AzTrials
AzTrials

Diabetic Macula EdemaPhase 3BUZZARDNCT04079231

Efficacy and Safety of Brolucizumab vs. Aflibercept in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Diabetic Macular Edema

A Phase 3 study testing Brolucizumab and Aflibercept in people with Diabetic Macula Edema, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab in treatment of patients with visual impairment due to diabetic macular edema (DME). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 110 years
Conditions the study is for
Diabetic Macula Edema
What is being tested?
Brolucizumab and Aflibercept
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Feb 2021to 31 Jan 2023
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 110 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus and HbA1c of ≤10% at Screening
  • BCVA score between 23 and 65 letters, inclusive, using ETDRS visual acuity testing charts at a testing distance of 4 meters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/50 to 20/320), at screening and baseline
  • DME involving the center of the macula, with central subfield retinal thickness (measured from RPE to ILM inclusively) of ≥ 320 µm on SD-OCT

Who cannot join

  • High risk or advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy in the study eye as per reading Center
  • Active intraocular or periocular infection or active intraocular inflammation in the study eye
  • Uncontrolled glaucoma in the study eye defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) > 25 millimeters mercury (mmHg)
  • Previous treatment with any anti-VEGF drugs or investigational drugs in the study eye in the last 3 months prior randomization
  • Stroke or myocardial infarction during the 6-month period prior to baseline
  • Uncontrolled blood pressure defined as a systolic value ≥160 mmHg or diastolic value ≥100 mmHg Other protocol-specified inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply

About this study

Official title: A Comparative Double Masked, Two-Arm, Randomized, Multicenter, Phase IIIb Study Analyzing the Efficacy and Safety of Brolucizumab Versus Aflibercept in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Diabetic Macular Edema (BUZZARD)

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab in treatment of patients with visual impairment due to diabetic macular edema (DME).

Read the detailed description

In this 48-week, randomized, double-masked, multicenter, active controlled study, consenting patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of the two treatment arms and attend 14 planned visits.

Being tested
Brolucizumab, Aflibercept
Keywords
Diabetic Macula Edema, Intravitreal injection, brolucizumab, aflibercept, double-masked

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BrolucizumabDrug

    Also called RTH258, ESBA1008

    Intravitreal Injection

  • AfliberceptDrug

    Also called Eylea

    Intravitreal injection

Study groups in NCT04079231
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Brolucizumab 6 mgExperimentalBrolucizumab 6 mg/0.05 mL, 5 loading doses, with subsequent doses per protocol-specified maintenance schedule
Receives: Drug: Brolucizumab
Aflibercept 2 mgActive comparatorAflibercept 2 mg/0.05 mL, as labeled, 5 loading doses, with subsequent doses every 8 weeks
Receives: Drug: Aflibercept

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of patients with a gain in Best Corrected Visual Acurity (BCVA) of ≥15 ETDRS letters at week 48

    BCVA will be assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts

    Measured: Week 48

  2. Mean change in BCVA from baseline to Week 48

    BCVA will be assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts

    Measured: Baseline, Week 48

Secondary outcomes (19)
  1. Change from baseline in BCVA averaged over a period Week 36 to Week 48

    BCVA will be assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts

    Measured: Week 36, Week 48

  2. Proportion of patients with a gain in BCVA of ≥10 ETDRS letters from baseline to Week 48

    BCVA will be assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts

    Measured: Baseline, Week 48

  3. Proportion of patients with a loss in BCVA of ≥15 ETDRS letters from baseline to Week 48

    BCVA will be assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts

    Measured: Baseline, Week 48

  4. Proportion of patients with a loss in BCVA of ≥10 ETDRS letters from baseline to Week 48

    BCVA will be assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts

    Measured: Baseline, Week 48

  5. Proportion of patients maintained at q12w up to Week 48

    Percentage of participants maintained at q12w (quarterly, every 12 weeks). This outcome measure is pre-specified for brolucizumab treatment arm only

    Measured: Baseline, Week 48

  6. Proportion of patients maintained at q12w up to Week 48, within those patients that qualified for q12w at week 28

    Percentage of patients maintained at (q12w) quarterly, every 12 weeks, up to Week 48, within those patients that qualified for (q12w) at week 28. This outcome measure is pre-specified for brolucizumab treatment arm only

    Measured: Week 28, Week 48

  7. Change from baseline in central subfield thickness (CSFT, as determined by SD-OCT) at each assessment visit

    Assessed by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)

    Measured: Baseline, Week 48

  8. Average change in CSFT from baseline over the period Week 36 through Week 48

    Assessed by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)

    Measured: Week 36, Week 48

  9. Average change in CSFT from baseline over the period Week 4 to Week 48

    Assessed by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)

    Measured: Week 4, Week 48

  10. Patient status regarding normal CSFT thickness (<280 microns) at each assessment visit

    Assessed by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)

    Measured: Baseline, Week 48

  11. Change from baseline in Central Subfield Thickness-neurosensory (CSFTns, as determined by SD-OCT) at each assessment visit

    Assessed by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)

    Measured: Baseline, week 48

  12. Average change in CSFTns from baseline over the period Week 36 through Week 48

    Assessed by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)

    Measured: Baseline, Week 36, Week 48

  13. Average change in CSFTns from baseline over the period Week 4 to Week 48

    Assessed by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4, Week 48

  14. Proportion of patients with presence of SRF, IRF and simultaneous absence of SRF and IRF at each assessment visit

    Assessed by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)

    Measured: Baseline, Week 48

  15. Proportion of patients with presence of leakage on FA at Week 48

    Assessed by fluorescein angiography

    Measured: Week 48

  16. Change in ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) score up to Week 48 (central reading)

    The Diabetic Retinopathy Disease Severity Scale measures the 5 levels of diabetic retinopathy - none, mild, moderate, severe, and proliferative

    Measured: Baseline, Week 48

  17. Patient status regarding a ≥2- and ≥3-step improvement or worsening from baseline in the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) score at each assessment visit

    Disease status measured by ETDRS-DRSS. Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) score at each assessment visit.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 48

  18. Incidence of progression to PDR as assessed by ETDRS-DRSS score of at least 61 by Week 48

    Incidence of progression to proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) measured by ETDRS-DRSS. Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) score at each assessment visit.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 48

  19. Rate of "inactive" PDRs by Week 48 compared to baseline

    Rate of "inactive" proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDRs) by Week 48 compared to baseline as measured by Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) score.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 48

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Sep 2019
  2. Study start1 Feb 2021 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Jan 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Jan 2023 (estimated)

Why it stopped: This study was cancelled due to COVID-19.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04079231
Sponsor's protocol ID
CRTH258BDE01
Acronym
BUZZARD
Status last verified
Jan 2021
First submitted
12 Aug 2019
Last updated
4 Mar 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on ww.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Brolucizumab and Aflibercept in people with Diabetic Macula Edema, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of patients with a gain in Best Corrected Visual Acurity (BCVA) of ≥15 ETDRS letters at week 48 (time frame: Week 48). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Mar 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in