AzTrials
AzTrials

Cervical CancerSOARAMIOCCNCT04022018

Study on Adaptive Radiotherapy and Multimodal Information of Cervical Cancer Assisted by Artificial Intelligence

A study testing Adaptive radiotherapy and no adaptive radiotherapy in people with Cervical Cancer and Radiotherapy Side Effect, run by The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The standard treatment for non-operative cervical cancer is concurrent external radiation therapy and chemotherapy followed by brachytherapy. During the period of radiotherapy, organ movement and tumor shrinkage may lead to insufficient or excessive radiation dose for the tumor and organs at risk. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
What is being tested?
Adaptive radiotherapy and no adaptive radiotherapy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
122 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
18 Dec 2019to 30 May 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • pathologically confirmed cervical squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma without treatment before;
  • Age: ≥18 years old;
  • The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics(FIGO) stage: IB2 to IVA, or IVB with only para-aortic lymph node metastasis, refused or could not be treated by surgery;
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG)score ≤2;
  • good bone marrow, hematopoietic and liver and kidney function: absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.5 ☓ 109 / L, the platelet count ≥100 ☓ 109 / L, or hemoglobin > 90 g/L, serum bilirubin < 1.5 ☓ upper limit of normal reference value(ULN), aspartate aminotransferase(AST) and alanine aminotransferase(ALT)< 2.5 ☓ ULN, serum creatinine clearance ≥ 50 ml/min.
  • provide informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • women in pregnancy or nursing;
  • contraindications to chemoradiotherapy;
  • subjects participating in other clinical trials or participating in other clinical trials within 30 days;

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Zhi-Yuan Xu, master contact

+86 18307555170

xuzy@hku-szh.org

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • HongKong University Shenzhen Hospital

    Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518053

    ZhiYuan Xu, Master, +86 18307555170, xuzy@hku-szh.org

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

The standard treatment for non-operative cervical cancer is concurrent external radiation therapy and chemotherapy followed by brachytherapy. During the period of radiotherapy, organ movement and tumor shrinkage may lead to insufficient or excessive radiation dose for the tumor and organs at risk. Adaptive radiotherapy can use images information acquired during treatment as feedback to reduce errors.

Total 122 cases of cervical cancer with stage IB2-IVA will be randomly enrolled. Concurrent external volumetric rotational intensity modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy is the treatment strategies of control group patients.

Concurrent adaptive external volumetric rotational intensity modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy is the treatment strategies of experimental group patients. CT repositioning will be performed after 15fractions of external radiotherapy, then new target volume will be contoured and new radiotherapy plan will be formulated with the assistance of artificial intelligence program. New radiotherapy plan will be performed from the 17th fraction external radiotherapy. Information on side effects, survival, dosimetry, imaging, clinical features, and cost-effectiveness will be collected. The statistical analysis is as follows, First is the difference in grade 3 side effects between the two groups. Second is 2-year PFS and OS differences between the two groups. Third is relationship between dosimetric differences and prognosis. Fourth one is to analyze the prognostic and predictive factors of adaptive radiotherapy from the patient's clinical characteristics, Positron emission tomography-computed tomography(PET/CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging(MRI) and other multimodal information. Fifth is cost-benefit analysis of Artificial Intelligence(AI).

Read the detailed description
  1. Introduction and background The standard treatment for non-operative cervical cancer is concurrent external radiation therapy and chemotherapy followed by brachytherapy. During the period of radiotherapy, organ movement and tumor shrinkage may lead to insufficient or excessive radiation dose for the tumor and organs at risk. Adaptive radiotherapy can use images information acquired during treatment as feedback to reduce errors.
  2. Hypothesis and purpose Main endpoint: adaptive radiotherapy can reduce level 3 side effects or not. Secondary endpoint: 1. The differences of 2-year progression-free survival and overall survival between two groups. 2. To analyze Physical dosimetry differences between two groups, and the correlation between physical dosimetry differences and prognosis also will be evaluated. 3. To analyze the prediction and prognostic factors of adaptive radiotherapy for cervical cancer, and to provide supporting data for the subsequent optimization of cervical cancer treatment. 4. To evaluate the effectiveness of AI and conduct cost-benefit analysis.
  3. Trial methodology and design Total 122 cases of IB2-IVA cervical cancer will be randomly enrolled. Concurrent external volumetric rotational intensity modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy is the treatment strategies of control group patients. Concurrent adaptive external volumetric rotational intensity modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy is the treatment strategies of experimental group patients. CT repositioning will be performed after 15fractions of external radiotherapy, then new target volume will be contoured and new radiotherapy plan will be formulated with the assistance of artificial intelligence program. New radiotherapy plan will be performed from the 17th fraction external radiotherapy. Meanwhile, concurrent chemotherapy regimen is cisplatin 40mg/m2/week (the maximum weekly dose should less than or equal to 70mg and no more than 6cycles). Information on side effects, survival, dosimetry, imaging, clinical features, and cost-effectiveness will be collected. The statistical analysis is as follows, First is the difference in grade 3 side effects between the two groups. Second is 2-year PFS and OS differences between the two groups. Third is relationship between dosimetric differences and prognosis. Fourth one is to analyze the prognostic and predictive factors of adaptive radiotherapy from the patient's clinical characteristics, PET/CT, MRI and other multimodal information. Fifth is cost-benefit analysis of AI.
  4. Anticipated result and potential impact Adaptive radiotherapy can reduce side effects and obtain prognosis and prognostic factors of adaptive radiotherapy.
Being tested
Adaptive radiotherapy, no adaptive radiotherapy
Keywords
cervical cancer, adaptive radiotherapy, side effects
Medical subject headings
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Radiation Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Adaptive radiotherapyRadiation

    CT repositioning will be performed after 15fractions of external radiotherapy, then new target volume will be contoured and new radiotherapy plan will be formulated with the assistance of artificial intelligence program. New radiotherapy plan will be performed from the 17th fraction external radiotherapy.

  • no adaptive radiotherapyRadiation

    Concurrent external volumetric rotational intensity modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy is the treatment strategies of control group patients

Study groups in NCT04022018
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Adaptive radiotherapy groupExperimentalConcurrent adaptive external volumetric rotational intensity modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy is the treatment strategies of adaptive radiotherapy group patients. CT repositioning will be performed after 15fractions of external radiotherapy, then new target volume will be contoured and new radiotherapy plan will be formulated with the assistance of artificial intelligence program. New radiotherapy plan will be performed from the 17th fraction external radiotherapy.
Receives: Radiation: Adaptive radiotherapy
Control groupActive comparatorConcurrent external volumetric rotational intensity modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy is the treatment strategies of control group patients.
Receives: Radiation: no adaptive radiotherapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. the difference in grade 3 side effects between the two groups

    Hematologic toxicity, bladder and rectal radiotherapy toxicity were recorded according to the evaluation criteria of common adverse events (CTCAE version 4.03).

    Measured: The acute radiotherapy reaction occur from the first day to 90 days after the end of radiotherapy, and the late radiotherapy reaction occur 90 days after radiotherapy.

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. 2-year PFS differences between the two groups

    Follow-up every 3 months within 2 years after the end of radiotherapy, and every 6 months after 2 years. 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) will be calculated.

    Measured: 2-year PFS

  2. 2-year OS differences between the two groups

    Follow-up every 3 months within 2 years after the end of radiotherapy, and every 6 months after 2 years. 2-year overall survival (OS) will be calculated.

    Measured: 2-year OS

  3. the correlation between physical dosimetry differences and prognosis

    To analyze Physical dosimetry differences between two groups, and the correlation between physical dosimetry differences and prognosis also will be evaluated.

    Measured: correlation between physical dosimetry differences and 2year PFS

  4. the predictive factors for the response rate of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer

    To investigate the predictive factors for the response rate of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer. The investigating multimodal factors include patients'demographic characteristics, ECOG score, disease staging, human papilloma virus(HPV) status, tumor standard uptake value (SUV) of PET/CT and tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of MRI, squamous cell carcinoma antigen, lymphocyte and hemoglobin. Response rate is assessed at 3 months after completion of radiotherapy by MRI according to RECIST 1.1 criteria.

    Measured: 3 months after radiotherapy

  5. the prognostic factors for the 2-year overall survival rate of patients with cervical cancer after concurrent chemoradiotherapy

    To investigate the prognostic factors for the 2-year overall survival rate of patients with cervical cancer after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The investigating multimodal factors include patients'demographic characteristics, ECOG score, disease staging, human papilloma virus(HPV) status, tumor standard uptake value (SUV) of PET/CT and tumor apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC) value of MRI, squamous cell carcinoma antigen, lymphocyte and hemoglobin. Overall survival is calculated from the date of diagnosis of cervical cancer to the date of death from any cause.

    Measured: 2 years after radiotherapy

  6. the time difference between labor and an artificial intelligence to design radiotherapy plans

    Compare the efficiency AI and labor.

    Measured: 2years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Jul 2019
  2. Study start18 Dec 2019
  3. Primary completion30 May 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 May 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Total 122 cases of IB2-IVA cervical cancer will be randomly enrolled. Concurrent external volumetric rotational intensity modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy is the treatment strategies of control group patients. Concurrent adaptive external volumetric rotational intensity modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy is the treatment strategies of experimental group patients. CT repositioning will be performed after 15fractions of external radiotherapy, then new target volume will be contoured and new radiotherapy plan will be formulated with the assistance of artificial intelligence program. New radiotherapy plan will be performed from the 17th fraction external radiotherapy.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
122 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04022018
Sponsor's protocol ID
hkuszh2019119
Acronym
SOARAMIOCC
Status last verified
Mar 2020
First submitted
1 Jul 2019
Last updated
27 Mar 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: The results will be published as papers, but the original data will not be Shared

Publications

  • Arbyn M, Castellsague X, de Sanjose S, Bruni L, Saraiya M, Bray F, Ferlay J. Worldwide burden of cervical cancer in 2008. Ann Oncol. 2011 Dec;22(12):2675-2686. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr015. Epub 2011 Apr 6.

    PubMed 21471563
  • Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, Jemal A, Yu XQ, He J. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Mar-Apr;66(2):115-32. doi: 10.3322/caac.21338. Epub 2016 Jan 25.

    PubMed 26808342
  • Kjaer SK, Frederiksen K, Munk C, Iftner T. Long-term absolute risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse following human papillomavirus infection: role of persistence. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Oct 6;102(19):1478-88. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq356. Epub 2010 Sep 14.

    PubMed 20841605
  • Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005 Mar-Apr;55(2):74-108. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74.

    PubMed 15761078
  • International Collaboration of Epidemiological Studies of Cervical Cancer. Comparison of risk factors for invasive squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix: collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 8,097 women with squamous cell carcinoma and 1,374 women with adenocarcinoma from 12 epidemiological studies. Int J Cancer. 2007 Feb 15;120(4):885-91. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22357.

    PubMed 17131323
  • Dugue PA, Rebolj M, Garred P, Lynge E. Immunosuppression and risk of cervical cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2013 Jan;13(1):29-42. doi: 10.1586/era.12.159.

    PubMed 23259425
  • Barnholtz-Sloan J, Patel N, Rollison D, Kortepeter K, MacKinnon J, Giuliano A. Incidence trends of invasive cervical cancer in the United States by combined race and ethnicity. Cancer Causes Control. 2009 Sep;20(7):1129-38. doi: 10.1007/s10552-009-9317-z. Epub 2009 Mar 1.

    PubMed 19253025
  • Rose PG, Bundy BN, Watkins EB, Thigpen JT, Deppe G, Maiman MA, Clarke-Pearson DL, Insalaco S. Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999 Apr 15;340(15):1144-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199904153401502.

    PubMed 10202165
  • Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-Analysis Collaboration. Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 18 randomized trials. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Dec 10;26(35):5802-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.4368. Epub 2008 Nov 10.

    PubMed 19001332
  • Klopp AH, Moughan J, Portelance L, Miller BE, Salehpour MR, Hildebrandt E, Nuanjing J, D'Souza D, Souhami L, Small W Jr, Gaur R, Jhingran A. Hematologic toxicity in RTOG 0418: a phase 2 study of postoperative IMRT for gynecologic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 May 1;86(1):83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.01.017.

    PubMed 23582248
  • Tyagi N, Lewis JH, Yashar CM, Vo D, Jiang SB, Mundt AJ, Mell LK. Daily online cone beam computed tomography to assess interfractional motion in patients with intact cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 May 1;80(1):273-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.06.003. Epub 2010 Nov 23.

    PubMed 21109360
  • Pathy S, Kumar L, Pandey RM, Upadhyay A, Roy S, Dadhwal V, Madan R, Chander S. Impact of Treatment Time on Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Carcinoma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(12):5075-9. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.12.5075.

    PubMed 26163644
  • Perez CA, Grigsby PW, Castro-Vita H, Lockett MA. Carcinoma of the uterine cervix. I. Impact of prolongation of overall treatment time and timing of brachytherapy on outcome of radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Jul 30;32(5):1275-88. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00220-S.

    PubMed 7635767
  • Petereit DG, Sarkaria JN, Chappell R, Fowler JF, Hartmann TJ, Kinsella TJ, Stitt JA, Thomadsen BR, Buchler DA. The adverse effect of treatment prolongation in cervical carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Jul 30;32(5):1301-7. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)00635-X.

    PubMed 7635769
  • Holschneider CH, Petereit DG, Chu C, Hsu IC, Ioffe YJ, Klopp AH, Pothuri B, Chen LM, Yashar C. Brachytherapy: A critical component of primary radiation therapy for cervical cancer: From the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) and the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS). Brachytherapy. 2019 Mar-Apr;18(2):123-132. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2018.11.009. Epub 2019 Jan 18.

    PubMed 30665713

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Adaptive radiotherapy and no adaptive radiotherapy in people with Cervical Cancer and Radiotherapy Side Effect, run by The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Zhi-Yuan Xu, master (+86 18307555170, xuzy@hku-szh.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

the difference in grade 3 side effects between the two groups (time frame: The acute radiotherapy reaction occur from the first day to 90 days after the end of radiotherapy, and the late radiotherapy reaction occur 90 days after radiotherapy.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04022018, which also lists 24 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Mar 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in