Clinical SkillsNCT03982927
Effect of Short Laparoscopic Skills Workshop on Residents' Knowledge and Skills
An observational study of Clinical Skills, run by Aga Khan University at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
There is no objective data on the outcome of a daylong workshop as commonly offered to the surgical residents by various institutions. Hence we planned a study with the objectives to determine if a one-day laparoscopic skills workshop enhanced the knowledge and skills of surgical residents in minimal access surgery… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Clinical Skills
- What is being tested?
- Laparoscopic skills workshop
- How many people
- 33 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 13 Apr 2016to 15 Jun 2016
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: A non-probability, all-inclusive sampling technique was used. The total number of participants recruited for this study was 33, including 24 residents from General Surgery and 9 residents from Obstetrics \& Gynaecology. For subgroup analysis, the residents were divided into two groups based on their expected exposure to minimal access surgery: Group I: year 1 \& 2 residents Group II: year 3, 4 \& 5 residents
Who may be able to join
- All general surgery and gynaecology residents were invited for participation in the study
Who cannot join
- Any resident who refused voluntary participation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effect of Laparoscopic Skills Workshop on Enhancing Knowledge and Skills of Surgical Residents and Its Comparison With DOPS (Direct Observation of Procedural Skills) Scores - Prospective Cohort Study
There is no objective data on the outcome of a daylong workshop as commonly offered to the surgical residents by various institutions. Hence we planned a study with the objectives to determine if a one-day laparoscopic skills workshop enhanced the knowledge and skills of surgical residents in minimal access surgery and did the workshop scores have any correlation with the Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) scores for the procedures performed in the real life.
The results of our study shall indicate the impact of one-day laparoscopic skills workshop on the knowledge and psychomotor skills of the surgical residents. The skills gained from the workshop shall also be correlated with DOPS scores reflecting the transfer of skills to real life performance.
Read the detailed description
- Introduction and Background:
Teaching and learning of psychomotor skills is of paramount importance for surgical residency programs. The 'traditional' model of teaching surgical skills on 'real' patients using graded responsibility is being seriously questioned. More and more focus has recently shifted on the use of models and simulators, with an objective of better preparation of residents for the operating room experience. At Aga Khan University, the focus of surgical training is still on the traditional model, but some innovations have been introduced to enhance the training outcomes and safety of the patients. The innovations include use of short workshops on bench models to train the residents in basic surgical skills before they can operate on the real patients.
The educational impact of such short workshops has been difficult to document, since a long-term follow up is usually not possible. But some recent data suggests that minimal access skills workshops can improve both the knowledge base and motor skills of the trainees. There is also some data to suggest that the skills obtained during a workshop not only have a long lasting effect on the performance of the residents, but may also result in change in practice of the participants. There is no study available where the educational effect of surgical workshop has been correlated with the real time work place based performance of the surgical residents including DOPS (direct observation of procedural skills). DOPS is a form of work place based assessment of residents' knowledge and skills, and can be used as a surrogate marker for the actual performance of the residents in the real world. Improvement of DOPS scores after the workshop might demonstrate the educational influence of the workshop on the residents' knowledge and skills.
II. Rationale and Objective of the Study:
The section of General Surgery at Aga Khan University offers surgical skills workshops to trainees every year to enhance their knowledge and psychomotor skills for the last many years. There is a general perception amongst the trainees and the faculty that these workshops have been quite valuable in refining the skills of the surgical trainees. However, there is no objective data to support this perception and hence there is a need to document the outcome of this important academic activity.
The basic questions that need to be answered are; if there is an effect of laparoscopic skills workshop on enhancing the knowledge and skills of surgical residents and how do the workshop scores correlate with the DOPS (Direct Observation of Procedural Skills) scores. The results of this study may be used for improving the teaching methods for surgical residents as well as the enthusiasm of the faculty involved in such labor intensive activities.
The objective of our study is to determine the difference in the mean scores of knowledge and skills assessment of surgical residents attending the minimal access skills workshop before and after the workshop; and at an interval of 2 months. The second objective is to compare the workshop scores with the DOPS (Direct Observation of Procedural Skills) scores conducted before and after the workshop during the same study period.
III. Methods:
Study Design: This will be a quasi-experimental, single arm, repeat measure study design. The pre-workshop knowledge and skills scores of residents will be compared with immediate post-workshop scores and scores of repeat assessment at 2 months after the workshop. The scores of DOPS on laparoscopic surgery before and after the workshop will also be compared for any change.
Participants: The trainees enrolled in the residency programs of General Surgery and Obstetrics / Gynecology of Aga Khan University have the mandate of acquiring skills of minimal access surgery as a part of their surgical armamentarium. These residents will be invited to participate in the proposed study and the workshop.
Sample Size \& Groups: A non-probability, all-inclusive sampling technique will be used. A voluntary participation will be required and the expected number of participants has been estimated to be 30+. The residents will be divided into two groups based on their expected exposure to minimal access surgery Group I: year 1 \& 2 residents Group II: year 3, 4 \& 5 residents
Setting: The workshop will be a one-day event and conducted at the Anatomy Dissection Hall of the Aga Khan University.
Pre-workshop Assessment:
There will be an MCQs based pre-test to assess the basic knowledge of the residents. The questions will be related to the knowledge of abdominal anatomy, electro-cautery, harmonic scalpel, laparoscopic instruments, port insertion techniques, physiological effects of laparoscopy, complications and management of laparoscopic surgery.
This will be followed by assessment of baseline psychomotor skills of the residents on laboratory-based models. The skills assessed will focus on port insertion, hand-eye coordination and depth perception.
Intervention: The training workshop will consist of didactic lectures, videos and live demonstrations on the basic knowledge and skills related to the minimal access surgery. The components of workshop will include:
- A lecture focused on introduction to laparoscopic surgery including equipment / instruments, energy sources, operating room setup and team work.
- Video demonstration of various techniques of creating pneumoperitoneum followed by hands-on practice on bench model.
- A tutorial on physiological effects, complications and outcome of laparoscopic surgery.
- Live demonstration of following techniques of minimal access surgery with focus on hand-eye coordination and depth perception, followed by hands-on practice.
- Transfer of bean balls across dishes
- Passing thread through hooks
- Passing rope in graspers / running rope
- Cutting a circle on gauze with endo-scissors The various components of the workshop will be spaced by intervals of refreshment and adequate time for hands-on practice to avoid fatigue. (Please see the attached workshop program for time specifications)
Post-workshop Assessment: The workshop will be followed by an immediate post-course assessment consisting of an MCQ test as well as assessment of psychomotor skills on a previously designed preforma.
Interval Assessment: All the participants of the workshop will be asked to keep a log of their involvement in minimal access procedures during the next two months. The purpose of log keeping is to assess their involvement in such procedures which may have an independent effect on their skills as compared to the influence of the workshop alone. At the end of this period, these residents will be invited to an interval assessment of their surgical skills on a previously designed performa to document the durability of surgical skills.
Assessment of Performance: The technical skills of the residents will be video-recorded at all three stages of assessment. The skills will be scored by two independent surgeons using the GOALS scoring system.18 The scores will be compared for inter-rater reliability and any difference will be sorted out by mutual discussion. Surgery residents routinely perform the DOPS and scores will be taken for DOPS performed on minimal access surgery before and after the workshop.
Statistical Analysis: Demographic data will be described in frequencies / percentage, while the pre and post MCQ / skills mean scores (3 readings) will compared by using repeat measures of ANOVA. Pre and post DOPS scores (2 readings) will be compared by using paired t test. The scores of MCQs, skills and DOPS will be compared by using correlation coefficient (Pearson r).
The effect of year of residency on scores will be analyzed by using one way ANOVA. Construct validity of the intervention will be calculated by comparing the scores of various years / level of experience. Inter-rater reliability of assessors will be assessed by comparing the scores of two assessors (Bald Altman test).
Ethical Clearance: An ethical approval for the conduct of the study will be obtained from the institutional ethics committee. An informed consent will be obtained from the participants for inclusion in the study.
IV. Results:
The detailed results will be given after completion of the study. It is expected that post-workshop knowledge and assessment scores of surgical residents will be better as compared to pre-workshop scores. The performance of residents in DOPS will also improve after the workshop. It is also expected that the scores of the senior residents will be better than the junior residents.
- Conclusions:
The results of the study will objectively establish the effect of surgical skills workshop on enhancing the knowledge and skills of the surgical residents. Te study will also demonstrate the correlation between the workshop and DOPS scores.
- Conditions
- Clinical Skills
- Being tested
- Laparoscopic skills workshop
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Laparoscopic skills workshopOther
One day laparoscopic skills workshop was offered to the surgical residents
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cognitive Skills
MCQ sores before and after the workshop; minimum score: zero; maximum score: 30
Measured: 02 months
Clinical Skills
GOALS (global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills) scale for assessment of clinical skills in laparoscopy. This is a validated tool and has 5 parameters assessed on a Likert scale of 1 to 5. Higher the score, better the value.
Measured: 03 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Clinical Skills (in real life)
Comparison of Direct Observation of Procedural skills (DOPS) Scores before and after the workshop. This is a validated tool used for assessment of procedural skills. It has a number of parameters assessed on a Likert scale of 1 to 3. Higher the score, better the value.
Measured: 06 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jun 2019
- Study start13 Apr 2016
- Primary completion15 Jun 2016
- Study completion15 Jun 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Clinical SkillsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 33 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Aga Khan University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Muhammad Rizwan Khan, Aga Khan University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03982927
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 3011-Sur-ERC-14
- Status last verified
- Jun 2019
- First submitted
- 26 May 2019
- Last updated
- 12 Jun 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: No plan to share individual data
Publications
Khan MR, Shariff AH, Nasim S, Sayyed RH, Effendi MS, Pinjani S. Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Skills Workshop on Enhancing Knowledge and Skills of Surgical Residents and Its Comparison with DOPS (Direct Observation of Procedural Skills) Scores: Prospective Cohort Study. Med Sci Educ. 2020 May 6;30(2):861-867. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-00966-5. eCollection 2020 Jun.
PubMed 34457743
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jun 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Laparoscopic Skills Workshop on Enhancing Knowledge and Skills of Surgical Residents and Its Comparison With DOPS (Direct Observation of Procedural Skills) Scores - Prospective Cohort Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03982927
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 3011-Sur-ERC-14
- Conditions
- Clinical Skills
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 33 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Aga Khan UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 13 Apr 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Jun 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Jun 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
There is no objective data on the outcome of a daylong workshop as commonly offered to the surgical residents by various institutions. Hence we planned a study with the objectives to determine if a one-day laparoscopic skills workshop enhanced the knowledge and skills of surgical residents in minimal access surgery and did the workshop scores have any correlation with the Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) scores for the procedures performed in the real life.
The results of our study shall indicate the impact of one-day laparoscopic skills workshop on the knowledge and psychomotor skills of the surgical residents. The skills gained from the workshop shall also be correlated with DOPS scores reflecting the transfer of skills to real life performance.
Detailed description
- Introduction and Background:
Teaching and learning of psychomotor skills is of paramount importance for surgical residency programs. The 'traditional' model of teaching surgical skills on 'real' patients using graded responsibility is being seriously questioned. More and more focus has recently shifted on the use of models and simulators, with an objective of better preparation of residents for the operating room experience. At Aga Khan University, the focus of surgical training is still on the traditional model, but some innovations have been introduced to enhance the training outcomes and safety of the patients. The innovations include use of short workshops on bench models to train the residents in basic surgical skills before they can operate on the real patients.
The educational impact of such short workshops has been difficult to document, since a long-term follow up is usually not possible. But some recent data suggests that minimal access skills workshops can improve both the knowledge base and motor skills of the trainees. There is also some data to suggest that the skills obtained during a workshop not only have a long lasting effect on the performance of the residents, but may also result in change in practice of the participants. There is no study available where the educational effect of surgical workshop has been correlated with the real time work place based performance of the surgical residents including DOPS (direct observation of procedural skills). DOPS is a form of work place based assessment of residents' knowledge and skills, and can be used as a surrogate marker for the actual performance of the residents in the real world. Improvement of DOPS scores after the workshop might demonstrate the educational influence of the workshop on the residents' knowledge and skills.
II. Rationale and Objective of the Study:
The section of General Surgery at Aga Khan University offers surgical skills workshops to trainees every year to enhance their knowledge and psychomotor skills for the last many years. There is a general perception amongst the trainees and the faculty that these workshops have been quite valuable in refining the skills of the surgical trainees. However, there is no objective data to support this perception and hence there is a need to document the outcome of this important academic activity.
The basic questions that need to be answered are; if there is an effect of laparoscopic skills workshop on enhancing the knowledge and skills of surgical residents and how do the workshop scores correlate with the DOPS (Direct Observation of Procedural Skills) scores. The results of this study may be used for improving the teaching methods for surgical residents as well as the enthusiasm of the faculty involved in such labor intensive activities.
The objective of our study is to determine the difference in the mean scores of knowledge and skills assessment of surgical residents attending the minimal access skills workshop before and after the workshop; and at an interval of 2 months. The second objective is to compare the workshop scores with the DOPS (Direct Observation of Procedural Skills) scores conducted before and after the workshop during the same study period.
III. Methods:
Study Design: This will be a quasi-experimental, single arm, repeat measure study design. The pre-workshop knowledge and skills scores of residents will be compared with immediate post-workshop scores and scores of repeat assessment at 2 months after the workshop. The scores of DOPS on laparoscopic surgery before and after the workshop will also be compared for any change.
Participants: The trainees enrolled in the residency programs of General Surgery and Obstetrics / Gynecology of Aga Khan University have the mandate of acquiring skills of minimal access surgery as a part of their surgical armamentarium. These residents will be invited to participate in the proposed study and the workshop.
Sample Size \& Groups: A non-probability, all-inclusive sampling technique will be used. A voluntary participation will be required and the expected number of participants has been estimated to be 30+. The residents will be divided into two groups based on their expected exposure to minimal access surgery Group I: year 1 \& 2 residents Group II: year 3, 4 \& 5 residents
Setting: The workshop will be a one-day event and conducted at the Anatomy Dissection Hall of the Aga Khan University.
Pre-workshop Assessment:
There will be an MCQs based pre-test to assess the basic knowledge of the residents. The questions will be related to the knowledge of abdominal anatomy, electro-cautery, harmonic scalpel, laparoscopic instruments, port insertion techniques, physiological effects of laparoscopy, complications and management of laparoscopic surgery.
This will be followed by assessment of baseline psychomotor skills of the residents on laboratory-based models. The skills assessed will focus on port insertion, hand-eye coordination and depth perception.
Intervention: The training workshop will consist of didactic lectures, videos and live demonstrations on the basic knowledge and skills related to the minimal access surgery. The components of workshop will include:
- A lecture focused on introduction to laparoscopic surgery including equipment / instruments, energy sources, operating room setup and team work.
- Video demonstration of various techniques of creating pneumoperitoneum followed by hands-on practice on bench model.
- A tutorial on physiological effects, complications and outcome of laparoscopic surgery.
- Live demonstration of following techniques of minimal access surgery with focus on hand-eye coordination and depth perception, followed by hands-on practice.
- Transfer of bean balls across dishes
- Passing thread through hooks
- Passing rope in graspers / running rope
- Cutting a circle on gauze with endo-scissors The various components of the workshop will be spaced by intervals of refreshment and adequate time for hands-on practice to avoid fatigue. (Please see the attached workshop program for time specifications)
Post-workshop Assessment: The workshop will be followed by an immediate post-course assessment consisting of an MCQ test as well as assessment of psychomotor skills on a previously designed preforma.
Interval Assessment: All the participants of the workshop will be asked to keep a log of their involvement in minimal access procedures during the next two months. The purpose of log keeping is to assess their involvement in such procedures which may have an independent effect on their skills as compared to the influence of the workshop alone. At the end of this period, these residents will be invited to an interval assessment of their surgical skills on a previously designed performa to document the durability of surgical skills.
Assessment of Performance: The technical skills of the residents will be video-recorded at all three stages of assessment. The skills will be scored by two independent surgeons using the GOALS scoring system.18 The scores will be compared for inter-rater reliability and any difference will be sorted out by mutual discussion. Surgery residents routinely perform the DOPS and scores will be taken for DOPS performed on minimal access surgery before and after the workshop.
Statistical Analysis: Demographic data will be described in frequencies / percentage, while the pre and post MCQ / skills mean scores (3 readings) will compared by using repeat measures of ANOVA. Pre and post DOPS scores (2 readings) will be compared by using paired t test. The scores of MCQs, skills and DOPS will be compared by using correlation coefficient (Pearson r).
The effect of year of residency on scores will be analyzed by using one way ANOVA. Construct validity of the intervention will be calculated by comparing the scores of various years / level of experience. Inter-rater reliability of assessors will be assessed by comparing the scores of two assessors (Bald Altman test).
Ethical Clearance: An ethical approval for the conduct of the study will be obtained from the institutional ethics committee. An informed consent will be obtained from the participants for inclusion in the study.
IV. Results:
The detailed results will be given after completion of the study. It is expected that post-workshop knowledge and assessment scores of surgical residents will be better as compared to pre-workshop scores. The performance of residents in DOPS will also improve after the workshop. It is also expected that the scores of the senior residents will be better than the junior residents.
- Conclusions:
The results of the study will objectively establish the effect of surgical skills workshop on enhancing the knowledge and skills of the surgical residents. Te study will also demonstrate the correlation between the workshop and DOPS scores.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- A non-probability, all-inclusive sampling technique was used. The total number of participants recruited for this study was 33, including 24 residents from General Surgery and 9 residents from Obstetrics \& Gynaecology. For subgroup analysis, the residents were divided into two groups based on their expected exposure to minimal access surgery: Group I: year 1 \& 2 residents Group II: year 3, 4 \& 5 residents
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All general surgery and gynaecology residents were invited for participation in the study
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Any resident who refused voluntary participation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Laparoscopic skills workshopOne day laparoscopic skills workshop was offered to the surgical residents | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Cognitive Skills
Time frame: 02 months
MCQ sores before and after the workshop; minimum score: zero; maximum score: 30
Clinical Skills
Time frame: 03 months
GOALS (global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills) scale for assessment of clinical skills in laparoscopy. This is a validated tool and has 5 parameters assessed on a Likert scale of 1 to 5. Higher the score, better the value.
1 secondary outcome
Clinical Skills (in real life)
Time frame: 06 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jun 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34457743Khan MR, Shariff AH, Nasim S, Sayyed RH, Effendi MS, Pinjani S. Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Skills Workshop on Enhancing Knowledge and Skills of Surgical Residents and Its Comparison with DOPS (Direct Observation of Procedural Skills) Scores: Prospective Cohort Study. Med Sci Educ. 2020 May 6;30(2):861-867. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-00966-5. eCollection 2020 Jun.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. No plan to share individual data
Related trials for Clinical Skills
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Validation of the Healthcare Relationship Assessment Scale (ERA) in Health Sciences Students.
Health Adult Subjects, Communication
Recruiting
Advancing Skills Through Consultation, Education, and Novel Technologies
PTSD - Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Gamified Neonatal Initial Care Education on Midwifery Students
Midwifery Education, Neonatal Care Education
Not yet recruiting
Effects of EbeCast Digital Learning on Midwifery Students' Women's Health Skills
Midwifery Education, Clinical Skills Training
Recruiting
Peripheral Venous Access Management by Radiologic Technologists in Radiodiagnostic Procedure
Skill Development of Staff, Clinical Practice
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Clinical Skills, run by Aga Khan University at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jun 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cognitive Skills (time frame: 02 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03982927, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jun 2019.