AzTrials
AzTrials

Mitral RegurgitationNCT04038879

Comparison Study of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Assessment of Mitral and Aortic Regurgitation

An observational study of Mitral Regurgitation and Aortic Regurgitation, run by Atlantic Health System at 1 site in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary treatment for patients determined to have severe aortic or mitral regurgitation is surgical repair or replacement their valves. The most commonly used tool to quantify the severity mitral and aortic regurgitation is echocardiography. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Mitral Regurgitation, Aortic Regurgitation
What is being tested?
MRI
How many people
300 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jul 2010to Jul 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Subjects with mitral or aortic regurgitation

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥18 years of age
  • Able to give informed consent
  • Referred for isolated aortic or mitral valve repair or replacement due to valve regurgitation

Who cannot join

  • Inability to provide consent.
  • Pregnancy
  • Claustrophobia
  • Metallic contraindications to MRI (e.g. noncompatible aneurysm clip etc)
  • Known intracardiac shunt
  • Planned concomitant cardiac surgical procedure such as coronary artery bypass, septal myomectomy, or other valve procedure.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • More than mild mitral or aortic stenosis.
  • For patients enrolled with mitral regurgitation: greater than mild aortic regurgitation.
  • For patients enrolled with aortic regurgitation: greater than mild mitral regurgitation.
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Morristown Medical Center

    Morristown, New Jersey, 07960

    Seth Uretsky, MD, 973-971-5597, seth.uretsky@atlantichealth.org

    Susan Miller, RN, 9739715597, susan.miller@atlantichealth.org

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

The primary treatment for patients determined to have severe aortic or mitral regurgitation is surgical repair or replacement their valves. The most commonly used tool to quantify the severity mitral and aortic regurgitation is echocardiography. Studies have shown that echocardiography may have significant limitations in quantifying regurgitant volume. MRI has recently been shown to easily and reproducibly quantify regurgitation. To better understand how to accurately quantify severity of regurgitation the investigators propose this study with the following aims: 1) compare MRI to echocardiography in the evaluation of regurgitant volume in patients with aortic or mitral regurgitation and 2) to assess which technique is better at predicting the response of the left ventricle to valve surgery.

Read the detailed description

The primary treatment for patients determined to have severe aortic or mitral regurgitation is surgical repair or replacement their valves. The most commonly used tool to quantify the severity mitral and aortic regurgitation is echocardiography. Studies have shown that echocardiography may have significant limitations in quantifying regurgitant volume. MRI has recently been shown to easily and reproducibly quantify regurgitation. To better understand how to accurately quantify severity of regurgitation the investigators propose this study with the following aims: 1) compare MRI to echocardiography in the evaluation of regurgitant volume in patients with aortic or mitral regurgitation and 2) to assess which technique is better at predicting the response of the left ventricle to valve surgery.

Being tested
MRI
Medical subject headings
Mitral Valve Insufficiency, Aortic Valve Insufficiency

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MRIDiagnostic test

    MRI of the heart

Study groups in NCT04038879
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Mitral/Aortic RegurgitationSubjects identified with mitral or aortic regurgitation will be asked to undergo testing with trans thoracic echocardiogram, stress echocardiography, and cardiac MRI with and without contrast. In addition, patients will be asked to answer the KCC and EQ5DL questionnaires.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: MRI

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Correlation of echocardiography and MRI

    Correlation of echocardiography and MRI

    Measured: 6 month

  2. Change in LV EDV post surgery

    Change in LV EDV post surgery

    Measured: 6 month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Jul 2019
  2. Study startJul 2010
  3. Primary completionJul 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJul 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
300 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04038879
Sponsor's protocol ID
555087
Status last verified
Aug 2019
First submitted
28 Jul 2019
Last updated
6 Aug 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Uretsky S, Aldaia L, Marcoff L, Koulogiannis K, Hiramatsu S, Argulian E, Rosenthal M, Gillam LD, Wolff SD. The Effect of Systolic Variation of Mitral Regurgitation on Discordance Between Noninvasive Imaging Modalities. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Dec;12(12):2431-2442. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.02.014. Epub 2019 Apr 17.

    PubMed 31005539
  • Uretsky S, Argulian E, Supariwala A, Marcoff L, Koulogiannis K, Aldaia L, Chaudhry FA, Wolff SD, Gillam LD. A Comparative Assessment of Echocardiographic Parameters for Determining Primary Mitral Regurgitation Severity Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Reference Standard. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018 Sep;31(9):992-999. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2018.04.006. Epub 2018 Jun 18.

    PubMed 29921479
  • Uretsky S, Gillam L, Lang R, Chaudhry FA, Argulian E, Supariwala A, Gurram S, Jain K, Subero M, Jang JJ, Cohen R, Wolff SD. Discordance between echocardiography and MRI in the assessment of mitral regurgitation severity: a prospective multicenter trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Mar 24;65(11):1078-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.12.047.

    PubMed 25790878
  • Uretsky S, Gillam LD, Biederman RWW, Han Y, Jacob R, Martin ET, Langer M, Choi AD, Sultan I, Cavalcante JL, Shah DJ, Tong MS, Wolff SD, Sakul S, Guglielmo M, Pontone G. Sex differences in pre- and post-surgical left ventricular remodelling and outcomes in primary mitral regurgitation. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Jul 31;26(8):1429-1437. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaf151.

    PubMed 40392571
  • Uretsky S, Animashaun IB, Sakul S, Aldaia L, Marcoff L, Koulogiannis K, Argulian E, Rosenthal M, Wolff SD, Gillam LD. American Society of Echocardiography Algorithm for Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation: Comparison With CMR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 May;15(5):747-760. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.10.006. Epub 2022 Jan 12.

    PubMed 35324429
  • Uretsky S, Morales DCV, Aldaia L, Mediratta A, Koulogiannis K, Marcoff L, Sakul S, Wolff SD, Gillam LD. Characterization of Primary Mitral Regurgitation With Flail Leaflet and/or Wall-Impinging Flow. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Dec 21;78(25):2537-2546. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.1382.

    PubMed 34915984
  • Uretsky S, Aldaia L, Marcoff L, Koulogiannis K, Argulian E, Lasam G, Gillam L. Concordance and Discordance of Echocardiographic Parameters Recommended for Assessing the Severity of Mitral Regurgitation. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 May;13(5):e010278. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.119.010278. Epub 2020 May 15.

    PubMed 32408828

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Mitral Regurgitation and Aortic Regurgitation, run by Atlantic Health System at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Correlation of echocardiography and MRI (time frame: 6 month). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04038879, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Aug 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in