Hair RemovalEmeraldNCT03945383
Clinical Investigation of Safety and Effectiveness of Emerald IPLdevice
A study testing Treatment with IPL device in people with Hair Removal, run by Philips Healthcare at 3 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Prospective, multi-center, single-arm, single blinded (Philips hair counter) study in healthy women of skin types I up to and including V. Safety and efficacy of hair removal with the Emerald IPL-device will be investigated for treatment in face of subjects with ST I - IV and for treatment in face, axilla, bikini… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Hair Removal
- What is being tested?
- Treatment with IPL device
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 15 Apr 2019to 14 Jan 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Be willing to provide informed consent
- Are healthy female subjects, in age of 18-65 years
- Have natural body hair color that is dark blonde, brown or black in the designated treatment areas
- 3.1. Subjects of ST I-IV - Face group:
- 3.1.1 Have Fitzpatrick Skin Type I, II, III, or IV
- 3.1.2 Measure melanin value ≤ 375 in the qualifying treatment areas bilateral on upper lip (face)
Show all 18Show fewer
- 3.1.3. Have a minimum of 10 hairs in the 1x2cm2 qualifying treatment areas bilateral on upper lip (face), by visual inspection
- 3.2. Subjects of ST V - All body area group:
- 3.2.1. Have Fitzpatrick Skin Type V
- 3.2.2. Measure melanin value ≤ 553 in the qualifying treatment areas bilateral on upper lip (face), axilla, bikini line, and leg
- 3.2.3. Have a minimum of 10 hairs in the 1x2cm2 qualifying treatment areas bilateral on upper lip (face), by visual inspection
- 3.2.4.Have a minimum of 24 hairs in each of the 2x4cm2 qualifying treatment areas bilateral on axilla, bikini line, and leg, by visual inspection
- Be either post-menopausal or surgically sterilized, or using a medically acceptable form of birth control (e.g., oral contraceptives, IUD, contraceptive implant, barrier methods with spermicide or abstinence, etc.).
- Be willing to participate in all study visits
- Be willing to refrain from deliberate exposure to strong sun, products or procedures that would cause the skin to become darker in the designated treatment areas during the treatment phase
- Be willing to refrain from the use of hair growth inhibitors/accelerators during the course of the study
- Be willing to refrain from waxing, depilating or epilating of the axilla, bikini line, leg, and face
- Be willing to refrain from using aspirin or NSAIDs (e.g. acetaminophen, ibuprofen, etc.) within 5 days prior to and 5 days after treatment(s) -
Who cannot join
- Have natural body hair color that is white, light blond, or red in the designated treatment areas
- 1.1. Subjects of ST I to IV - Face group:
- 1.1.1. Have Fitzpatrick Skin Type V or VI
- 1.1.2. Measure melanin value higher than 375 in the qualifying treatment areas bilateral on upper lip
- 1.1.3. Have fewer than 2 qualifying treatment areas on bilateral on upper lip (face)
- 1.2. Subjects of ST V - All body area group:
Show all 40Show fewer
- 1.2.1. Have Fitzpatrick Skin Type I, II, III, IV, or VI
- 1.2.2. Measure melanin value higher than 553 in any of the qualifying treatment areas bilateral on the body
- 1.2.3. Have fewer than 8 qualifying treatment areas bilateral: 2 in face, 2 in axilla, 2 on bikini line, and 2 on legs
- Have a malignant or pre-malignant pigment in the area to be treated
- Have scarring or infection of the area to be treated
- Have a known history of photosensitivity or use of medication known to induce photosensitivity
- Are currently pregnant or lactating or planning be become pregnant in the period of the study, per subject report
- Are currently on a daily dose of aspirin or NSAIDs (e.g. acetaminophen, ibuprofen, etc.) or have taken aspirin and/or NSAIDs within 5 days prior to treatment that would reduce or increase the sensation of pain
- Are not willing to abstain from the use of products or light exposure that would induce tanning in the treatment areas during the IPL treatment period (first 10 months)
- Have a history of immunosuppressive disease (including HIV infection or AIDS)
- Are on a anticoagulative medication or thromboembolic condition
- Have taken any form of isotretinoin (such as Accutane or Roaccutane etc.) in the last six months
- Have an active implantable device such as a pacemaker, neurostimulator or internal defibrillator
- Have used waxing or other methods of root hair removal, or photo-epilation in the areas to be treated within 6 months prior to treatment
- Have been exposed to strong sunlight or an artificial tanning machine in the area to be treated within 4 weeks of enrolment
- Have a tattoo(s), warts, moles, benign skin lesions, dark pigmented areas, permanent make-up etc. in the areas to be treated.
- Have eczema, psoriasis, lesions, open wounds or any skin affliction in the areas to be treated
- Have a history of keloid scar formation
- Have a history of herpes outbreaks in the areas to be treated
- Have a history of photosensitive epilepsy
- Have a condition related to hormonal changes like polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) or taking drugs leading to hormonal changes resulting in excessive hair growth like hirsutism or idiopathic hirsutism
- Have diabetes, or metabolic disease that affects hair growth
- Taking immunosuppressive medication(s)
- Have a disease related to photosensitivity, such as polymorphic light eruption (PMLE), solar urticaria, porphyria etc.
- Have a history of skin cancer, including past basal cell carcinoma and/or squamous cell carcinoma in the areas to be treated
- Have a history of any radiation therapy in any of the areas to be treated
- Have history of radiation therapy in non-treatment areas within 5 years
- Have a history of chemotherapy
- Have used hair growth inhibitors and/or accelerators within 6 months preceding enrolment
- Have had laser or electrolysis treatment for the removal of hair in the areas to be treated within the last year
- Have natural body hair colors of white, grey, light to mid-blond, or red in the areas to be treated
- Have bleaching of their body hair in the areas to be treated 6 months prior to study enrolment
- Have shaved the areas to be treated within 7 days prior to study enrolment
- Participating in other clinical studies prior to, or concurrently with this study, that could be deemed to interfere with full and complete participation in this study - as determined by the site investigator.
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
United States3 sites
Great Lakes Clinical Trials
Chicago, Illinois, 60640
My Community Research Center
Miami, Florida, 33155
Virginia Clinical Research
Norfolk, Virginia, 23502
About this study
Official title: Clinical Investigation of Safety and Efficacy of the Emerald IPL Device for Hair Reduction for the Extension of Its Intended Use to Face and to Skin Type V Population
Prospective, multi-center, single-arm, single blinded (Philips hair counter) study in healthy women of skin types I up to and including V.
Safety and efficacy of hair removal with the Emerald IPL-device will be investigated for treatment in face of subjects with ST I - IV and for treatment in face, axilla, bikini area, and legs of subjects with ST V.
Read more
In-clinic, the study subjects will undergo twelve IPL-treatments bilaterally at the qualified areas (face and / or axilla, bikini line, and legs) with the Emerald IPL device applied by a device operator.
Hair re-growth in each area will be evaluated separately and across all skin types.
After the 4 bi-weekly treatments, one follow-up visit will be organized two weeks after the 4th treatment. After the completion of the full treatment cycle (12 treatments), subjects will be followed for 1 and 3 months (short-term follow-up) and for 6, 9 and 12 months (long-term follow up).
Read the detailed description
Hair grows in cyclic phases: anagen, catagen and telogen. These phases impact on how the process of light-based hair removal works. The hair grows during the anagen phase, which has the longest duration in the hair growth cycle. Hair growth ends with the transition from anagen into the catagen phase, a short transition phase to prepare for the resting phase, the telogen, which ends with shedding of the hair and the start of the hair growth cycle. During telogen phase, the hair follicle remains inactive. Each hair follicle is independent and goes through the growth cycle at different times. As presented in table 5 [11], the duration of the growth cycle of the upper lip, axilla and bikini line are different from that of the legs. In general, the telogen and anagen phase's durations of the cycle are longest for the legs (i.e., 24 and 16 weeks, respectively) and the shortest for upper lip (i.e. 6 weeks for both phases). Therefore, hair response to the IPL treatment will be evaluated by body area.
The efficacy of permanent hair reduction will be measured following the definition of permanent hair reduction according to the FDA as follows: "Permanent hair reduction is defined as the long-term, stable reduction in the number of hairs re-growing after a treatment regime, which may include several sessions. The number of hairs re-growing must be stable over time greater than the duration of the complete growth cycle of hair follicles, which varies from four to twelve months according to body location. Permanent hair reduction does not necessarily imply the elimination of all hairs in the treatment area."
In an attempt to promote permanent hair reduction, the aim is to expose all hairs at least once to an IPL flash and therefore treatment will cover the full duration of a hair growth cycle). The longest relevant full hair growth cycle is on the legs (40 weeks, excluding approximately 2 weeks for the catagen phase). Therefore, a treatment duration of 10 months (approximately 38weeks) has been selected: a full IPL treatment cycle consists of 4 initial treatments, once every 2 weeks, followed by 8 maintenance (monthly) treatments, once every 4 weeks. The hair growth cycle on face (upper lip) is the shortest (12 weeks, 6 weeks in anagen, 6 weeks in telogen phases). The initial treatments in 2 weeks interval are expected to be most beneficial for face treatment.
For this study, there are two cohorts for enrollment:
- Subjects with Skin Type I-IV for treatment of Face only. (N=53)
- Subjects with Skin Type V for treatment of all body areas: Face, Axilla, Bikini line and leg. (N=19)
The visits are as follows:
Screening Visit: The volunteers are screened to identify subjects who meet all of the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria. Device settings are selected based on skin tone and comfort evaluation..
Visits 1-4 (TX1-TX4): Four treatments and the collection of safety and efficacy data are scheduled to occur every 2 weeks/ 14 days; Visits 5 (Initial Treatment 2wk Follow-up): Safety and efficacy data are collected 2 weeks/ 14 days after 4th treatment to demonstrate hair removal performance 8 weeks after baseline.
- Conditions
- Hair Removal
- Being tested
- Treatment with IPL device
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Treatment with IPL deviceDevice
Treatment with IPL device
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment with IPL device | Experimental | The Emerald IPL device is applied by the Investigator or designee to the right and left side of the body. Treatment areas are 2x4 cm2 for the leg and bikini line areas. The entire axilla and face (upper lip) area will be treated due to the small area involved. Receives: Device: Treatment with IPL device |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of subjects with at least 30% hair reduction relative to baseline at 8 and 10 weeks after baseline and at 1 and 3 months after last treatment
Efficacy of the device will be measured by evaluating the proportion of subjects with >= 30% hair reduction on the face, axilae, bikini area and legs following the intensive treatment phase at 8 and 10 weeks as well as during short term follow up of 1 month and 3 months after the last treatment.
Measured: approximately 13 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Safety will be measured by proportion of treatment-emerged, anticipated adverse events, non-anticipated adverse events, serious adverse events and other related reasons for discontinuation.
The primary safety endpoints include the treatment-emerged, anticipated adverse events, non-anticipated adverse events, serious adverse events and reasons for discontinuation during the treatment of the face, axilae, bikini area and legs with the device as well as during the follow-up period.
Measured: Approximately 22 months
Assessment of the subjective satisfaction with the treatment results of the Emerald IPL device for removal of unwanted hair on face, axillae, bikini area, and legs: 5-point Likert satisfaction scale
Percent of top-two category answers of 5-point Likert satisfaction scale in assessment of subjective satisfaction with the treatment results in all body areas.
Measured: Approximately 22 months
Assessment of the acceptance of the Emerald IPL devices for removal of unwanted hair in each body area: Percent of top-two category answers in assessment of acceptance
Percent of top-two category answers in assessment of acceptance of hair reduction, skin smoothness, and comfort after treatment with Philips investigational IPL devices in all body areas.
Measured: Approximately 22 months
Proportion of subjects with at least 30% hair reduction relative to baseline at 6, 9 and 12 months post-final treatment per body area.
Efficacy of the device will be measured by evaluating the proportion of subjects with >= 30% hair reduction on the face, axilae, bikini area and legs during the long term follow up of 1 month and 3 months after the last treatment.
Measured: Approximately 22 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 May 2019
- Study start15 Apr 2019
- Primary completion14 Jan 2022
- Study completion14 Jan 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hair RemovalStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- All enrolled subjects will be treated with the investigational device
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Philips Healthcare
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Rupal Trivedi, M.D., Principal investigator, Great Lakes Clinical TrialsDavid Pariser, M.D., Principal investigator, Virginia Clinical Research
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03945383
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PC-BEA-Emerald STV&Face-10560
- Acronym
- Emerald
- Status last verified
- Oct 2022
- First submitted
- 29 Apr 2019
- Last updated
- 19 Oct 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Altshuler GB, Anderson RR, Manstein D, Zenzie HH, Smirnov MZ. Extended theory of selective photothermolysis. Lasers Surg Med. 2001;29(5):416-32. doi: 10.1002/lsm.1136.
PubMed 11891730Ravnbak MH. Objective determination of Fitzpatrick skin type. Dan Med Bull. 2010 Aug;57(8):B4153.
PubMed 20682135Shamsuddin K et. al, The reliability of Fitzpatrick Skin Type Chart Comparing to Mexameter (Mx 18) in measuring skin color among first trimester, Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine 2016, Vol. 16 (3): 59-65
Gold MH, Bell MW, Foster TD, Street S. Long-term epilation using the EpiLight broad band, intense pulsed light hair removal system. Dermatol Surg. 1997 Oct;23(10):909-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1997.tb00746.x.
PubMed 9357500Gold MH, Bell MW, Foster TD, Street S. One-year follow-up using an intense pulsed light source for long-term hair removal. J Cutan Laser Ther. 1999 Sep;1(3):167-71. doi: 10.1080/14628839950516823.
PubMed 11360413Dierickx CC. Hair removal by lasers and intense pulsed light sources. Dermatol Clin. 2002 Jan;20(1):135-46. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8635(03)00052-4.
PubMed 11859588Thaysen-Petersen D, Bjerring P, Dierickx C, Nash JF, Town G, Haedersdal M. A systematic review of light-based home-use devices for hair removal and considerations on human safety. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012 May;26(5):545-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04353.x. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
PubMed 22126235Town G, Ash C, Dierickx C, Fritz K, Bjerring P, Haedersdal M. Guidelines on the safety of light-based home-use hair removal devices from the European Society for Laser Dermatology. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012 Jul;26(7):799-811. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04406.x. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
PubMed 22211702Fitzpatrick TB. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol. 1988 Jun;124(6):869-71. doi: 10.1001/archderm.124.6.869. No abstract available.
PubMed 3377516
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Oct 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Investigation of Safety and Efficacy of the Emerald IPL Device for Hair Reduction for the Extension of Its Intended Use to Face and to Skin Type V Population
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03945383
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Emerald / PC-BEA-Emerald STV&Face-10560
- Conditions
- Hair Removal
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Philips HealthcareIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 15 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 14 Jan 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 May 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Prospective, multi-center, single-arm, single blinded (Philips hair counter) study in healthy women of skin types I up to and including V.
Safety and efficacy of hair removal with the Emerald IPL-device will be investigated for treatment in face of subjects with ST I - IV and for treatment in face, axilla, bikini area, and legs of subjects with ST V.
In-clinic, the study subjects will undergo twelve IPL-treatments bilaterally at the qualified areas (face and / or axilla, bikini line, and legs) with the Emerald IPL device applied by a device operator.
Hair re-growth in each area will be evaluated separately and across all skin types.
After the 4 bi-weekly treatments, one follow-up visit will be organized two weeks after the 4th treatment. After the completion of the full treatment cycle (12 treatments), subjects will be followed for 1 and 3 months (short-term follow-up) and for 6, 9 and 12 months (long-term follow up).
Detailed description
Hair grows in cyclic phases: anagen, catagen and telogen. These phases impact on how the process of light-based hair removal works. The hair grows during the anagen phase, which has the longest duration in the hair growth cycle. Hair growth ends with the transition from anagen into the catagen phase, a short transition phase to prepare for the resting phase, the telogen, which ends with shedding of the hair and the start of the hair growth cycle. During telogen phase, the hair follicle remains inactive. Each hair follicle is independent and goes through the growth cycle at different times. As presented in table 5 [11], the duration of the growth cycle of the upper lip, axilla and bikini line are different from that of the legs. In general, the telogen and anagen phase's durations of the cycle are longest for the legs (i.e., 24 and 16 weeks, respectively) and the shortest for upper lip (i.e. 6 weeks for both phases). Therefore, hair response to the IPL treatment will be evaluated by body area.
The efficacy of permanent hair reduction will be measured following the definition of permanent hair reduction according to the FDA as follows: "Permanent hair reduction is defined as the long-term, stable reduction in the number of hairs re-growing after a treatment regime, which may include several sessions. The number of hairs re-growing must be stable over time greater than the duration of the complete growth cycle of hair follicles, which varies from four to twelve months according to body location. Permanent hair reduction does not necessarily imply the elimination of all hairs in the treatment area."
In an attempt to promote permanent hair reduction, the aim is to expose all hairs at least once to an IPL flash and therefore treatment will cover the full duration of a hair growth cycle). The longest relevant full hair growth cycle is on the legs (40 weeks, excluding approximately 2 weeks for the catagen phase). Therefore, a treatment duration of 10 months (approximately 38weeks) has been selected: a full IPL treatment cycle consists of 4 initial treatments, once every 2 weeks, followed by 8 maintenance (monthly) treatments, once every 4 weeks. The hair growth cycle on face (upper lip) is the shortest (12 weeks, 6 weeks in anagen, 6 weeks in telogen phases). The initial treatments in 2 weeks interval are expected to be most beneficial for face treatment.
For this study, there are two cohorts for enrollment:
- Subjects with Skin Type I-IV for treatment of Face only. (N=53)
- Subjects with Skin Type V for treatment of all body areas: Face, Axilla, Bikini line and leg. (N=19)
The visits are as follows:
Screening Visit: The volunteers are screened to identify subjects who meet all of the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria. Device settings are selected based on skin tone and comfort evaluation..
Visits 1-4 (TX1-TX4): Four treatments and the collection of safety and efficacy data are scheduled to occur every 2 weeks/ 14 days; Visits 5 (Initial Treatment 2wk Follow-up): Safety and efficacy data are collected 2 weeks/ 14 days after 4th treatment to demonstrate hair removal performance 8 weeks after baseline.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- All enrolled subjects will be treated with the investigational device
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment with IPL device | Experimental | Device: Treatment with IPL deviceThe Emerald IPL device is applied by the Investigator or designee to the right and left side of the body. Treatment areas are 2x4 cm2 for the leg and bikini line areas. The entire axilla and face (upper lip) area will be treated due to the small area involved. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Be willing to provide informed consent
- Are healthy female subjects, in age of 18-65 years
- Have natural body hair color that is dark blonde, brown or black in the designated treatment areas
- 3.1.1 Have Fitzpatrick Skin Type I, II, III, or IV
- 3.1.2 Measure melanin value ≤ 375 in the qualifying treatment areas bilateral on upper lip (face)
Key exclusion criteria (40 listed)
- Have natural body hair color that is white, light blond, or red in the designated treatment areas
- 1.1.1. Have Fitzpatrick Skin Type V or VI
- 1.1.2. Measure melanin value higher than 375 in the qualifying treatment areas bilateral on upper lip
- 1.1.3. Have fewer than 2 qualifying treatment areas on bilateral on upper lip (face)
- 1.2.1. Have Fitzpatrick Skin Type I, II, III, IV, or VI
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment with IPL deviceTreatment with IPL device | Device | Treatment with IPL device |
Primary outcome
Proportion of subjects with at least 30% hair reduction relative to baseline at 8 and 10 weeks after baseline and at 1 and 3 months after last treatment
Time frame: approximately 13 months
Efficacy of the device will be measured by evaluating the proportion of subjects with >= 30% hair reduction on the face, axilae, bikini area and legs following the intensive treatment phase at 8 and 10 weeks as well as during short term follow up of 1 month and 3 months after the last treatment.
4 secondary outcomes
Safety will be measured by proportion of treatment-emerged, anticipated adverse events, non-anticipated adverse events, serious adverse events and other related reasons for discontinuation.
Time frame: Approximately 22 months
Assessment of the subjective satisfaction with the treatment results of the Emerald IPL device for removal of unwanted hair on face, axillae, bikini area, and legs: 5-point Likert satisfaction scale
Time frame: Approximately 22 months
Assessment of the acceptance of the Emerald IPL devices for removal of unwanted hair in each body area: Percent of top-two category answers in assessment of acceptance
Time frame: Approximately 22 months
Proportion of subjects with at least 30% hair reduction relative to baseline at 6, 9 and 12 months post-final treatment per body area.
Time frame: Approximately 22 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Oct 2022.
- Background: PubMed 11891730Altshuler GB, Anderson RR, Manstein D, Zenzie HH, Smirnov MZ. Extended theory of selective photothermolysis. Lasers Surg Med. 2001;29(5):416-32. doi: 10.1002/lsm.1136.
- Background: PubMed 20682135Ravnbak MH. Objective determination of Fitzpatrick skin type. Dan Med Bull. 2010 Aug;57(8):B4153.
- BackgroundShamsuddin K et. al, The reliability of Fitzpatrick Skin Type Chart Comparing to Mexameter (Mx 18) in measuring skin color among first trimester, Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine 2016, Vol. 16 (3): 59-65
- Background: PubMed 9357500Gold MH, Bell MW, Foster TD, Street S. Long-term epilation using the EpiLight broad band, intense pulsed light hair removal system. Dermatol Surg. 1997 Oct;23(10):909-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1997.tb00746.x.
- Background: PubMed 11360413Gold MH, Bell MW, Foster TD, Street S. One-year follow-up using an intense pulsed light source for long-term hair removal. J Cutan Laser Ther. 1999 Sep;1(3):167-71. doi: 10.1080/14628839950516823.
- Background: PubMed 11859588Dierickx CC. Hair removal by lasers and intense pulsed light sources. Dermatol Clin. 2002 Jan;20(1):135-46. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8635(03)00052-4.
- Background: PubMed 22126235Thaysen-Petersen D, Bjerring P, Dierickx C, Nash JF, Town G, Haedersdal M. A systematic review of light-based home-use devices for hair removal and considerations on human safety. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012 May;26(5):545-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04353.x. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
- Background: PubMed 22211702Town G, Ash C, Dierickx C, Fritz K, Bjerring P, Haedersdal M. Guidelines on the safety of light-based home-use hair removal devices from the European Society for Laser Dermatology. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012 Jul;26(7):799-811. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04406.x. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
- Background: PubMed 3377516Fitzpatrick TB. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol. 1988 Jun;124(6):869-71. doi: 10.1001/archderm.124.6.869. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hair Removal
Active, not recruiting
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Candela Technology
Hair Reduction, Tattoo Removal
Recruiting
Pilot Trial Assessing the Effectiveness of Laser Hair Depilation on Pilonidal Disease Recurrence in Patients With Darker Skin Color
Pilonidal Disease
Not yet recruiting
Vacuum-Assisted Clipper in Preoperative Hair Removal: Effects on Contamination and Skin Integrity
Microbial Contamination, Environmental Contamination
Not yet recruiting
Evidence-Based Integrated Protocol to Maximize Hair Follicle Survival in Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE)
Androgenetic Alopecia, Cicatricial Alopecia
Not yet recruiting
Hair Regrowth Following Partial Thickness Removal of SSCIS
Squamous Cell Carcinoma (Skin), Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Situ
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Rupal Trivedi, M.D. principal investigator
Great Lakes Clinical Trials
David Pariser, M.D. principal investigator
Virginia Clinical Research
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Treatment with IPL device in people with Hair Removal, run by Philips Healthcare at 3 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 18 inclusion and 40 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Oct 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of subjects with at least 30% hair reduction relative to baseline at 8 and 10 weeks after baseline and at 1 and 3 months after last treatment (time frame: approximately 13 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03945383, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Oct 2022.