AzTrials
AzTrials

Gastrointestinal CancerNCT04030624

Remote Electronic Patient Monitoring in Gastrointestinal Cancer

A study testing Remote Electronic Patient Monitoring in people with Gastrointestinal Cancer, run by Massachusetts General Hospital.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this research study is to evaluate a program that involves remote electronic monitoring of vital signs and symptoms of patients with gastrointestinal cancer who were recently hospitalized at Massachusetts General Hospital or presented to the oncology clinic for an unplanned, urgent visit. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Gastrointestinal Cancer
What is being tested?
Remote Electronic Patient Monitoring
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Sep 2020to 9 Sep 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 or older
  • Diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer
  • Hospitalized at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) or presenting to the ambulatory MGH oncology clinic for an unplanned, urgent visit
  • Planning to receive outpatient care at the MGH Cancer Center
  • Ability to read and respond to questions in English

Who cannot join

  • Uncontrolled psychiatric illness or impaired cognition that would interfere with completing study procedures
  • Enrolled in hospice
  • Planning to be discharged to any location other than their home

About this study

The goal of this research study is to evaluate a program that involves remote electronic monitoring of vital signs and symptoms of patients with gastrointestinal cancer who were recently hospitalized at Massachusetts General Hospital or presented to the oncology clinic for an unplanned, urgent visit.

Read the detailed description

Patients with gastrointestinal cancer often experience troublesome symptoms and side effects related to the cancer and its treatment. Unfortunately, patients commonly require hospital admission or urgent clinic visits to help manage uncontrolled symptoms. For this study, the investigators seek to determine if a program that entails remote electronic monitoring may improve the overall care experience of patients with gastrointestinal cancer who have urgent care needs.

The investigators are asking the participants to take part in this research study because the participants are currently hospitalized at Massachusetts General Hospital or recently presented to the oncology clinic for an urgent visit, and are receiving treatment at the Cancer Center. The goal of this study is to test a program that involves remote electronic monitoring of vital signs and patient-reported health outcomes. This study is a pilot study, and the investigators are evaluating the feasibility of delivering the program, the acceptability and satisfaction with the program, changes in the quality of life and symptoms of patients who receive the program, as well as the frequency of urgent hospital visits while the patient is in the program.

Being tested
Remote Electronic Patient Monitoring
Medical subject headings
Gastrointestinal Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Remote Electronic Patient MonitoringDevice

    The Remote Patient Monitoring intervention is a remote monitoring system intended for use by healthcare professionals for the collection of physiological data in home and healthcare settings. Patient information is displayed on a computer located at the medical institution. Throughout the day, patient data from the remote monitoring system are presented on the clinician user interface (e.g., temperature, blood pressure, heart rate, respiration rate). Data are transmitted from sensors to the patient's smart phone.

Study groups in NCT04030624
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Remote Electronic Patient MonitoringExperimental* The Remote Electronic Patient Monitoring intervention will entail monitoring of vital sign data and patient reported assessments to address and manage any concerning issues identified. * The Remote Patient Monitoring system uses algorithms that can indicate when patient vitals and patient-reported outcomes have changed. * Automatic patient surveys are sent to the patient with results displayed on the clinician user interface (i.e., dashboard) on a computer located in the clinical area. * Qualitative interviews with patient participants and their oncology clinicians using a semi-structured interview guide will be conducted.
Receives: Device: Remote Electronic Patient Monitoring

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The Feasibility of Remote Electronic Patient Monitoring Intervention

    The intervention will be deemed feasible if at least 50% (95% confidence interval +/- 13%) of patients agree to participate in the study and sign informed consent, and if participants wear the Remote Electronic Patient Monitoring device ≥ 50% (95% confidence interval +/- 13%) of the time within the two weeks following the baseline time point.

    Measured: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Proportion of participants completing self-reported symptom monitoring through the remote electronic monitoring device during study period

    Measured: 4 weeks

  2. Proportion of participants completing vital sign monitoring through the remote electronic monitoring device during study period

    Measured: 4 weeks

  3. Number of concerning issues identified per patient during study period

    Measured: 4 weeks

  4. Number of intervention-triggered phone calls from clinicians required per patient as well as average duration of these calls during study period

    Measured: 4 weeks

  5. Number of intervention-triggered emails generated to the primary oncology team during study period

    Measured: 4 weeks

  6. Proportion of intervention-triggered events that are not clinically acted upon (i.e., no change in patient care based on an intervention trigger) during study period

    Measured: 4 weeks

  7. Acceptability of Remote Electronic Patient Monitoring Intervention

    Participant report of perceptions of the usefulness, effectiveness, and relevance of the intervention per acceptability ratings and qualitative interviews with patient participants and their clinicians.

    Measured: 4 weeks

  8. Patient-Reported Quality of Life

    Change in patient-reported quality of life from baseline to 2 and 4 weeks per the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General

    Measured: 2 weeks and 4 weeks

  9. Patient-Reported Symptoms

    Change in patient-reported symptoms from baseline to 2 and 4 weeks per the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised

    Measured: 2 weeks and 4 weeks

  10. Patient-Reported Depression and Anxiety Symptoms

    Change in patient-reported depression and anxiety symptoms from baseline to 2 and 4 weeks per the Patient Health Questionnaire-4

    Measured: 2 weeks and 4 weeks

  11. Health Care Utilization

    Number of urgent clinic visits, emergency department visits, and hospital admissions during study period

    Measured: 4 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Jul 2019
  2. Study startSep 2020 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion9 Sep 2020
  4. Study completion9 Sep 2020

Why it stopped: Funding discontinued due to changes in corporate structures

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04030624
Sponsor's protocol ID
19-329
Status last verified
Nov 2020
First submitted
22 Jul 2019
Last updated
13 Nov 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: The Dana-Farber / Harvard Cancer Center encourages and supports the responsible and ethical sharing of data from clinical trials. De-identified participant data from the final research dataset used in the published manuscript may only be shared under the terms of a Data Use Agreement. Requests may be directed to: \[contact information for Sponsor Investigator or designee\]. The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available on Clinicaltrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or as a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Remote Electronic Patient Monitoring in people with Gastrointestinal Cancer, run by Massachusetts General Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The Feasibility of Remote Electronic Patient Monitoring Intervention (time frame: 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Nov 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in