Relapsing-remitting Multiple SclerosisPhase 3NCT04032158
Study of Evobrutinib in Participants With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (RMS)
A Phase 3 study testing Evobrutinib and Avonex® in people with Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis, run by EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc. at 2 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of evobrutinib administered orally twice daily versus Interferon-beta-1a (Avonex®), once a week intramuscularly in participants with RMS. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis
- What is being tested?
- Evobrutinib and Avonex®
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 3 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 26 Aug 2019to 16 Apr 2020
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Inclusion Criteria: - Participants are diagnosed with RMS (relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis [RRMS] or secondary progressive multiple sclerosis [SPMS] with relapses) in accordance with 2017 Revised McDonald criteria (Thompson 2018) - Participants with one or more documented relapses within the 2 years before Screening with either: a. one relapse which occurred within the last year prior to randomization, OR b. the presence of at least 1 gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) T1 lesion within 6 months prior to randomization - Participants have Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 0 to 5.5 at Baseline. Participants with an EDSS score <= 2 at Screening are only eligible for participation if their disease duration (time since onset of symptoms) is no more than 10 years - Participants are neurologically stable for >= 30 days prior to both screening and baseline - Female participants must be neither pregnant nor breast-feeding and must lack child-bearing potential, as defined by either: post-menopausal or surgically sterile or use an effective method of contraception for the duration of the study - Participants have given written informed consent prior to any study-related procedure - Other protocol defined inclusion criteria could apply Exclusion Criteria: - Participants diagnosed with Progressive MS, in accordance with the 2017 Revised McDonald criteria as follows: a). Participants with Primary Progressive MS. b). Participants with secondary progressive MS without evidence of relapse.
- Disease duration more than (>) 10 years in participants with an EDSS =< 2.0 at screening.
- Immunologic disorder other than MS, or any other condition requiring oral, intravenous (IV) , intramuscular, or intra-articular corticosteroid therapy, with the exception of well-controlled Type 2 diabetes mellitus or well controlled thyroid disease.
- Other protocol defined exclusion criteria could apply.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 2 countries.
2 sites in 2 countries
United States1 site
Please Contact U.S. Medical Information
Rockland, Massachusetts, 02370
About this study
Official title: A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel Group, Double Blind, Double Dummy, Active Controlled Study of Evobrutinib Compared With an Interferon Beta 1a (Avonex®), in Participants With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety
The study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of evobrutinib administered orally twice daily versus Interferon-beta-1a (Avonex®), once a week intramuscularly in participants with RMS.
- Conditions
- Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis
- Being tested
- Evobrutinib, Avonex®, Avonex® matched Placebo, Evobrutinib matched Placebo
- Keywords
- Evobrutinib, Avonex®, Interferon-beta 1a, Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EvobrutinibDrug
Also called M2951
Participants received evobrutinib twice daily (BID).
Avonex®Drug
Participants received avonex® IM injection once a week.
Avonex® matched PlaceboDrug
Participants received IM injection of placebo matched to Avonex® once a week.
Evobrutinib matched PlaceboDrug
Participants received placebo matched to evobrutinib twice a day.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Evobrutinib + Avonex® matched Placebo | Experimental | Participants received active evobrutinib twice daily (BID) along with concomitant intramuscular (IM) injection of placebo matched to Avonex® once a week. Treatment period was planned to be of 96 weeks. Receives: Drug: Evobrutinib; Drug: Avonex® matched Placebo |
| Avonex® + Evobrutinib matched Placebo | Active comparator | Participants received IM injection of active Avonex® once a week along with concomitant placebo matched to evobrutinib BID. Treatment period was planned to be of 96 weeks. Receives: Drug: Avonex®; Drug: Evobrutinib matched Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR)
The annualized relapse rate at 96 weeks was to be calculated based on qualified relapses. A qualifying relapse is the occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to MS. The relapse should be accompanied by an increase of 0.5 points or more on Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), or 2 points increase on one of the Functional System Scores (FSS), or 1 point increase on at least two of the FSS. The increase in FSS scores must be related to the neurological symptoms which were reported as new or worsening.
Measured: At Week 96
Secondary outcomes (23)
Time to First Occurrence of 12-Week Confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Progression
EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that measures disability in participants with MS. EDSS progression is defined as an increase of 1 point or more from Baseline EDSS score when the Baseline score is 5.0 or less, and an increase of 0.5 points or more when the Baseline score is 5.5 or greater. Time to first occurrence of 12-week confirmed EDSS progression is defined as the time from randomization to the first EDSS progression event that was confirmed at a regularly scheduled visit at least 12 weeks later.
Measured: Baseline up to 96 weeks
Time to First Occurrence of 24-Week Confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Progression
EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that measures disability in participants with MS. EDSS progression is defined as an increase of 1 point or more from Baseline EDSS score when the Baseline score is 5.0 or less, and an increase of 0.5 points or more when the Baseline score is 5.5 or greater. Time to first occurrence of 24-week confirmed EDSS progression is defined as the time from randomization to the first EDSS progression event that was confirmed at a regularly scheduled visit at least 24 weeks later.
Measured: Baseline up to 96 weeks
Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) Short Form Score at Week 96
The PROMIS PF Short Form is specific to measuring the physical function domain of MS patients, with each item on the form scored on a T-score metric. Higher scores indicate higher PF. Change from baseline at Week 96 is the difference between the PROMIS PF scores at 96 weeks and at baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Week 96
Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) MS Fatigue Score at Week 96
The PROMIS Fatigue Short Form is specific to measuring the fatigue domain of MS patients, with each item on the form scored on a T-score metric. Higher scores indicate higher fatigue. Change from baseline at Week 96 is the difference between the PROMIS Fatigue scores at 96 weeks and at baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Week 96
Total Number of Gadolinium-Enhancing (Gd+) Time Constant 1 (T1) Lesions Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans at Week 24, 48, and 96
Total number of Gd+ T1 lesions was to be assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Measured: At Week 24, 48 and 96
Total Number of New or Enlarging Time Constant 2 (T2) Lesions Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans at Week 24, 48, and 96
Total number of new or enlarging T2 lesions was to be assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Measured: At Week 24, 48 and 96
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal relationship with this treatment. Therefore, an AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, regardless if it is considered related to the medicinal product. TEAE is an AE that started after study drug treatment; or if the event was continuous from baseline and was serious, related to study drug, or resulted in death, discontinuation, interruption or reduction of study therapy. TEAEs includes both serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. AESIs included liver AEs (possible drug induced, non-infectious, non-alcoholic and immune-mediated) infections (serious and opportunistic infections), lipase and amylase elevation, and seizure.
Measured: Baseline up to 235 days
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Based on Severity According to National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.03 (NCI-CTCAE v4.03)
TEAE is an AE that started after study drug treatment; or if the event was continuous from baseline and was serious, related to investigational medicinal product (IMP), or resulted in death, discontinuation, interruption or reduction of study therapy. Severity of TEAEs were graded using NCI-CTCAE v4.03 toxicity grades, as follows: Grade 1= Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life-threatening and Grade 5 = Death. Number of participants with TEAEs based on severity were reported.
Measured: Baseline up to 235 days
Vital Signs: Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) and Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)
DBP and SBP were measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest for the participants at indicated time points.
Measured: At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155
Vital Signs: Pulse Rate
Pulse rate was measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest for the participants at indicated time points.
Measured: At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155
Vital Signs: Respiratory Rate
Respiration rate was measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest for the participants at indicated time points.
Measured: At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155
Vital Signs: Temperature
Temperature was measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest for the participants at indicated time points.
Measured: At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155
Vital Signs: Weight
Measured: At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155
Number of Participants With Abnormal Lab Values
The total number of participants with laboratory test abnormalities was assessed. Clinical laboratory tests included hematology, coagulation, biochemistry and urinalysis.
Measured: Baseline up to 235 days
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
ECG parameters included heart rhythm, heart rate, QRS intervals, QT intervals, RR intervals and corrected QT (QTc) intervals.
Measured: Baseline up to 235 days
Absolute Concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) A Level
Absolute concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) A was reported.
Measured: At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155
Absolute Concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) E Level
Absolute concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) E was reported.
Measured: At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155
Absolute Concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) G Level
Absolute concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) G was reported.
Measured: At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155
Absolute Concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) M Level
Absolute concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) M was reported.
Measured: At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155
Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin (Ig) A Level
Change from baseline in immunoglobulin (Ig) A level was reported.
Measured: At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155
Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin (Ig) E Level
Change from baseline in immunoglobulin (Ig) E level was reported.
Measured: At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155
Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin (Ig) G Level
Change from baseline in immunoglobulin (Ig) G level was reported.
Measured: At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155
Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin (Ig) M Level
Change from baseline in immunoglobulin (Ig) M level was reported.
Measured: At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Jul 2019
- Study start26 Aug 2019
- Primary completion16 Apr 2020
- Study completion16 Apr 2020
Why it stopped: Following analysis of open label extension (OLE) data from RMS phase 2 study (MS200527- 0086), it was determined that a change in active comparator warranted in phase 3 RMS comprised of trial MS200527-0073. Consequently, this trial terminated early.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Relapsing-remitting Multiple SclerosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 3 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Responsible, Study director, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04032158
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MS200527_0073
- Other IDs
- 2018-004701-11, 2018
- Status last verified
- Jul 2021
- First submitted
- 23 Jul 2019
- Last updated
- 5 Aug 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Per company policy, following approval of a new product or a new indication for an approved product in both the EU and the US, EMD Serono will share study protocols, anonymized patient level and study level data and redacted clinical study reports from clinical trials in patients with qualified scientific and medical researchers, upon request, as necessary for conducting legitimate research. Further information on how to request data can be found on our website https://www.emdgroup.com/en/research/our-approach-to-research-and-development/healthcare/clinical-trials/commitment-responsible-data-sharing.html
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Aug 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel Group, Double Blind, Double Dummy, Active Controlled Study of Evobrutinib Compared With an Interferon Beta 1a (Avonex®), in Participants With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04032158
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MS200527_0073
- Conditions
- Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis
- Keywords
- Evobrutinib, Avonex®, Interferon-beta 1a, Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Following analysis of open label extension (OLE) data from RMS phase 2 study (MS200527- 0086), it was determined that a change in active comparator warranted in phase 3 RMS comprised of trial MS200527-0073. Consequently, this trial terminated early.
- Enrolment
- 3 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
- Study start
- 26 Aug 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 16 Apr 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 5 Aug 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of evobrutinib administered orally twice daily versus Interferon-beta-1a (Avonex®), once a week intramuscularly in participants with RMS.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Evobrutinib + Avonex® matched Placebo | Experimental | Drug: Evobrutinib, Drug: Avonex® matched PlaceboParticipants received active evobrutinib twice daily (BID) along with concomitant intramuscular (IM) injection of placebo matched to Avonex® once a week. Treatment period was planned to be of 96 weeks. |
| Avonex® + Evobrutinib matched Placebo | Active comparator | Drug: Avonex®, Drug: Evobrutinib matched PlaceboParticipants received IM injection of active Avonex® once a week along with concomitant placebo matched to evobrutinib BID. Treatment period was planned to be of 96 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 55 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EvobrutinibAlso: M2951Participants received evobrutinib twice daily (BID). | Drug | Evobrutinib + Avonex® matched Placebo |
| Avonex®Participants received avonex® IM injection once a week. | Drug | Avonex® + Evobrutinib matched Placebo |
| Avonex® matched PlaceboParticipants received IM injection of placebo matched to Avonex® once a week. | Drug | Evobrutinib + Avonex® matched Placebo |
| Evobrutinib matched PlaceboParticipants received placebo matched to evobrutinib twice a day. | Drug | Avonex® + Evobrutinib matched Placebo |
Primary outcome
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR)
Time frame: At Week 96
The annualized relapse rate at 96 weeks was to be calculated based on qualified relapses. A qualifying relapse is the occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to MS. The relapse should be accompanied by an increase of 0.5 points or more on Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), or 2 points increase on one of the Functional System Scores (FSS), or 1 point increase on at least two of the FSS. The increase in FSS scores must be related to the neurological symptoms which were reported as new or worsening.
23 secondary outcomes
Time to First Occurrence of 12-Week Confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Progression
Time frame: Baseline up to 96 weeks
Time to First Occurrence of 24-Week Confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Progression
Time frame: Baseline up to 96 weeks
Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) Short Form Score at Week 96
Time frame: Baseline, Week 96
Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) MS Fatigue Score at Week 96
Time frame: Baseline, Week 96
Total Number of Gadolinium-Enhancing (Gd+) Time Constant 1 (T1) Lesions Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans at Week 24, 48, and 96
Time frame: At Week 24, 48 and 96
Total Number of New or Enlarging Time Constant 2 (T2) Lesions Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans at Week 24, 48, and 96
Time frame: At Week 24, 48 and 96
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)
Time frame: Baseline up to 235 days
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Based on Severity According to National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.03 (NCI-CTCAE v4.03)
Time frame: Baseline up to 235 days
Vital Signs: Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) and Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)
Time frame: At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155
Vital Signs: Pulse Rate
Time frame: At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155
Vital Signs: Respiratory Rate
Time frame: At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155
Vital Signs: Temperature
Time frame: At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155
Vital Signs: Weight
Time frame: At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155
Number of Participants With Abnormal Lab Values
Time frame: Baseline up to 235 days
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Time frame: Baseline up to 235 days
Absolute Concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) A Level
Time frame: At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155
Absolute Concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) E Level
Time frame: At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155
Absolute Concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) G Level
Time frame: At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155
Absolute Concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) M Level
Time frame: At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155
Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin (Ig) A Level
Time frame: At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155
Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin (Ig) E Level
Time frame: At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155
Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin (Ig) G Level
Time frame: At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155
Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin (Ig) M Level
Time frame: At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Aug 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Trial Awareness and Transparency websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
- US Medical Information website, Medical ResourcesLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Per company policy, following approval of a new product or a new indication for an approved product in both the EU and the US, EMD Serono will share study protocols, anonymized patient level and study level data and redacted clinical study reports from clinical trials in patients with qualified scientific and medical researchers, upon request, as necessary for conducting legitimate research. Further information on how to request data can be found on our website https://www.emdgroup.com/en/research/our-approach-to-research-and-development/healthcare/clinical-trials/commitment-responsible-data-sharing.html
Related trials for Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis
Active, not recruiting
Myrosinase Bioactivated Gglucoraphanin for the Treatment of Neurodegenerative Diseases (GRA-MYR-ND)
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Multiple Sclerosis (MS) - Relapsing-remitting
Recruiting
Wearable Focal Vibration Therapy on Upper Extremity Function of People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Pilot Study
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) - Relapsing-remitting, Upper Extremity Dysfunction
Not yet recruiting
Treatment of Memory Retrieval Impairments in MS With HDtDCS to the LIFG in a Placebo Controlled Trial
Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS)
Recruiting
Monthly Monitoring of Plasma NfL in Treated Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis to Detect Persistent Infraclinical Disease Activity
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) - Relapsing-remitting
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Safety and Efficacy Study of Fingolimod in Taiwanese Adults (≥ 20years) With Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Responsible study director
Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
2 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Evobrutinib and Avonex® in people with Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis, run by EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc. at 2 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States, Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Aug 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) (time frame: At Week 96). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Aug 2021.