Procedural PainNCT03968432
Parent Targeted Interventions in Vaccination Pain Management of Infants
A study testing MIAS&Q and Be Sweet to Babies Videos and Pamphlet in people with Procedural Pain, run by University of Ottawa at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The overall aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, preliminary effectiveness and sustainability of parent-targeted interventions for pain management during vaccination of infants. To achieve the goal, a two-phase pilot randomized control trial is planned. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 month to 6 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Procedural Pain
- What is being tested?
- MIAS&Q and Be Sweet to Babies Videos and Pamphlet
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 151 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2018to 1 May 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 month to 6 months
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Parents of infants,
- Recruited before the infants receive their 2, 4, or 6-month vaccinations,
- Respond to the online invitation,
- Consent to participate in this study
- Parents living in Canada
- Read, speak and understand English sufficiently to understand the videos and complete the surveys.
Who cannot join
- Parents who cannot understand, read or communicate in English
- Do not plan to have their infant vaccinated
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Effectiveness of Parent Targeted Interventions in Vaccination Pain Management of Infants: A Pilot Randomized Control Trial (RCT)
The overall aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, preliminary effectiveness and sustainability of parent-targeted interventions for pain management during vaccination of infants. To achieve the goal, a two-phase pilot randomized control trial is planned. Study one, currently in the data collection phase, aims i) to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of data collection tools, participants' recruitment procedures and implementation process of parent-targeted interventions prior to infant vaccination at two, four, or six months. ii) to evaluate the preliminary effectiveness of parent-targeted interventions prior to infant vaccination in promoting the use of pain management strategies during vaccinations of infants at two, four, or six months. iii) to identify the parent's knowledge, use, intention and recommendation to use the recommended pain management strategies, and facilitators and barriers influencing the implementation of the parent-targeted interventions during vaccinations of infants at two, four, or six months. Methods. This study is a prospective multi-faceted two-armed pilot randomized control trial (RCT). a pilot randomized control trial. The participants are parents of infants, recruited before the infants receive their 2, 4, or 6- month vaccinations, who responded to the online invitation and consent to participate in this study. Parents living in Canada and prior to the infant receiving one of the three vaccinations were invited to participate through an online recruitment process. A sample of 50 parent/infant dyads in each group of control and intervention is estimated to be sufficient to achieve the study's goals. The outcome measurements are being done by five brief study questionnaires; Brief information of the study goals and the researchers' affiliation followed by a hyperlink to the survey were posted on different online platforms. Eligible parents of infants who respond to the study invitation are being randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups (Intervention and control). There are two interventions in the study one being compared: 1) Be Sweet to Babies Videos and Pamphlet; and 2) Be Sweet to Babies Videos, pamphlet, and MIAS\&Q. After the intervention, the impact of the vaccination pain management video and brochure followed by MIAS\&Q questions are being evaluated by a brief online survey exploring the use of pain management (breastfeeding or sucrose and upright secure holding) during infants' vaccination in both groups. Following that, the opinion of parents about the understandability, applicability, feasibility, and acceptability of this study are evaluated. All data are being collected electronically using REDCap survey tool. SPSS version 23.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois) will be used to perform all descriptive and inferential statistical analyses. NVivo version 11.0 (Qualitative data analysis Software; QSR International Pty Ltd) will be used for content analysis and descriptive statistical analysis and thematic analysis will be used for the analysis of the qualitative data.
Read the detailed description
Early childhood vaccination is the most important public health intervention to protect against life-threatening infectious diseases worldwide. However, vaccinations are painful and result in distress and anxiety for infants and, in many cases, their parents. If vaccination pain is not addressed, this pain can lead to subsequent non-adherence with vaccination schedules, fears of needles and avoidance of health care. Clinical practice guidelines and high-quality synthesized evidence shows that breastfeeding, sucrose, and upright secure holding effectively reduce pain during vaccination in infants. Despite the evidence, these strategies are not consistently used in practice highlighting an important gap in translating this knowledge into practice. Aims. The overall aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, preliminary effectiveness and sustainability of parent-targeted interventions for pain management during vaccination of infants. To achieve the goal, a two-phase pilot randomized control trial is planned. Study one, currently in the data collection phase, aims i) to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of data collection tools, participants' recruitment procedures and implementation process of parent-targeted interventions prior to infant vaccination at two, four, or six months. ii) to evaluate the preliminary effectiveness of parent-targeted interventions prior to infant vaccination in promoting the use of pain management strategies during vaccinations of infants at two, four, or six months. iii) to identify the parent's knowledge, use, intention and recommendation to use the recommended pain management strategies, and facilitators and barriers influencing the implementation of the parent-targeted interventions during vaccinations of infants at two, four, or six months. Methods. This study is a prospective multi-faceted two-armed pilot randomized control trial (RCT). a pilot randomized control trial. The participants are parents of infants, recruited before the infants receive their 2, 4, or 6- month vaccinations, who responded to the online invitation and consent to participate in this study. Parents living in Canada and prior to the infant receiving one of the three vaccinations were invited to participate through an online recruitment process. Parents were eligible if they have an infant scheduled to receive their 2, 4, or 6-month routine vaccination as per the childhood immunization schedule of the province the parents are living in, and they read, speak and understand English sufficiently to understand the videos and complete the surveys. A sample of 50 parent/infant dyads in each group of control and intervention is estimated to be sufficient to achieve the study's goals. The outcome measurements are being done by five brief study questionnaires; Baseline demographic questionnaire, Baseline knowledge questionnaire, Knowledge utilization questionnaire, Acceptability, and feasibility questionnaire. All recruited parents of infants before their 2, 4, or 6-month vaccination were invited to take part in a baseline survey, aimed to assess current awareness, previous use and future intent to use one of the recommended pain care strategies (breastfeeding, sucrose/other sweet solutions and holding). Different methods were taken for online recruiting of the participants. Brief information of the study goals and the researchers' affiliation followed by a hyperlink to the survey were posted on different online platforms. When participants clicked on the survey link, they were directed to a REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) survey.
If the respondents are not eligible, a brief message containing a thank-you note and explanation about their in-eligibility to continue the study was sent to them. However, if they meet the listed screening criteria, they are directed to the next page which is the study's consent form. They are invited to read the forms and provide online informed consent to participate in this study. They are then being directed to the next page which is the demographic questionnaires. A hyperlink directs participants to a brief survey asking questions about previous awareness and intention to use specified recommended pain management strategies in their infants' future immunization episodes. In addition, they were asked to provide an email address to be contacted for the following steps of the study. Eligible parents of infants who respond to the study invitation are being randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups (Intervention and control) in a 1:1 ratio before the infants' 2, 4, or 6-months vaccination. Participants were stratified according to the infant's age of receiving the vaccine (two, four, or six months). There are two interventions in the study one being compared: 1) Be Sweet to Babies Videos and Pamphlet; and 2) Be Sweet to Babies Videos, pamphlet, and MIAS\&Q. The Be Sweet to Babies vaccination pain management videos and pamphlet are provided to all participants. Those in the intervention arm is also be given MIAS\&Q. Be Sweet to Babies vaccination pain management videos showing parents how to use breastfeeding, upright secure holding, and a small volume of the sweet solution during vaccination, are used. In addition, the pamphlet is a knowledge translation tool developed in partnership with the Children Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) and Ottawa Public Health. MIAS\&Q includes five questions and statements based on MI approach consists of four scaled questions and two open-ended questions, aimed to present brief informative and affirmative questions and statements. After the intervention, the impact of the vaccination pain management video and brochure followed by MIAS\&Q questions are being evaluated by a brief online survey exploring the use of pain management (breastfeeding or sucrose and upright secure holding) during infants' vaccination in both groups. Following that, the opinion of parents about the understandability, applicability, feasibility, and acceptability of this study are evaluated. All data are being collected electronically using REDCap survey tool. SPSS version 23.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois) will be used to perform all descriptive and inferential statistical analyses. NVivo version 11.0 (Qualitative data analysis Software; QSR International Pty Ltd) will be used for content analysis and descriptive statistical analysis and thematic analysis will be used for the analysis of the qualitative data.
- Conditions
- Procedural Pain
- Being tested
- MIAS&Q, Be Sweet to Babies Videos and Pamphlet
- Keywords
- Childhood Vaccination,, Knowledge Translation,, Pain management,, Parents.
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Procedural, Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MIAS&QBehavioural
Also called MI based affirmation statements and questions
There were two interventions compared in this study: 1) Be Sweet to Babies Videos and Pamphlet; and 2) Be Sweet to Babies Videos, pamphlet, and MIAS\&Q. The Be Sweet to Babies vaccination pain management videos and pamphlet were provided to all participants as this information is publicly available, and demonstrates the effectiveness of the evidence-based recommended vaccination pain management strategies for infants. In addition, a pamphlet was used which was developed in partnership with CHEO and Ottawa Public Health as a knowledge translation tool. Those in the intervention arm were also given MIAS\&Q included five questions and statements based on the MI approach consisted of four scaled questions and two open-ended questions, aimed to present brief informative and affirmative questions and statements to help the parents reflect on their own thoughts and support them to advocate for the use of the recommended pain management strategies during their infant's vaccination.
Be Sweet to Babies Videos and PamphletBehavioural
The Be Sweet to Babies vaccination pain management videos and pamphlet will be provided to all participants. Be Sweet to Babies vaccination pain management videos showing parents how to use breastfeeding, upright secure holding, and a small volume of sweet solution during vaccination, will be used. This pamphlet is a knowledge translation tool previously developed in partnership with the Children Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) and Ottawa Public Health and has been publicly available on the Ottawa Public Health Website since June 2013. The content presented about pain management for infants during vaccination is the same information as the video.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Care | Sham comparator | Be Sweet to Babies Videos and Pamphlet. Be Sweet to Babies vaccination pain management videos showing parents how to use breastfeeding, upright secure holding, and a small volume of the sweet solution during vaccination will be used. Receives: Behavioral: Be Sweet to Babies Videos and Pamphlet |
| Intervention | Active comparator | Be Sweet to Babies Videos, pamphlet, and MIAS\&Q. MIAS\&Q includes five questions and statements based on MI approach which was developed by the researcher and was reviewed further by a panel of parent representatives and HCPs representatives and the research team consisting of the supervisor and two Ph.D. committee members. This MIAS\&Q intervention consists of four scaled questions and two open-ended questions and presents brief informative and affirmative questions and statements. This aims to help the parents reflect on their own thoughts, and support them to advocate for the use of the recommended pain management strategies during their infant's vaccination. Receives: Behavioral: MIAS&Q; Behavioral: Be Sweet to Babies Videos and Pamphlet |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The primary outcome: Feasibility and acceptability of study procedure
This outcome will be measured by the numbers of completed consent forms, number of completed surveys, and number of lost-to-fallow-up people.
Measured: after the study completion (4 months after the baseline survey)
Secondary outcomes (1)
The secondary outcome: increase in use of pain management strategies
This will be measured by the number/proportion of vaccination episodes where any of the recommended pain management strategies are used in comparison with baseline and it will be recorded by a self-report survey.
Measured: After the intervention (2 months after the baseline survey)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 May 2019
- Study start1 Aug 2018
- Primary completion30 Dec 2018
- Study completion1 May 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Procedural PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider
- Enrolment
- 151 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Ottawa
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Shokoufeh Modanloo, University of Ottawa
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03968432
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H-04-18-405
- Status last verified
- May 2019
- First submitted
- 13 May 2019
- Last updated
- 30 May 2019
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Modanloo S, Dunn S, Stacey D, Harrison D. The feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of parent-targeted interventions in vaccination pain management of infants: a pilot randomized control trial (RCT). Pain Manag. 2021 May;11(3):287-301. doi: 10.2217/pmt-2020-0072. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
PubMed 33593096
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 May 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Effectiveness of Parent Targeted Interventions in Vaccination Pain Management of Infants: A Pilot Randomized Control Trial (RCT)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03968432
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H-04-18-405
- Conditions
- Procedural Pain
- Keywords
- Childhood Vaccination,, Knowledge Translation,, Pain management,, Parents.
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 151 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of OttawaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 May 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 May 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The overall aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, preliminary effectiveness and sustainability of parent-targeted interventions for pain management during vaccination of infants. To achieve the goal, a two-phase pilot randomized control trial is planned. Study one, currently in the data collection phase, aims i) to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of data collection tools, participants' recruitment procedures and implementation process of parent-targeted interventions prior to infant vaccination at two, four, or six months. ii) to evaluate the preliminary effectiveness of parent-targeted interventions prior to infant vaccination in promoting the use of pain management strategies during vaccinations of infants at two, four, or six months. iii) to identify the parent's knowledge, use, intention and recommendation to use the recommended pain management strategies, and facilitators and barriers influencing the implementation of the parent-targeted interventions during vaccinations of infants at two, four, or six months. Methods. This study is a prospective multi-faceted two-armed pilot randomized control trial (RCT). a pilot randomized control trial. The participants are parents of infants, recruited before the infants receive their 2, 4, or 6- month vaccinations, who responded to the online invitation and consent to participate in this study. Parents living in Canada and prior to the infant receiving one of the three vaccinations were invited to participate through an online recruitment process. A sample of 50 parent/infant dyads in each group of control and intervention is estimated to be sufficient to achieve the study's goals. The outcome measurements are being done by five brief study questionnaires; Brief information of the study goals and the researchers' affiliation followed by a hyperlink to the survey were posted on different online platforms. Eligible parents of infants who respond to the study invitation are being randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups (Intervention and control). There are two interventions in the study one being compared: 1) Be Sweet to Babies Videos and Pamphlet; and 2) Be Sweet to Babies Videos, pamphlet, and MIAS\&Q. After the intervention, the impact of the vaccination pain management video and brochure followed by MIAS\&Q questions are being evaluated by a brief online survey exploring the use of pain management (breastfeeding or sucrose and upright secure holding) during infants' vaccination in both groups. Following that, the opinion of parents about the understandability, applicability, feasibility, and acceptability of this study are evaluated. All data are being collected electronically using REDCap survey tool. SPSS version 23.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois) will be used to perform all descriptive and inferential statistical analyses. NVivo version 11.0 (Qualitative data analysis Software; QSR International Pty Ltd) will be used for content analysis and descriptive statistical analysis and thematic analysis will be used for the analysis of the qualitative data.
Detailed description
Early childhood vaccination is the most important public health intervention to protect against life-threatening infectious diseases worldwide. However, vaccinations are painful and result in distress and anxiety for infants and, in many cases, their parents. If vaccination pain is not addressed, this pain can lead to subsequent non-adherence with vaccination schedules, fears of needles and avoidance of health care. Clinical practice guidelines and high-quality synthesized evidence shows that breastfeeding, sucrose, and upright secure holding effectively reduce pain during vaccination in infants. Despite the evidence, these strategies are not consistently used in practice highlighting an important gap in translating this knowledge into practice. Aims. The overall aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, preliminary effectiveness and sustainability of parent-targeted interventions for pain management during vaccination of infants. To achieve the goal, a two-phase pilot randomized control trial is planned. Study one, currently in the data collection phase, aims i) to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of data collection tools, participants' recruitment procedures and implementation process of parent-targeted interventions prior to infant vaccination at two, four, or six months. ii) to evaluate the preliminary effectiveness of parent-targeted interventions prior to infant vaccination in promoting the use of pain management strategies during vaccinations of infants at two, four, or six months. iii) to identify the parent's knowledge, use, intention and recommendation to use the recommended pain management strategies, and facilitators and barriers influencing the implementation of the parent-targeted interventions during vaccinations of infants at two, four, or six months. Methods. This study is a prospective multi-faceted two-armed pilot randomized control trial (RCT). a pilot randomized control trial. The participants are parents of infants, recruited before the infants receive their 2, 4, or 6- month vaccinations, who responded to the online invitation and consent to participate in this study. Parents living in Canada and prior to the infant receiving one of the three vaccinations were invited to participate through an online recruitment process. Parents were eligible if they have an infant scheduled to receive their 2, 4, or 6-month routine vaccination as per the childhood immunization schedule of the province the parents are living in, and they read, speak and understand English sufficiently to understand the videos and complete the surveys. A sample of 50 parent/infant dyads in each group of control and intervention is estimated to be sufficient to achieve the study's goals. The outcome measurements are being done by five brief study questionnaires; Baseline demographic questionnaire, Baseline knowledge questionnaire, Knowledge utilization questionnaire, Acceptability, and feasibility questionnaire. All recruited parents of infants before their 2, 4, or 6-month vaccination were invited to take part in a baseline survey, aimed to assess current awareness, previous use and future intent to use one of the recommended pain care strategies (breastfeeding, sucrose/other sweet solutions and holding). Different methods were taken for online recruiting of the participants. Brief information of the study goals and the researchers' affiliation followed by a hyperlink to the survey were posted on different online platforms. When participants clicked on the survey link, they were directed to a REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) survey.
If the respondents are not eligible, a brief message containing a thank-you note and explanation about their in-eligibility to continue the study was sent to them. However, if they meet the listed screening criteria, they are directed to the next page which is the study's consent form. They are invited to read the forms and provide online informed consent to participate in this study. They are then being directed to the next page which is the demographic questionnaires. A hyperlink directs participants to a brief survey asking questions about previous awareness and intention to use specified recommended pain management strategies in their infants' future immunization episodes. In addition, they were asked to provide an email address to be contacted for the following steps of the study. Eligible parents of infants who respond to the study invitation are being randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups (Intervention and control) in a 1:1 ratio before the infants' 2, 4, or 6-months vaccination. Participants were stratified according to the infant's age of receiving the vaccine (two, four, or six months). There are two interventions in the study one being compared: 1) Be Sweet to Babies Videos and Pamphlet; and 2) Be Sweet to Babies Videos, pamphlet, and MIAS\&Q. The Be Sweet to Babies vaccination pain management videos and pamphlet are provided to all participants. Those in the intervention arm is also be given MIAS\&Q. Be Sweet to Babies vaccination pain management videos showing parents how to use breastfeeding, upright secure holding, and a small volume of the sweet solution during vaccination, are used. In addition, the pamphlet is a knowledge translation tool developed in partnership with the Children Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) and Ottawa Public Health. MIAS\&Q includes five questions and statements based on MI approach consists of four scaled questions and two open-ended questions, aimed to present brief informative and affirmative questions and statements. After the intervention, the impact of the vaccination pain management video and brochure followed by MIAS\&Q questions are being evaluated by a brief online survey exploring the use of pain management (breastfeeding or sucrose and upright secure holding) during infants' vaccination in both groups. Following that, the opinion of parents about the understandability, applicability, feasibility, and acceptability of this study are evaluated. All data are being collected electronically using REDCap survey tool. SPSS version 23.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois) will be used to perform all descriptive and inferential statistical analyses. NVivo version 11.0 (Qualitative data analysis Software; QSR International Pty Ltd) will be used for content analysis and descriptive statistical analysis and thematic analysis will be used for the analysis of the qualitative data.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, care provider)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Care | Sham comparator | Behavioral: Be Sweet to Babies Videos and PamphletBe Sweet to Babies Videos and Pamphlet. Be Sweet to Babies vaccination pain management videos showing parents how to use breastfeeding, upright secure holding, and a small volume of the sweet solution during vaccination will be used. |
| Intervention | Active comparator | Behavioral: MIAS&Q, Behavioral: Be Sweet to Babies Videos and PamphletBe Sweet to Babies Videos, pamphlet, and MIAS\&Q. MIAS\&Q includes five questions and statements based on MI approach which was developed by the researcher and was reviewed further by a panel of parent representatives and HCPs representatives and the research team consisting of the supervisor and two Ph.D. committee members. This MIAS\&Q intervention consists of four scaled questions and two open-ended questions and presents brief informative and affirmative questions and statements. This aims to help the parents reflect on their own thoughts, and support them to advocate for the use of the recommended pain management strategies during their infant's vaccination. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 month to 6 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Parents of infants,
- Recruited before the infants receive their 2, 4, or 6-month vaccinations,
- Respond to the online invitation,
- Consent to participate in this study
- Parents living in Canada
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Parents who cannot understand, read or communicate in English
- Do not plan to have their infant vaccinated
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MIAS&QAlso: MI based affirmation statements and questionsThere were two interventions compared in this study: 1) Be Sweet to Babies Videos and Pamphlet; and 2) Be Sweet to Babies Videos, pamphlet, and MIAS\&Q. The Be Sweet to Babies vaccination pain management videos and pamphlet were provided to all participants as this information is publicly available, and demonstrates the effectiveness of the evidence-based recommended vaccination pain management strategies for infants. In addition, a pamphlet was used which was developed in partnership with CHEO and Ottawa Public Health as a knowledge translation tool. Those in the intervention arm were also given MIAS\&Q included five questions and statements based on the MI approach consisted of four scaled questions and two open-ended questions, aimed to present brief informative and affirmative questions and statements to help the parents reflect on their own thoughts and support them to advocate for the use of the recommended pain management strategies during their infant's vaccination. | Behavioural | Intervention |
| Be Sweet to Babies Videos and PamphletThe Be Sweet to Babies vaccination pain management videos and pamphlet will be provided to all participants. Be Sweet to Babies vaccination pain management videos showing parents how to use breastfeeding, upright secure holding, and a small volume of sweet solution during vaccination, will be used. This pamphlet is a knowledge translation tool previously developed in partnership with the Children Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) and Ottawa Public Health and has been publicly available on the Ottawa Public Health Website since June 2013. The content presented about pain management for infants during vaccination is the same information as the video. | Behavioural | Intervention, Standard Care |
Primary outcome
The primary outcome: Feasibility and acceptability of study procedure
Time frame: after the study completion (4 months after the baseline survey)
This outcome will be measured by the numbers of completed consent forms, number of completed surveys, and number of lost-to-fallow-up people.
1 secondary outcome
The secondary outcome: increase in use of pain management strategies
Time frame: After the intervention (2 months after the baseline survey)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 May 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33593096Modanloo S, Dunn S, Stacey D, Harrison D. The feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of parent-targeted interventions in vaccination pain management of infants: a pilot randomized control trial (RCT). Pain Manag. 2021 May;11(3):287-301. doi: 10.2217/pmt-2020-0072. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Procedural Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Family-Proxy-Selected Natural Sound Therapy Versus Standardized Natural Sound and Noise Reduction on Procedural Pain During Endotracheal Suctioning in Non-Communicative Mechanically Ventilated Adults: A Four-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial
Procedural Pain During Endotracheal Suctioning
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Soap-and-Water Bed Bath Versus Disposable Wipe Bath in the Same ICU Patients
Critical Illness, Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Effect of Ketamine on Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter During Procedural Analgesia
Procedural Pain, Procedural Sedation and Analgesia
Not yet recruiting
Virtual Reality for Pain and Anxiety During Surgical Uterine Evacuation After Early Pregnancy Loss
Early Pregnancy Loss, Procedural Pain
Not yet recruiting
Leg and Foot Massage for Pain in Newborns Receiving Heel Stick
Procedural Pain in Newborns
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing MIAS&Q and Be Sweet to Babies Videos and Pamphlet in people with Procedural Pain, run by University of Ottawa at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The primary outcome: Feasibility and acceptability of study procedure (time frame: after the study completion (4 months after the baseline survey)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03968432, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 May 2019.