AzTrials
AzTrials

Procedural PainNCT03968432

Parent Targeted Interventions in Vaccination Pain Management of Infants

A study testing MIAS&Q and Be Sweet to Babies Videos and Pamphlet in people with Procedural Pain, run by University of Ottawa at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The overall aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, preliminary effectiveness and sustainability of parent-targeted interventions for pain management during vaccination of infants. To achieve the goal, a two-phase pilot randomized control trial is planned. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 month to 6 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Procedural Pain
What is being tested?
MIAS&Q and Be Sweet to Babies Videos and Pamphlet
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
151 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
1 Aug 2018to 1 May 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 month to 6 months
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Parents of infants,
  • Recruited before the infants receive their 2, 4, or 6-month vaccinations,
  • Respond to the online invitation,
  • Consent to participate in this study
  • Parents living in Canada
  • Read, speak and understand English sufficiently to understand the videos and complete the surveys.

Who cannot join

  • Parents who cannot understand, read or communicate in English
  • Do not plan to have their infant vaccinated

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • University of Ottawa

    Ottawa, Ontario

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: The Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Effectiveness of Parent Targeted Interventions in Vaccination Pain Management of Infants: A Pilot Randomized Control Trial (RCT)

The overall aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, preliminary effectiveness and sustainability of parent-targeted interventions for pain management during vaccination of infants. To achieve the goal, a two-phase pilot randomized control trial is planned. Study one, currently in the data collection phase, aims i) to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of data collection tools, participants' recruitment procedures and implementation process of parent-targeted interventions prior to infant vaccination at two, four, or six months. ii) to evaluate the preliminary effectiveness of parent-targeted interventions prior to infant vaccination in promoting the use of pain management strategies during vaccinations of infants at two, four, or six months. iii) to identify the parent's knowledge, use, intention and recommendation to use the recommended pain management strategies, and facilitators and barriers influencing the implementation of the parent-targeted interventions during vaccinations of infants at two, four, or six months. Methods. This study is a prospective multi-faceted two-armed pilot randomized control trial (RCT). a pilot randomized control trial. The participants are parents of infants, recruited before the infants receive their 2, 4, or 6- month vaccinations, who responded to the online invitation and consent to participate in this study. Parents living in Canada and prior to the infant receiving one of the three vaccinations were invited to participate through an online recruitment process. A sample of 50 parent/infant dyads in each group of control and intervention is estimated to be sufficient to achieve the study's goals. The outcome measurements are being done by five brief study questionnaires; Brief information of the study goals and the researchers' affiliation followed by a hyperlink to the survey were posted on different online platforms. Eligible parents of infants who respond to the study invitation are being randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups (Intervention and control). There are two interventions in the study one being compared: 1) Be Sweet to Babies Videos and Pamphlet; and 2) Be Sweet to Babies Videos, pamphlet, and MIAS\&Q. After the intervention, the impact of the vaccination pain management video and brochure followed by MIAS\&Q questions are being evaluated by a brief online survey exploring the use of pain management (breastfeeding or sucrose and upright secure holding) during infants' vaccination in both groups. Following that, the opinion of parents about the understandability, applicability, feasibility, and acceptability of this study are evaluated. All data are being collected electronically using REDCap survey tool. SPSS version 23.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois) will be used to perform all descriptive and inferential statistical analyses. NVivo version 11.0 (Qualitative data analysis Software; QSR International Pty Ltd) will be used for content analysis and descriptive statistical analysis and thematic analysis will be used for the analysis of the qualitative data.

Read the detailed description

Early childhood vaccination is the most important public health intervention to protect against life-threatening infectious diseases worldwide. However, vaccinations are painful and result in distress and anxiety for infants and, in many cases, their parents. If vaccination pain is not addressed, this pain can lead to subsequent non-adherence with vaccination schedules, fears of needles and avoidance of health care. Clinical practice guidelines and high-quality synthesized evidence shows that breastfeeding, sucrose, and upright secure holding effectively reduce pain during vaccination in infants. Despite the evidence, these strategies are not consistently used in practice highlighting an important gap in translating this knowledge into practice. Aims. The overall aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, preliminary effectiveness and sustainability of parent-targeted interventions for pain management during vaccination of infants. To achieve the goal, a two-phase pilot randomized control trial is planned. Study one, currently in the data collection phase, aims i) to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of data collection tools, participants' recruitment procedures and implementation process of parent-targeted interventions prior to infant vaccination at two, four, or six months. ii) to evaluate the preliminary effectiveness of parent-targeted interventions prior to infant vaccination in promoting the use of pain management strategies during vaccinations of infants at two, four, or six months. iii) to identify the parent's knowledge, use, intention and recommendation to use the recommended pain management strategies, and facilitators and barriers influencing the implementation of the parent-targeted interventions during vaccinations of infants at two, four, or six months. Methods. This study is a prospective multi-faceted two-armed pilot randomized control trial (RCT). a pilot randomized control trial. The participants are parents of infants, recruited before the infants receive their 2, 4, or 6- month vaccinations, who responded to the online invitation and consent to participate in this study. Parents living in Canada and prior to the infant receiving one of the three vaccinations were invited to participate through an online recruitment process. Parents were eligible if they have an infant scheduled to receive their 2, 4, or 6-month routine vaccination as per the childhood immunization schedule of the province the parents are living in, and they read, speak and understand English sufficiently to understand the videos and complete the surveys. A sample of 50 parent/infant dyads in each group of control and intervention is estimated to be sufficient to achieve the study's goals. The outcome measurements are being done by five brief study questionnaires; Baseline demographic questionnaire, Baseline knowledge questionnaire, Knowledge utilization questionnaire, Acceptability, and feasibility questionnaire. All recruited parents of infants before their 2, 4, or 6-month vaccination were invited to take part in a baseline survey, aimed to assess current awareness, previous use and future intent to use one of the recommended pain care strategies (breastfeeding, sucrose/other sweet solutions and holding). Different methods were taken for online recruiting of the participants. Brief information of the study goals and the researchers' affiliation followed by a hyperlink to the survey were posted on different online platforms. When participants clicked on the survey link, they were directed to a REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) survey.

If the respondents are not eligible, a brief message containing a thank-you note and explanation about their in-eligibility to continue the study was sent to them. However, if they meet the listed screening criteria, they are directed to the next page which is the study's consent form. They are invited to read the forms and provide online informed consent to participate in this study. They are then being directed to the next page which is the demographic questionnaires. A hyperlink directs participants to a brief survey asking questions about previous awareness and intention to use specified recommended pain management strategies in their infants' future immunization episodes. In addition, they were asked to provide an email address to be contacted for the following steps of the study. Eligible parents of infants who respond to the study invitation are being randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups (Intervention and control) in a 1:1 ratio before the infants' 2, 4, or 6-months vaccination. Participants were stratified according to the infant's age of receiving the vaccine (two, four, or six months). There are two interventions in the study one being compared: 1) Be Sweet to Babies Videos and Pamphlet; and 2) Be Sweet to Babies Videos, pamphlet, and MIAS\&Q. The Be Sweet to Babies vaccination pain management videos and pamphlet are provided to all participants. Those in the intervention arm is also be given MIAS\&Q. Be Sweet to Babies vaccination pain management videos showing parents how to use breastfeeding, upright secure holding, and a small volume of the sweet solution during vaccination, are used. In addition, the pamphlet is a knowledge translation tool developed in partnership with the Children Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) and Ottawa Public Health. MIAS\&Q includes five questions and statements based on MI approach consists of four scaled questions and two open-ended questions, aimed to present brief informative and affirmative questions and statements. After the intervention, the impact of the vaccination pain management video and brochure followed by MIAS\&Q questions are being evaluated by a brief online survey exploring the use of pain management (breastfeeding or sucrose and upright secure holding) during infants' vaccination in both groups. Following that, the opinion of parents about the understandability, applicability, feasibility, and acceptability of this study are evaluated. All data are being collected electronically using REDCap survey tool. SPSS version 23.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois) will be used to perform all descriptive and inferential statistical analyses. NVivo version 11.0 (Qualitative data analysis Software; QSR International Pty Ltd) will be used for content analysis and descriptive statistical analysis and thematic analysis will be used for the analysis of the qualitative data.

Conditions
Procedural Pain
Being tested
MIAS&Q, Be Sweet to Babies Videos and Pamphlet
Keywords
Childhood Vaccination,, Knowledge Translation,, Pain management,, Parents.
Medical subject headings
Pain, Procedural, Agnosia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MIAS&QBehavioural

    Also called MI based affirmation statements and questions

    There were two interventions compared in this study: 1) Be Sweet to Babies Videos and Pamphlet; and 2) Be Sweet to Babies Videos, pamphlet, and MIAS\&Q. The Be Sweet to Babies vaccination pain management videos and pamphlet were provided to all participants as this information is publicly available, and demonstrates the effectiveness of the evidence-based recommended vaccination pain management strategies for infants. In addition, a pamphlet was used which was developed in partnership with CHEO and Ottawa Public Health as a knowledge translation tool. Those in the intervention arm were also given MIAS\&Q included five questions and statements based on the MI approach consisted of four scaled questions and two open-ended questions, aimed to present brief informative and affirmative questions and statements to help the parents reflect on their own thoughts and support them to advocate for the use of the recommended pain management strategies during their infant's vaccination.

  • Be Sweet to Babies Videos and PamphletBehavioural

    The Be Sweet to Babies vaccination pain management videos and pamphlet will be provided to all participants. Be Sweet to Babies vaccination pain management videos showing parents how to use breastfeeding, upright secure holding, and a small volume of sweet solution during vaccination, will be used. This pamphlet is a knowledge translation tool previously developed in partnership with the Children Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) and Ottawa Public Health and has been publicly available on the Ottawa Public Health Website since June 2013. The content presented about pain management for infants during vaccination is the same information as the video.

Study groups in NCT03968432
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard CareSham comparatorBe Sweet to Babies Videos and Pamphlet. Be Sweet to Babies vaccination pain management videos showing parents how to use breastfeeding, upright secure holding, and a small volume of the sweet solution during vaccination will be used.
Receives: Behavioral: Be Sweet to Babies Videos and Pamphlet
InterventionActive comparatorBe Sweet to Babies Videos, pamphlet, and MIAS\&Q. MIAS\&Q includes five questions and statements based on MI approach which was developed by the researcher and was reviewed further by a panel of parent representatives and HCPs representatives and the research team consisting of the supervisor and two Ph.D. committee members. This MIAS\&Q intervention consists of four scaled questions and two open-ended questions and presents brief informative and affirmative questions and statements. This aims to help the parents reflect on their own thoughts, and support them to advocate for the use of the recommended pain management strategies during their infant's vaccination.
Receives: Behavioral: MIAS&Q; Behavioral: Be Sweet to Babies Videos and Pamphlet

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The primary outcome: Feasibility and acceptability of study procedure

    This outcome will be measured by the numbers of completed consent forms, number of completed surveys, and number of lost-to-fallow-up people.

    Measured: after the study completion (4 months after the baseline survey)

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. The secondary outcome: increase in use of pain management strategies

    This will be measured by the number/proportion of vaccination episodes where any of the recommended pain management strategies are used in comparison with baseline and it will be recorded by a self-report survey.

    Measured: After the intervention (2 months after the baseline survey)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 May 2019
  2. Study start1 Aug 2018
  3. Primary completion30 Dec 2018
  4. Study completion1 May 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider
Enrolment
151 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03968432
Sponsor's protocol ID
H-04-18-405
Status last verified
May 2019
First submitted
13 May 2019
Last updated
30 May 2019
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Modanloo S, Dunn S, Stacey D, Harrison D. The feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of parent-targeted interventions in vaccination pain management of infants: a pilot randomized control trial (RCT). Pain Manag. 2021 May;11(3):287-301. doi: 10.2217/pmt-2020-0072. Epub 2021 Feb 17.

    PubMed 33593096

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing MIAS&Q and Be Sweet to Babies Videos and Pamphlet in people with Procedural Pain, run by University of Ottawa at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The primary outcome: Feasibility and acceptability of study procedure (time frame: after the study completion (4 months after the baseline survey)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03968432, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 May 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in