Parkinson's DiseaseAEROPROTECTNCT04046276
Intensity of Aerobic Training and Neuroprotection in Parkinson's Disease
A study testing High Intensity Aerobic program, Conventional Physical Therapy and Medium Intensity Aerobic program in people with Parkinson's Disease, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 3 sites in France.
Trial summary
In phenotypic animal models of Parkinson's Disease (PD), chronic physical exercise has produced nigrostriatal neuroprotection and symptom improvement, provided training was of high-intensity and prolonged duration (>3 months in rodent models). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Parkinson's Disease
- What is being tested?
- High Intensity Aerobic program, Conventional Physical Therapy and Medium Intensity Aerobic program
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 69 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- Sep 2019to Nov 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of PD according to the UKPDSBB criteria
- Previous MRI available, to further help distinguish idiopathic PD from atypical parkinsonism Hoehn \& Yahr Stage 1-3 in OFF state
- Age > 18
- Signed informed consent to participate in study
Who cannot join
- Patients lacking motivation or ability to participate in training sessions for 9 months, in the investigator's opinion
- Contra-indications to high-intensity aerobic training in the cardiologist's opinion
- Contra-indications to perchlorate de potassium or to the use of 123I-FP-CIT
- Concurrent severe co-morbidities
- Cognitive deficit limiting participation to the program in the investigator's opinion
- Montreal Cognitive Assessment test (MoCA)<23
Show all 9Show fewer
- Uninsured patient
- Participation in another ongoing interventional clinical trial (drug therapy, surgical treatment, another rehabilitation treatment, medical device)
- Pregnancy or current lactation, or no efficacious contraception during the 9 months of intervention.
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
France3 sites
Henri Mondor Hospital
Créteil, 94010
Jean-Michel GRACIES, MD, PhD, +33 1 49 81 30 61, jean-michel.gracies@aphp.fr
Nicolas BAYLE, MD, +33 1 49 81 30 61, nicolas.bayle@aphp.fr
Sébastopol hospital
Reims, 51100
François Constant BOYER, MD,PH, +33 3 26 78 85 97, fboyer@chu-reims.fr
Rangueil hospital
Toulouse, 31059
Marc LABRUNEE, MD, +33 5 61 32 28 01, labrunee.m@chu-toulouse.fr
About this study
Official title: Neuroprotective, Motor and Cognitive Impact of a Long-standing Aerobic Training Program in Parkinson's Disease. A Multicenter Comparison of the Effects of Two Aerobic Programs of Graded Intensities and a Conventional Physical Therapy Program Prolonged for 9 Months on Nigrostriatal, Motor and Cognitive Functions.
In phenotypic animal models of Parkinson's Disease (PD), chronic physical exercise has produced nigrostriatal neuroprotection and symptom improvement, provided training was of high-intensity and prolonged duration (>3 months in rodent models). Conventional physical therapy in Parkinson's disease (PD) has traditionally avoided fatigue and high intensity workouts. Yet, in PD controlled studies have shown that: (i) an acute aerobic stress produces endogenous dopamine immediately after the exercise and (ii) short term (a few weeks) high intensity aerobic training enhances D2 striatal receptor density and cortical excitability and clinically improves walking, upper limb and executive functions; (iii) long-term (six months) high intensity aerobic treadmill training is associated with less deterioration of subjective UPDRS III score compared to a waiting list. Long-term high intensity aerobic training has not been compared to low or medium intensity training in PD patients for its objective motor, cognitive and putative neuroprotective effects.
Read the detailed description
A short description, 5000 characters Intro: In phenotypic animal models of Parkinson's Disease (PD), chronic physical exercise has produced nigrostriatal neuroprotection and symptom improvement, provided training was of high-intensity and prolonged duration (>3 months in rodent models). Conventional physical therapy in Parkinson's disease (PD) has traditionally avoided fatigue and high intensity workouts. Yet, in PD controlled studies have shown that: (i) an acute aerobic stress produces endogenous dopamine immediately after the exercise and (ii) short term (a few weeks) high intensity aerobic training enhances D2 striatal receptor density and cortical excitability and clinically improves walking, upper limb and executive functions; (iii) long-term (six months) high intensity aerobic treadmill training is associated with less deterioration of subjective UPDRS III score compared to a waiting list. Long-term high intensity aerobic training has not been compared to low or medium intensity training in PD patients for its objective motor, cognitive and putative neuroprotective effects.
Hypothesis/Objective
Hypothesis High-intensity aerobic exercises practiced over 9 months will produce greater symptomatic motor and cognitive benefits and neuroprotective effects in PD patients, than low or medium intensity training.
Primary Objective To compare the motor effects of a 9-month conventional physical therapy program (light aerobic exercises), an aerobic program of medium intensity on stationary bicycle (50% maximal oxygen uptake, VO2 max), and an aerobic program of high intensity (70% VO2 max) in Parkinson's disease.
Secondary Objectives
- To evaluate aerobic capacities before and after the program.
- To evaluate cognitive functions, depression, quality of life before and after each program as well as 3 months following program termination and motor function 3 months following program termination.
- To explore potential neuroprotective effects of a 9-month aerobic program through specialized brain imaging (123I-Ioflupane SPECT) and a potential aerobic intensity-effect of such neuroprotection.
Primary outcome measure Change in MDS-UPDRS III Score (Movement Disorders Society - Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale) in the " OFF " state between Day 1 and Month 9.
Secondary outcome measures OFF-state at Day 1, Month 9, Month 12
- Two-minute walking test from D1 to M9
- Modified 20-meter up-and-go test (AT20)
- 2-minute walk test (from M1 to M12)
- Global Mobility Task (GMT) scale (standing up off the floor)
- Upper limb performance in activities of daily living (Mount Sinai Parkinsonism Impairment Rating Scale, MSPIR)
- Static posturography
- Maximal aerobic capacity (VO2 max)
- Montreal Cognitive Assessment test (MoCA)
- Digit span task (forward and backward)
- Trail Making Test
ON-state at D1, M9, M12
- MDS-UPDRS III Score;
- Mean number of steps performed over the past three weeks (pedometry);
- Monthly incidence of falls in the past 3 months (questionnaire)
- Daily consumption of dopaminergic medications
- Quality of life (EQ-5D)
- Depression (GDS15)
- Dopaminergic striatal function by SPECT [123I] beta-CIT striatal uptake at D1, M12.
Method Design
Single-blind randomized study, 3 parallel groups (n= 7 or 8 per group and per center, over 3 centers):
- Group 1 " High Intensity Aerobic exercise ", HIA (70% VO2 max);
- Group 2 " Medium Intensity Aerobic exercise ", MIA (50% VO2 max);
- Group 3 " Conventional Physical Therapy ", CPT HIA and MIA groups are experimental groups and CPT group is the control group. Each group will attend 3 weekly 45-minute sessions at the hospital for 9 months.
Number of subjects needed: 69 Inclusion criteria Patients with diagnosis of PD according to the UKPDSBB criteria to distinguish idiopathic PD from atypical parkinsonism such as multi-system atrophy, progressive supra-nuclear paralysis or vascular parkinsonism; Previous MRI available, to further help distinguish idiopathic PD from atypical parkinsonism; Hoehn \& Yahr Stage 1-3 in OFF state; Age > 18; Signed informed consent to participate in study.
Non-inclusion criteria Patients lacking motivation or ability to participate in training sessions for 9 months, in the investigator's opinion; contra-indications to high-intensity aerobic training in the cardiologist's opinion; contra-indications to perchlorate de potassium or to the use of 123I-FP-CIT; concurrent severe co-morbidities; cognitive deficit limiting participation to the program; Montreal Cognitive Assessment test (MoCA)<23; uninsured patient; participation in another ongoing interventional clinical trial (drug therapy, surgical treatment, another rehabilitation treatment, medical device); Pregnancy or current lactation, or no efficacious contraception during the 9 months of intervention.
Recruitment period: 1 year; Study duration: 26 months (24 patients recruited in 2 centers and 21 patients in the other 2 centers) Participation duration for each patient: 14 months Number of participating centers: 3
- Conditions
- Parkinson's Disease
- Being tested
- High Intensity Aerobic program, Conventional Physical Therapy, Medium Intensity Aerobic program
- Keywords
- Parkinson's disease, Aerobic Exercises, High Intensity Training, Neuroprotection
- Medical subject headings
- Parkinson Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
High Intensity Aerobic programBehavioural
Three sessions a week of hospital-based exercise on a stationary bicycle, all in presence and with the guidance of a physical education teacher, for nine months
Conventional Physical TherapyOther
Three sessions a week of hospital-based exercise on a stationary bicycle, all in presence and with the guidance of a physical education teacher, for nine months
Medium Intensity Aerobic programBehavioural
Three sessions a week of hospital-based exercise on a stationary bicycle, all in presence and with the guidance of a physical education teacher, for nine months
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional Physical Therapy | Placebo comparator | Three sessions a week of hospital-based conventional physical therapy, all in presence and with the guidance of a registered physical therapist, for nine months Receives: Other: Conventional Physical Therapy |
| Medium Intensity Aerobic exercise (50% VO2 max) | Sham comparator | Three sessions a week of hospital-based Medium Intensity Aerobic exercise (50% VO2 max); on a stationary bicycle, all in presence and with the guidance of a physical education teacher, for nine months Receives: Behavioral: Medium Intensity Aerobic program |
| High Intensity Aerobic exercise | Experimental | Three sessions a week of hospital-based High Intensity Aerobic exercise (70% VO2 max) on a stationary bicycle, all in presence and with the guidance of a physical education teacher, for nine months Receives: Behavioral: High Intensity Aerobic program |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in MDS-UPDRS III Score (Movement Disorders Society - Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale) in the " OFF " state between Day 1 and Month 9.
The MDS-UPDRS III Score is a subjective assessment of motor symptoms based on the addition of ordinal 1-4 scores.
Measured: at day 1 and 9 Months
Secondary outcomes (8)
Two-minute walking test at maximal speed
Measured: at day 1, 9 Months and 12 Months
Modified 20-meter up-and-go test (AT20)
Measured: at day 1, 9 Months and 12 Months
Global Mobility Task (GMT)
time required to stand up off the floor
Measured: at day 1, 9 Months and 12 Months
Upper limb performance in activities of daily living (Mount Sinai Parkinsonism Impairment Rating Scale, MSPIR)
three unimanual tasks on each side and six bimanual everyday living tasks all times
Measured: at day 1, 9 Months and 12 Months
Maximal aerobic capacity (VO2 max)
Measured: at day 1, 9 Months and 12 Months
Montreal Cognitive Assessment test (MoCA)
Measured: at day 1, 9 Months and 12 Months
Digit span task (forward and backward)
Measured: at day 1, 9 Months and 12 Months
Trail Making Test
Measured: at day 1, 9 Months and 12 Months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Aug 2019
- Study startSep 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completionJun 2021 (estimated)
- Study completionNov 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Parkinson's DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Single-blind randomized study, three parallel groups (n= 7 or 8 per group and per center, over 3 centers): * Group 1 "Conventional Physical Therapy", CPT * Group 2 "Medium Intensity Aerobic program", MIA (50% VO2 max); * Group 3 "High Intensity Aerobic program", HIA (70% VO2 max); HIA and MIA groups are experimental groups and CPT group is the control group. Each group will attend 3 weekly 45-minute sessions at the hospital for 9 months.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 69 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jean-Michel GRACIES, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04046276
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P140926
- Other IDs
- 2015-A01345-44
- Acronym
- AEROPROTECT
- Status last verified
- Aug 2019
- First submitted
- 2 Aug 2019
- Last updated
- 6 Aug 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: DATAS ARE OWN BY ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE - HOPITAUX DE PARIS, PLEASE CONTACT SPONSOR FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
Publications
Ernst M, Folkerts AK, Gollan R, Lieker E, Caro-Valenzuela J, Adams A, Cryns N, Monsef I, Dresen A, Roheger M, Eggers C, Skoetz N, Kalbe E. Physical exercise for people with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 8;4(4):CD013856. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013856.pub3.
PubMed 38588457Ernst M, Folkerts AK, Gollan R, Lieker E, Caro-Valenzuela J, Adams A, Cryns N, Monsef I, Dresen A, Roheger M, Eggers C, Skoetz N, Kalbe E. Physical exercise for people with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 5;1(1):CD013856. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013856.pub2.
PubMed 36602886
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Aug 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Neuroprotective, Motor and Cognitive Impact of a Long-standing Aerobic Training Program in Parkinson's Disease. A Multicenter Comparison of the Effects of Two Aerobic Programs of Graded Intensities and a Conventional Physical Therapy Program Prolonged for 9 Months on Nigrostriatal, Motor and Cognitive Functions.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04046276
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AEROPROTECT / P140926
- Conditions
- Parkinson's Disease
- Keywords
- Parkinson's disease, Aerobic Exercises, High Intensity Training, Neuroprotection
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 69 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Nov 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 Aug 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In phenotypic animal models of Parkinson's Disease (PD), chronic physical exercise has produced nigrostriatal neuroprotection and symptom improvement, provided training was of high-intensity and prolonged duration (>3 months in rodent models). Conventional physical therapy in Parkinson's disease (PD) has traditionally avoided fatigue and high intensity workouts. Yet, in PD controlled studies have shown that: (i) an acute aerobic stress produces endogenous dopamine immediately after the exercise and (ii) short term (a few weeks) high intensity aerobic training enhances D2 striatal receptor density and cortical excitability and clinically improves walking, upper limb and executive functions; (iii) long-term (six months) high intensity aerobic treadmill training is associated with less deterioration of subjective UPDRS III score compared to a waiting list. Long-term high intensity aerobic training has not been compared to low or medium intensity training in PD patients for its objective motor, cognitive and putative neuroprotective effects.
Detailed description
A short description, 5000 characters Intro: In phenotypic animal models of Parkinson's Disease (PD), chronic physical exercise has produced nigrostriatal neuroprotection and symptom improvement, provided training was of high-intensity and prolonged duration (>3 months in rodent models). Conventional physical therapy in Parkinson's disease (PD) has traditionally avoided fatigue and high intensity workouts. Yet, in PD controlled studies have shown that: (i) an acute aerobic stress produces endogenous dopamine immediately after the exercise and (ii) short term (a few weeks) high intensity aerobic training enhances D2 striatal receptor density and cortical excitability and clinically improves walking, upper limb and executive functions; (iii) long-term (six months) high intensity aerobic treadmill training is associated with less deterioration of subjective UPDRS III score compared to a waiting list. Long-term high intensity aerobic training has not been compared to low or medium intensity training in PD patients for its objective motor, cognitive and putative neuroprotective effects.
Hypothesis/Objective
Hypothesis High-intensity aerobic exercises practiced over 9 months will produce greater symptomatic motor and cognitive benefits and neuroprotective effects in PD patients, than low or medium intensity training.
Primary Objective To compare the motor effects of a 9-month conventional physical therapy program (light aerobic exercises), an aerobic program of medium intensity on stationary bicycle (50% maximal oxygen uptake, VO2 max), and an aerobic program of high intensity (70% VO2 max) in Parkinson's disease.
Secondary Objectives
- To evaluate aerobic capacities before and after the program.
- To evaluate cognitive functions, depression, quality of life before and after each program as well as 3 months following program termination and motor function 3 months following program termination.
- To explore potential neuroprotective effects of a 9-month aerobic program through specialized brain imaging (123I-Ioflupane SPECT) and a potential aerobic intensity-effect of such neuroprotection.
Primary outcome measure Change in MDS-UPDRS III Score (Movement Disorders Society - Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale) in the " OFF " state between Day 1 and Month 9.
Secondary outcome measures OFF-state at Day 1, Month 9, Month 12
- Two-minute walking test from D1 to M9
- Modified 20-meter up-and-go test (AT20)
- 2-minute walk test (from M1 to M12)
- Global Mobility Task (GMT) scale (standing up off the floor)
- Upper limb performance in activities of daily living (Mount Sinai Parkinsonism Impairment Rating Scale, MSPIR)
- Static posturography
- Maximal aerobic capacity (VO2 max)
- Montreal Cognitive Assessment test (MoCA)
- Digit span task (forward and backward)
- Trail Making Test
ON-state at D1, M9, M12
- MDS-UPDRS III Score;
- Mean number of steps performed over the past three weeks (pedometry);
- Monthly incidence of falls in the past 3 months (questionnaire)
- Daily consumption of dopaminergic medications
- Quality of life (EQ-5D)
- Depression (GDS15)
- Dopaminergic striatal function by SPECT [123I] beta-CIT striatal uptake at D1, M12.
Method Design
Single-blind randomized study, 3 parallel groups (n= 7 or 8 per group and per center, over 3 centers):
- Group 1 " High Intensity Aerobic exercise ", HIA (70% VO2 max);
- Group 2 " Medium Intensity Aerobic exercise ", MIA (50% VO2 max);
- Group 3 " Conventional Physical Therapy ", CPT HIA and MIA groups are experimental groups and CPT group is the control group. Each group will attend 3 weekly 45-minute sessions at the hospital for 9 months.
Number of subjects needed: 69 Inclusion criteria Patients with diagnosis of PD according to the UKPDSBB criteria to distinguish idiopathic PD from atypical parkinsonism such as multi-system atrophy, progressive supra-nuclear paralysis or vascular parkinsonism; Previous MRI available, to further help distinguish idiopathic PD from atypical parkinsonism; Hoehn \& Yahr Stage 1-3 in OFF state; Age > 18; Signed informed consent to participate in study.
Non-inclusion criteria Patients lacking motivation or ability to participate in training sessions for 9 months, in the investigator's opinion; contra-indications to high-intensity aerobic training in the cardiologist's opinion; contra-indications to perchlorate de potassium or to the use of 123I-FP-CIT; concurrent severe co-morbidities; cognitive deficit limiting participation to the program; Montreal Cognitive Assessment test (MoCA)<23; uninsured patient; participation in another ongoing interventional clinical trial (drug therapy, surgical treatment, another rehabilitation treatment, medical device); Pregnancy or current lactation, or no efficacious contraception during the 9 months of intervention.
Recruitment period: 1 year; Study duration: 26 months (24 patients recruited in 2 centers and 21 patients in the other 2 centers) Participation duration for each patient: 14 months Number of participating centers: 3
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Single-blind randomized study, three parallel groups (n= 7 or 8 per group and per center, over 3 centers): * Group 1 "Conventional Physical Therapy", CPT * Group 2 "Medium Intensity Aerobic program", MIA (50% VO2 max); * Group 3 "High Intensity Aerobic program", HIA (70% VO2 max); HIA and MIA groups are experimental groups and CPT group is the control group. Each group will attend 3 weekly 45-minute sessions at the hospital for 9 months.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional Physical Therapy | Placebo comparator | Other: Conventional Physical TherapyThree sessions a week of hospital-based conventional physical therapy, all in presence and with the guidance of a registered physical therapist, for nine months |
| Medium Intensity Aerobic exercise (50% VO2 max) | Sham comparator | Behavioral: Medium Intensity Aerobic programThree sessions a week of hospital-based Medium Intensity Aerobic exercise (50% VO2 max); on a stationary bicycle, all in presence and with the guidance of a physical education teacher, for nine months |
| High Intensity Aerobic exercise | Experimental | Behavioral: High Intensity Aerobic programThree sessions a week of hospital-based High Intensity Aerobic exercise (70% VO2 max) on a stationary bicycle, all in presence and with the guidance of a physical education teacher, for nine months |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Diagnosis of PD according to the UKPDSBB criteria
- Previous MRI available, to further help distinguish idiopathic PD from atypical parkinsonism Hoehn \& Yahr Stage 1-3 in OFF state
- Age > 18
- Signed informed consent to participate in study
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patients lacking motivation or ability to participate in training sessions for 9 months, in the investigator's opinion
- Contra-indications to high-intensity aerobic training in the cardiologist's opinion
- Contra-indications to perchlorate de potassium or to the use of 123I-FP-CIT
- Concurrent severe co-morbidities
- Cognitive deficit limiting participation to the program in the investigator's opinion
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| High Intensity Aerobic programThree sessions a week of hospital-based exercise on a stationary bicycle, all in presence and with the guidance of a physical education teacher, for nine months | Behavioural | High Intensity Aerobic exercise |
| Conventional Physical TherapyThree sessions a week of hospital-based exercise on a stationary bicycle, all in presence and with the guidance of a physical education teacher, for nine months | Other | Conventional Physical Therapy |
| Medium Intensity Aerobic programThree sessions a week of hospital-based exercise on a stationary bicycle, all in presence and with the guidance of a physical education teacher, for nine months | Behavioural | Medium Intensity Aerobic exercise (50% VO2 max) |
Primary outcome
Change in MDS-UPDRS III Score (Movement Disorders Society - Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale) in the " OFF " state between Day 1 and Month 9.
Time frame: at day 1 and 9 Months
The MDS-UPDRS III Score is a subjective assessment of motor symptoms based on the addition of ordinal 1-4 scores.
8 secondary outcomes
Two-minute walking test at maximal speed
Time frame: at day 1, 9 Months and 12 Months
Modified 20-meter up-and-go test (AT20)
Time frame: at day 1, 9 Months and 12 Months
Global Mobility Task (GMT)
Time frame: at day 1, 9 Months and 12 Months
Upper limb performance in activities of daily living (Mount Sinai Parkinsonism Impairment Rating Scale, MSPIR)
Time frame: at day 1, 9 Months and 12 Months
Maximal aerobic capacity (VO2 max)
Time frame: at day 1, 9 Months and 12 Months
Montreal Cognitive Assessment test (MoCA)
Time frame: at day 1, 9 Months and 12 Months
Digit span task (forward and backward)
Time frame: at day 1, 9 Months and 12 Months
Trail Making Test
Time frame: at day 1, 9 Months and 12 Months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Aug 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38588457Ernst M, Folkerts AK, Gollan R, Lieker E, Caro-Valenzuela J, Adams A, Cryns N, Monsef I, Dresen A, Roheger M, Eggers C, Skoetz N, Kalbe E. Physical exercise for people with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 8;4(4):CD013856. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013856.pub3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36602886Ernst M, Folkerts AK, Gollan R, Lieker E, Caro-Valenzuela J, Adams A, Cryns N, Monsef I, Dresen A, Roheger M, Eggers C, Skoetz N, Kalbe E. Physical exercise for people with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 5;1(1):CD013856. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013856.pub2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. DATAS ARE OWN BY ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE - HOPITAUX DE PARIS, PLEASE CONTACT SPONSOR FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
Related trials for Parkinson's Disease
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Early Molecular Biomarkers for Differentiating Parkinsonian Syndromes
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Atypical Parkinsonism
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stromal Cells-derived Exosomes in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson Disease (PD)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Adaptive DBS to Offset STN Dysregulation During Exercise in PD
Parkinson Disease
Not yet recruiting
Compulsive Eating and Brain's Reward System in Different Pathologies
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Bipolar 1 Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating the Effect of the Zeen Mobility Device on Clinical Practicality, Safety, and Impact (Via Assessments of Walking, Standing Tolerance, Balance, Endurance, Effort, and Participation in Daily Tasks) in an Outpatient Rehabilitation Setting for Individuals With Mobility Impairments.
Stroke, Parkinson's Disease (PD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jean-Michel GRACIES, MD, PhD principal investigator
Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP)
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing High Intensity Aerobic program, Conventional Physical Therapy and Medium Intensity Aerobic program in people with Parkinson's Disease, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 3 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jean-Michel GRACIES, MD, PhD (+33 1 49 81 30 61, jean-michel.gracies@aphp.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in MDS-UPDRS III Score (Movement Disorders Society - Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale) in the " OFF " state between Day 1 and Month 9. (time frame: at day 1 and 9 Months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04046276, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Aug 2019.