Study of Truvada for HIV Pre Exposure Prophylaxis Using Daily Directly Observed Therapy to Look at Potential Interactions Between Truvada and Hormone Therapy

BACKGROUND The TRIUMPH study, or trans Research-Informed communities United in the Mobilization for the Prevention of HIV, is a new study responding to a pressing need for culturally-relevant community-led pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) programs for transgender communities, especially for trans women of color who are most affected by the HIV epidemic. The TRIUMPH study will strive to identify the most effective PrEP service provision strategies which take into account the particular facilitators and barriers that transgender communities encounter in the health care system. To date, transgender women included in HIV prevention studies have been lumped into the larger aggregate of Men who have sex with Men (MSM) without taking into account the unique sociocultural context of transgender women. The TRIUMPH study will also include transgender men and other members of various transgender communities. The TRIUMPH project's goal is to identify the best methods to deliver PrEP safely and effectively to transgender communities while achieving the highest levels of adherence possible.

PrEP is the newest and most promising biomedical HIV prevention intervention yet developed and tested. The first clinical trial of PrEP ('iPrEx' or iniciativa Profilaxis Pre-Exposición) included MSM and transgender women who were at higher risk for HIV infection, and found that daily oral Truvada PrEP reduced the risk of HIV acquisition by 44% on an intention to treat basis. However, a sub-analysis of the iPrEx data conducted by Deutsch et al , found zero effectiveness on an intention to treat basis among the small subgroup of transwomen in the study. Further analyses revealed that the subgroup of trans women in iPrEx who were using hormones were less likely to have protective drug levels than those trans women not on hormones (OR 0.14, p<0.001). It is unclear if this difference is behavioral (less drug uptake) or biomedical (drug-drug interactions) in nature, or due to some combination of these factors, given the lack of pharmacokinetic (PK) studies testing for interactions between cross-sex hormone therapy (HT) and TDF/FTC, the active ingredients of Truvada. While there are studies of systemic drug-drug interactions between oral contraceptives and TDF, no such studies have been done with FTC, and no studies have been done with gender affirming HT, which differs from hormonal contraception in several respects. Drug-drug interactions with bioidentical 17-beta estradiol used for gender affirming hormone therapy among transgender women have not been studied.

The Interactions BEtween Antiretrovirals And Transgender Hormones, or I-BrEATHe study, is a sub study of the TRIUMPH study. I-BrEATHe will address one of the secondary aims of the TRIUMPH study which is to assess the pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions between cross-sex HT and daily oral FTC/TDF.

Given that there are no PrEP studies to date that have specifically enrolled trans identified men, or have looked at the interactions between masculinizing HT and FTC/TDF, I-BrEATHe will enroll both transgender women and men. Transgender men report sexual rapport without condoms both vaginally and anally (range 26-60%), exhibit patterns of Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI) transmission and unwanted pregnancies. Transgender men also report use of sex for gender affirmation. Small convenience samples show that HIV prevalence is between 2- 5%. To date, there are no programs or PrEP recommendations specific for transgender men.

Overview of Previous Clinical Studies of PrEP There have been a large number of trials conducted with Truvada PrEP, including several demonstration projects. While there is no evidence to suggest that TDF/FTC interacts with commonly used feminizing or masculinizing hormone regimens, and evidence from studies of Antiretroviral (ARV) interactions with hormonal contraceptives have been reassuring, no direct study of these interactions has been conducted to date.

Our team led the only trans-specific sub analysis to date of the iPrEx randomized controlled trial (RCT) data as well as the open label extension (OLE) study, which included periodic dried blood spot (DBS) drug level monitoring. In iPrEx, gender identity data was not collected using current best practices ("two-step" method), making the identification of transgender participants in this multinational, multicultural and multilingual trial difficult. As all iPrEx participants had been assigned male sex at birth, a transgender subgroup of 339/2499 participants (14% of overall sample) was constructed comprised of the 29 (1%) who identified as women, 296 (12%) who identified as "trans", and 14 (1%) who reported use of feminizing hormones. None had undergone gender affirming genital surgery. Compared with MSM, transgender women more frequently reported transactional sex, receptive anal intercourse without a condom, or more than 5 partners in the past 3 months. Excluding those with a male identity who also used feminizing hormones, trans- and woman-identified participants were less likely to have TDF levels detected on random testing in the RCT (OR=0.39, 95% CI = 0.16 to 0.96, p=0.04). While there was no effectiveness of PrEP for transgender women on an intention-to-treat basis, none of the transgender participants who seroconverted had detectible drug levels at the time of HIV diagnosis. In comparison to MSM in the OLE, transgender participants had less time with protective drug concentrations (17% vs 35%, p<0.001) and were less likely to have concentrations indicating > 3 tablets/week (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.03, p=0.07). Of the two transgender women who seroconverted during the OLE, both had drug levels below 350 fmol/punch in DBS, the level associated use of 2 tablets per week at the time of seroconversion. The lower concentrations were more likely if the transgender women used feminizing hormones.

Of the 7 clinical trials of Truvada PrEP for HIV prevention conducted to date, iPrEx is the only one with confirmed enrollment of trans women. No clinical studies or demonstration projects were conducted with transgender men.

STUDY RATIONALE The fact that concentrations of FTC/TDF were especially low among transgender women reporting use of feminizing hormones in the iPrEx study, which may reflect less PrEP use or a drug-drug interaction, is of high interest given that concerns about the impact of PrEP on gender affirming hormone therapy is the main barrier for uptake of PrEP among transgender women. While transgender men as a group have also been shown to be at elevated risk for HIV infection, no information about PrEP use and drug levels is available for transgender men since they have never been formally included in PrEP research. Therefore, there are no data on the potential effects of testosterone on FTC/TDF drug concentrations. FTC/TDF drug concentrations have emerged as strong correlates of protection in PrEP trials, accounting for the majority of the variation in PrEP benefits across trials and across individual participants in trials. For example, while oral FTC/TDF PrEP had 44% efficacy on an intention to treat basis in iPrEx, the protective effect was more than 90% among those with detectable drug and negligible among those with no detectable drug in blood.

The I-BrEATHe pharmacokinetic study of PrEP metabolites concentrations in association with feminizing and masculinizing hormones using directly observed therapy (DOT) will allow to establish whether interactions exist between these drugs. I-BrEATHe also provides an opportunity to include transgender men in PrEP research. Though transgender men are likely to be at lower risk for HIV acquisition than transgender women, the lack of available data regarding use of PrEP in transgender men must be remediated. I-BrEATHe will recruit equal numbers of transgender women who are using estradiol plus spironolactone (the most common HT regimen) and transgender men who are using testosterone. The primary aim will be to measure the intracellular active metabolites of TDF/FTC, tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP) and emtricitabine triphosphate (FTC-TP), levels in DBS collected after 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks of video-observed Truvada for PrEP daily dosing, and comparing drug levels in the two groups receiving HT to previously acquired DBS drug levels data in MSM.

Risk / Benefit Assessment Oral Truvada for PrEP has been FDA approved since 2012. At this time, there is plentiful evidence to support the use of daily oral FTC/TDF in HIV-1-uninfected heterosexual biological men and women, and men who have sex with men for HIV prevention. The toxicity and tolerability of daily oral FTC/TDF in HIV-uninfected individuals have been established. Side effects that may arise in the first weeks of PrEP use -- nausea, abdominal cramping, vomiting, dizziness, headache, and fatigue usually go away without treatment interruption (see Truvada Prescribing information for more details). Known potential risks can be effectively managed by experienced PrEP providers. Participants enrolled in this study will be provided Truvada for PrEP within the confines of an established PrEP clinic, and will benefit from the expertise of trained staff. Individuals who may be susceptible to the possible nephrotoxic effect of FTC/TDF as determined by the measure of creatinine clearance (see exclusion criteria) will not be enrolled in the study. Long term effect of Truvada use (such as bone density loss or kidney dysfunction) are unlikely to occur over the course of this short study in otherwise healthy participants. Participants will be seen weekly by a clinician, and any adverse event immediately addressed, in addition participants will be interacting daily with study staff via phone, providing an opportunity to address any questions or concerns. Moreover, the daily interactions with study staff will provide support for adherence. Concerns about risks of combining gender-affirming hormone therapy and PrEP will be alleviated by trained providers with expertise in the management of both antiretroviral and hormone therapy. Guidelines for these matters will be provided by the University of California San Francisco Center of Excellence for Transgender Health.

STUDY OBJECTIVES Primary Objective To assess pharmacokinetics for daily oral FTC/TDF in transgender women and transgender men, and to determine if FTC/TDF drug concentrations are lower among transgender women who are using hormone therapy and in transgender men who use testosterone compared to historical controls in non-transgender MSM.

Secondary Objectives To determine if daily oral FTC/TDF is associated with comparable rates of adverse events (AEs) in transgender women and in transgender men compared to historical controls in non-transgender MSM.

STUDY DESIGN Study Overview This is a single center pharmacokinetic study of daily oral Truvada at the following FDA approved dose of one tablet containing 200 mg of emtricitabine (FTC) and 300 mg of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) for PrEP using daily directly observed therapy (DOT).

The study will include 48 participants will be divided into two groups: one group will include 24 participants who currently describe their gender identity as "woman" or "transgender women", or other transfeminine spectrum identity, and the second group will enroll 24 participants who identify as "man" or "transgender man", or other transmasculine spectrum identity.

Each participant will be taking a single daily dose of study drug in DOT performed either via video calling, or at study visit, for a total study duration of 28 to 30 days (4 weeks).

Laboratory evaluations for HT (including testosterone, or estradiol) drug levels will be performed at enrolment, and after 4 weeks on study drug. Study drug levels will be monitored weekly in DBS while participants are on study.

Screening data will be reviewed to determine participant eligibility. Participants who meet all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will be entered into the study.

The treatment regimen that will be used:

Truvada at the following FDA approved dose of one tablet containing 200 mg of emtricitabine and 300 mg of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate

Total duration of participant participation will be up to 4 weeks, plus the 28 days of screening window period between screening visit and on study daily observed therapy. Total duration of the study is expected to be 9 -10 months.

Pharmacogenetic testing Pharmacogenetics (PGx) studies the variability in drug response due to hereditary factors in populations. There is increasing evidence that individual's genetic background may impact the pharmacokinetics (absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination) of drugs. The goal of the PGx analyses is to investigate a relationship between genetic factors and PK measures in I-BrEATHe, for example if there is potential unexpected or unexplained variation in drug levels. Blood samples collected for drug levels on DBS may be used for DNA extraction and PGx assessments. Participants will be specifically asked if they wish to participate in the genetic testing in the informed consent form.