ARDSCAVIARDSNCT03963622
Careful Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19)
A study testing Respiratory Mechanics and Standard Ventilation Strategy in people with ARDS, run by Unity Health Toronto at 33 sites in 8 countries.
Trial summary
This is a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial with an adaptive design assessing the efficacy of setting the ventilator based on measurements of respiratory mechanics (recruitability and effort) to reduce Day 60 mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- ARDS
- What is being tested?
- Respiratory Mechanics and Standard Ventilation Strategy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 740 participants
- Where
- 33 sitesin 8 countries
- Study dates
- 23 Nov 2020to Sep 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18 y
- Moderate or severe ARDS (PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 200 mmHg) within 48 h of meeting Berlin ARDS criteria (Patients who were eligible at the time of screening and whose PaO2/FiO2 became > 200 mm Hg under prone positioning when starting the protocol remained eligible)
Who cannot join
- Received continuous mechanical ventilation > 7 days
- Known or clinically suspected elevated intracranial pressure (>18mmHg) necessitating strict control of PaCO2
- Known pregnancy
- Broncho-pleural fistula
- Severe liver disease (Child-Pugh Score ≥ 10)
- BMI >40kg/m2
- Anticipating withdrawal of life support and/or shift to palliation as the goal of care
- Patient is receiving ECMO at time of randomization
Trial locations and contacts
33 sites in 8 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
33 sites in 8 countries
France16 sites, 16 recruiting
- Recruiting
CHU Amiens-Picardie
Amiens
Michel Slama, MD
- Recruiting
Centre hospitalier universitaire d'Angers
Angers
Francois Beloncle, MD
- Recruiting
CH Victor Dupouy
Argenteuil
Gaetan Plantefeve, MD
- Recruiting
CH de Beauvais
Beauvais
Jack Richecoeur, MD
- Recruiting
CHU Bordeaux - Haut Leveque
Bordeaux
Benjamin Repusseau, MD
- Recruiting
Hopital de la Cavale Blanche - CHRU Brest
Brest
Gwenael Prat, MD
- Recruiting
CH de Cholet
Cholet
Johann Auchabie, MD
- Recruiting
Hopital Intercommunal de Creteil
Créteil
Tommaso Maraffi, MD
- Recruiting
CHU Grenoble-Alpes
Grenoble
Florian Sigaud, MD
- Recruiting
Hopital Roger Salengro - CHU Lille
Lille
Saad Nseir, MD
- Recruiting
Groupe Hospitalier de la Region de Mulhouse et Sud Alsace
Mulhouse
Khaldoun Kuteifan, MD
- Recruiting
Hopital de l'Archet 1 - CHU de Nice
Nice
Jean Dellamonica, MD
- Recruiting
Hopital Europeen Georges-Pompidou
Paris
Jean-Luc Diehl, MD
- Recruiting
CHU de Poitiers - La Miletrie
Poitiers
Remi Coudroy, MD
- Recruiting
CH Bretagne Atlantique Vannes-Auray
Vannes
Agathe Delbove, MD
- Recruiting
HIA Robert Picque
Villenave-d'Ornon
David Tran-Van, MD
Argentina6 sites, 6 recruiting
- Recruiting
Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas Dr Norberto Quirno (CEMIC)
Buenos Aires
Pablo Rodriguez, MD
- Recruiting
Complejo Médico Policía Federal Argentina Churruca Visca
Buenos Aires
Maria Guaymas, MD
- Recruiting
Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires
Buenos Aires
Gustavo Plotnikov, RRT
- Recruiting
Sanatorio Anchorena Recoleta
Buenos Aires
Daniela Vasquez, MD
- Recruiting
Sanatorio Mater Dei
Buenos Aires
Magalí Gutiérrez, MD
- Recruiting
Sanatorio Anchorena San Martín
San Martin
Matias Accoce, RRT
Canada3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Recruiting
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto
Laurent Brochard, MD
- Recruiting
Toronto General Hospital
Toronto
Ewan Goligher, MD
- Recruiting
Toronto Western Hospital
Toronto
Irene Telias, MD
Italy3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Recruiting
Arcispedale Sant'Anna
Ferrara
Savino Spadaro, MD
- Recruiting
University of Foggia
Foggia
Michela Rauseo, MD
- Recruiting
Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
Rome
Domenico L Grieco, MD
Spain2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
L'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona
Marta I Gomez, MD
- Recruiting
Vall d'Hebron University Hospital
Barcelona
Andres F Pacheco, MD
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
New York University Grossman School of Medicine
New York, New York, 10016
David Kaufman, MD
Chile1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Santiago
Felipe Damiani, PhD
Netherlands1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
OLVG
Amsterdam, North Holland
Rogier Determann, MD
About this study
Official title: Careful Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
This is a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial with an adaptive design assessing the efficacy of setting the ventilator based on measurements of respiratory mechanics (recruitability and effort) to reduce Day 60 mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
The CAVIARDS study is also a basket trial; a basket trial design examines a single intervention in multiple disease populations. CAVIARDS consists of an identical 2-arm mechanical ventilation protocol implemented in two different study populations (COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients). As per a typical basket trial design, the operational structure of both the COVID-19 substudy (CAVIARDS-19) and non-COVID-19 substudy (CAVIARDS-all) is shared (recruitment, procedures, data collection, analysis, management, etc.).
Read the detailed description
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a major public health problem affecting approximately 10% of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) and 23% of all patients on a breathing machine (mechanical ventilator). The short-term mortality of patients with ARDS is approximately 40% and better ventilation of these patients has the greatest potential to improve outcomes.
The lungs in patients with ARDS are severely inflamed which reduces lung volume and their ability to stretch, making ventilation difficult and dangerous. However, mechanical ventilation is the mainstay of supportive therapy. Although it is life-saving, it can also can generate secondary injury and inflammation, called ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). The investigators know that inadequate mechanical ventilation worsens outcomes but are uncertain of the optimal way to manage ventilators at the bedside.
Furthermore, ARDS is challenging because there is no treatment for the alveolar-capillary leak characterizing this syndrome; aside from treating the underlying cause, the only supportive therapy is mechanical ventilation. This is specially the case for COVID-19 induced ARDS. Despite best practices, over-distension of the lung or inappropriate positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) is common. Finally, once spontaneous breathing has resumed and is assisted by the ventilator, an additional phenomenon occurs, called patient self-inflicted lung injury. The drive for breathing in many patients is stimulated by lung inflammation, and strong breathing efforts can generate high distending pressures, causing lung (and systemic) inflammation and organ damage. Whether the management of COVID-19 induced ARDS should differ from all other ARDS has been debated at length but has no clear response
Recent advances in our understanding of bedside physiology (airway closure, recruitability, lung distension, respiratory drive) can now be applied for an individual titration of mechanical ventilation.
- Conditions
- ARDS
- Being tested
- Respiratory Mechanics, Standard Ventilation Strategy
- Keywords
- Ventilation, ARDS, Airway closure, Lung recruitment, COVID-19, Basket trial
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Aspiration, COVID-19
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Respiratory MechanicsOther
Different maneuvers based on respiratory mechanics will be assessed at the bedside and will be used to individualize ventilator parameters. Recruitability will be assessed with a one breath decremental PEEP maneuver, and search for airway closure with a low-flow pressure volume or pressure-time curve. If the patient has airway closure, the minimal PEEP will be set at the airway opening pressure to avoid closure. If the patient is considered recruitable, the goal is to set PEEP at or above 15cmH20 to maximize alveolar recruitment, until the plateau pressure reaches the safety limit. Volume control ventilation at 6ml·kg-1 will be used.
Once spontaneous breathing has started, the occlusion pressure (P0.1) will be maintained within targets.
Standard Ventilation StrategyOther
Patients randomized to the control arm will receive standard care. The PEEP is adjusted for oxygenation based on a PEEP-FiO2 table, either the low PEEP-FiO2 or the high PEEP-FiO2 table. Volume targeted ventilation with initial VT 6 mL·kg-1 and Plateau pressure at 30 cmH2O or below, targeting PaO2 60-80 or SpO2 90-95%, adjusted as per the protocol. Pressure-support ventilation is at physician's discretion, but recommended when FiO2 <60%, and is titrated VT 6-8 mL·kg-1.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Active comparator | Standard ventilation strategy. Receives: Other: Standard Ventilation Strategy |
| Respiratory Mechanics | Experimental | The goal of this arm is to individualize tidal volume (VT) and PEEP according to respiratory mechanics. Receives: Other: Respiratory Mechanics |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
All-cause 60-day mortality
The lack of an appropriate surrogate endpoint, and the high baseline mortality rate mandate a multicentre RCT to determine the mortality effects of setting the ventilator based on recruitability and effort compared with conventional ventilation.
Measured: 60 days
Secondary outcomes (5)
Duration of ventilation
Duration of ventilation in days
Measured: May exceed 60 days
Duration of ICU and hospital stay
Duration of ICU and hospital stay in days
Measured: May exceed 60 days
Number of patients with organ dysfunction
Organ dysfunction as per the SOFA score
Measured: Day 1-7, 14, 21, 28
Number of patients with barotrauma
Barotrauma defined as new onset of pneumothorax
Measured: Up to 60 days
Mortality at ICU discharge, 28 days, and hospital discharge
Mortality
Measured: Up to date of ICU discharge, 28 days, and hospital discharge
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 May 2019
- Study start23 Nov 2020
- Primary completionJun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionSep 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ARDSStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Unity Health TorontoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This study is also a basket design, which examines a single intervention in multiple disease populations. This basket trial consists of an identical 2-arm mechanical ventilation protocol implemented in two different study populations (patients with COVID-19-induced ARDS, and patients with all ARDS not induced by COVID-19). The protocol and procedures are identical between the two study populations in this basket trial.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 740 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Unity Health Toronto
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), University of Toronto, Applied Health Research Centre
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Laurent Brochard, MD, Principal investigator, Unity Health Toronto
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03963622
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1765
- Acronym
- CAVIARDS
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 6 May 2019
- Last updated
- 16 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The final anonymized trial dataset will be available on reasonable written request to the principal investigator one year after publication of the main manuscript.
Publications
Coudroy R, Telias I, Jonkman A, Thille AW, Diehl JL, Peron N, Ko M, Bourion AA, Tiribelli N, Fredes S, Gutierrez M, Manchado Bruno A, Vasquez DN, Pratto RA, Plotnikow GA, Bianchini F, Accoce M, Dorado J, Spadaro S, La Rosa R, Prat G, Bailly P, Delbove A, Pacheco-Reyes A, Roca O, Kuteifan K, Rouze A, Grieco DL, Izura-Gomez M, Mancebo J, Sigaud F, Terzi N, Saccheri C, Dellamonica J, Richecoeur J, Setten M, Rauseo M, Beloncle F, Repusseau B, Roze H, Tran-Van D, Damiani F, Slama M, Kaufman DA, Maraffi T, Goligher EC, Plantefeve G, Determann R, Giamou M, Pham T, Del Sorbo L, Keown-Stoneman CDG, Nisenbaum R, Thorpe K, Piraino T, Chen L, Juni P, Ferguson ND, Slutsky AS, Brochard L; CAVIARDS study group. Careful ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome: the protocol of the CAVIARDS international multicentre randomised basket trial. BMJ Open. 2026 Feb 23;16(2):e115775. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115775.
PubMed 41730551Villalba DS, Matesa A, Boni S, Gutierrez FJ, Moracci R, Plotnikow GA. Impact of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy on the Pressure of the Airway System in Humans. Respir Care. 2025 Jan;70(1):10-16. doi: 10.1089/respcare.12082.
PubMed 39964860
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Careful Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03963622
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CAVIARDS / 1765
- Conditions
- ARDS
- Keywords
- Ventilation, ARDS, Airway closure, Lung recruitment, COVID-19, Basket trial
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 740 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Unity Health TorontoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), University of Toronto, Applied Health Research Centre
- Study start
- 23 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Sep 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 May 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial with an adaptive design assessing the efficacy of setting the ventilator based on measurements of respiratory mechanics (recruitability and effort) to reduce Day 60 mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
The CAVIARDS study is also a basket trial; a basket trial design examines a single intervention in multiple disease populations. CAVIARDS consists of an identical 2-arm mechanical ventilation protocol implemented in two different study populations (COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients). As per a typical basket trial design, the operational structure of both the COVID-19 substudy (CAVIARDS-19) and non-COVID-19 substudy (CAVIARDS-all) is shared (recruitment, procedures, data collection, analysis, management, etc.).
Detailed description
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a major public health problem affecting approximately 10% of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) and 23% of all patients on a breathing machine (mechanical ventilator). The short-term mortality of patients with ARDS is approximately 40% and better ventilation of these patients has the greatest potential to improve outcomes.
The lungs in patients with ARDS are severely inflamed which reduces lung volume and their ability to stretch, making ventilation difficult and dangerous. However, mechanical ventilation is the mainstay of supportive therapy. Although it is life-saving, it can also can generate secondary injury and inflammation, called ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). The investigators know that inadequate mechanical ventilation worsens outcomes but are uncertain of the optimal way to manage ventilators at the bedside.
Furthermore, ARDS is challenging because there is no treatment for the alveolar-capillary leak characterizing this syndrome; aside from treating the underlying cause, the only supportive therapy is mechanical ventilation. This is specially the case for COVID-19 induced ARDS. Despite best practices, over-distension of the lung or inappropriate positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) is common. Finally, once spontaneous breathing has resumed and is assisted by the ventilator, an additional phenomenon occurs, called patient self-inflicted lung injury. The drive for breathing in many patients is stimulated by lung inflammation, and strong breathing efforts can generate high distending pressures, causing lung (and systemic) inflammation and organ damage. Whether the management of COVID-19 induced ARDS should differ from all other ARDS has been debated at length but has no clear response
Recent advances in our understanding of bedside physiology (airway closure, recruitability, lung distension, respiratory drive) can now be applied for an individual titration of mechanical ventilation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This study is also a basket design, which examines a single intervention in multiple disease populations. This basket trial consists of an identical 2-arm mechanical ventilation protocol implemented in two different study populations (patients with COVID-19-induced ARDS, and patients with all ARDS not induced by COVID-19). The protocol and procedures are identical between the two study populations in this basket trial.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Active comparator | Other: Standard Ventilation StrategyStandard ventilation strategy. |
| Respiratory Mechanics | Experimental | Other: Respiratory MechanicsThe goal of this arm is to individualize tidal volume (VT) and PEEP according to respiratory mechanics. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Age ≥ 18 y
- Moderate or severe ARDS (PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 200 mmHg) within 48 h of meeting Berlin ARDS criteria (Patients who were eligible at the time of screening and whose PaO2/FiO2 became > 200 mm Hg under prone positioning when starting the protocol remained eligible)
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Received continuous mechanical ventilation > 7 days
- Known or clinically suspected elevated intracranial pressure (>18mmHg) necessitating strict control of PaCO2
- Known pregnancy
- Broncho-pleural fistula
- Severe liver disease (Child-Pugh Score ≥ 10)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Respiratory MechanicsDifferent maneuvers based on respiratory mechanics will be assessed at the bedside and will be used to individualize ventilator parameters. Recruitability will be assessed with a one breath decremental PEEP maneuver, and search for airway closure with a low-flow pressure volume or pressure-time curve. If the patient has airway closure, the minimal PEEP will be set at the airway opening pressure to avoid closure. If the patient is considered recruitable, the goal is to set PEEP at or above 15cmH20 to maximize alveolar recruitment, until the plateau pressure reaches the safety limit. Volume control ventilation at 6ml·kg-1 will be used. Once spontaneous breathing has started, the occlusion pressure (P0.1) will be maintained within targets. | Other | Respiratory Mechanics |
| Standard Ventilation StrategyPatients randomized to the control arm will receive standard care. The PEEP is adjusted for oxygenation based on a PEEP-FiO2 table, either the low PEEP-FiO2 or the high PEEP-FiO2 table. Volume targeted ventilation with initial VT 6 mL·kg-1 and Plateau pressure at 30 cmH2O or below, targeting PaO2 60-80 or SpO2 90-95%, adjusted as per the protocol. Pressure-support ventilation is at physician's discretion, but recommended when FiO2 <60%, and is titrated VT 6-8 mL·kg-1. | Other | Control |
Primary outcome
All-cause 60-day mortality
Time frame: 60 days
The lack of an appropriate surrogate endpoint, and the high baseline mortality rate mandate a multicentre RCT to determine the mortality effects of setting the ventilator based on recruitability and effort compared with conventional ventilation.
5 secondary outcomes
Duration of ventilation
Time frame: May exceed 60 days
Duration of ICU and hospital stay
Time frame: May exceed 60 days
Number of patients with organ dysfunction
Time frame: Day 1-7, 14, 21, 28
Number of patients with barotrauma
Time frame: Up to 60 days
Mortality at ICU discharge, 28 days, and hospital discharge
Time frame: Up to date of ICU discharge, 28 days, and hospital discharge
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jan 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41730551Coudroy R, Telias I, Jonkman A, Thille AW, Diehl JL, Peron N, Ko M, Bourion AA, Tiribelli N, Fredes S, Gutierrez M, Manchado Bruno A, Vasquez DN, Pratto RA, Plotnikow GA, Bianchini F, Accoce M, Dorado J, Spadaro S, La Rosa R, Prat G, Bailly P, Delbove A, Pacheco-Reyes A, Roca O, Kuteifan K, Rouze A, Grieco DL, Izura-Gomez M, Mancebo J, Sigaud F, Terzi N, Saccheri C, Dellamonica J, Richecoeur J, Setten M, Rauseo M, Beloncle F, Repusseau B, Roze H, Tran-Van D, Damiani F, Slama M, Kaufman DA, Maraffi T, Goligher EC, Plantefeve G, Determann R, Giamou M, Pham T, Del Sorbo L, Keown-Stoneman CDG, Nisenbaum R, Thorpe K, Piraino T, Chen L, Juni P, Ferguson ND, Slutsky AS, Brochard L; CAVIARDS study group. Careful ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome: the protocol of the CAVIARDS international multicentre randomised basket trial. BMJ Open. 2026 Feb 23;16(2):e115775. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115775.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39964860Villalba DS, Matesa A, Boni S, Gutierrez FJ, Moracci R, Plotnikow GA. Impact of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy on the Pressure of the Airway System in Humans. Respir Care. 2025 Jan;70(1):10-16. doi: 10.1089/respcare.12082.
- Study websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The final anonymized trial dataset will be available on reasonable written request to the principal investigator one year after publication of the main manuscript.
Related trials for ARDS
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Development and Multicenter Validation of an Explainable System for Neonatal ARDS-Compatible Phenotyping
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Assessment of Blood Viscosity in ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)
ARDS
Recruiting
Comparing Surfactant Administration Through Supraglottic Airway and Thin Catheter for Preterm Infants
Surfactant, Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal)
Recruiting
REspiratory MEchanics for Delivering Individualised Exogenous Surfactant
Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infant
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Laurent Brochard, MD principal investigator
Unity Health Toronto
33 sites in 8 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Respiratory Mechanics and Standard Ventilation Strategy in people with ARDS, run by Unity Health Toronto at 33 sites in 8 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 33 sites in France, Argentina, Canada, Italy, Spain and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Laurent Brochard, MD (416-864-6060 ext. 5686, laurent.brochard@unityhealth.to), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
All-cause 60-day mortality (time frame: 60 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03963622, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jan 2026.