Osteoarthritis, HipNCT04039984
Prospective Evaluation of Fixation of the Prime Acetabular Cup
A study testing Prime Cup in people with Osteoarthritis, Hip, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's.
Trial summary
This is a prospective study to compare migration of the Microport Prime acetabular cup to a well-established acetabular cup design after total hip replacement. We will enroll 30 patients with the Prime cup and compare migration, function, pain and quality of life to a historical cohort of patients whom had a different… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoarthritis, Hip
- What is being tested?
- Prime Cup
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Aug 2019to Aug 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- hip osteoarthritis
- scheduled for primary total hip arthroplasty
- ability to provide informed consent
- over the age of 18 years
Who cannot join
- prior arthroplasty on the indicated joint
- individuals who do not speak or understand English
- individuals with neuromuscular disorders or cognitive impairments
- individuals ho live >100km from our centre and/or are unlikely to return for multiple follow-up appointments
About this study
This is a prospective study to compare migration of the Microport Prime acetabular cup to a well-established acetabular cup design after total hip replacement. We will enroll 30 patients with the Prime cup and compare migration, function, pain and quality of life to a historical cohort of patients whom had a different cup used during surgery.
Read the detailed description
The gold standard for measurement of implant fixation over time is radiostereometric analysis (RSA). At the time of surgery, 0.8-1.0 mm Tantalum beads (typically n = 6-8 per region of interest) are inserted into the bone surrounding the implant of interest, and occasionally also into the polyethylene liner or insert of the implant. RSA exams are then acquired within the first 2 weeks post-operation, and again at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Each exam involves a stereo x-ray acquisition with a calibration unit to reconstruct the 3D location of the implant relative to the marker beads. Across each exam, the migration of the implant relative to the marker beads is tracked compared to the baseline exam acquired within the first 2 weeks. RSA is extremely precise and accurate, and is able to track migrations on the order of 10's of microns. Large early migrations within the first 1-2 years post-operation are predictive of eventual implant loosening and failure. For acetabular cups, proximal migration of greater than 1.0 mm within the first 2 years post-operation is considered unacceptable, with cups migrating between 0.2 and 1.0 mm at risk of having a revision rate exceeding 5% at 10 years.
An RSA study should be completed for any new implant under the principles of phased innovation in orthopaedics. This ensures the new device will achieve long-term, stable fixation prior to its widespread adoption. Many device manufacturers incorporate the results of the RSA migration study into their marketing material. The advantage of RSA is its high degree of accuracy and its well-established thresholds for implant migration, meaning a relatively small number of patients are required to provide meaningful results.
Several joint replacement companies (Microport excluded) have previously released new products to the marketplace without RSA evaluation and these implants have later been identified as having ingrowth problems. The scientific aim of this study is to prove efficacy of ingrowth with a recently released implant.
This study design will be a prospective cohort with a retrospective control group. The study will be conducted at a single centre (London Health Sciences Centre - University Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada) with all cases performed by a single, fellowship-trained high-volume surgeon.
The study group will receive a Prime cementless acetabular cup (manufactured by Microport located in Arlington, Tennessee). All patients will also receive a cementless Profemur femoral stem with a 32 mm Cobalt Chromium femoral head, articulating on a highly crosslinked acetabular liner. The control group will be a previously published cohort that received the Reflection cementless acetabular cup with Roughcoat coating (Smith \& Nephew, Memphis, TN). This is a well-established cup with long-term survivorship available in multiple registries, making it an ideal comparator.
Demographic details will be recorded from each patient. Outcome scores will be collected pre-operatively and at each post-operative visit. Standard outcome scores at our centre are the Western and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Short Form 12 (SF-12), and Harris Hip Score. At the time of surgery, n = 8 of 1.0 mm Tantalum beads will be inserted into the pelvis surrounding the acetabular cup. Patients will undergo post-operative supine RSA exams within 0-2 weeks (baseline exam) and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years, following standardized protocols. RSA exams will be conducted at Robarts with a member of the research team escorting participants over to Robarts for each required post-operative visit.
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis, Hip
- Being tested
- Prime Cup
- Keywords
- radiostereometric analysis, implant migration, total hip replacement, arthroplasty
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Hip
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Prime CupDevice
Patients in this group will have the Prime cementless acetabular cup used during surgery.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Prime Cup | Experimental | The study group will receive a Prime cementless acetabular cup (manufactured by Microport located in Arlington, Tennessee). All patients will also receive a cementless Profemur femoral stem with a 32 mm CoCr femoral head, articulating on a highly crosslinked acetabular liner. Receives: Device: Prime Cup |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Implant Migration
Migration will include translations, rotations and maximum total point motion measured between the 3D CAD models of the cup and the bone bead segment using model-based RSA software
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (3)
Short Form 12
Patient-reported questionnaire to assess general health and quality of life. Physical and Mental Health Composite Scores (PCS \& MCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
Measured: 2 years
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index
Patient-reported questionnaire to assess function, stiffness and pain caused by hip or knee osteoarthritis. It is a self-administered questionnaire consisting of 24 items divided into 3 subscales (function, stiffness and pain). The scores for each subscale are summed up, with a possible score range of 0-20 for Pain, 0-8 for Stiffness, and 0-68 for Physical Function. The total score is calculated by summing the scores for each subscale. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.
Measured: 2 years
Harris Hip Score
The Harris Hip Scale (HHS) was developed for the assessment of the results of hip surgery, and is intended to evaluate various hip disabilities and methods of treatment in an adult population. It is a physician-completed instrument that consists of subscales for pain severity (1 item, 0-44 points), function (7 items, 0-47 points), absence of deformity (1 item, 0-4 points), and range of motion (2 items, 0-5 points). The HHS is a measure of dysfunction so the higher the score, the better the outcome for the individual. The maximum score possible is 100.
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Jul 2019
- Study startAug 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completionAug 2022 (estimated)
- Study completionAug 2022 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Decided the study on this implant was no longer relevant
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Osteoarthritis, HipStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- This study design will be a prospective cohort with a retrospective control group.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Western Ontario, Canada
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Douglas Naudie, London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
- Investigators
- Douglas Naudie, MD, Principal investigator, London Health Sciences Centre
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04039984
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 113456
- Status last verified
- Mar 2023
- First submitted
- 29 Jul 2019
- Last updated
- 15 Mar 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: There is currently no plan to share individual participant data.
Publications
Valstar ER, Gill R, Ryd L, Flivik G, Borlin N, Karrholm J. Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants. Acta Orthop. 2005 Aug;76(4):563-72. doi: 10.1080/17453670510041574.
PubMed 16195075Pijls BG, Nieuwenhuijse MJ, Fiocco M, Plevier JW, Middeldorp S, Nelissen RG, Valstar ER. Early proximal migration of cups is associated with late revision in THA: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 26 RSA studies and 49 survivalstudies. Acta Orthop. 2012 Dec;83(6):583-91. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.745353. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
PubMed 23126575Malchau H, Bragdon CR, Muratoglu OK. The stepwise introduction of innovation into orthopedic surgery: the next level of dilemmas. J Arthroplasty. 2011 Sep;26(6):825-31. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.08.007. Epub 2010 Oct 2.
PubMed 20888183Naudie DD, Somerville L, Korczak A, Yuan X, McCalden RW, Holdsworth D, Bourne RB. A randomized trial comparing acetabular component fixation of two porous ingrowth surfaces using RSA. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep;28(8 Suppl):48-52. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.06.041. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
PubMed 23953963
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Mar 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective Evaluation of Fixation of the Prime Acetabular Cup
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04039984
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 113456
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis, Hip
- Keywords
- radiostereometric analysis, implant migration, total hip replacement, arthroplasty
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Decided the study on this implant was no longer relevant
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Western Ontario, Canada
- Study start
- Aug 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Aug 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Aug 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 31 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective study to compare migration of the Microport Prime acetabular cup to a well-established acetabular cup design after total hip replacement. We will enroll 30 patients with the Prime cup and compare migration, function, pain and quality of life to a historical cohort of patients whom had a different cup used during surgery.
Detailed description
The gold standard for measurement of implant fixation over time is radiostereometric analysis (RSA). At the time of surgery, 0.8-1.0 mm Tantalum beads (typically n = 6-8 per region of interest) are inserted into the bone surrounding the implant of interest, and occasionally also into the polyethylene liner or insert of the implant. RSA exams are then acquired within the first 2 weeks post-operation, and again at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Each exam involves a stereo x-ray acquisition with a calibration unit to reconstruct the 3D location of the implant relative to the marker beads. Across each exam, the migration of the implant relative to the marker beads is tracked compared to the baseline exam acquired within the first 2 weeks. RSA is extremely precise and accurate, and is able to track migrations on the order of 10's of microns. Large early migrations within the first 1-2 years post-operation are predictive of eventual implant loosening and failure. For acetabular cups, proximal migration of greater than 1.0 mm within the first 2 years post-operation is considered unacceptable, with cups migrating between 0.2 and 1.0 mm at risk of having a revision rate exceeding 5% at 10 years.
An RSA study should be completed for any new implant under the principles of phased innovation in orthopaedics. This ensures the new device will achieve long-term, stable fixation prior to its widespread adoption. Many device manufacturers incorporate the results of the RSA migration study into their marketing material. The advantage of RSA is its high degree of accuracy and its well-established thresholds for implant migration, meaning a relatively small number of patients are required to provide meaningful results.
Several joint replacement companies (Microport excluded) have previously released new products to the marketplace without RSA evaluation and these implants have later been identified as having ingrowth problems. The scientific aim of this study is to prove efficacy of ingrowth with a recently released implant.
This study design will be a prospective cohort with a retrospective control group. The study will be conducted at a single centre (London Health Sciences Centre - University Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada) with all cases performed by a single, fellowship-trained high-volume surgeon.
The study group will receive a Prime cementless acetabular cup (manufactured by Microport located in Arlington, Tennessee). All patients will also receive a cementless Profemur femoral stem with a 32 mm Cobalt Chromium femoral head, articulating on a highly crosslinked acetabular liner. The control group will be a previously published cohort that received the Reflection cementless acetabular cup with Roughcoat coating (Smith \& Nephew, Memphis, TN). This is a well-established cup with long-term survivorship available in multiple registries, making it an ideal comparator.
Demographic details will be recorded from each patient. Outcome scores will be collected pre-operatively and at each post-operative visit. Standard outcome scores at our centre are the Western and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Short Form 12 (SF-12), and Harris Hip Score. At the time of surgery, n = 8 of 1.0 mm Tantalum beads will be inserted into the pelvis surrounding the acetabular cup. Patients will undergo post-operative supine RSA exams within 0-2 weeks (baseline exam) and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years, following standardized protocols. RSA exams will be conducted at Robarts with a member of the research team escorting participants over to Robarts for each required post-operative visit.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- This study design will be a prospective cohort with a retrospective control group.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Prime Cup | Experimental | Device: Prime CupThe study group will receive a Prime cementless acetabular cup (manufactured by Microport located in Arlington, Tennessee). All patients will also receive a cementless Profemur femoral stem with a 32 mm CoCr femoral head, articulating on a highly crosslinked acetabular liner. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- hip osteoarthritis
- scheduled for primary total hip arthroplasty
- ability to provide informed consent
- over the age of 18 years
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- prior arthroplasty on the indicated joint
- individuals who do not speak or understand English
- individuals with neuromuscular disorders or cognitive impairments
- individuals ho live >100km from our centre and/or are unlikely to return for multiple follow-up appointments
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Prime CupPatients in this group will have the Prime cementless acetabular cup used during surgery. | Device | Prime Cup |
Primary outcome
Implant Migration
Time frame: 2 years
Migration will include translations, rotations and maximum total point motion measured between the 3D CAD models of the cup and the bone bead segment using model-based RSA software
3 secondary outcomes
Short Form 12
Time frame: 2 years
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index
Time frame: 2 years
Harris Hip Score
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Mar 2023.
- Background: PubMed 16195075Valstar ER, Gill R, Ryd L, Flivik G, Borlin N, Karrholm J. Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants. Acta Orthop. 2005 Aug;76(4):563-72. doi: 10.1080/17453670510041574.
- Background: PubMed 23126575Pijls BG, Nieuwenhuijse MJ, Fiocco M, Plevier JW, Middeldorp S, Nelissen RG, Valstar ER. Early proximal migration of cups is associated with late revision in THA: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 26 RSA studies and 49 survivalstudies. Acta Orthop. 2012 Dec;83(6):583-91. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.745353. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
- Background: PubMed 20888183Malchau H, Bragdon CR, Muratoglu OK. The stepwise introduction of innovation into orthopedic surgery: the next level of dilemmas. J Arthroplasty. 2011 Sep;26(6):825-31. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.08.007. Epub 2010 Oct 2.
- Background: PubMed 23953963Naudie DD, Somerville L, Korczak A, Yuan X, McCalden RW, Holdsworth D, Bourne RB. A randomized trial comparing acetabular component fixation of two porous ingrowth surfaces using RSA. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep;28(8 Suppl):48-52. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.06.041. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. There is currently no plan to share individual participant data.
Related trials for Osteoarthritis, Hip
Active, not recruiting
Effectiveness of Therapeutic Exercises on Spinopelvic Mobility
Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Hip
Recruiting
Intravenous Dexamethasone (0 vs 4 vs 8 mg) as an Adjunct to PENG Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Total Hip Arthroplasty
Osteoarthritis, Hip, Hip Osteoarthritis
Recruiting
Effects of EDUcation and EXercise Compared to Education Alone on Clinical and Physiological Outcomes in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis
Hip Osteoarthritis
Recruiting
Comparison of Spinal Anesthesia With Intrathecal Morphine Versus PENG Block With or Without Dexamethasone in Hip Arthroplasty
Arthropathy of Hip, Hip Osteoarthritis
RecruitingPhase 4
PENG vs L-ESPB With S-ESPB for Analgesia in Total Hip Arthroplasty
Hip Osteoarthritis, Hip Arthropathy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Douglas Naudie, MD principal investigator
London Health Sciences Centre
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Prime Cup in people with Osteoarthritis, Hip, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Implant Migration (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04039984, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Mar 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.