AzTrials
AzTrials

PainNCT03941717

Testing the Effectiveness of a Parent and Child Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Child Venipuncture

A study testing Mindfulness-Based Condition and Unfocused attention Condition in people with Pain and Needle Stick, run by University of Guelph at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study investigates the impact of mindfulness-based intervention for children undergoing a blood-draw and their accompanying parent on (a) child ratings of pain and fear, (b) parent and child ratings of parent distress, and (c) parent perceptions of child pain and fear. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 7 to 12 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Pain, Needle Stick
What is being tested?
Mindfulness-Based Condition and Unfocused attention Condition
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
61 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
4 Oct 2019to 13 Mar 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 7 to 12 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Proficiency in English

Who cannot join

  • Major developmental delays in child

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • University of Guelph

    Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial Testing the Effectiveness of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Both Parents and Children During Child Venipuncture

This study investigates the impact of mindfulness-based intervention for children undergoing a blood-draw and their accompanying parent on (a) child ratings of pain and fear, (b) parent and child ratings of parent distress, and (c) parent perceptions of child pain and fear. Half of the parent-child pairs will receive the mindfulness-based intervention, while half will receive an unfocused-attention task to serve as a comparison with no active component.

Read the detailed description

To date, there are no randomized controlled trials (RCT) involving a mindfulness intervention for pediatric acute pain. Moreover, this will be the first study to investigate a parent mindfulness intervention in the context of child acute pain. Within a randomized control trial, the objectives of this study are to test the effectiveness of a mindfulness-based intervention for children undergoing a venipuncture and their accompanying parent on (a) child ratings of pain and fear, (b) parent and child ratings of parent distress, and (c) parent perceptions of child pain and fear. Participants will complete questionnaires immediately before and after child venipuncture. This study aims to offer a novel intervention that may improve both parent and child experience during a stressful situation in which parent and child unmanaged distress has deleterious effects. The long-term objectives of this line of research are to improve extant pain management interventions for children undergoing needle-pokes or other painful procedures.

Moderator Aims: To identify possible moderators of a differential treatment outcome (parent and child responses during the needle-poke). These psychological factors include parent and child state catastrophizing, trait experiential avoidance, and trait mindfulness which will be investigated as moderators of the impact of experimental group on the primary outcomes of child self-reported pain and fear, and secondary outcome of parent self-reported distress.

Conditions
Pain, Needle Stick
Being tested
Mindfulness-Based Condition, Unfocused attention Condition
Keywords
pain management, children, parents, mindfulness
Medical subject headings
Pain, Needlestick Injuries, Agnosia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Mindfulness-Based ConditionOther

    Each script for the mindfulness-based intervention was slightly modified to fit the context of a venipuncture, and begins with instructions to take deep breaths. Both scripts aim to cultivate present moment awareness of experiences, curiosity, nonjudgement, and acceptance of experiences as they unfold. In particular, the scripts ask that the participant visualize their worries and feelings as a cloud in the sky, and probes for curious thoughts about these experiences. The temporary nature of sensations is described, and the participant is asked to keep this openness and curiosity during the venipuncture.

  • Unfocused attention ConditionOther

    Each script for the unfocused attention task instructs participants to allow their mind and thoughts to roam. The aim is to encourage the participant to continue thinking and mind wandering as they typically would.

Study groups in NCT03941717
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Mindfulness-Based ConditionExperimentalParents and children in the mindfulness intervention condition will be provided with a tablet and accompanying headphones, and will listen to pre-recorded audio of a mindfulness activity. There is a parent and child version of the mindfulness intervention. Both scripts were developed by Siegel and Bryson (2011), and include a parent and child version of a mindfulness activity targeting worries and anxiety. Adjustments to the child script were informed by the work of Petter and colleagues (2013). Adjustments to the parent script were informed by the work of Garland and colleagues (2015). This activity will last 5-minutes.
Receives: Other: Mindfulness-Based Condition
Unfocused attention ConditionSham comparatorParents and children in the unfocused attention condition will be provided with a tablet and accompanying headphones, and will listen to pre-recorded audio of an unfocused attention activity. There is a parent and child version of this activity. The parent version has been validated in other research with healthy adults as a control for a mindfulness intervention (Garland, Hanley, Farb, \& Froeliger, 2015). This script was condensed in time from the original reading. The child version of the activity was developed for the current study, and was adapted from a mind-wandering script used for children aged 7-12 in past research (Spann, 2016). It was also informed by the unfocused attention script used for parents (Garland, Hanley, Farb, \& Froeliger, 2015), and work by Cahn and Polich (2009). This activity will last 5-mintues.
Receives: Other: Unfocused attention Condition

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Child pain during the needle: Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    Between group changes in child self-reported pain as rated on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The NRS has been used to assess pain intensity in children aged 7 and older during acutely painful procedures (Hsieh et al., 2017; Pagé, Stinson, Campbell, Isaac, \& Katz, 2013; Vervoort et al., 2011).The NRS is rated on an 11-point numerical rating scale, ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("a lot of pain").

    Measured: Within two minutes following the needle-poke.

  2. Child fear during the needle

    Between group changes in child self-reported fear as rated on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The NRS has been used to assess child fear in children aged 7 and older during acutely painful procedures (Hsieh et al., 2017; Vervoort et al., 2011). The NRS is rated on an 11-point numerical rating scale, ranging from 0 ("not scared") to 10 ("very scared").

    Measured: Within two minutes following the needle-poke.

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Child perceptions of parent distress

    Between group changes in child perceptions of parent fear as rated on a NRS (researcher generated). Children will be asked to "Tell us how upset you think your parent was during the needle". This item will be rated on an 11-point numerical rating scale, ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 10 ("extremely").

    Measured: Within five minutes following the needle-poke.

  2. Parent distress

    Between group changes in parent self-report distress as rated on a NRS. Parents will be asked to provide ratings indicating their level of distress experienced on a NRS (researcher generated). For the purpose of the current study, the NRS will ask parents to "Tell us how distressed you were during the needle". The NRS is rated on an 11-point numerical rating scale, ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 10 ("extremely").

    Measured: Within five minutes following the needle-poke.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 May 2019
  2. Study start4 Oct 2019
  3. Primary completion13 Mar 2020
  4. Study completion13 Mar 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The study will be a single-site, two-arm, parallel group RCT with an intervention group (mindfulness-based intervention) and control group (unfocused-attention task, no active components).
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
61 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03941717
Sponsor's protocol ID
REB 5481
Status last verified
May 2022
First submitted
5 May 2019
Last updated
1 Jun 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Hsieh LY, Chen YR, Lu MC. Efficacy of cold application on pain during chest tube removal: a randomized controlled trial: A CONSORT-compliant article. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Nov;96(46):e8642. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008642.

    PubMed 29145288
  • Page MG, Stinson J, Campbell F, Isaac L, Katz J. Identification of pain-related psychological risk factors for the development and maintenance of pediatric chronic postsurgical pain. J Pain Res. 2013;6:167-80. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S40846. Epub 2013 Mar 5.

    PubMed 23503375
  • Vervoort T, Goubert L, Vandenbossche H, Van Aken S, Matthys D, Crombez G. Child's and parents' catastrophizing about pain is associated with procedural fear in children: a study in children with diabetes and their mothers. Psychol Rep. 2011 Dec;109(3):879-95. doi: 10.2466/07.15.16.21.PR0.109.6.879-895.

    PubMed 22420118
  • Spann, C. A. (2016). Mindfulness and mind-wandering: the impact of brief interventions on child affect, arousal, and cognition. The University of Texas at Arlington. Retrieved from https://uta-ir.tdl.org/uta-ir/bitstream/handle/10106/25806/SPANN-DISSERTATION-2016.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

  • Cahn BR, Polich J. Meditation (Vipassana) and the P3a event-related brain potential. Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 Apr;72(1):51-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.03.013. Epub 2008 Sep 23.

    PubMed 18845193
  • Garland EL, Hanley A, Farb NA, Froeliger BE. State Mindfulness During Meditation Predicts Enhanced Cognitive Reappraisal. Mindfulness (N Y). 2015 Apr 1;6(2):234-242. doi: 10.1007/s12671-013-0250-6.

    PubMed 26085851
  • Petter M, Chambers CT, MacLaren Chorney J. The effects of mindfulness-based attention on cold pressor pain in children. Pain Res Manag. 2013 Jan-Feb;18(1):39-45. doi: 10.1155/2013/857045.

    PubMed 23457685
  • Siegel, D. J., & Bryson, T. P. (2011). The whole-brain child : 12 revolutionary strategies to nurture your child's developing mind. Delacorte Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ca/books/about/The_Whole_Brain_Child.html?id=APzgCL8mgHUC&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

  • Constantin KL, Moline RL, Pillai Riddell R, Spence JR, Fiacconi CM, Lupo-Flewelling K, McMurtry CM. Parent and child self- and co-regulation during pediatric venipuncture: Exploring heart rate variability and the effects of a mindfulness intervention. Dev Psychobiol. 2022 Jul;64(5):e22277. doi: 10.1002/dev.22277.

    PubMed 35603416

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Mindfulness-Based Condition and Unfocused attention Condition in people with Pain and Needle Stick, run by University of Guelph at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jun 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Child pain during the needle: Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (time frame: Within two minutes following the needle-poke.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03941717, which also lists 9 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jun 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in