AzTrials
AzTrials

Hepatic TumorAblationNCT04072224

Evaluation of the Reproducibility of Ablation Volumes at One Month After Microwave Treatment Compared to the Manufacturer's Abacus: on the Kidney, Liver and Lung

An observational study of Hepatic Tumor and Renal Tumor, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Microwave thermal ablation (MO) is recognized as an alternative to surgery for the local-regional treatment of primary and secondary hepatic and renal tumors and for secondary pulmonary tumors in patients at anesthetic and/or surgical risk. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hepatic Tumor, Renal Tumor
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
23 Oct 2018to 23 Oct 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Major patients who have received thermoablative treatment with MO with the Covidian manufacturer of a primary hepatic or renal tumor or secondary hepatic, renal or pulmonary tumor

Who may be able to join

  • thermo-ablative treated patients with MO with the Covidian manufacturer
  • primary hepatic or renal or secondary hepatic, renal or pulmonary tumor at the University Hospital of Nîmes between June 2016 and June 2018
  • diagnosis and size of the tumour established on the basis of tomodensitometric (CT) or magnetic resonance (MRI) imaging.

Who cannot join

  • patients with coagulation disorders
  • patients with progressive infectious process contraindicating the procedure and/or for whom thermo-ablation equipment other than Covidien has been used

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • CHU de Nîmes

    Nîmes, 30029

Other trials in France

About this study

Microwave thermal ablation (MO) is recognized as an alternative to surgery for the local-regional treatment of primary and secondary hepatic and renal tumors and for secondary pulmonary tumors in patients at anesthetic and/or surgical risk.

Microwaves have a reputation for not producing reproducible ablation volumes with elliptical deformations and risks of over or under processing.

Read more

The Covidien manufacturer offers a microwave system that guarantees more spherical and reproducible ablations: Emprint TM ablation system with Thermosphere TM technology (thermal control, field control, wavelength control).

The investigators have 2 years of experience and therefore propose to carry out a first retrospective study, on a cohort of about fifty patients, whose objective will be to compare the volume of in vivo ablation one month after thermo-ablative treatment by microwave of a hepatic, renal or pulmonary tumour with the reference volume announced by the Covidien abacus manufacturer.

Microwave ablation, which is much less studied, is less used because of the low reproducibility of necrosis volumes.

The Covidien manufacturer offers a system that allows ablation volumes that are supposed to be reproducible, which attracted the Nîmes University Hospital during the call for tenders.

To the investigator's knowledge, there are no studies that have evaluated the actual volume of ablation by this system.

Read the detailed description

The investigators have 2 years of experience and therefore propose to carry out a first retrospective study, on a cohort of about fifty patients, whose objective will be to compare the volume of in vivo ablation one month after thermo-ablative treatment by microwave of a hepatic, renal or pulmonary tumour with the reference volume announced by the Covidien abacus manufacturer.

Microwave ablation, which is much less studied, is less used because of the low reproducibility of necrosis volumes.

The Covidien manufacturer offers a system that allows ablation volumes that are supposed to be reproducible, which attracted the Nîmes University Hospital during the call for tenders.

To the investigator's knowledge, there are no studies that have evaluated the actual volume of ablation by this system.

This is a retrospective monocentric study that divides patients into three groups according to the organ concerned (liver, kidney, lung). It concerns patients with hepatic, renal or pulmonary tumours whose indication for treatment by thermo-ablation has been validated in RCP at the University Hospital of Nîmes.

Each patient was informed of the therapeutic management and was seen in interventional radiology consultation before the expected date of thermo-ablation.

A letter of no objection was sent to each patient prior to treatment. A CT or MRI control imaging is performed one month before the operation, systematically at the University Hospital of Nîmes after a thermo-ablative procedure.

The size of the ablation volume obtained is measured (major axis and minor axis) on this control imaging. This volume will be compared to the ablation volume planned by the manufacturer, depending on the power and duration of the impact chosen according to the size of the tumor (evaluated on the imaging prior to the procedure).

Data stored in Redcap. 50-60 patients included.

Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Carcinoma, Renal Cell

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Description of volume of in vivo ablation

    microwave ablation Versus ablation by the Covidien abacus manufacturer

    Measured: at one month

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. spleen response

    • Complications rate measured by microwave

    Measured: at one month

  2. liver response

    Complications rate measured by microwave

    Measured: at one month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Aug 2019
  2. Study start23 Oct 2018
  3. Primary completion23 Oct 2020
  4. Study completion23 Oct 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04072224
Sponsor's protocol ID
Local/2018/02
Acronym
Ablation
Status last verified
Jan 2023
First submitted
1 Jul 2019
Last updated
26 Jan 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Hepatic Tumor and Renal Tumor, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jan 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Description of volume of in vivo ablation (time frame: at one month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jan 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in