An average of 3-months post-PET study visit). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04080544, which also lists 18 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Sep 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in