AzTrials
AzTrials

Quadratus Lumborum BlockEarly Phase 1NCT03973398

Anterior vs. Posterior Quadratus Lumborum Block in Nephrectomy Patients

A Early Phase 1 study testing Quadratus Lumborum block in people with Quadratus Lumborum Block, run by Sherif Mahmoud Mohammed Bekhet.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Primary outcome: to compare the efficacy of Anterior subcostal versus Posterior approach in ultrasound guided Quadratus Lumborum Block. Secondary outcome: to evaluate the efficacy of Quadratus Lumborum Block in the control of postoperative pain in patients undergoing Nephrectomy surgery, hemodynamics, any… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years
Conditions the study is for
Quadratus Lumborum Block
What is being tested?
Quadratus Lumborum block
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
120 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Jul 2020to 1 Sep 2021
Phase
Early Phase 1
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Both sex
  • Age: 18-60 years.
  • ASA I and II
  • Elective surgery

Who cannot join

  • Patient's refusal.
  • Allergy to local anesthetics.
  • Peripheral neuropathy.
  • Bleeding diathesis.
  • Inflammation or infection over injection site.
  • Morbid obesity.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Patients on previous opioid therapy.
  • Psychiatric disorders.
  • Emergency surgery

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

About this study

Official title: 1.1 English Title of Research Project: Comparing the Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block Anterior Subcostal Versus Posterior Approach in Managing Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Nephrectomy Surger: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Double Blinded Study

  • Primary outcome: to compare the efficacy of Anterior subcostal versus Posterior approach in ultrasound guided Quadratus Lumborum Block.
  • Secondary outcome: to evaluate the efficacy of Quadratus Lumborum Block in the control of postoperative pain in patients undergoing Nephrectomy surgery, hemodynamics, any complications and patients' satisfaction..
Read the detailed description

A variant of the ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block was first described in an abstract, in which local anesthetic injection occurs at the point where the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles taper off and adjoin the lateral border of quadratus lumborum (QL) muscle.

Currently, the QL block is performed as one of the perioperative pain management procedures for all generations (pediatrics, pregnant, and adult) undergoing abdominal surgery.

However, there is large disagreement regarding the best approach for administering the block because of unclear mechanisms responsible for the effects and complicated nomenclature system. Nephrectomy for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was first described in 1969. Surgical treatment varies with the pathology. Simple nephrectomy is the preferred option for those with non-neoplastic disease (e.g. trauma, non-functioning kidney with chronic infection) with radical nephrectomy being preferred in those with neoplastic disease. Radical nephrectomy implies resection of the whole of Gerota's fascia, including the perinephric fat, lymphatics, and the ipsilateral adrenal gland. Here the investigators are going to compare the Anterior (subcostal) approach to the Posterior approach to determine their level of spread and their value in controlling postoperative pain in patients scheduled for Nephrectomy surgery.

Being tested
Quadratus Lumborum block

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Quadratus Lumborum blockProcedure or surgery

    ultrasound guided Quadratus Lumborum block for postoperative pain

Study groups in NCT03973398
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Quadratus Lumborum Block anterior subcostal (QLa)Active comparatorPatients in this group will receive Anterior subcostal Quadratus Lumborum block postoperative with 30 ml of 0.125 bupivacaine.
Receives: Procedure: Quadratus Lumborum block
Quadratus Lumborum Block posterior (QLp)Active comparatorPatients in this group will receive Posterior Quadratus Lumborum block postoperative with 30 ml of 0.125 bupivacaine.
Receives: Procedure: Quadratus Lumborum block
Quadratus Lumborum Block anterior subcostal control (QLca)Placebo comparatorPatients in this group will receive Anterior subcostal Quadratus Lumborum block postoperative with 30 ml of 0.9% normal saline.
Receives: Procedure: Quadratus Lumborum block
Quadratus Lumborum Block posterior control (QLcp)Placebo comparatorPatients in this group will receive Anterior subcostal Quadratus Lumborum block postoperative with 30 ml of 0.9% normal saline.
Receives: Procedure: Quadratus Lumborum block

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Comparing the analgesic effects of Anterior subcostal versus Posterior approach in ultrasound guided Quadratus Lumborum Block by using the Numeric Rating Scale.

    : to compare the efficacy of Anterior subcostal versus Posterior approach in ultrasound guided Quadratus Lumborum Block by The Numeric rating scale (NRS) both resting and ambulatory which measures pain as felt by the patient every two hours for the first 24 hours then every six hours for the second day. the Numeric rating scale is a scale from 0 to 10 with '0' being lowest pain or no pain and '10' is the worst pain felt.

    Measured: baseline

  2. Comparing the analgesic effects of Anterior subcostal versus Posterior approach in ultrasound guided Quadratus Lumborum Block by using the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire.

    to compare the efficacy of Anterior subcostal versus Posterior approach in ultrasound guided Quadratus Lumborum Block by the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire which is a set of questions answered by the patient to evaluate the patient's satisfaction and for quality improvement of pain management in hospitalized patients

    Measured: baseline

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. using the numeric rating scale to determine the effect of Quadratus Lumborum block in reducing the postoperative pain in patients undergoing nephrectomy surgery

    to evaluate the efficacy of Quadratus Lumborum Block in the control of postoperative pain in patients undergoing Nephrectomy surgery, hemodynamics, any complications and patients' satisfaction.The Numeric rating scale (NRS) both resting and ambulatory which measures pain as felt by the patient every two hours for the first 24 hours then every six hours for the second day. the Numeric rating scale is a scale from 0 to 10 with '0' being lowest pain or no pain and '10' is the worst pain felt.

    Measured: baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Jun 2019
  2. Study start1 Jul 2020 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Jul 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Sep 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03973398
Sponsor's protocol ID
QLB in Nephrectomy
Status last verified
Feb 2020
First submitted
21 May 2019
Last updated
3 Mar 2020
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Early Phase 1 study testing Quadratus Lumborum block in people with Quadratus Lumborum Block, run by Sherif Mahmoud Mohammed Bekhet.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Sherif Bekhet (00201155538773, bekhetsherif89@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Comparing the analgesic effects of Anterior subcostal versus Posterior approach in ultrasound guided Quadratus Lumborum Block by using the Numeric Rating Scale. (time frame: baseline). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Mar 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in