AzTrials
AzTrials

Diabetes MellitusGENEPEDIABNCT04021199

Screening for Genetic Forms of Diabetes in Convention of Care for Children and Adolescents With Diabetes (GENEPEDIAB)

A study testing Mody test in people with Diabetes Mellitus and MODY, run by Université Catholique de Louvain at 1 site in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background/Aims: Diabetes, which affects 420 million people worldwide with a continuously rising incidence, is defined by a state of chronic hyperglycemia; a criterion referring to a heterogeneous group of diseases with various etiologies and distinct therapeutic options. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 50 years
Conditions the study is for
Diabetes Mellitus, MODY
What is being tested?
Mody test
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
446 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
22 Oct 2018to 22 Jun 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age between 0 and 18 years at the age of diabetes diagnosis.
  • Patients followed and/or diagnosed within diabetes care agreements of the pediatric endocrinology departments participating in the study.

Who cannot join

  • none

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc - UCLouvain

    Brussels, 1200

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Background/Aims: Diabetes, which affects 420 million people worldwide with a continuously rising incidence, is defined by a state of chronic hyperglycemia; a criterion referring to a heterogeneous group of diseases with various etiologies and distinct therapeutic options. Besides the two main forms of diabetes (i.e., type 1 (T1D) and type 2 (T2D)), there are rare subtypes of the disease called monogenic diabetes (or formerly MODY) that are hardly diagnosed because of their resemblance to T1D or T2D. Since these monogenic diabetes may appear early in life, a consortium of expert pediatric clinical centers was created under a clinical research initiative (the GENEPEDIAB study) to develop tools for accurate diagnosis of rare diabetes and to propose appropriate care to these children and adolescents wrongly assigned to T1D or T2D cohorts. The GENEPEDIAB study was initiated in the context of a broader collaborative project (DiaType) with the objective to develop personalized diabetes medicine and better patient care.

Methods: For discrimination of patients with monogenic diabetes from those with classical forms of diabetes using the MODY probability calculator, patients enrolled in the GENEPEDIAB study are phenotyped and genotyped for T1D risk (anti-islet antibodies and HLA). Patients fulfilling sufficient criteria are then genotyped using the routine MODY panel, before being proposed a thorough gene analysis. More comprehensive genetic tests will be conducted in patients without anomalies found after the MODY gene-sequencing test.

Perspective: the GENEPEDIAB study will enable the investigators to adapt treatment to diabetes etiology and help to provide genetic counseling to patients and their family members. The investigators anticipate that its broad genetic analyses will provide them with important information about the genetic susceptibility of these subgroups of patients with atypical diabetes.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND:

Diabetes currently affects 420 million people worldwide, a number that is expected to increase to 642 million in 2040. This disease is responsible for a high morbidity rate and an overall mortality equivalent to 5 million deaths per year. In Belgium, the prevalence of diabetes is estimated at 8% in adults over 35 years of age, the risk of diabetes being 3 to 5 times higher in populations with high consanguinity, mainly due to the susceptibility to generate recessive genetic variants, which are characteristic of atypical forms of diabetes.

Although diabetes is linearly defined by a state of chronic hyperglycaemia, this criterion refers to a heterogeneous group of diseases of various aetiologies and distinct therapeutic options. Ten to 15% of diabetic patients have insulin-dependent type 1 diabetes (T1D), attributed to autoimmune destruction of insulin-producing beta cells, while 80% of patients have type 2 diabetes (T2DM), treated - inter alia - with oral antidiabetic drugs. Despite the diagnosis of T1D is confirmed by the determination of specific antibodies, DT1 and T2D are clinically characterized by the phenotypic type and evolution of the patient, without recourse to specific etiological and/or pathognomonic criteria. Recently, subtypes of T1D and T2D have been categorized to help the clinician choose the best therapeutic interventions for the patient (i.e., dietary approach, physical activity, oral antidiabetic drugs, insulin, combined therapies).

Monogenic causes of diabetes are less common (up to 5% of all cases) and of recent discovery, their molecular basis having been established in the 1990s, under the name "maturity onset diabetes of the young" (MODY). The diagnosis of a genetic origin of diabetes has multiple consequences, primarily at therapeutic level. Despite the implications of a monogenic diabetes diagnosis, this form remains largely underdiagnosed, and it is accepted that 2 to 3% of active patients within diabetes conventions of care suffer from undetected genetic forms.

AIM:

Screening, using routinely diagnostic tools, of monogenic forms of diabetes in cohorts of paediatric patients with atypical forms of diabetes, who are followed in conventions of care for diabetic patients. After diagnosis of monogenic forms of diabetes, screened patients will be monitored and treated according to international recommendations applied to specifically recognized forms of diabetes.

The aim of GENEPEDIAB study is to improve the diagnosis of atypical forms of diabetes in children and adolescents, and not to evaluate the effects of treatment modification following genetic screening.

INTERVENTION:

  1. Retrospective analysis of data from active and historical diabetic patients within diabetes care conventions of paediatric endocrinology services; screening of patients with atypical diabetes; use of clinical routine tests to allow genetic diagnosis of the condition.
  2. Prospective analysis of the evolution of new diabetic patients followed in paediatric diabetes care conventions; screening of patients with atypical diabetes; use of clinical routine tests to allow genetic diagnosis of the condition.
  3. Screening of patients with atypical diabetes:
  • The monogenic diabetes probability will initially be assessed using the MODY probability calculator (old terminology for monogenic diabetes), which identifies at risk patients based on clinical history (age, sex, body mass index, HbA1C, type of therapy, presence of diabetes in the family). This calculator is available on Internet at www.diabetesgenes.org.
  • In addition, other clinical criteria will be used to improve the sensitivity and specificity of screening for monogenic diabetes.
  1. Genetic diagnosis of the condition:
  • The diagnosis of T1D will first be completed based on factors currently recognized by the International Society for Paediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (ISPAD): anti islet antibodies and at risk HLA genotype. Residual insulin secretion will be also evaluated.
  • Subjects that are detected using criteria described above will be screened using the routine MODY gene sequencing test, which includes GCK, HNF1A, HNF4A, HNF1B, KCNJ11, ABCC8, and INS gene sequencing.
  • More comprehensive genetic tests will be conducted in patients without anomalies found after the MODY gene-sequencing test.

PARTICIPATING SITES:

GENEPEDIAB is a multicentre study that include various diabetes care conventions of paediatric endocrinology services in Belgium.

  • Main site: Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc (UCLouvain), Brussel (Belgium)
  • Principal investigator : Dr. Philippe Lysy, Paediatric Endocrinology Unit
  • Co-investigators : PhD student Sophie Welsch, PhD Caroline Daems, Paediatric Endocrinology Unit
  • Clinical Research Coordinator : Paola Gallo, Paediatric Endocrinology Unit
  • Other sites:
  • CHU ND-des Bruyeres (ULg), Liege (Belgium) - Prof. Marie-Christine Lebrethon;
  • CHU UCL Namur site Mont-Godinne \& CHU UCL Namur site Sainte-Elisabeth (UCLouvain), Namur (Belgium) - Dr. Dominique Beckers \& Dr. Thierry Mouraux;
  • CHC, Liege (Belgium) - Dr. Nicole Seret;
  • Grand Hopital de Charleroi site Notre Dame (GHdC), Charleroi (Belgium) - Dr. Jacques Louis.
Being tested
Mody test
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Mody testGenetic

    Subjects will be screened using a MODY gene-sequencing test, which includes GCK, HNF1A, HNF4A, HNF1B, KCNJ11, ABCC8, and INS gene sequencing.

    More comprehensive genetic tests will be conducted in patients without anomalies found after the MODY gene-sequencing test.

Study groups in NCT04021199
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
T1D GroupActive comparator* Retrospective analysis of data from active and historical diabetic patients within diabetes care conventions of pediatric endocrinology services; screening of patients with atypical diabetes; use of tests used in clinical routine to allow referral to the genetic diagnosis of the condition. * Prospective analysis of the evolution of new diabetic patients followed in pediatric endocrinology services of diabetes care conventions; screening of patients with atypical diabetes; use of tests used in clinical routine to allow the genetic diagnosis of the condition. * Screening of patients with atypical diabetes: first evaluated according to the "MODY" probability calculator. In addition, other clinical criteria will be used to improve the sensitivity and specificity of pediatric monogenic diabetes screening.
Receives: Genetic: Mody test
MODY GroupExperimental* Retrospective analysis of data from active and historical diabetic patients within diabetes care conventions of pediatric endocrinology services; screening of patients with atypical diabetes; use of tests used in clinical routine to allow referral to the genetic diagnosis of the condition. * Prospective analysis of the evolution of new diabetic patients followed in pediatric endocrinology services of diabetes care conventions; screening of patients with atypical diabetes; use of tests used in clinical routine to allow the genetic diagnosis of the condition. * Screening of patients with atypical diabetes: first evaluated according to the "MODY" probability calculator. In addition, other clinical criteria will be used to improve the sensitivity and specificity of pediatric monogenic diabetes screening.
Receives: Genetic: Mody test

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diagnostic of atypical diabetes using follow-up of clinical parameters: Weight

    Weight in kilograms (Kg)

    Measured: At diabetes diagnosis

  2. Diagnostic of atypical diabetes using follow-up of clinical parameters: Height

    Height in meters (m)

    Measured: At diabetes diagnosis

  3. Diagnostic of atypical diabetes using follow-up of clinical parameters: BMI

    Body Mass Index (Kg/m²)

    Measured: At diabetes diagnosis

  4. Diagnostic of atypical diabetes using follow-up of laboratory results: HbA1c (%)

    Glicated hemoglobin (%)

    Measured: from diabetes diagnosis to study inclusion. (The study inclusion will be from 18 months after diagnosis to several years)

  5. Diagnostic of atypical diabetes using follow-up of laboratory results: HbA1c (mmol/mol)

    Glicated hemoglobin (mmol/mol)

    Measured: from diabetes diagnosis to study inclusion. (The study inclusion will be from 18 months after diagnosis to several years)

  6. Diagnostic of atypical diabetes using follow-up of laboratory results: Glycaemia

    Glycaemia (mg/dL)

    Measured: from diabetes diagnosis to study inclusion

  7. Diagnostic of atypical diabetes using follow-up of laboratory results: C-peptide

    C-peptide (pmol/mL)

    Measured: from diabetes diagnosis to study inclusion. (The study inclusion will be from 18 months after diagnosis to several years)

  8. Genetic diagnosis of diabetes: Anti-islets antibodies

    Presence of measurable Anti-islets antibodies

    Measured: from diabetes diagnosis to study inclusion. (The study inclusion will be from 18 months after diagnosis to several years)

  9. Genetic diagnosis of diabetes: HLA genotype

    Presence of at risk HLA genotype

    Measured: from diabetes diagnosis to study inclusion. (The study inclusion will be from 18 months after diagnosis to several years)

  10. Genetic diagnosis of atypical diabetes: MODY gene-sequencing test

    MODY gene-sequencing test (GCK, HNF1A, HNF4A, HNF1B, KCNJ11, ABCC8, and INS gene sequencing)

    Measured: at inclusion in the study

  11. Genetic diagnosis of atypical diabetes: More comprehensive genetic tests

    More comprehensive genetic tests will be conducted in patients without anomalies found after the MODY gene-sequencing test.

    Measured: After MODY gene-sequencing test, from 3 months to 1.5 year after study inclusion

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Jul 2019
  2. Study start22 Oct 2018
  3. Primary completion22 Oct 2021
  4. Study completion22 Jun 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
446 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04021199
Sponsor's protocol ID
GENEPEDIAB
Acronym
GENEPEDIAB
Status last verified
Jul 2022
First submitted
2 Jul 2019
Last updated
15 Jul 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Mody test in people with Diabetes Mellitus and MODY, run by Université Catholique de Louvain at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diagnostic of atypical diabetes using follow-up of clinical parameters: Weight (time frame: At diabetes diagnosis). The study lists 11 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jul 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in