Arthritis, RheumatoidNCT03981900
IDentification of Factors Predictive of Tofacitinib's Survival in Patient With Rheumatoid Arthritis
An observational study of Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Pfizer at 66 sites in France.
Trial summary
Regarding Tofacitinib, newly introduced on the market, few data on drug retention and no data on the factors predictive of Tofacitinib drug survival in patients with RA are available. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- What is being tested?
- Tofacitinib
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- How many people
- 314 participants
- Where
- 66 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 4 Jan 2019to 6 Feb 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with a diagnosis of moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis for whom the rheumatologist has decided to initiate a treatment with Tofacitinib
Who may be able to join
- Patient 18 years of age or older
- Patient in whom the diagnosis of moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis has been confirmed by a rheumatologist
- Patient for whom the rheumatologist decides to initiate treatment with Tofacitinib
- Patient informed of the study
Who cannot join
- Patient participating in a randomised clinical trial.
- Patient presenting with a contraindication to prescription of Tofacitinib
- Patients who are investigational site staff members or patients who are Pfizer employees directly involved in the conduct of the trial.
Trial locations and contacts
66 sites in 1 country.
66 sites in 1 country
France66 sites
Centre Hospitalier D'arras
Arras, 62022
Hopital Robert Ballanger
Aulnay-sous-Bois, 93602
Cabinet Medical
Aurillac, 15000
Centre Hospitalier D Auxerre
Auxerre, 89011
Institut Calot Helio Marin
Berck, 62600
hopital Avicenne
Bobigny, 93009
Centre Hospitalier de Fleyriat
Bourg-en-Bresse, 01012
Hopital Jacques Cœur
Bourges, 18020
Cabinet Medical
Brest, 29200
Cabinet Medical
Brive-la-Gaillarde, 19100
Cabinet Medical
Bruges, 33520
Centre Hospitalier Jean Rougier
Cahors, 46005
Infirmerie Protestante de Lyon
Caluire-et-Cuire, 69641
Hopital Pierre Nouveau
Cannes, 06414
Centre Hospitalier de Carcassonne
Carcassonne, 11010
Hopital Gabriel Montpied
Clermont-Ferrand, 63003
Centre Hospitalier de Compiegne
Compiègne, 60321
Hopital Henri Mondor
Créteil, 94010
Hopital Victor Jousselin
Dreux, 28102
Centre Hospitalier des Deux Vallees Juvisy
Juvisy-sur-Orge, 91265
Cabinet Medical
La Battie Vieille, 05000
Cabinet Medical
La Moutonne, 83260
Centre Hospitalier Departemental Vendee Les Oudairies
La Roche-sur-Yon, 85925
Hopital Suburbain Du Bouscat
Le Bouscat, 33110
Hopital Suburbain
Le Bouscat, 33491
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille - Hopital B Roger Salengro
Lille, 59037
Hopital B Roger Salengro-chu De Lille
Lille, 59037
Hopital Dupuytren
Limoges, 87042
Cabinet Medical
Limoges, 87100
Clinique de La Sauvegarde / Cabinet Le Trait D Union
Lyon, 69009
Clinique de la Sauvegarde
Lyon, 69337
Clinique du Pont de Chaume
Montauban, 82000
Centre Hospitalier de Montauban
Montauban, 82013
Centre Hospitalier Montceau Les Mines-Hopital Jean Bouveri
Montceau-les-Mines, 71307
Hopital Jacques Monod
Montivilliers, 76290
Cabinet Medical
Montpellier, 34000
Cabinet Medical Saint Roch
Montpellier, 34070
Clinique Beau Soleil
Montpellier, 34070
Hopital Lapeyronie
Montpellier, 34295
Hopital Caremeau
Nîmes, 30029
Centre Hospitalier Orleans-Hopital La Source
Orléans, 45067
Cabinet Medical
Paris, 75008
Centre Hospitalier Pitie Salpetriere
Paris, 75651
Hopital Cochin
Paris, 75679
Hopital Bichat Claude Bernard
Paris, 75877
Centre Hospitalier de Perigueux
Périgueux, 24019
Hospices Civils de Lyon - Hopital Lyon Sud- Hematologie
Pierre-Bénite, 69495
Cabinet Medical
Poitiers, 86000
Centre Hospitalier La Miletrie
Poitiers, 86021
Centre Hospitalier Annecy Genevois Site Annecy
Pringy, 74374
Hopital Charles Nicolle
Rouen, 76031
Cabinet Medical
Saint-Lô, 50000
Hopital Inter-armees Begin
Saint-Mandé, 94163
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierre
Saint-Pierre, 97410
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Etienne Hopital Nord
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42277
Hopital Nord
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42277
Centre Hospitalier de Bigorre Site La Gespe
Tarbes, 65013
Clinique Medipole Garonne
Toulouse, 31036
Hopital Purpan
Toulouse, 31059
Cabinet Medical
Toulouse, 31400
Cabinet de Rhumatologie
Tours, 37000
Cabinet Medical
Tours, 37000
Hopital des Hauts Clos
Troyes, 10003
Cabinet Medical
Valenciennes, 59322
Hopital Psv
Villeneuve-sur-Lot, 47305
Cabinet Medical
Vincennes, 94300
About this study
Official title: IDentification of Predictive Factors of Continuation of Treatment With Tofacitinib in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in Common Practice and the Impact of the Patient's Behavioural Strategies on Clinical Parameters: The DeFacTo Study.
Regarding Tofacitinib, newly introduced on the market, few data on drug retention and no data on the factors predictive of Tofacitinib drug survival in patients with RA are available.
Therefore, the primary objective of the DeFacTo study will be to identify the factors predictive of Tofacitinib drug survival in patients with RA.
As secondary objectives, the impact of behavioural strategies on drug survival and other clinical parameters as well as Tofacitinib effectiveness and tolerability will be studied under real-life conditions of use in French patients with RA.
Read the detailed description
This is an observational, open-label, prospective, multi-centre, national study designed to evaluate the factors predictive of Tofacitinib's survival in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
If catastrophisation is described as a distortion of the perception of pain involving a both emotional and cognitive component, pushing the patient to see only the worst, coping involves adaptive strategies by which the patient attempts to find solutions in order to better cope with his/her disease. It has been demonstrated that such behavioural strategies can influence directly or indirectly the intensity of symptoms in patients suffering from chronic disease.
Therefore, as secondary objectives, the impact of behavioural strategies on drug survival and other clinical parameters as well as Tofacitinib effectiveness and tolerability will be studied under real-life conditions of use in French patients with RA.
The duration of this study will be approximately 48 months including a 24-month recruitment period and a 24-month patient follow-up period.
Patients will be followed prospectively and follow-up visits will be conducted after the initial consultations. No visit or additional test is required by the protocol, since the study is observational
- Conditions
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- Being tested
- Tofacitinib
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TofacitinibDrug
Also called Xeljanz
5 mg BID, oral administrtaion
TofacitinibDrug
Also called Xeljanz
tablet form 11mg once daily oral
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Rheumatoid arthritis | All participants with a diagnosis of moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis and treated with Tofacitinib Receives: Drug: Tofacitinib |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Duration of Tofacitinib Drug Survival
The duration of tofacitinib drug survival was calculated as: date of permanent drug discontinuation minus date of first taking the drug + 1. If a participant did not present with the event of interest, that is they did not have a permanent drug discontinuation record during the study, then they were censored at the time of their last visit. Kaplan-Meier method was used for estimation.
Measured: Date of initiation of study drug treatment up to date of permanent drug discontinuation or date of censoring (up to a maximum of 48 months)
Secondary outcomes (23)
Change From Baseline in Total Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS) Score at Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
PCS is a 13 item questionnaire around thoughts and emotions experienced during pain, with each question scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time), where higher scores indicated worse condition. There are three subscales of PCS: rumination (thinking deeply) [4 items], exaggeration [3 items] and helplessness [6 items]. Total scores and domain scores are derived by summing the scores of the individual items. Overall possible Total PCS score range is 0 to 52, where higher scores signifies worse condition. A total score of greater than or equal to (>=) 20 indicates a clinically relevant level of catastrophising. Mean change from baseline in total PCS score is reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change From Baseline in Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) Score at Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
CSQ evaluates cognitive coping, has 21 items and 5 domains in its French version. For each item, participants rate the frequency of their use of each coping strategy on a 4- point Likert-type scale (0= Never, 1= sometimes, 2= often and 3= very often). Domain scores are derived by summing the individual items scores that make-up the domain. Five domains with score range: distraction (5 items, score range: 0 to 15), catastrophising (4 items, score range: 0 to 12), distancing from pain (4 items, score range: 0 to 12), ignoring pain sensations (5 items, score range: 0 to 15) and praying (3 items, score range: 0 to 9). For each domain, higher scores indicated worse condition. Mean change from baseline in CSQ domain scores are reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6 12, 18 and 24
Percentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity (LDA) According to Disease Activity Index 28 (DAS28)-4 Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) (<=3.2)
DAS28-4 ESR is a composite endpoint, calculated using 4 variables (represented by '4' in the name). Components includes: Tender Joint Count (TJC) with 28 joints assessed, Swollen Joint Count (SJC) with 28 joints assessed, ESR (millimeter per hours [mm/h]) and Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) recorded on 100 mm VAS (scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity). The calculation of DAS28-4 ESR is as follows: 0.56 * square root (sqrt) (TJC) + 0.28 * sqrt (SJC) + 0.70* In (ESR) + 0.014* (PtGA); where ln = natural logarithm. Total DAS28-4 score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28(ESR) score of <=3.2 indicates LDA. Percentage of participants with DAS28-4 ESR <=3.2 is presented in this outcome measure.
Measured: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12 18, and 24
Percentage of Participants With LDA According to DAS28-4 C Reactive Protein (CRP) (<=3.2)
DAS28-4 CRP is a composite endpoint, calculated using 4 variables (represented by '-4' in the name). Components includes: TJC with 28 joints assessed, SJC with 28 joints assessed, CRP (mg/L) and PtGA recorded on 100 mm VAS (scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity). The calculation of DAS28-4 CRP is as follows: 0.56 * sqrt (TJC) + 0.28 * sqrt (SJC) + 0.36 * ln (CRP+l) + 0.014*PtGA + 0.96; where ln = natural logarithm. Total DAS28-4 score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28(CRP) score of <=3.2 indicates LDA. Percentage of participants with DAS28-4 CRP <=3.2 is presented in this outcome measure.
Measured: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12 18, and 24
Percentage of Participants With LDA According to Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) <=11
SDAI is a composite end point, calculated as TJC + SJC (both using 28 joints) + PtGA (0-10 cm scale, higher score=more disease activity) + Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) (0-10 cm scale, higher score=more disease activity) + CRP (milligrams per deciliter [mg/dL]). The SDAI score is classified into four categories: remission (<=3.3), low (>3.3-11), moderate (>11-26), and high (>26) disease activity. The SDAI score ranges from 0 to 86 where higher scores indicates high disease activity. SDAI score of <=11 indicates LDA. Percentage of participants with SDAI <=11 is presented in this outcome measure.
Measured: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12 18, and 24
Percentage of Participants With LDA According to Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) <=10
CDAI is a composite end point, calculated as TJC + SJC (both using 28 joints) + PtGA (0-10 cm scale, higher score=more disease activity) + PhGA (0-10 cm scale, higher score=more disease activity). The CDAI score is classified into four categories: remission (<=2.8), low (>2.8-10), moderate (>10-22), and high (>22) disease activity. The CDAI score ranges from 0 to 76, where higher scores indicates high disease activity. CDAI score of <=10 indicates LDA. Percentage of participants with CDAI <=10 is presented in this outcome measure.
Measured: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12 18, and 24
Percentage of Participants With Remission According to DAS28-4 ESR<2.6
DAS28-4 ESR is a composite endpoint, calculated using 4 variables (represented by '-4' in the name). Components includes: TJC with 28 joints assessed, SJC with 28 joints assessed, ESR (mm/h) and PtGA recorded on 100 mm VAS (scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity). The calculation of DAS28-4 ESR is as follows: 0.56 * sqrt (TJC) + 0.28 * sqrt (SJC) + 0.70* In(ESR) + 0.014* (PtGA); where ln = natural logarithm. Total DAS28-4 score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28(ESR) score of <2.6 indicates LDA. Percentage of participants with DAS28-4 ESR <2.6 is presented in this outcome measure.
Measured: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12 18, and 24
Percentage of Participants With Remission According to DAS28-4 CRP <2.6
DAS28-4 CRP is a composite endpoint, calculated using 4 variables (represented by '-4' in the name). Components includes: TJC with 28 joints assessed, SJC with 28 joints assessed, CRP (mg/L) and PtGA recorded on 100 mm VAS (scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity). The calculation of DAS28-4 CRP is as follows: 0.56 * sqrt (TJC) + 0.28 * sqrt (SJC) + 0.36 * ln (CRP+l) + 0.014*PtGA + 0.96; where ln = natural logarithm. Total DAS28-4 score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28(CRP) score of <2.6 indicates LDA. Percentage of participants with DAS28-4 CRP <2.6 is presented in this outcome measure.
Measured: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12 18, and 24
Percentage of Participants in Remission According to SDAI <=3.3
SDAI is a composite end point, calculated as TJC + SJC (both using 28 joints) + PtGA (0-10 cm scale, higher score=more disease activity) + PhGA (0-10 cm scale, higher score=more disease activity) + CRP (mg/dL). The SDAI score is classified into four categories: remission (<=3.3), low (>3.3-11), moderate (>11-26), and high (>26) disease activity. The SDAI score ranges from 0 to 86 where higher scores indicates high disease activity. SDAI score of <=3.3 indicates LDA. Percentage of participants with SDAI <=3.3 is presented in this outcome measure.
Measured: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12 18, and 24
Percentage of Participants in Remission According to CDAI<=2.8
CDAI is a composite end point, calculated as TJC + SJC (both using 28 joints) + PtGA (0-10 cm scale) + PhGA (0-10 cm scale). The CDAI score is classified into four categories: remission (<=2.8), low (>2.8-10), moderate (>10-22), and high (>22) disease activity. The CDAI score ranges from 0 to 76, where higher scores indicates high disease activity. CDAI score of <=2.8 indicates LDA. Percentage of participants with CDAI <=2.8 is presented in this outcome measure.
Measured: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12 18, and 24
Percentage of Participants With Remission According to American College of Rheumatology-European League Against Rheumatism (ACR-EULAR) 2011 Boolean Criteria
ACREULAR 2011 Boolean criteria is derived as: ACR Remission = 1, if SJC (using 28 joints) <=1, TJC (using 28 joints) <=1, CRP <=1 mg/dL, and PtGA (0 to 10 cm scale, higher score=more disease activity) <=1 centimeter (cm) otherwise ACR remission =0. Higher scores indicated greater affection due to disease activity. Percentage of participants with remission according to ACR-EULAR 2011 Boolean criteria is reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12 18, and 24
Change From Baseline in DAS28-4 ESR Score at Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
DAS28-4 ESR is a composite endpoint, calculated using 4 variables (represented by '-4' in the name). Components includes: TJC with 28 joints assessed, SJC with 28 joints assessed, ESR (mm/h) and PtGA recorded on 100 mm VAS (scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity). The calculation of DAS28-4 ESR is as follows: 0.56 * sqrt (TJC) + 0.28 * sqrt (SJC) + 0.70* In(ESR) + 0.014* (PtGA); where ln = natural logarithm. Total DAS28-4 score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score=more disease activity. Mean change from baseline in DAS28-4 ESR score at months 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 is presented in this outcome measure.
Measured: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24
Change From Baseline in DAS28-4 CRP Score at Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
DAS28-4 CRP is a composite endpoint, calculated using 4 variables (represented by '-4' in the name). Components includes: TJC with 28 joints assessed, SJC with 28 joints assessed, CRP (mg/L) and PtGA recorded on 100 mm VAS (scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity). The calculation of DAS28-4 CRP is as follows: 0.56 * sqrt (TJC) + 0.28 * sqrt (SJC) + 0.36 * ln (CRP+l) + 0.014*PtGA + 0.96; where ln = natural logarithm. Total DAS28-4 score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score=more disease activity. Mean change from baseline in DAS28-4 CRP score at months 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 is presented in this outcome measure.
Measured: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24
Number of Participants Responding To Treatment by Considering DAS28 (EULAR Criterion)
28 EULAR criteria to evaluate participant's response to treatment is categorised as good responder, moderate responder and non-responder based on participants DAS28-4 CRP score and decrease in DAS28-4 CRP compared to initial pre-treatment visit (Visit 0 [V0]). Good response: DAS28 at treatment visit <= 3.2 and decrease in DAS 28 compared to V0 >1.2. Moderate responder: DAS28 at treatment visit > 3.2 to <= 5.1 or > 5.1 and decrease in DAS 28 compared to V0 >1.2 DAS28 at treatment visit <= 3.2 or > 3.2 to <= 5.1 and decrease in DAS 28 compared to V0 >0.6 and <=1.2. Non-responder: DAS28 at treatment visit > 5.1 and decrease in DAS 28 compared to V0 >0.6 to <=1.2 DAS28 at treatment visit <= 3.2 or > 3.2 to <= 5.1 or > 5.1 and decrease in DAS 28 compared to V0 <=0.6. Number of participants responding to treatment by considering DAS28 (EULAR criterion) is reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24
Change From Baseline in TJC at Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
TJC (28) is the count of the total number of tender joints out of a possible 28 joints which are checked at the visit. TJC was used to measure the pain and inflammation in the joints. Mean change from baseline in TJC is reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24
Change From Baseline in SJC at Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
SJC (28) is the count of the total number of swollen joints out of a possible 28 joints which are checked at the visit. SJC was used to measure the pain and inflammation in the joints. Mean change from baseline in TJC is reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24
Number of Participants With Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool (FiRST) Questionnaire Response
FiRST is used to detect fibromyalgia in participants with diffuse rheumatic pain. It is a questionnaire which contains 6 items: diffuse pain, painful symptoms, fatigue, sleep and cognitive disorders, nonpainful abnormal sensations and functional somatic symptoms. Each of the 6 items contain yes or no response, and a positive answer to 5 out of the 6 answers can detect fibromyalgia. At each specified time points number of participants with "Yes" or "No" to fibromyalgia is reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Morning stiffness is a common symptom of rheumatoid arthritis. The duration of morning stiffness is measured in minutes. Mean change from baseline in morning stiffness is reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Number of Participants Based on Response to Girerd Questionnaire at Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Girerd questionnaire is used to evaluate participant's treatment compliance and is made up of 6 yes or no questions. lf the participant responds "no" to all questions, it is considered as participant is a good complier. lf the participant responds "yes" once or twice, it is considered as participant is a minor complier. lf the participant responds "yes" three times or more, it is considered as participant is a no-complier.
Measured: Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life (EuroQoL) 5-Dimension 3 Levels of Severity (EQ-5D-3L) Index Score at Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
EQ-5D-3L is a standardized, participant administered measure of self-reported instrument used to evaluate health-related quality of life. It consists of two parts: EQ-5D index score (Part I) and the EQ-VAS (Part II). For Part I, i.e. EQ-5D-3L index score, participants rated their current health state on 5 single-item dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression with each dimension having three levels of function:. 1=no problems, 2=some problems and 3=extreme problems. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score was transformed and results in a total index score range of 0 to 1.00; higher scores indicating a better health condition. Mean change from baseline in EQ-5D-3L index score is reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change From Baseline in Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12) Score at Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
SF-12 was a participant reported outcome survey that represented overall health status by measuring 8 health-related aspects of an individual: Physical Functioning (PF), Role-Physical (RP), Bodily Pain (BP), General Health (GH), Vitality (VT), Social Functioning (SF), Role-Emotional (RE) and Mental Health (MH). The score range for each of the 8 health aspects was from 0 (poor health) to 100 (better health), higher scores indicating good health condition. Responses on the SF-12 were also used to calculate 2 summary scores: Physical component score (PCS) and mental component score (MCS). The score range for each of these 2 summary scores was from 0 (poor health) to 100 (better health), where 100 indicated good health condition. Mean change from baseline in PCS and MCS scores are reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Total Score at Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
FACIT-Fatigue questionnaire consists of 13 self-evaluated questions. Each question has a response of values 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Score for each question is calculated by first reversing negatively stated-items (subtracting the response from '4' except for the 2 positively stated-items) and then summing the raw (0-4) scores. The FACIT-Fatigue total score is derived by summing the response to each question which gives a value between 0 (worse score) and 52 (best score). Higher scores represent better participant's status (less fatigue). Mean change from baseline in FACIT-Fatigue total score is reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Number of Participants With Tofacitinib Tolerance Issue
Number of participants who discontinued tofacitinib due to tolerance issue.
Measured: Month 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jun 2019
- Study start4 Jan 2019
- Primary completion6 Feb 2023
- Study completion6 Feb 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Arthritis, RheumatoidStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 314 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03981900
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A3921313
- Other IDs
- DeFacTo
- Status last verified
- Jun 2024
- First submitted
- 7 Jun 2019
- Last updated
- 1 Oct 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Oct 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- IDentification of Predictive Factors of Continuation of Treatment With Tofacitinib in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in Common Practice and the Impact of the Patient's Behavioural Strategies on Clinical Parameters: The DeFacTo Study.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03981900
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A3921313
- Conditions
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 314 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 4 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 6 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 6 Feb 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 1 Oct 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Regarding Tofacitinib, newly introduced on the market, few data on drug retention and no data on the factors predictive of Tofacitinib drug survival in patients with RA are available.
Therefore, the primary objective of the DeFacTo study will be to identify the factors predictive of Tofacitinib drug survival in patients with RA.
As secondary objectives, the impact of behavioural strategies on drug survival and other clinical parameters as well as Tofacitinib effectiveness and tolerability will be studied under real-life conditions of use in French patients with RA.
Detailed description
This is an observational, open-label, prospective, multi-centre, national study designed to evaluate the factors predictive of Tofacitinib's survival in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
If catastrophisation is described as a distortion of the perception of pain involving a both emotional and cognitive component, pushing the patient to see only the worst, coping involves adaptive strategies by which the patient attempts to find solutions in order to better cope with his/her disease. It has been demonstrated that such behavioural strategies can influence directly or indirectly the intensity of symptoms in patients suffering from chronic disease.
Therefore, as secondary objectives, the impact of behavioural strategies on drug survival and other clinical parameters as well as Tofacitinib effectiveness and tolerability will be studied under real-life conditions of use in French patients with RA.
The duration of this study will be approximately 48 months including a 24-month recruitment period and a 24-month patient follow-up period.
Patients will be followed prospectively and follow-up visits will be conducted after the initial consultations. No visit or additional test is required by the protocol, since the study is observational
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Rheumatoid arthritis | – | Drug: TofacitinibAll participants with a diagnosis of moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis and treated with Tofacitinib |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with a diagnosis of moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis for whom the rheumatologist has decided to initiate a treatment with Tofacitinib
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patient 18 years of age or older
- Patient in whom the diagnosis of moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis has been confirmed by a rheumatologist
- Patient for whom the rheumatologist decides to initiate treatment with Tofacitinib
- Patient informed of the study
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patient participating in a randomised clinical trial.
- Patient presenting with a contraindication to prescription of Tofacitinib
- Patients who are investigational site staff members or patients who are Pfizer employees directly involved in the conduct of the trial.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TofacitinibAlso: Xeljanz5 mg BID, oral administrtaion | Drug | Rheumatoid arthritis |
| TofacitinibAlso: Xeljanztablet form 11mg once daily oral | Drug | Rheumatoid arthritis |
Primary outcome
Duration of Tofacitinib Drug Survival
Time frame: Date of initiation of study drug treatment up to date of permanent drug discontinuation or date of censoring (up to a maximum of 48 months)
The duration of tofacitinib drug survival was calculated as: date of permanent drug discontinuation minus date of first taking the drug + 1. If a participant did not present with the event of interest, that is they did not have a permanent drug discontinuation record during the study, then they were censored at the time of their last visit. Kaplan-Meier method was used for estimation.
23 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Total Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS) Score at Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change From Baseline in Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) Score at Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6 12, 18 and 24
Percentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity (LDA) According to Disease Activity Index 28 (DAS28)-4 Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) (<=3.2)
Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12 18, and 24
Percentage of Participants With LDA According to DAS28-4 C Reactive Protein (CRP) (<=3.2)
Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12 18, and 24
Percentage of Participants With LDA According to Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) <=11
Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12 18, and 24
Percentage of Participants With LDA According to Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) <=10
Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12 18, and 24
Percentage of Participants With Remission According to DAS28-4 ESR<2.6
Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12 18, and 24
Percentage of Participants With Remission According to DAS28-4 CRP <2.6
Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12 18, and 24
Percentage of Participants in Remission According to SDAI <=3.3
Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12 18, and 24
Percentage of Participants in Remission According to CDAI<=2.8
Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12 18, and 24
Percentage of Participants With Remission According to American College of Rheumatology-European League Against Rheumatism (ACR-EULAR) 2011 Boolean Criteria
Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12 18, and 24
Change From Baseline in DAS28-4 ESR Score at Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24
Change From Baseline in DAS28-4 CRP Score at Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24
Number of Participants Responding To Treatment by Considering DAS28 (EULAR Criterion)
Time frame: Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24
Change From Baseline in TJC at Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24
Change From Baseline in SJC at Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24
Number of Participants With Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool (FiRST) Questionnaire Response
Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Number of Participants Based on Response to Girerd Questionnaire at Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Time frame: Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life (EuroQoL) 5-Dimension 3 Levels of Severity (EQ-5D-3L) Index Score at Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change From Baseline in Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12) Score at Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Total Score at Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Number of Participants With Tofacitinib Tolerance Issue
Time frame: Month 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Oct 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Related trials for Arthritis, Rheumatoid
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
66 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Pfizer at 66 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 66 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Oct 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Duration of Tofacitinib Drug Survival (time frame: Date of initiation of study drug treatment up to date of permanent drug discontinuation or date of censoring (up to a maximum of 48 months)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2024.