Low Back PainNCT04022798
Management of LBP With Radiculopathy.
A study testing Exercise, manual therapy in people with Low Back Pain, run by University of Tabuk at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.
Trial summary
This study is to determine the effectiveness of Neural mobilization(NM) technique compared with lumbar stabilization exercise (LSE) and Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (rESWT) in the physical therapy management of chronic low back pain (CLBP) with radiculopathy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Low Back Pain
- What is being tested?
- Exercise, manual therapy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSaudi Arabia
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2019to 30 Nov 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Lower back pain should be Lower than 5 on the Visual Analogue Scale,
- > 18 years,
- Not taken physical therapy treatment in the past 6 months period,
- No previous surgery, such as structural anomalies, spinal cord compressions, severe instabilities, severe osteoporosis, acute infections, severe cardiovascular or metabolic diseases,
- A body mass index less than 30kg/m2.
Who cannot join
- Pain with a score above 5 on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS),
- ≤ 18 years,
- Had physical therapy treatment in the past 6 months period,
- Had undergone previous surgery, such as structural anomalies, spinal cord compressions, severe instabilities, severe osteoporosis, acute infections, severe cardiovascular or metabolic diseases,
- pregnant
- A body mass index above 30kg/m2.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Saudi Arabia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Salem F Alatawi
Tabuk, 71491
Salem F Alatawi, Phd, 549638301, sfalatawi@ut.edu.sa
Ahmad S Almasoudi, PhD, 00966503579505, aelmasoudy@ut.edu.sa
About this study
Official title: Randomized Controlled Trial of Effectiveness of Neural Mobilization in the Management of Chronic Low Back Pain With Radiculopathy.
This study is to determine the effectiveness of Neural mobilization(NM) technique compared with lumbar stabilization exercise (LSE) and Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (rESWT) in the physical therapy management of chronic low back pain (CLBP) with radiculopathy. Subjects will be randomly assigned into two groups. Group A (NM, LSE and rESWT) and Group B (LSE and rESWT).
Read the detailed description
Randomized clinical control trail will be conducted in the North West area of Saudi Arabia.
Patients diagnosed to have CLBP with radiculopathy at three different hospitals in Saudi Arabia will be recruited for this study.
Participants will be randomly assigned into treatment or control group. Before starting of the study, the author will designe the treatment and control group treatment program and instructed the treating physiotherapists in their implementation. An ethical approval was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Tabuk- Saudi Arabia. Participants in each group will receive 12 treatment sessions of 45 minutes each, 2 days a week for 6 consecutive weeks.
For each group, a menu of a lumbar stabilization program was designed. This program included 8 levels of exercise ( single leg knee to chest stretch, double leg knee to chest, supine piriformis stretch, supine hamstring stretch, lower trunk rotation stretch, lumbar rotation stretch, pelvic tilt, pelivic tilt with alternative legs). Exercises were tailored for each individual ability and, if possible, progressed at each session which would last approximately 30 minutes. Each single exercise was repeated many times based on the patient's clinical condition. All sessions were provided by physiotherapists. After finishing of session of lumbar stabilization program, a shock wave therapy was applied for each participant in a prone position over the region of low back pain (Figure 2 ).
Only participants in the treatment group were receive neural mobilization technique. This includes the following: sciatic neural mobilization technique (Figure 3), slump neural mobilization technique (Figure 4) and self neural mobilization (Figure 5 ).
OUTCOME MEASUREMENT TOOLS:
There were three outcome measures as following: pain, disability and lumbar spine range of motion. Subjected were tested three times as following: at the baseline (0 week), at the mid of treatment (3 weeks) and finally at the end of treatment (6 weeks).
- Pain Pain was assessed by using NPRS, where 0 represented no pain and 10 represented the worst pain possible, to indicate the intensity of pain in the lower back (Jensen et al., 1994). Disability Disability was measured by using the Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (MODQ) which is a self-rating questionnaire used to evaluate functional physical disability (Rajfur, et al., 2017).
- Lumbar flexion range of motion Lumbar flexion range of motion was measured by using modified Schober method (Philadelphia Panel Members, 2001).
DATA ANALYSIS:
A simple descriptive statistical analysis was adopted to describe the patient specific demographic characteristics with respect to outcomes parameters. Within group and between groups comparison was analyzed using ANOVA and Scheffes' post-hoc tests by using SPSS 20.0.
Work Plan:
Roles and responsibilities :
- Principal Investigator-is responsible for the following:
- The management and integrity of the research design 2. Approval from ethical board committee or its equivalent 3. Preparation and conduct of the study 4. Reporting of the research project 5. Managing, monitoring and ensuring the integrity of any collaborative relationships.
- Directs and oversees compliance, financial, personnel, and other related aspects and resources of the research project 7. Coordination with department and central administration personnel to assure research in is conducted in accordance with regulations of the University and sponsoring agency policies and procedures.
- Publication of the study, local and international. Work Flow
- The principal investigator will be responsible in check points, meetings, and coordination with the research team, regular meeting will be set on thursday every after two weeks and when necessary.
- Co-investigator will be assigned as custodian to all data and investigations from the start of the study.
- Co-investigator will be assigned to record all financial transaction according to the policies of sponsoring unit of the university.
- Co-investigator will be responsible logistic and making sure all researched needed are adequate and available when needed.
- A clear communication and coordination scheme will be established.
- Co-investigator will be required to submit status accomplish report on regular basis determined by the team.
Utilization:
The outcomes of the research will be used to:
- NM techniques enhance patient outcomes in the management of CLBP with radiculopathy when added to standard care.
- NM technique applied by experienced physical therapists combined with LSE and ESWT in a brief clinical trial might better and earlier than LST and ESWT alone for decreasing pain, reducing back disability and improving function in patients with CLBP with radiculopathy symptoms.
- The findings are interesting and motivate further studies, including long-term follow-up of large groups, randomized studies and the comparison of this treatment model with other treatment models.
- A faster program with fewer hospital visits not only enables the patients to proceed with most of their daily activities but also decreases the costs of the treatment.
- A NM technique might also be an alternative to conventional physiotherapy in the treatment of the CLBP patients with radiculopathy symptoms.
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Being tested
- Exercise, manual therapy
- Keywords
- Low back pain, Neural mobilization, lumbar stabilization exercise, Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Low Back Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Exercise, manual therapyOther
Participants were randomly assigned into treatment (n=15) or control group (n=15). Participants in each group received 12 treatment sessions of 45 minutes each, 2 days a week for 6 consecutive weeks.
For each group, a menu of a lumbar stabilization program was designed. This program included 8 levels of exercise ( single leg knee to chest stretch, double leg knee to chest, supine piriformis stretch, supine hamstring stretch, lower trunk rotation stretch, lumbar rotation stretch, pelvic tilt, pelivic tilt with alternative legs). Exercises were tailored for each individual ability and, if possible, progressed at each session which would last approximately 30 minutes. Each single exercise was repeated many times based on the patient's clinical condition. All sessions were provided by physiotherapists.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | Experimental | Neural mobilization (NM), lumbar stabilization exercise (LSE) and Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (rESWT) Receives: Other: Exercise, manual therapy |
| Control group | Active comparator | lumbar stabilization exercise (LSE) and Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (rESWT) Receives: Other: Exercise, manual therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Pain is being assessed using NPRS
Pain was assessed by using NPRS, where 0 represented no pain and 10 represented the worst pain possible, to indicate the intensity of pain in the lower back (Jensen et al., 1994).
Measured: baseline, 3 weeks and 6 weeks
Change in Disability is being assessed using the Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire
Disability was measured by using the Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (MODQ) which is a self-rating questionnaire used to evaluate functional physical disability (Rajfur, et al., 2017).
Measured: baseline, 3 weeks and 6 weeks
Change in Lumbar flexion range of motion is being assessed using modified Schober method
Lumbar flexion range of motion was measured by using modified Schober method (Philadelphia Panel Members, 2001).
Measured: baseline, 3 weeks and 6 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jul 2019
- Study start1 Jul 2019
- Primary completion30 Oct 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Nov 2019 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Low Back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Experimental group: Group A (NM, LSE and rESWT) and Control group: Group B (LSE and rESWT).
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Tabuk
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Salem F Alatawi, University of Tabuk
- Investigators
- Salem F Alatawi, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Tabuk
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04022798
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UTabuk
- Status last verified
- Jul 2019
- First submitted
- 8 Jul 2019
- Last updated
- 17 Jul 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: After publication
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jul 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Controlled Trial of Effectiveness of Neural Mobilization in the Management of Chronic Low Back Pain With Radiculopathy.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04022798
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UTabuk
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Keywords
- Low back pain, Neural mobilization, lumbar stabilization exercise, Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of TabukUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Oct 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2019 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is to determine the effectiveness of Neural mobilization(NM) technique compared with lumbar stabilization exercise (LSE) and Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (rESWT) in the physical therapy management of chronic low back pain (CLBP) with radiculopathy. Subjects will be randomly assigned into two groups. Group A (NM, LSE and rESWT) and Group B (LSE and rESWT).
Detailed description
Randomized clinical control trail will be conducted in the North West area of Saudi Arabia.
Patients diagnosed to have CLBP with radiculopathy at three different hospitals in Saudi Arabia will be recruited for this study.
Participants will be randomly assigned into treatment or control group. Before starting of the study, the author will designe the treatment and control group treatment program and instructed the treating physiotherapists in their implementation. An ethical approval was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Tabuk- Saudi Arabia. Participants in each group will receive 12 treatment sessions of 45 minutes each, 2 days a week for 6 consecutive weeks.
For each group, a menu of a lumbar stabilization program was designed. This program included 8 levels of exercise ( single leg knee to chest stretch, double leg knee to chest, supine piriformis stretch, supine hamstring stretch, lower trunk rotation stretch, lumbar rotation stretch, pelvic tilt, pelivic tilt with alternative legs). Exercises were tailored for each individual ability and, if possible, progressed at each session which would last approximately 30 minutes. Each single exercise was repeated many times based on the patient's clinical condition. All sessions were provided by physiotherapists. After finishing of session of lumbar stabilization program, a shock wave therapy was applied for each participant in a prone position over the region of low back pain (Figure 2 ).
Only participants in the treatment group were receive neural mobilization technique. This includes the following: sciatic neural mobilization technique (Figure 3), slump neural mobilization technique (Figure 4) and self neural mobilization (Figure 5 ).
OUTCOME MEASUREMENT TOOLS:
There were three outcome measures as following: pain, disability and lumbar spine range of motion. Subjected were tested three times as following: at the baseline (0 week), at the mid of treatment (3 weeks) and finally at the end of treatment (6 weeks).
- Pain Pain was assessed by using NPRS, where 0 represented no pain and 10 represented the worst pain possible, to indicate the intensity of pain in the lower back (Jensen et al., 1994). Disability Disability was measured by using the Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (MODQ) which is a self-rating questionnaire used to evaluate functional physical disability (Rajfur, et al., 2017).
- Lumbar flexion range of motion Lumbar flexion range of motion was measured by using modified Schober method (Philadelphia Panel Members, 2001).
DATA ANALYSIS:
A simple descriptive statistical analysis was adopted to describe the patient specific demographic characteristics with respect to outcomes parameters. Within group and between groups comparison was analyzed using ANOVA and Scheffes' post-hoc tests by using SPSS 20.0.
Work Plan:
Roles and responsibilities :
- Principal Investigator-is responsible for the following:
- The management and integrity of the research design 2. Approval from ethical board committee or its equivalent 3. Preparation and conduct of the study 4. Reporting of the research project 5. Managing, monitoring and ensuring the integrity of any collaborative relationships.
- Directs and oversees compliance, financial, personnel, and other related aspects and resources of the research project 7. Coordination with department and central administration personnel to assure research in is conducted in accordance with regulations of the University and sponsoring agency policies and procedures.
- Publication of the study, local and international. Work Flow
- The principal investigator will be responsible in check points, meetings, and coordination with the research team, regular meeting will be set on thursday every after two weeks and when necessary.
- Co-investigator will be assigned as custodian to all data and investigations from the start of the study.
- Co-investigator will be assigned to record all financial transaction according to the policies of sponsoring unit of the university.
- Co-investigator will be responsible logistic and making sure all researched needed are adequate and available when needed.
- A clear communication and coordination scheme will be established.
- Co-investigator will be required to submit status accomplish report on regular basis determined by the team.
Utilization:
The outcomes of the research will be used to:
- NM techniques enhance patient outcomes in the management of CLBP with radiculopathy when added to standard care.
- NM technique applied by experienced physical therapists combined with LSE and ESWT in a brief clinical trial might better and earlier than LST and ESWT alone for decreasing pain, reducing back disability and improving function in patients with CLBP with radiculopathy symptoms.
- The findings are interesting and motivate further studies, including long-term follow-up of large groups, randomized studies and the comparison of this treatment model with other treatment models.
- A faster program with fewer hospital visits not only enables the patients to proceed with most of their daily activities but also decreases the costs of the treatment.
- A NM technique might also be an alternative to conventional physiotherapy in the treatment of the CLBP patients with radiculopathy symptoms.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Experimental group: Group A (NM, LSE and rESWT) and Control group: Group B (LSE and rESWT).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | Experimental | Other: Exercise, manual therapyNeural mobilization (NM), lumbar stabilization exercise (LSE) and Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (rESWT) |
| Control group | Active comparator | Other: Exercise, manual therapylumbar stabilization exercise (LSE) and Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (rESWT) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Lower back pain should be Lower than 5 on the Visual Analogue Scale,
- > 18 years,
- Not taken physical therapy treatment in the past 6 months period,
- No previous surgery, such as structural anomalies, spinal cord compressions, severe instabilities, severe osteoporosis, acute infections, severe cardiovascular or metabolic diseases,
- A body mass index less than 30kg/m2.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Pain with a score above 5 on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS),
- ≤ 18 years,
- Had physical therapy treatment in the past 6 months period,
- Had undergone previous surgery, such as structural anomalies, spinal cord compressions, severe instabilities, severe osteoporosis, acute infections, severe cardiovascular or metabolic diseases,
- pregnant
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Exercise, manual therapyParticipants were randomly assigned into treatment (n=15) or control group (n=15). Participants in each group received 12 treatment sessions of 45 minutes each, 2 days a week for 6 consecutive weeks. For each group, a menu of a lumbar stabilization program was designed. This program included 8 levels of exercise ( single leg knee to chest stretch, double leg knee to chest, supine piriformis stretch, supine hamstring stretch, lower trunk rotation stretch, lumbar rotation stretch, pelvic tilt, pelivic tilt with alternative legs). Exercises were tailored for each individual ability and, if possible, progressed at each session which would last approximately 30 minutes. Each single exercise was repeated many times based on the patient's clinical condition. All sessions were provided by physiotherapists. | Other | Control group, Experimental group |
Primary outcome
Change in Pain is being assessed using NPRS
Time frame: baseline, 3 weeks and 6 weeks
Pain was assessed by using NPRS, where 0 represented no pain and 10 represented the worst pain possible, to indicate the intensity of pain in the lower back (Jensen et al., 1994).
Change in Disability is being assessed using the Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire
Time frame: baseline, 3 weeks and 6 weeks
Disability was measured by using the Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (MODQ) which is a self-rating questionnaire used to evaluate functional physical disability (Rajfur, et al., 2017).
Change in Lumbar flexion range of motion is being assessed using modified Schober method
Time frame: baseline, 3 weeks and 6 weeks
Lumbar flexion range of motion was measured by using modified Schober method (Philadelphia Panel Members, 2001).
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jul 2019.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. After publication
Related trials for Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Whole-Body Vibration and Cervical Stabilization With Core Stabilization in Young Adults With Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Spinery Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for Vertebrogenic Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Salem F Alatawi, PhD principal investigator
University of Tabuk
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Exercise, manual therapy in people with Low Back Pain, run by University of Tabuk at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Salem F Alatawi, PhD (0549638301, sfalatawi@ut.edu.sa), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Pain is being assessed using NPRS (time frame: baseline, 3 weeks and 6 weeks). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jul 2019.