SafetyPIPAC-SecureNCT04014426
Evaluation of Healthcare Workers Safety During Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy
A study testing Blood sample and Urinary sample in people with Safety and Healthy Volunteers, run by Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new treatment that applies chemotherapeutic drugs into the peritoneal cavity as an aerosol. It is used to treat patient with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis (PC). During this procedure, healthcare workers may be under risks of exposure to cytotoxic treatments. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Safety, Healthy Volunteers
- What is being tested?
- Blood sample and Urinary sample
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 18 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 2 Jan 2018to 4 Jul 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female subjects ≥ 18 and ≤ 70 years old
- Exposed subjects: The healthcarers involved in two different PIPAC using oxaliplatin (Surgeon, Anesthesiste, Block nurse …)
- Non-exposed subjects: Healthy volunteers not exposed to oxaliplatin or other platin based chemotherapy (administrative function).
- Must be affiliated to a social security system
- Informed consent agreement and signature
Who cannot join
- Legal incapacity or physical, psychological or mental status interfering with the subject's ability to sign the inform consent or to terminate the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Oxaliplatin Exposure and Security of Healthcare Workers During Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy
Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new treatment that applies chemotherapeutic drugs into the peritoneal cavity as an aerosol. It is used to treat patient with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis (PC). During this procedure, healthcare workers may be under risks of exposure to cytotoxic treatments.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of the heathcare workers and the risk of operation room Oxaliplatin's contamination during a PIPAC.
Read the detailed description
Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), which was long considered as a terminal stage, is now potentially curable. Nevertheless, in most cases, the surgical treatment of PC is limited by the disease extent which is commonly measured with the Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index (PCI). For the patients that are not considered good candidates for resection, there are very few alternatives. Systemic chemotherapy may have limited or no effect therefore an alternative solution is needed for these patients.
Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new treatment that applies chemotherapeutic drugs into the peritoneal cavity as an aerosol under pressure through minimal laparoscopic surgery.
Nevertheless, as it is the case for most technologies, security is not always completely tested. The innovative team started by establishing a set of security rules that concern the operating room ventilation, distance monitoring of the patient during nebulization, evacuation of the aerosols in a closed system. In a work dedicated to occupational hazards, the authors followed the following steps: identification of hazardous substances and dose; identification of possible exposure ways; simulation of the PIPAC procedure with nontoxic aerosols and smoke; redaction of standard operating procedures (SOP); second simulation according to the SOP; informing and training the health care workers; and performance of the first two PIPAC procedures with chemotherapeutic substances and workplace measurements under real conditions. At the end of the study, there were no traces of doxorubicin or cisplatin (the two drugs used in the two consecutive test procedures) in the operating room air, neither to the position of the anesthesiologist, nor of the surgeon.
This study does not concern PIPAC with oxaliplatin, nor does it research the presence of the drugs in the health caregivers.
Therefore we considered mandatory to further investigate occupational hazards in the specific case of oxaliplatin by focusing more on the healthcare workers and partially applying the same protocols as in the case of Heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).
- Conditions
- Safety, Healthy Volunteers
- Being tested
- Blood sample, Urinary sample
- Keywords
- Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, Healthcare Workers, Security, Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy, Aerosols/administration & dosage, Oxaliplatin
- Medical subject headings
- Peritoneal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Blood sampleOther
Exposed group:
- 15 to 30 minutes before the start of the procedure: 1 EDTA tube of 6 ml for blood (T0)
- 2hours after the end of the procedure: 1 EDTA tube of 6 ml (T1)
Non-exposed group:
- During the morning (8 to 10 a.m): 1 EDTA tube of 6 ml (T0)
Urinary sampleOther
Exposed group:
- 15 to 30 min before the PIPAC procedure (T0)
- 2hours after the end of the procedure (T1)
- The next morning after the procedure (T2)
Non-exposed group:
- During the morning (8 to 10 a.m) (T0)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Exposed | Other | Healthcare workers participating at two PIPAC Receives: Other: Blood sample; Other: Urinary sample |
| Non-exposed | Other | Healthy volunteers unexposed to chemotherapy Receives: Other: Blood sample; Other: Urinary sample |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Blood levels of oxaliplatin - Exposed group
Blood levels of oxaliplatin in healthcare workers in two PIPAC
Measured: Change from before PIPAC and 2hours after PIPAC
Blood levels of oxaliplatin - Non-exposed group
Blood levels of oxaliplatin in heathy subject non-exposed to chemotherapy
Measured: At baseline
Urinary levels of oxaliplatin - Exposed group
Urinary levels of oxaliplatin in healthcare workers in two PIPAC
Measured: Change from before PIPAC, 2hours after PIPAC and the next day after PIPAC
Urinary levels of oxaliplatin - Non-exposed group
Urinary levels of oxaliplatin in heathy subject non-exposed to chemotherapy
Measured: At baseline
Secondary outcomes (1)
Oxaliplatin contamination of the operating room
Oxaliplatin dosed on standardized gazes used to clear four different spots in the operating room: the ceiling lamp, the electroagulation device, the laparoscopy tower and the anesthesia monitoring screen
Measured: Before PIPAC and 10min after PIPAC
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Jul 2019
- Study start2 Jan 2018
- Primary completion4 Jul 2018
- Study completion4 Jul 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for SafetyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'AurelleThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Exposed/ Non-exposed
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Olivia SGARBURA, MD, Study chair, ICM - Institut régional du Cancer Montpellier
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04014426
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ICM-URC 2017/36
- Acronym
- PIPAC-Secure
- Status last verified
- Jun 2019
- First submitted
- 1 Jul 2019
- Last updated
- 10 Jul 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Tempfer CB, Celik I, Solass W, Buerkle B, Pabst UG, Zieren J, Strumberg D, Reymond MA. Activity of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) with cisplatin and doxorubicin in women with recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: preliminary clinical experience. Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Feb;132(2):307-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.11.022. Epub 2013 Nov 23.
PubMed 24275155Markman M. Intraperitoneal antineoplastic drug delivery: rationale and results. Lancet Oncol. 2003 May;4(5):277-83. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(03)01074-x.
PubMed 12732164Solass W, Giger-Pabst U, Zieren J, Reymond MA. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC): occupational health and safety aspects. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Oct;20(11):3504-11. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3039-x. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
PubMed 23765417Larroque M, Arnaudguilhem C, Bouyssiere B, Quenet F, Bouazza N, Jarlier M, Boulabas S, Mounicou S, Sgarbura O. Evaluation of the environmental contamination and exposure risk in medical/non-medical staff after oxaliplatin-based pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2021 Oct 15;429:115694. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2021.115694. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
PubMed 34428445
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jul 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Oxaliplatin Exposure and Security of Healthcare Workers During Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04014426
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PIPAC-Secure / ICM-URC 2017/36
- Conditions
- Safety, Healthy Volunteers
- Keywords
- Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, Healthcare Workers, Security, Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy, Aerosols/administration & dosage, Oxaliplatin
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'AurelleUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 4 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 4 Jul 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new treatment that applies chemotherapeutic drugs into the peritoneal cavity as an aerosol. It is used to treat patient with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis (PC). During this procedure, healthcare workers may be under risks of exposure to cytotoxic treatments.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of the heathcare workers and the risk of operation room Oxaliplatin's contamination during a PIPAC.
Detailed description
Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), which was long considered as a terminal stage, is now potentially curable. Nevertheless, in most cases, the surgical treatment of PC is limited by the disease extent which is commonly measured with the Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index (PCI). For the patients that are not considered good candidates for resection, there are very few alternatives. Systemic chemotherapy may have limited or no effect therefore an alternative solution is needed for these patients.
Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new treatment that applies chemotherapeutic drugs into the peritoneal cavity as an aerosol under pressure through minimal laparoscopic surgery.
Nevertheless, as it is the case for most technologies, security is not always completely tested. The innovative team started by establishing a set of security rules that concern the operating room ventilation, distance monitoring of the patient during nebulization, evacuation of the aerosols in a closed system. In a work dedicated to occupational hazards, the authors followed the following steps: identification of hazardous substances and dose; identification of possible exposure ways; simulation of the PIPAC procedure with nontoxic aerosols and smoke; redaction of standard operating procedures (SOP); second simulation according to the SOP; informing and training the health care workers; and performance of the first two PIPAC procedures with chemotherapeutic substances and workplace measurements under real conditions. At the end of the study, there were no traces of doxorubicin or cisplatin (the two drugs used in the two consecutive test procedures) in the operating room air, neither to the position of the anesthesiologist, nor of the surgeon.
This study does not concern PIPAC with oxaliplatin, nor does it research the presence of the drugs in the health caregivers.
Therefore we considered mandatory to further investigate occupational hazards in the specific case of oxaliplatin by focusing more on the healthcare workers and partially applying the same protocols as in the case of Heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Exposed/ Non-exposed
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Exposed | Other | Other: Blood sample, Other: Urinary sampleHealthcare workers participating at two PIPAC |
| Non-exposed | Other | Other: Blood sample, Other: Urinary sampleHealthy volunteers unexposed to chemotherapy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Male or female subjects ≥ 18 and ≤ 70 years old
- Exposed subjects: The healthcarers involved in two different PIPAC using oxaliplatin (Surgeon, Anesthesiste, Block nurse …)
- Non-exposed subjects: Healthy volunteers not exposed to oxaliplatin or other platin based chemotherapy (administrative function).
- Must be affiliated to a social security system
- Informed consent agreement and signature
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Legal incapacity or physical, psychological or mental status interfering with the subject's ability to sign the inform consent or to terminate the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Blood sampleExposed group: * 15 to 30 minutes before the start of the procedure: 1 EDTA tube of 6 ml for blood (T0) * 2hours after the end of the procedure: 1 EDTA tube of 6 ml (T1) Non-exposed group: - During the morning (8 to 10 a.m): 1 EDTA tube of 6 ml (T0) | Other | Exposed, Non-exposed |
| Urinary sampleExposed group: * 15 to 30 min before the PIPAC procedure (T0) * 2hours after the end of the procedure (T1) * The next morning after the procedure (T2) Non-exposed group: - During the morning (8 to 10 a.m) (T0) | Other | Exposed, Non-exposed |
Primary outcome
Blood levels of oxaliplatin - Exposed group
Time frame: Change from before PIPAC and 2hours after PIPAC
Blood levels of oxaliplatin in healthcare workers in two PIPAC
Blood levels of oxaliplatin - Non-exposed group
Time frame: At baseline
Blood levels of oxaliplatin in heathy subject non-exposed to chemotherapy
Urinary levels of oxaliplatin - Exposed group
Time frame: Change from before PIPAC, 2hours after PIPAC and the next day after PIPAC
Urinary levels of oxaliplatin in healthcare workers in two PIPAC
Urinary levels of oxaliplatin - Non-exposed group
Time frame: At baseline
Urinary levels of oxaliplatin in heathy subject non-exposed to chemotherapy
1 secondary outcome
Oxaliplatin contamination of the operating room
Time frame: Before PIPAC and 10min after PIPAC
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jul 2019.
- Background: PubMed 24275155Tempfer CB, Celik I, Solass W, Buerkle B, Pabst UG, Zieren J, Strumberg D, Reymond MA. Activity of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) with cisplatin and doxorubicin in women with recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: preliminary clinical experience. Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Feb;132(2):307-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.11.022. Epub 2013 Nov 23.
- Background: PubMed 12732164Markman M. Intraperitoneal antineoplastic drug delivery: rationale and results. Lancet Oncol. 2003 May;4(5):277-83. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(03)01074-x.
- Background: PubMed 23765417Solass W, Giger-Pabst U, Zieren J, Reymond MA. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC): occupational health and safety aspects. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Oct;20(11):3504-11. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3039-x. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34428445Larroque M, Arnaudguilhem C, Bouyssiere B, Quenet F, Bouazza N, Jarlier M, Boulabas S, Mounicou S, Sgarbura O. Evaluation of the environmental contamination and exposure risk in medical/non-medical staff after oxaliplatin-based pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2021 Oct 15;429:115694. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2021.115694. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Safety
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Extension Study of Safety and Tolerability of DDY391 in Participants With Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis (CDDY391A12201-extension)
Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Enrolling by invitationPhase 3
An Open-Label Study to Assess the Long-Term Safety of Solriamfetol in Children and Adolescents With ADHD
ADHD
Recruiting
Endo-SPONGE for Treatment of Anastomotic or Hartmann's Stump Leakages in Lower Pelvic Area
Anastomotic Leaks, Hartmanns Stump Leakage
Recruiting
Safety and Performance of UCon Patch Electrode
Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence, Urge
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Olivia SGARBURA, MD study chair
ICM - Institut régional du Cancer Montpellier
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Blood sample and Urinary sample in people with Safety and Healthy Volunteers, run by Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Blood levels of oxaliplatin - Exposed group (time frame: Change from before PIPAC and 2hours after PIPAC). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04014426, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jul 2019.