Cervical CancerSOARAMIOCCNCT04022018
Study on Adaptive Radiotherapy and Multimodal Information of Cervical Cancer Assisted by Artificial Intelligence
A study testing Adaptive radiotherapy and no adaptive radiotherapy in people with Cervical Cancer and Radiotherapy Side Effect, run by The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
The standard treatment for non-operative cervical cancer is concurrent external radiation therapy and chemotherapy followed by brachytherapy. During the period of radiotherapy, organ movement and tumor shrinkage may lead to insufficient or excessive radiation dose for the tumor and organs at risk. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervical Cancer, Radiotherapy Side Effect, Biomarker
- What is being tested?
- Adaptive radiotherapy and no adaptive radiotherapy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 122 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 18 Dec 2019to 30 May 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- pathologically confirmed cervical squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma without treatment before;
- Age: ≥18 years old;
- The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics(FIGO) stage: IB2 to IVA, or IVB with only para-aortic lymph node metastasis, refused or could not be treated by surgery;
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG)score ≤2;
- good bone marrow, hematopoietic and liver and kidney function: absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.5 ☓ 109 / L, the platelet count ≥100 ☓ 109 / L, or hemoglobin > 90 g/L, serum bilirubin < 1.5 ☓ upper limit of normal reference value(ULN), aspartate aminotransferase(AST) and alanine aminotransferase(ALT)< 2.5 ☓ ULN, serum creatinine clearance ≥ 50 ml/min.
- provide informed consent.
Who cannot join
- women in pregnancy or nursing;
- contraindications to chemoradiotherapy;
- subjects participating in other clinical trials or participating in other clinical trials within 30 days;
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
HongKong University Shenzhen Hospital
Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518053
ZhiYuan Xu, Master, +86 18307555170, xuzy@hku-szh.org
About this study
The standard treatment for non-operative cervical cancer is concurrent external radiation therapy and chemotherapy followed by brachytherapy. During the period of radiotherapy, organ movement and tumor shrinkage may lead to insufficient or excessive radiation dose for the tumor and organs at risk. Adaptive radiotherapy can use images information acquired during treatment as feedback to reduce errors.
Total 122 cases of cervical cancer with stage IB2-IVA will be randomly enrolled. Concurrent external volumetric rotational intensity modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy is the treatment strategies of control group patients.
Concurrent adaptive external volumetric rotational intensity modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy is the treatment strategies of experimental group patients. CT repositioning will be performed after 15fractions of external radiotherapy, then new target volume will be contoured and new radiotherapy plan will be formulated with the assistance of artificial intelligence program. New radiotherapy plan will be performed from the 17th fraction external radiotherapy. Information on side effects, survival, dosimetry, imaging, clinical features, and cost-effectiveness will be collected. The statistical analysis is as follows, First is the difference in grade 3 side effects between the two groups. Second is 2-year PFS and OS differences between the two groups. Third is relationship between dosimetric differences and prognosis. Fourth one is to analyze the prognostic and predictive factors of adaptive radiotherapy from the patient's clinical characteristics, Positron emission tomography-computed tomography(PET/CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging(MRI) and other multimodal information. Fifth is cost-benefit analysis of Artificial Intelligence(AI).
Read the detailed description
- Introduction and background The standard treatment for non-operative cervical cancer is concurrent external radiation therapy and chemotherapy followed by brachytherapy. During the period of radiotherapy, organ movement and tumor shrinkage may lead to insufficient or excessive radiation dose for the tumor and organs at risk. Adaptive radiotherapy can use images information acquired during treatment as feedback to reduce errors.
- Hypothesis and purpose Main endpoint: adaptive radiotherapy can reduce level 3 side effects or not. Secondary endpoint: 1. The differences of 2-year progression-free survival and overall survival between two groups. 2. To analyze Physical dosimetry differences between two groups, and the correlation between physical dosimetry differences and prognosis also will be evaluated. 3. To analyze the prediction and prognostic factors of adaptive radiotherapy for cervical cancer, and to provide supporting data for the subsequent optimization of cervical cancer treatment. 4. To evaluate the effectiveness of AI and conduct cost-benefit analysis.
- Trial methodology and design Total 122 cases of IB2-IVA cervical cancer will be randomly enrolled. Concurrent external volumetric rotational intensity modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy is the treatment strategies of control group patients. Concurrent adaptive external volumetric rotational intensity modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy is the treatment strategies of experimental group patients. CT repositioning will be performed after 15fractions of external radiotherapy, then new target volume will be contoured and new radiotherapy plan will be formulated with the assistance of artificial intelligence program. New radiotherapy plan will be performed from the 17th fraction external radiotherapy. Meanwhile, concurrent chemotherapy regimen is cisplatin 40mg/m2/week (the maximum weekly dose should less than or equal to 70mg and no more than 6cycles). Information on side effects, survival, dosimetry, imaging, clinical features, and cost-effectiveness will be collected. The statistical analysis is as follows, First is the difference in grade 3 side effects between the two groups. Second is 2-year PFS and OS differences between the two groups. Third is relationship between dosimetric differences and prognosis. Fourth one is to analyze the prognostic and predictive factors of adaptive radiotherapy from the patient's clinical characteristics, PET/CT, MRI and other multimodal information. Fifth is cost-benefit analysis of AI.
- Anticipated result and potential impact Adaptive radiotherapy can reduce side effects and obtain prognosis and prognostic factors of adaptive radiotherapy.
- Being tested
- Adaptive radiotherapy, no adaptive radiotherapy
- Keywords
- cervical cancer, adaptive radiotherapy, side effects
- Medical subject headings
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Radiation Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Adaptive radiotherapyRadiation
CT repositioning will be performed after 15fractions of external radiotherapy, then new target volume will be contoured and new radiotherapy plan will be formulated with the assistance of artificial intelligence program. New radiotherapy plan will be performed from the 17th fraction external radiotherapy.
no adaptive radiotherapyRadiation
Concurrent external volumetric rotational intensity modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy is the treatment strategies of control group patients
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Adaptive radiotherapy group | Experimental | Concurrent adaptive external volumetric rotational intensity modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy is the treatment strategies of adaptive radiotherapy group patients. CT repositioning will be performed after 15fractions of external radiotherapy, then new target volume will be contoured and new radiotherapy plan will be formulated with the assistance of artificial intelligence program. New radiotherapy plan will be performed from the 17th fraction external radiotherapy. Receives: Radiation: Adaptive radiotherapy |
| Control group | Active comparator | Concurrent external volumetric rotational intensity modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy is the treatment strategies of control group patients. Receives: Radiation: no adaptive radiotherapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
the difference in grade 3 side effects between the two groups
Hematologic toxicity, bladder and rectal radiotherapy toxicity were recorded according to the evaluation criteria of common adverse events (CTCAE version 4.03).
Measured: The acute radiotherapy reaction occur from the first day to 90 days after the end of radiotherapy, and the late radiotherapy reaction occur 90 days after radiotherapy.
Secondary outcomes (6)
2-year PFS differences between the two groups
Follow-up every 3 months within 2 years after the end of radiotherapy, and every 6 months after 2 years. 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) will be calculated.
Measured: 2-year PFS
2-year OS differences between the two groups
Follow-up every 3 months within 2 years after the end of radiotherapy, and every 6 months after 2 years. 2-year overall survival (OS) will be calculated.
Measured: 2-year OS
the correlation between physical dosimetry differences and prognosis
To analyze Physical dosimetry differences between two groups, and the correlation between physical dosimetry differences and prognosis also will be evaluated.
Measured: correlation between physical dosimetry differences and 2year PFS
the predictive factors for the response rate of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer
To investigate the predictive factors for the response rate of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer. The investigating multimodal factors include patients'demographic characteristics, ECOG score, disease staging, human papilloma virus(HPV) status, tumor standard uptake value (SUV) of PET/CT and tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of MRI, squamous cell carcinoma antigen, lymphocyte and hemoglobin. Response rate is assessed at 3 months after completion of radiotherapy by MRI according to RECIST 1.1 criteria.
Measured: 3 months after radiotherapy
the prognostic factors for the 2-year overall survival rate of patients with cervical cancer after concurrent chemoradiotherapy
To investigate the prognostic factors for the 2-year overall survival rate of patients with cervical cancer after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The investigating multimodal factors include patients'demographic characteristics, ECOG score, disease staging, human papilloma virus(HPV) status, tumor standard uptake value (SUV) of PET/CT and tumor apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC) value of MRI, squamous cell carcinoma antigen, lymphocyte and hemoglobin. Overall survival is calculated from the date of diagnosis of cervical cancer to the date of death from any cause.
Measured: 2 years after radiotherapy
the time difference between labor and an artificial intelligence to design radiotherapy plans
Compare the efficiency AI and labor.
Measured: 2years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jul 2019
- Study start18 Dec 2019
- Primary completion30 May 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion30 May 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (24)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cervical CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Total 122 cases of IB2-IVA cervical cancer will be randomly enrolled. Concurrent external volumetric rotational intensity modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy is the treatment strategies of control group patients. Concurrent adaptive external volumetric rotational intensity modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy is the treatment strategies of experimental group patients. CT repositioning will be performed after 15fractions of external radiotherapy, then new target volume will be contoured and new radiotherapy plan will be formulated with the assistance of artificial intelligence program. New radiotherapy plan will be performed from the 17th fraction external radiotherapy.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 122 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Zhi-Yuan Xu, master, Principal investigator, HongKong University Shenzhen Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04022018
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- hkuszh2019119
- Acronym
- SOARAMIOCC
- Status last verified
- Mar 2020
- First submitted
- 1 Jul 2019
- Last updated
- 27 Mar 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: The results will be published as papers, but the original data will not be Shared
Publications
Arbyn M, Castellsague X, de Sanjose S, Bruni L, Saraiya M, Bray F, Ferlay J. Worldwide burden of cervical cancer in 2008. Ann Oncol. 2011 Dec;22(12):2675-2686. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr015. Epub 2011 Apr 6.
PubMed 21471563Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, Jemal A, Yu XQ, He J. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Mar-Apr;66(2):115-32. doi: 10.3322/caac.21338. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
PubMed 26808342Kjaer SK, Frederiksen K, Munk C, Iftner T. Long-term absolute risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse following human papillomavirus infection: role of persistence. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Oct 6;102(19):1478-88. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq356. Epub 2010 Sep 14.
PubMed 20841605Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005 Mar-Apr;55(2):74-108. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74.
PubMed 15761078International Collaboration of Epidemiological Studies of Cervical Cancer. Comparison of risk factors for invasive squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix: collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 8,097 women with squamous cell carcinoma and 1,374 women with adenocarcinoma from 12 epidemiological studies. Int J Cancer. 2007 Feb 15;120(4):885-91. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22357.
PubMed 17131323Dugue PA, Rebolj M, Garred P, Lynge E. Immunosuppression and risk of cervical cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2013 Jan;13(1):29-42. doi: 10.1586/era.12.159.
PubMed 23259425Barnholtz-Sloan J, Patel N, Rollison D, Kortepeter K, MacKinnon J, Giuliano A. Incidence trends of invasive cervical cancer in the United States by combined race and ethnicity. Cancer Causes Control. 2009 Sep;20(7):1129-38. doi: 10.1007/s10552-009-9317-z. Epub 2009 Mar 1.
PubMed 19253025Rose PG, Bundy BN, Watkins EB, Thigpen JT, Deppe G, Maiman MA, Clarke-Pearson DL, Insalaco S. Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999 Apr 15;340(15):1144-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199904153401502.
PubMed 10202165Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-Analysis Collaboration. Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 18 randomized trials. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Dec 10;26(35):5802-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.4368. Epub 2008 Nov 10.
PubMed 19001332Klopp AH, Moughan J, Portelance L, Miller BE, Salehpour MR, Hildebrandt E, Nuanjing J, D'Souza D, Souhami L, Small W Jr, Gaur R, Jhingran A. Hematologic toxicity in RTOG 0418: a phase 2 study of postoperative IMRT for gynecologic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 May 1;86(1):83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.01.017.
PubMed 23582248Tyagi N, Lewis JH, Yashar CM, Vo D, Jiang SB, Mundt AJ, Mell LK. Daily online cone beam computed tomography to assess interfractional motion in patients with intact cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 May 1;80(1):273-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.06.003. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
PubMed 21109360Pathy S, Kumar L, Pandey RM, Upadhyay A, Roy S, Dadhwal V, Madan R, Chander S. Impact of Treatment Time on Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Carcinoma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(12):5075-9. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.12.5075.
PubMed 26163644Perez CA, Grigsby PW, Castro-Vita H, Lockett MA. Carcinoma of the uterine cervix. I. Impact of prolongation of overall treatment time and timing of brachytherapy on outcome of radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Jul 30;32(5):1275-88. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00220-S.
PubMed 7635767Petereit DG, Sarkaria JN, Chappell R, Fowler JF, Hartmann TJ, Kinsella TJ, Stitt JA, Thomadsen BR, Buchler DA. The adverse effect of treatment prolongation in cervical carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Jul 30;32(5):1301-7. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)00635-X.
PubMed 7635769Holschneider CH, Petereit DG, Chu C, Hsu IC, Ioffe YJ, Klopp AH, Pothuri B, Chen LM, Yashar C. Brachytherapy: A critical component of primary radiation therapy for cervical cancer: From the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) and the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS). Brachytherapy. 2019 Mar-Apr;18(2):123-132. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2018.11.009. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
PubMed 30665713
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Mar 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Study on Adaptive Radiotherapy and Multimodal Information of Cervical Cancer Assisted by Artificial Intelligence
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04022018
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SOARAMIOCC / hkuszh2019119
- Keywords
- cervical cancer, adaptive radiotherapy, side effects
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 122 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 18 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 May 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 May 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The standard treatment for non-operative cervical cancer is concurrent external radiation therapy and chemotherapy followed by brachytherapy. During the period of radiotherapy, organ movement and tumor shrinkage may lead to insufficient or excessive radiation dose for the tumor and organs at risk. Adaptive radiotherapy can use images information acquired during treatment as feedback to reduce errors.
Total 122 cases of cervical cancer with stage IB2-IVA will be randomly enrolled. Concurrent external volumetric rotational intensity modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy is the treatment strategies of control group patients.
Concurrent adaptive external volumetric rotational intensity modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy is the treatment strategies of experimental group patients. CT repositioning will be performed after 15fractions of external radiotherapy, then new target volume will be contoured and new radiotherapy plan will be formulated with the assistance of artificial intelligence program. New radiotherapy plan will be performed from the 17th fraction external radiotherapy. Information on side effects, survival, dosimetry, imaging, clinical features, and cost-effectiveness will be collected. The statistical analysis is as follows, First is the difference in grade 3 side effects between the two groups. Second is 2-year PFS and OS differences between the two groups. Third is relationship between dosimetric differences and prognosis. Fourth one is to analyze the prognostic and predictive factors of adaptive radiotherapy from the patient's clinical characteristics, Positron emission tomography-computed tomography(PET/CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging(MRI) and other multimodal information. Fifth is cost-benefit analysis of Artificial Intelligence(AI).
Detailed description
- Introduction and background The standard treatment for non-operative cervical cancer is concurrent external radiation therapy and chemotherapy followed by brachytherapy. During the period of radiotherapy, organ movement and tumor shrinkage may lead to insufficient or excessive radiation dose for the tumor and organs at risk. Adaptive radiotherapy can use images information acquired during treatment as feedback to reduce errors.
- Hypothesis and purpose Main endpoint: adaptive radiotherapy can reduce level 3 side effects or not. Secondary endpoint: 1. The differences of 2-year progression-free survival and overall survival between two groups. 2. To analyze Physical dosimetry differences between two groups, and the correlation between physical dosimetry differences and prognosis also will be evaluated. 3. To analyze the prediction and prognostic factors of adaptive radiotherapy for cervical cancer, and to provide supporting data for the subsequent optimization of cervical cancer treatment. 4. To evaluate the effectiveness of AI and conduct cost-benefit analysis.
- Trial methodology and design Total 122 cases of IB2-IVA cervical cancer will be randomly enrolled. Concurrent external volumetric rotational intensity modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy is the treatment strategies of control group patients. Concurrent adaptive external volumetric rotational intensity modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy is the treatment strategies of experimental group patients. CT repositioning will be performed after 15fractions of external radiotherapy, then new target volume will be contoured and new radiotherapy plan will be formulated with the assistance of artificial intelligence program. New radiotherapy plan will be performed from the 17th fraction external radiotherapy. Meanwhile, concurrent chemotherapy regimen is cisplatin 40mg/m2/week (the maximum weekly dose should less than or equal to 70mg and no more than 6cycles). Information on side effects, survival, dosimetry, imaging, clinical features, and cost-effectiveness will be collected. The statistical analysis is as follows, First is the difference in grade 3 side effects between the two groups. Second is 2-year PFS and OS differences between the two groups. Third is relationship between dosimetric differences and prognosis. Fourth one is to analyze the prognostic and predictive factors of adaptive radiotherapy from the patient's clinical characteristics, PET/CT, MRI and other multimodal information. Fifth is cost-benefit analysis of AI.
- Anticipated result and potential impact Adaptive radiotherapy can reduce side effects and obtain prognosis and prognostic factors of adaptive radiotherapy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Total 122 cases of IB2-IVA cervical cancer will be randomly enrolled. Concurrent external volumetric rotational intensity modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy is the treatment strategies of control group patients. Concurrent adaptive external volumetric rotational intensity modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy is the treatment strategies of experimental group patients. CT repositioning will be performed after 15fractions of external radiotherapy, then new target volume will be contoured and new radiotherapy plan will be formulated with the assistance of artificial intelligence program. New radiotherapy plan will be performed from the 17th fraction external radiotherapy.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Adaptive radiotherapy group | Experimental | Radiation: Adaptive radiotherapyConcurrent adaptive external volumetric rotational intensity modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy is the treatment strategies of adaptive radiotherapy group patients. CT repositioning will be performed after 15fractions of external radiotherapy, then new target volume will be contoured and new radiotherapy plan will be formulated with the assistance of artificial intelligence program. New radiotherapy plan will be performed from the 17th fraction external radiotherapy. |
| Control group | Active comparator | Radiation: no adaptive radiotherapyConcurrent external volumetric rotational intensity modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy is the treatment strategies of control group patients. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- pathologically confirmed cervical squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma without treatment before;
- Age: ≥18 years old;
- The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics(FIGO) stage: IB2 to IVA, or IVB with only para-aortic lymph node metastasis, refused or could not be treated by surgery;
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG)score ≤2;
- good bone marrow, hematopoietic and liver and kidney function: absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.5 ☓ 109 / L, the platelet count ≥100 ☓ 109 / L, or hemoglobin > 90 g/L, serum bilirubin < 1.5 ☓ upper limit of normal reference value(ULN), aspartate aminotransferase(AST) and alanine aminotransferase(ALT)< 2.5 ☓ ULN, serum creatinine clearance ≥ 50 ml/min.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- women in pregnancy or nursing;
- contraindications to chemoradiotherapy;
- subjects participating in other clinical trials or participating in other clinical trials within 30 days;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Adaptive radiotherapyCT repositioning will be performed after 15fractions of external radiotherapy, then new target volume will be contoured and new radiotherapy plan will be formulated with the assistance of artificial intelligence program. New radiotherapy plan will be performed from the 17th fraction external radiotherapy. | Radiation | Adaptive radiotherapy group |
| no adaptive radiotherapyConcurrent external volumetric rotational intensity modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy is the treatment strategies of control group patients | Radiation | Control group |
Primary outcome
the difference in grade 3 side effects between the two groups
Time frame: The acute radiotherapy reaction occur from the first day to 90 days after the end of radiotherapy, and the late radiotherapy reaction occur 90 days after radiotherapy.
Hematologic toxicity, bladder and rectal radiotherapy toxicity were recorded according to the evaluation criteria of common adverse events (CTCAE version 4.03).
6 secondary outcomes
2-year PFS differences between the two groups
Time frame: 2-year PFS
2-year OS differences between the two groups
Time frame: 2-year OS
the correlation between physical dosimetry differences and prognosis
Time frame: correlation between physical dosimetry differences and 2year PFS
the predictive factors for the response rate of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer
Time frame: 3 months after radiotherapy
the prognostic factors for the 2-year overall survival rate of patients with cervical cancer after concurrent chemoradiotherapy
Time frame: 2 years after radiotherapy
the time difference between labor and an artificial intelligence to design radiotherapy plans
Time frame: 2years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Mar 2020.
- Background: PubMed 21471563Arbyn M, Castellsague X, de Sanjose S, Bruni L, Saraiya M, Bray F, Ferlay J. Worldwide burden of cervical cancer in 2008. Ann Oncol. 2011 Dec;22(12):2675-2686. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr015. Epub 2011 Apr 6.
- Background: PubMed 26808342Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, Jemal A, Yu XQ, He J. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Mar-Apr;66(2):115-32. doi: 10.3322/caac.21338. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
- Background: PubMed 20841605Kjaer SK, Frederiksen K, Munk C, Iftner T. Long-term absolute risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse following human papillomavirus infection: role of persistence. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Oct 6;102(19):1478-88. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq356. Epub 2010 Sep 14.
- Background: PubMed 15761078Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005 Mar-Apr;55(2):74-108. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74.
- Background: PubMed 17131323International Collaboration of Epidemiological Studies of Cervical Cancer. Comparison of risk factors for invasive squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix: collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 8,097 women with squamous cell carcinoma and 1,374 women with adenocarcinoma from 12 epidemiological studies. Int J Cancer. 2007 Feb 15;120(4):885-91. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22357.
- Background: PubMed 23259425Dugue PA, Rebolj M, Garred P, Lynge E. Immunosuppression and risk of cervical cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2013 Jan;13(1):29-42. doi: 10.1586/era.12.159.
- Background: PubMed 19253025Barnholtz-Sloan J, Patel N, Rollison D, Kortepeter K, MacKinnon J, Giuliano A. Incidence trends of invasive cervical cancer in the United States by combined race and ethnicity. Cancer Causes Control. 2009 Sep;20(7):1129-38. doi: 10.1007/s10552-009-9317-z. Epub 2009 Mar 1.
- Background: PubMed 10202165Rose PG, Bundy BN, Watkins EB, Thigpen JT, Deppe G, Maiman MA, Clarke-Pearson DL, Insalaco S. Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999 Apr 15;340(15):1144-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199904153401502.
- Background: PubMed 19001332Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-Analysis Collaboration. Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 18 randomized trials. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Dec 10;26(35):5802-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.4368. Epub 2008 Nov 10.
- Background: PubMed 23582248Klopp AH, Moughan J, Portelance L, Miller BE, Salehpour MR, Hildebrandt E, Nuanjing J, D'Souza D, Souhami L, Small W Jr, Gaur R, Jhingran A. Hematologic toxicity in RTOG 0418: a phase 2 study of postoperative IMRT for gynecologic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 May 1;86(1):83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.01.017.
- Background: PubMed 21109360Tyagi N, Lewis JH, Yashar CM, Vo D, Jiang SB, Mundt AJ, Mell LK. Daily online cone beam computed tomography to assess interfractional motion in patients with intact cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 May 1;80(1):273-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.06.003. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
- Background: PubMed 26163644Pathy S, Kumar L, Pandey RM, Upadhyay A, Roy S, Dadhwal V, Madan R, Chander S. Impact of Treatment Time on Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Carcinoma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(12):5075-9. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.12.5075.
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network(NCCN)Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. The results will be published as papers, but the original data will not be Shared
Related trials for Cervical Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Proton Re-irradiation in Patients With Recurrent or Second Primary Head and Neck Cancer , a Multicentre Phase II Single Arm Trial
Head & Neck Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Proton Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy or Photon Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Combination With Pembrolizumab Before Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced and Radiation-Naive Locoregionally Recurrent Oral Cavity Cancer, OSPRI Trial
Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Locally Recurrent Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 4
Lidocaine Infiltration and Neuroimmunomodulation in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery
Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Zhi-Yuan Xu, master principal investigator
HongKong University Shenzhen Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Adaptive radiotherapy and no adaptive radiotherapy in people with Cervical Cancer and Radiotherapy Side Effect, run by The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Zhi-Yuan Xu, master (+86 18307555170, xuzy@hku-szh.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
the difference in grade 3 side effects between the two groups (time frame: The acute radiotherapy reaction occur from the first day to 90 days after the end of radiotherapy, and the late radiotherapy reaction occur 90 days after radiotherapy.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04022018, which also lists 24 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Mar 2020.