AzTrials
AzTrials

Gram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsNCT04055922

Comparison of Solid Organ Transplant

An observational study of Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections and Gram-negative Bacteremia, run by Methodist Health System at 1 site in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients have increased incidence of infections with MDRO pathogens. This difference leads to a disparity in antibiograms between SOT recipients and other hospitalized patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
How many people
150 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
3 May 2018to May 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients

Who may be able to join

  • 18 years or older

Who cannot join

  • Missing data necessary to determine study outcomes

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Methodist Dallas Medical Center

    Dallas, Texas, 75203

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Solid Organ Transplant Specific and Hospital-wide Gram-Negative Antibiograms

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients have increased incidence of infections with MDRO pathogens. This difference leads to a disparity in antibiograms between SOT recipients and other hospitalized patients.

Read the detailed description

There is limited guidance for empiric antimicrobial therapy in this population. Local epidemiology plays a voluble role in managing infections empirically within the hospital setting. Antibiograms can serve as a critical tool in optimizing empiric antimicrobial decisions. Refining antibiogram data to specific populations such as SOT patients may allow for timelier and appropriate empiric use of antimicrobials, and improve clinical outcomes.

Time to appropriate therapy (antimicrobial testing susceptible in vitro to the pathogen identified) is of vital importance in management of serious infections. SOT may have different resistance rates at Methodist Dallas Medical Center making the applicability of the yearly hospital-wide antibiogram unknown for use in this specialized patient population. A SOT-Specific antibiogram may highlight common resistance patterns identified in pathogens seen in this patient population. Additionally, this investigation may further emphasize the importance of antimicrobial stewardship activities such as: appropriate empiric antibacterial decisions, de-escalation, and effective durations of therapy.

Medical subject headings
Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections, Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Creation of a liver transplant specific antibiogram

    Creation of a liver transplant specific antibiogram (cumulative susceptibility rates per bacterial organism for select antibiotics)

    Measured: Jan 1, 2012 - December 31, 2016

  2. Creation of a kidney transplant specific antibiogram

    Creation of a kidney transplant specific antibiogram (cumulative susceptibility rates per bacterial organism for select antibiotics)

    Measured: Jan 1, 2012 - December 31, 2016

  3. Comparison of SOT

    Comparison of SOT (liver and kidney) antibiograms with the hospital-wide antibiogram

    Measured: Jan 1, 2012 - December 31, 2016

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Creation of transplant antibiogram for subgroups

    Creation of transplant antibiogram for subgroups of patients including the following: ICU patients, Kidney transplant urinary tract infections (UTI), SOT bloodstream infections (BSI)

    Measured: Jan 1, 2012 - December 31, 2016

  2. Identification of risk factors among liver transplant recipients

    Identification of risk factors among liver transplant recipients for vancomycin-resistant enterococci infections

    Measured: Jan 1, 2012 - December 31, 2016

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Aug 2019
  2. Study start3 May 2018
  3. Primary completionMay 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMay 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
150 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04055922
Sponsor's protocol ID
058.PHA.2017.D
Status last verified
Apr 2019
First submitted
12 Aug 2019
Last updated
2 Jan 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections and Gram-negative Bacteremia, run by Methodist Health System at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jan 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Creation of a liver transplant specific antibiogram (time frame: Jan 1, 2012 - December 31, 2016). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jan 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in