AzTrials
AzTrials

Quality ControlDALDIMNCT03977636

Determinants of Time Required by Medical Information Technicians for Quality Control of Hospital Activity Coding

An observational study of Quality Control, run by Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Since 2008, in France, hospital funding is determined by the nature of activities provided (activity-based funding). Quality control of hospital activity coding is essential to optimize hospital remuneration. There is a need for reliable tools to allocate human resources wisely in order to improve these controls. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Quality Control
How many people
5,431 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
22 Mar 2016to 1 Jun 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients admitted to the Regional Hospital of Metz-Thionville

Who may be able to join

  • To be admitted to a medical unit of the CHR Metz Thionville

Who cannot join

  • Any exclusion criteria

About this study

Official title: Determinants of Time Required by Medical Information Technicians for Quality Control of Hospital Activity Coding, in French Medico-administrative System

Since 2008, in France, hospital funding is determined by the nature of activities provided (activity-based funding). Quality control of hospital activity coding is essential to optimize hospital remuneration. There is a need for reliable tools to allocate human resources wisely in order to improve these controls.

Read the detailed description

The main objective of this study was to identify the determinants of time needed by medical information technicians to control hospital activity coding in a Regional Hospital Center.

From March 2016 to the beginning of January 2017, medical information technicians reported the time they spent on each quality control, and the time they needed when they had to code the entire stay. Multiple linear regressions were performed to identify the determinants of quality control or coding duration. A split sample validation was used: model was created on one half of the sample and validated on the remaining half.

Conditions
Quality Control
Keywords
Diagnosis-related groups, Activity-based funding

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time for quality control

    medical information technicians reported the time they spent on each quality control

    Measured: Day 1

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Time to code the entire stay

    medical information technicians reported the time they needed when they had to code the entire stay

    Measured: Day 1

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Jun 2019
  2. Study start22 Mar 2016
  3. Primary completion18 Jan 2017
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
5,431 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03977636
Sponsor's protocol ID
2016-09Obs-CHRMT
Acronym
DALDIM
Status last verified
Jun 2019
First submitted
5 Jun 2019
Last updated
6 Jun 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Quality Control, run by Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jun 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time for quality control (time frame: Day 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jun 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in