AzTrials
AzTrials

Strokec-SIGHTNCT03963661

Investigating Usability of c-SIGHT in the Homes of Brain Injury Survivors

A study testing c-SIGHT (computorized spatial innatention grasping home-based therapy) in people with Stroke and Brain Injuries, run by University of East Anglia at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A brain injury can damage the brain, so that it no longer receives information about the space around one side of the world. If this happens, people may not be aware of anything on one side, usually the same side they also lost their movement (the most affected side). This severe condition is called spatial neglect. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Stroke, Brain Injuries, Spatial Neglect
What is being tested?
c-SIGHT (computorized spatial innatention grasping home-based therapy)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
10 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
6 May 2019to 3 Apr 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • +18
  • suffered brain injury
  • have TV with around 2 meters in front of it to be able to run the therapy
  • live in the Norfolk, Suffolk, Essex or Cambridgeshire (UK)
  • no other pre-existing neurological disorders (such as dementia)
  • no language impairment (able to follow 1-stage command)
Show all 10Show fewer
  • mental capacity to consent
  • no known learning disability
  • no major psychiatric illness
  • no history of substance abuse

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Stephanie Rossit, Ph.D contact

+44 (0)160359 1674

s.rossit@uea.ac.uk

Valerie Pomeroy, Ph.D contact

+44 (0)1603 59 1668

v.pomeroy@uea.ac.uk

United Kingdom1 site, 1 recruiting
  • University of East Anglia

    Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7TJ

    Stephanie Rossit, PhD

    Stephanie Rossit

    Recruiting

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Investigating a Portable Patient-led Virtual Reality Platform for Assessment and Rehabilitation of Hemispatial Neglect: a Usability Study

A brain injury can damage the brain, so that it no longer receives information about the space around one side of the world. If this happens, people may not be aware of anything on one side, usually the same side they also lost their movement (the most affected side). This severe condition is called spatial neglect. Currently there is no recommended diagnostic test or clinically-proven treatment for the condition. In a recent study, the investigators found a long-lasting reduction in neglect if people practiced picking-up an object with their unaffected hand. This intervention is called Spatial Inattention Grasping Home-based Therapy (SIGHT). It requires people to lift wooden rods of different lengths. Once a person is familiar with the task, they can practice on their own at a time convenient to them in their homes. The investigators have developed the first computerized version of SIGHT (c-SIGHT) as well as a novel diagnostic test for neglect using portable low-cost motion-tracking technology that can be used in the patient's home. In the proposed study, the investigators will investigate how usable and acceptable this technology is in people's homes. Stroke survivors (recruited from community settings) will undergo a 7-day self-led training at their homes with c-SIGHT. At the end of the intervention, 1:1 semi-structured interviews will be carried out with both stroke survivors and carers to investigate usability and acceptability of c-SIGHT. Moreover, spatial neglect, carer burden and motor function will be assessed pre- and post-completion of c-SIGHT.

Being tested
c-SIGHT (computorized spatial innatention grasping home-based therapy)
Keywords
Telerehabilitation, Spatial neglect, SIGHT, Computorized therapy, Stroke, Innatention, Self-admnistered therapy, Usability
Medical subject headings
Stroke, Brain Injuries, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • c-SIGHT (computorized spatial innatention grasping home-based therapy)Behavioural

    Also called visuomotor feedback training

    C-SIGHT will be self-administered at people's homes. c-SIGHT is a computerized therapy administered via people's television. The therapy involves performing repeated rod lifts with the less impaired arm in response to auditory and visual instructions presented on the television screen connected to a laptop. A small motion-tracking camera monitors rod lifts during therapy sessions. People will be asked to self-administer c-SIGHT for 1 hour a day (30min after breakfast and 30min after lunch) for 7 consecutive days. The first day of therapy will be performed with a therapist there for training purposes.

Study groups in NCT03963661
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
c-SIGHTExperimentalSIGHT requires participants to grasp and lift rods with their less impaired arm.
Receives: Behavioral: c-SIGHT (computorized spatial innatention grasping home-based therapy)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT) conventional sub tests

    Standardized measure of spatial inattention

    Measured: Change from baseline (T0) to 7 days (pre-treatment baseline, T1) and from T1 to immediately after 7 days of therapy (T2)

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Line bisection Test

    Test for spatial inattention which measures spatial biases when marking middle of 10 20mm lines. Bisection error bigger that 6mm is considered evidence of spatial inattention.

    Measured: Change from baseline (T0) to 7 days (pre-treatment baseline, T1) and from T1 to immediately after 7 days of therapy (T2)

  2. Broken Hearts test from Oxford Cognitive Screening (paper version)

    Standardized measure of spatial inattention

    Measured: Change from baseline (T0) to 7 days (pre-treatment baseline, T1) and from T1 to immediately after 7 days of therapy (T2)

  3. Computerized extrapersonal neglect test (CENT)

    Computerized test measuring ego and allocentric neglect sub types in extra personal space via television screen

    Measured: Change from baseline (T0) to 7 days (pre-treatment baseline, T1) and from T1 to immediately after 7 days of therapy (T2)

  4. Catherine Bergego Scale

    Standardized checklist to detect presence and degree of unilateral neglect during observation of everyday life situations. The scale also measures self-awareness of behavioral neglect (anosognosia).

    The CBS uses a 4-point rating scale to indicate the severity of neglect for each item:

    0 = no neglect

    1. = mild neglect (patient always explores the right hemispace first and slowly or hesitantly explores the left side)
    2. = moderate neglect (patient demonstrates constant and clear left-sided omissions or collisions)
    3. = severe neglect (patient is only able to explore the right hemispace)

    This results in a total score out of 30.

    Azouvi et al. (2002, 2003) have reported arbitrary ratings of neglect severity according to total scores:

    0 = No behavioral neglect 1-10 = Mild behavioral neglect 11-20 = Moderate behavioral neglect 21-30 = Severe behavioral neglect

    Measured: Change from baseline (T0) to 7 days (pre-treatment baseline, T1) and from T1 to immediately after 7 days of therapy (T2)

  5. Pinch and grip force task (dynamometer)

    Measures upper limb function

    Measured: Change from baseline (T0) to 7 days (pre-treatment baseline, T1) and from T1 to immediately after 7 days of therapy (T2)

  6. Caregiver Burden Scale

    To assess perceived burden among people caring for others with disabilities. There are 22 items in which the carer rates perceived burden from 0 (never) to 4 (nearly always).

    A total score of 0 to 20 = little or no burden; 21 to 40 = mild to moderate burden; 41 to 60 = moderate to severe burden; 61 to 88 = severe burden.

    Measured: Change from baseline (T0) to 7 days (pre-treatment baseline, T1) and from T1 to immediately after 7 days of therapy (T2)

  7. Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL)

    A patient-centered outcome measure intended to provide an assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) specific to patients with stroke. Patients must respond to each question of the SS-QOL with reference to the past week. It is a self-report scale containing 49 items in 12 domains. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate better functioning. The SS-QOL yields both domain scores and an overall SS-QOL summary score. The domain scores are unweighted averages of the associated items while the summary score is an unweighted average of all twelve domain scores.

    Measured: Change from baseline (T0) to 7 days (pre-treatment baseline, T1) and from T1 to immediately after 7 days of therapy (T2)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 May 2019
  2. Study start6 May 2019
  3. Primary completion1 Feb 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completion3 Apr 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
10 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03963661
Sponsor's protocol ID
R206721
Acronym
c-SIGHT
Status last verified
Aug 2019
First submitted
20 May 2019
Last updated
12 Aug 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Rossit S, Benwell CSY, Szymanek L, Learmonth G, McKernan-Ward L, Corrigan E, Muir K, Reeves I, Duncan G, Birschel P, Roberts M, Livingstone K, Jackson H, Castle P, Harvey M. Efficacy of home-based visuomotor feedback training in stroke patients with chronic hemispatial neglect. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2019 Mar;29(2):251-272. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2016.1273119. Epub 2017 Jan 24.

    PubMed 28116988

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing c-SIGHT (computorized spatial innatention grasping home-based therapy) in people with Stroke and Brain Injuries, run by University of East Anglia at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Stephanie Rossit, Ph.D (+44 (0)160359 1674, s.rossit@uea.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT) conventional sub tests (time frame: Change from baseline (T0) to 7 days (pre-treatment baseline, T1) and from T1 to immediately after 7 days of therapy (T2)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03963661, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Aug 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in