Rheumatoid ArthritisTREAT-RANCT04079920
Predictors of Response to Tofacitinib Treatment in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients
An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Pfizer at 18 sites in Greece.
Trial summary
This is a 24-month, prospective, non-interventional, multi-center study with primary aim to identify baseline characteristics of patients that predict response at 6 months of treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- How many people
- 198 participants
- Where
- 18 sitesGreece
- Study dates
- 22 Sep 2020to 8 Feb 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adult patients presenting in outpatient clinics of Hospitals in Greece (secondary care)
Who may be able to join
- Adult subjects with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis who start treatment with tofacitinib in usual clinical practice conditions in compliance with the label
- Patients aged ≥ 18 years
- Confirmed Diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis by rheumatologist
- Patients with moderate to severe RA diagnosed according to local practice who have already been started on treatment with tofacitinib, for at most seven working days .
- Patients eligible for tofacitinib treatment according to current approved Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC).
- Evidence of a personally signed and dated informed consent document indicating that the patient (or a legally acceptable representative) has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study.
Who cannot join
- Patients meeting any of the following criteria will not be included in the study:
- Exclusion Criteria according to the Xeljanz® SmPC.
- Contraindications to Xeljanz® according to SmPC.
- Hypersensitivity to the active substance (tofacitinib) or to any of the excipients.
- Active tuberculosis (TB), serious infections, such as sepsis, or opportunistic infections.
- Receipt of any investigational drug within 3 months before study inclusion as well as currently not participating in an interventional clinical trial.
- Subjects who have received any previous treatment with tofacitinib or other JAK inhibitors.
- Subjects who are investigational site staff members or subjects who are Pfizer employees directly involved in the conduct of the trial.
Trial locations and contacts
18 sites in 1 country.
18 sites in 1 country
Greece18 sites
University General Hospital of Athens "Attikon"
Athens, Attica, 12462
251 Air Force Hospital of Athens
Athens, 11525
General Hospital of Athens Gennimatas
Athens
Ippokrateio General Hospital of Athens
Athens
Laiko General Hospital of Athens
Athens
Naval Hospital of Athens
Athens
Nearchou 18
Crete
Univerisity General Hospital of Heraklion
Heraklion
University General Hospital of Ioannina
Ioannina, 45500
KAT General Hospital of Attica
Kfisia
Univerisity General Hospital of Larisa
Larissa, 41110
Univerisity General Hospital of Larisa
Larissa
University General Hospital of Patras
Pátrai, 26500
Agios Andreas General Hospital of Patra
Pátrai
Euromedica General Clinic of Thessaloniki
Thessaloniki
Euromedica Kyanous Stavros General Clinic
Thessaloniki
General Hospital of Thessaloniki Ippokrateio
Thessaloniki
Asklipieio General Hospital of Voula
Voula
About this study
Official title: BASELINE VARIABLES PREDICTING TREATMENT RESPONSE AT 6 MONTHS IN ADULT RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS TREATED WITH TOFACITINIB 5MG BID IN A NON-INTERVENTIONAL SETTING (TREAT - RA)
This is a 24-month, prospective, non-interventional, multi-center study with primary aim to identify baseline characteristics of patients that predict response at 6 months of treatment. The study also aims to describe the treatment patterns of RA patients prescribed tofacitinib in a real-world setting and assess the effect of treatment on patient quality of life and physical function. Finally the study will assess the use of healthcare resources and costs in patients with RA treated with tofacitinib in Greece.
The planned recruitment period is 12 months. The planned observation period of each patient is 12 months. In this time period up to 4 visits will be documented.
The study will be reviewed and approved by the Central Regulatory Committee for NIS and IRB Board of each participating site
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Remission and Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Month 6 Assessed Using 28-Joint Disease Activity Score C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-4 CRP)
Remission is defined as DAS28-4 CRP less than (<) 2.6 and DAS28-4 CRP < 3.2 corresponds to LDA. DAS28-4 CRP is a composite endpoint, calculated using 4 variables (represented by '-4' in the name). It includes components: tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count ((SJC) [both out of 28 evaluated joints], CRP milligram per liter (mg/l) and Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) recorded on 100 millimeter (mm) visual analogue scale (VAS) (scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity). DAS28-4 CRP is calculated as: 0.56 * square root (sqrt) (TJC) + 0.28 * sqrt (SJC) + 0.36 * ln (CRP+1) + 0.014*PtGA + 0.96; where ln = natural logarithm.
Measured: Month 6
Secondary outcomes (28)
Percentage of Participants With Remission and LDA at Month 12 Assessed Using DAS28-4 CRP
Remission is defined as DAS28-4 CRP < 2.6 and DAS28-4 CRP < 3.2 corresponds to LDA. DAS28-4 CRP is a composite endpoint, calculated using 4 variables (represented by '-4' in the name). It includes components: TJC and SJC assessed using 28 joints, CRP (mg/l) and PtGA recorded on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity). DAS28-4 CRP is calculated as: 0.56 * (sqrt) (TJC28) + 0.28 * sqrt (SJC28) + 0.36 * ln (CRP+1) + 0.014*PtGA + 0.96; where ln = natural logarithm.
Measured: Month 12
Change From Baseline in DAS28-4 (ESR) and DAS28-4 (CRP)
DAS28-4 CRP is a composite endpoint, calculated using 4 variables (represented by '-4' in the name). It includes components: TJC and SJC both assessed using 28 joints, CRP (mg/l) and PtGA recorded recorded on VAS scores (mm). DAS28-4 CRP is calculated as: 0.56 * sqrt (TJC28) + 0.28 * sqrt (SJC28) + 0.36 * ln (CRP+1) + 0.014*PtGA + 0.96; where ln = natural logarithm. DAS28-4 CRP is a composite endpoint, calculated using 4 variables (represented by '-4' in the name). It includes components: TJC and SJC both assessed using 28 joints, ESR using mm/ hour and PtGA in recorded on VAS (mm). DAS28-4 ESR is calculated as: 0.56*sqrt (TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt (SJC28) + 0.70*In (ESR) + 0.014*PtGA where In = natural logarithm. The calculated range of DAS28-4 CRP and DAS 28-4 ESR is 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (maximal disease activity). A decrease from baseline in score indicates improvement of disease activity.
Measured: Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Months 3, 6 and 12
HAQ-DI is a participant-reported assessment which assess the degree of difficulty a participant had experienced during the last week in 8 domains/categories of daily living activities: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities. Each activity category consists of 2 to 3 items. Each item is scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Any activity requiring assistance from another individual or the use of an assistive device adjusts to a minimum score of 2 to represent a more limited functional status. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score ranges from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates least difficulty and 3 indicates extreme difficulty.
Measured: Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12
Number of Participants With Remission According to Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) <=3.3 at Months 3, 6, and 12
Remission is defined as SDAI <=3.3. SDAI is a composite end point, calculated at each time point using the formula: as TJC + SJC both assessed using 28 joints + PtGA (assessed on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity) + Physician's Global Assessment of Health [PhGA] (assessed on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity)+ CRP (mg/dL).
Measured: Months 3, 6 and 12
Number of Participants With Remission According to Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) <=2.8 at Months 3, 6, and 12
Remission is defined as CDAI <=2.8. CDAI is a composite end point, calculated based on each time-point using TJC + SJC both assessed using 28 joints + PtGA (assessed on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity) + PhGA (assessed on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity).
Measured: Months 3, 6 and 12
Number of Participants With Remission According to DAS28-4 ESR<2.6 at Months 3, 6, and 12
DAS28-4 ESR is a composite endpoint, calculated using 4 variables (represented by '-4' in the name). Components includes: TJC, SJC both assessed using 28 joints, ESR (mm/h) and PtGA (mm) (recorded on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher score indicates high disease activity). The calculation of DAS28-4 ESR is as follows: 0.56 * sqrt (TJC28) + 0.28 * sqrt (SJC28) + 0.70* In (ESR) + 0.014* (PtGA); where ln = natural logarithm. DAS28-4 (ESR) score of <2.6 indicates remission.
Measured: Months 3, 6 and 12
Number of Participants With Remission According to DAS28-4 CRP <2.6 at Months 3, 6, and 12
DAS28-4 CRP is a composite endpoint, calculated using 4 variables (represented by '-4' in the name). Components includes: TJC, SJC both assessed using 28 joints, CRP (mg/l) and PtGA (mm) (recorded on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher score indicates high disease activity). The calculation of DAS28-4 CRP is as follows: 0.56 * sqrt (TJC) + 0.28 * sqrt (SJC) + 0.36 * ln (CRP+1) + 0.014*PtGA + 0.96; where ln = natural logarithm. DAS28-4 (CRP) score of <2.6 indicates remission.
Measured: Months 3, 6 and 12
Number of Participants With LDA According to SDAI <=11 at Months 3, 6, and 12
LDA is defined as SDAI <=11. SDAI is a composite end point, calculated at each time point using the formula: as TJC + SJC (both assessed using 28 joints) + PtGA (assessed on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity) + PhGA (assessed on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity)+ CRP (mg/dL).
Measured: Months 3, 6 and 12
Number of Participants With LDA According to CDAI <=10 at Months 3, 6, and 12
LDA is defined as CDAI <=10. CDAI is a composite end point, calculated based on each time-point using TJC + SJC (both assessed using 28 joints) + PtGA (assessed on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity) + PhGA (assessed on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity.
Measured: Months 3, 6 and 12
Number of Participants With LDA According to DAS28-4 ESR (<3.2) at Months 3, 6, and 12
DAS28-4 ESR is a composite endpoint, calculated using 4 variables (represented by '-4' in the name). Components includes: TJC, SJC (both assessed using 28 joints), ESR (mm/h) and PtGA (recorded on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher score indicates high disease activity). The calculation of DAS28-4 ESR is as follows: 0.56 * sqrt (TJC28) + 0.28 * sqrt (SJC28) + 0.70* In(ESR) + 0.014* (PtGA); where ln = natural logarithm. DAS28-4 (ESR) score of <3.2 indicates LDA.
Measured: Months 3, 6 and 12
Number of Participants With LDA According to DAS28-4 CRP<=3.2 at Months 3, 6, and 12
LDA is defined as DAS28-4(CRP) score of <3.2. DAS28-4 CRP is a composite endpoint, calculated using 4 variables (represented by '-4' in the name). It includes components: TJC, SJC (both assessed using 28 joints), CRP (mg/l) and PtGA (mm) (recorded on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity). The calculation of DAS28-4 CRP is as follows: 0.56*sqrt (TJC) + 0.28*sqrt (SJC) + 0.36*ln (CRP+1) + 0.014*PtGA + 0.96; where ln = natural logarithm. DAS28-4 (CRP) score of <3.2 indicates LDA.
Measured: Months 3, 6 and 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving HAQ-DI Response at Months 3,6 and 12
HAQ-DI is a participant-reported assessment which assess the degree of difficulty a participant had experienced during the last week in 8 domains/categories of daily living activities: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities. Each activity category consists of 2 to 3 items. Each item is scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Any activity requiring assistance from another individual or the use of an assistive device adjusts to a minimum score of 2 to represent a more limited functional status. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score ranges from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates least difficulty and 3 indicates extreme difficulty. A HAQ-DI response is defined as a decrease from baseline of at least 0.22.
Measured: Months 3, 6 and 12
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life (EuroQol) -5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Health State Profile at Months 3, 6 and 12
EQ-5D is a standardized instrument used to measure quality of life. It is based on five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has three responses and the participant is asked to select the response that best describes them. The responses are scored 1-3 where 1 indicates no problems, 2 indicates some problems and 3 indicates unable to perform normal activities. The score (1 to 3), for each dimension is weighted based on United Kingdom (UK) data (Dolan et al 1995). An algorithm was applied to calculate the total EQ-5D health state score. Maximum and minimum score value were 1 and -0.6 respectively. Higher score indicates better health state.
Measured: Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Questionnaire Score at Months 3, 6 and 12
FACIT-fatigue questionnaire score consists of 13 self-evaluated questions. Each question is scored from 0 to 4; the sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-fatigue score of 0 (maximum fatigue) to 52 (no fatigue). A higher score represents better participant status.
Measured: Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12
Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of Morning Stiffness at Day 1 and 2 of Months 3, 6 and 12
The duration of morning stiffness is determined by asking the following questions: "Over the last 2 days, when did you wake in the morning? Over the last 2 days, when were you able to resume your normal activities without stiffness?". Time elapsed when participant woke up in morning and was able to resume normal activities without stiffness in minutes.
Measured: Baseline, Day 1 and 2 of Months 3, 6 and 12
Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire at Months 3, 6 and 12
WPAI: 6-item questionnaire \& scores are derived for four domains:absenteeism, presenteeism,work productivity loss \& activity impairment.Question (Q)2 asked participants to indicate number of hours missed due to health problems in past 7 days. Q4 asked participants to indicate number of hours they worked in past 7 days.Q5 asked participants the degree to which their health affected productivity while working in past 7 days,on scale ranging from 0-10, Where 0 = health problems had no effect on their work \& 10=health problems completely prevented participant from working. Q6 asked participants to indicate the degree to which their health affected their regular activities in past 7 days.Absenteeism=(Q2/[Q2 + Q4])*100.Presenteeism=(Q5/10)*100.Work Production Loss={(Q2/[Q2 + Q4])+(1-[Q2/(Q2 + Q4))*(Q5/10 )]}*100.Activity Impairment=(Q6/10)*100.Each WPAI domain is expressed as impairment percentages ranging from 0 to 100,with higher numbers indicating greater impairment \&less productivity.
Measured: Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction at Baseline and Month 12
Participant's satisfaction with treatment was assessed on a 5-point scale (where 0 = very dissatisfied and 4 = very satisfied) in response to the question "How satisfied are you with the drugs you received for your arthritis during the last year?"
Measured: Baseline, Month 12
Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) at Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12
PtGA of Arthritis was measured using a VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity in response to the question "Considering all the way your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?".
Measured: Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12
Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) at Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12
PhGA was measured using a VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity in response to how the physician assesses the participant's overall arthritis at the time of the visit. This is an evaluation based on the participant's disease signs, functional capacity and physical examination, and should be independent of the PtGA of arthritis.
Measured: Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12
Number of Participants as Per Treatment Received
Number of participants who received tofacitinib as monotherapy,tofacitinib in combination therapy, tofacitinib switched from monotherapy to combination therapy, tofacitinib switched from combination therapy to monotherapy, tofacitinib in combination with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) then switched to tofacitinib monotherapy and tofacitinib in combination with DMARD then discontinued are presented in this outcome measure.
Measured: Up to 12 months
Median Number of Visits to Rheumatologist or Other Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Specialist Since Last Visit
The study consisted of 4 visits. Baseline (visit 1), Month 3 (visit 2), Month 6 (visit 3), Month 12 (final or close out visit). The number of visits to a rheumatologist or other RA specialist since the last visit were reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: Months 3, 6 and 12
Number of Participants With Diagnostic Test Since Last Visit
The study consisted of 4 visits. Baseline (visit 1), Month 3 (visit 2), Month 6 (visit 3), Month 12 (final or close out visit). Number of participants who underwent the diagnostic tests since last visit including: whole blood cell (WBC), ESR/CRP, glucose, hepatic enzymes, urea, creatinine, lipid profile (total cholesterol [TC], low density lipoprotein [LDL], high density lipoprotein [HDL], triglycerides [TG]), X-rays, others are presented.
Measured: Months 3, 6 and 12
Number of Participants According to the Type of Diagnostic Test
The study consisted of 4 visits. Baseline (visit 1), Month 3 (visit 2), Month 6 (visit 3), Month 12 (final or close out visit). Number of participants who underwent the diagnostic tests including: WBC, ESR/CRP, glucose, hepatic enzymes, urea, creatinine, lipid profile (TC,LDL,HDL,TG), X-rays, others summarized by visit are presented.
Measured: Months 3, 6 and 12
Number of Diagnostic Tests Since Last Visit
The study consisted of 4 visits. Baseline (visit 1), Month 3 (visit 2), Month 6 (visit 3), Month 12 (final or close out visit). Diagnostic tests performed were as follow: WBC, ESR/CRP, glucose, hepatic enzymes, urea, creatinine, lipid profile (TC, LDL, HDL, TG), X-rays, others summarized by visit are presented.
Measured: Months 3, 6 and 12
Number of Participants Hospitalized Since Last Visit
The study consisted of 4 visits. Baseline (visit 1), Month 3 (visit 2), Month 6 (visit 3), Month 12 (final or close out visit). Number of participants hospitalized since their last visit were reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: Months 3, 6 and 12
Number of Participants Hospitalized in Daycare and Night Care Since Last Visit
The study consisted of 4 visits. Baseline (visit 1), Month 3 (visit 2), Month 6 (visit 3), Month 12 (final or close out visit). Number of participants hospitalized in daycare and nightcare since their last visit were reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: Months 3, 6 and 12
Mean Number of Days Participants Were Hospitalized Since Last Visit
The study consisted of 4 visits. Baseline (visit 1), Month 3 (visit 2), Month 6 (visit 3), Month 12 (final or close out visit). Mean number of days participants were hospitalized since last visit were reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12
Number of Participants According to Reason for Hospitalization Since Last Visit
The study consisted of 4 visits. Baseline (visit 1), Month 3 (visit 2), Month 6 (visit 3), Month 12 (final or close out visit). Number of participants according to reason for hospitalization: polyarthritis, RA and pericarditis, RA flare, and right knee arthroplasty due to osteoarthritis since their last visit is presented in this outcome measure.
Measured: Months 3, 6 and 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Sep 2019
- Study start22 Sep 2020
- Primary completion8 Feb 2023
- Study completion8 Feb 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 198 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04079920
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A3921342
- Other IDs
- TREAT-RA
- Acronym
- TREAT-RA
- Status last verified
- Jun 2025
- First submitted
- 5 Aug 2019
- Last updated
- 8 Jun 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jun 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- BASELINE VARIABLES PREDICTING TREATMENT RESPONSE AT 6 MONTHS IN ADULT RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS TREATED WITH TOFACITINIB 5MG BID IN A NON-INTERVENTIONAL SETTING (TREAT - RA)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04079920
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TREAT-RA / A3921342
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 198 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 22 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 8 Feb 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 8 Jun 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a 24-month, prospective, non-interventional, multi-center study with primary aim to identify baseline characteristics of patients that predict response at 6 months of treatment. The study also aims to describe the treatment patterns of RA patients prescribed tofacitinib in a real-world setting and assess the effect of treatment on patient quality of life and physical function. Finally the study will assess the use of healthcare resources and costs in patients with RA treated with tofacitinib in Greece.
The planned recruitment period is 12 months. The planned observation period of each patient is 12 months. In this time period up to 4 visits will be documented.
The study will be reviewed and approved by the Central Regulatory Committee for NIS and IRB Board of each participating site
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adult patients presenting in outpatient clinics of Hospitals in Greece (secondary care)
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Adult subjects with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis who start treatment with tofacitinib in usual clinical practice conditions in compliance with the label
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patients meeting any of the following criteria will not be included in the study:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With Remission and Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Month 6 Assessed Using 28-Joint Disease Activity Score C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-4 CRP)
Time frame: Month 6
Remission is defined as DAS28-4 CRP less than (<) 2.6 and DAS28-4 CRP < 3.2 corresponds to LDA. DAS28-4 CRP is a composite endpoint, calculated using 4 variables (represented by '-4' in the name). It includes components: tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count ((SJC) [both out of 28 evaluated joints], CRP milligram per liter (mg/l) and Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) recorded on 100 millimeter (mm) visual analogue scale (VAS) (scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity). DAS28-4 CRP is calculated as: 0.56 * square root (sqrt) (TJC) + 0.28 * sqrt (SJC) + 0.36 * ln (CRP+1) + 0.014*PtGA + 0.96; where ln = natural logarithm.
28 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Remission and LDA at Month 12 Assessed Using DAS28-4 CRP
Time frame: Month 12
Change From Baseline in DAS28-4 (ESR) and DAS28-4 (CRP)
Time frame: Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Months 3, 6 and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12
Number of Participants With Remission According to Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) <=3.3 at Months 3, 6, and 12
Time frame: Months 3, 6 and 12
Number of Participants With Remission According to Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) <=2.8 at Months 3, 6, and 12
Time frame: Months 3, 6 and 12
Number of Participants With Remission According to DAS28-4 ESR<2.6 at Months 3, 6, and 12
Time frame: Months 3, 6 and 12
Number of Participants With Remission According to DAS28-4 CRP <2.6 at Months 3, 6, and 12
Time frame: Months 3, 6 and 12
Number of Participants With LDA According to SDAI <=11 at Months 3, 6, and 12
Time frame: Months 3, 6 and 12
Number of Participants With LDA According to CDAI <=10 at Months 3, 6, and 12
Time frame: Months 3, 6 and 12
Number of Participants With LDA According to DAS28-4 ESR (<3.2) at Months 3, 6, and 12
Time frame: Months 3, 6 and 12
Number of Participants With LDA According to DAS28-4 CRP<=3.2 at Months 3, 6, and 12
Time frame: Months 3, 6 and 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving HAQ-DI Response at Months 3,6 and 12
Time frame: Months 3, 6 and 12
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life (EuroQol) -5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Health State Profile at Months 3, 6 and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Questionnaire Score at Months 3, 6 and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12
Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of Morning Stiffness at Day 1 and 2 of Months 3, 6 and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 and 2 of Months 3, 6 and 12
Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire at Months 3, 6 and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction at Baseline and Month 12
Time frame: Baseline, Month 12
Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) at Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12
Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) at Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12
Number of Participants as Per Treatment Received
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Median Number of Visits to Rheumatologist or Other Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Specialist Since Last Visit
Time frame: Months 3, 6 and 12
Number of Participants With Diagnostic Test Since Last Visit
Time frame: Months 3, 6 and 12
Number of Participants According to the Type of Diagnostic Test
Time frame: Months 3, 6 and 12
Number of Diagnostic Tests Since Last Visit
Time frame: Months 3, 6 and 12
Number of Participants Hospitalized Since Last Visit
Time frame: Months 3, 6 and 12
Number of Participants Hospitalized in Daycare and Night Care Since Last Visit
Time frame: Months 3, 6 and 12
Mean Number of Days Participants Were Hospitalized Since Last Visit
Time frame: Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12
Number of Participants According to Reason for Hospitalization Since Last Visit
Time frame: Months 3, 6 and 12
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jun 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
18 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Pfizer at 18 sites in Greece.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 18 sites in Greece. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Jun 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With Remission and Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Month 6 Assessed Using 28-Joint Disease Activity Score C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-4 CRP) (time frame: Month 6). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jun 2025.