AzTrials
AzTrials

Ureter InjuryPhase 2NCT03937505

A Safety and Efficacy Study of IS-001 Injection in Patients Undergoing Robotic Hysterectomy

A Phase 2 study testing IS-001 and No treatment in people with Ureter Injury, run by Intuitive Surgical at 3 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of intravenous injection of IS-001 to aid in intraoperative ureter structure delineation. Stage A of the study will determine the safe optimal dose and Stage B will determine expanded safety and efficacy for intraoperative ureter structure delineation for the identified… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Ureter Injury
What is being tested?
IS-001 and No treatment
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
94 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited States
Study dates
28 May 2019to 22 Jul 2021
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Female subject is between the ages of 18 and 75, inclusive
  • Subject is scheduled to undergo robotic gynecological surgery using a da Vinci® surgical system with Firefly® fluorescent imaging
  • Subject is willing and able to provide informed consent
  • Subject is considered capable of complying with study procedures

Who cannot join

  • Subject is pregnant or nursing
  • Subject has known active hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection
  • 4. Subject is already enrolled in another investigational study 5. Subject has any other condition or personal circumstance that, in the judgment of the Investigator, might interfere with the collection of complete quality data or represents an unacceptable safety profile

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United States3 sites
  • St.David's Medical Center

    Austin, Texas, 78758

  • Las Palmas Medical Center

    El Paso, Texas, 79902

  • George Washington University Hospital

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20037

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Phase 2 Multi-Center Safety and Efficacy Study of IS-001 Injection in Patients Undergoing Robotic Gynecological Surgery Using the da Vinci® Surgical System With Firefly® Fluorescent Imaging

This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of intravenous injection of IS-001 to aid in intraoperative ureter structure delineation. Stage A of the study will determine the safe optimal dose and Stage B will determine expanded safety and efficacy for intraoperative ureter structure delineation for the identified optimal dose in study participants.

Read the detailed description

Injury to the ureter, the duct by which urine passes from the kidney into the bladder, is a well-known and serious complication of pelvic and abdominal surgery that frequently goes unrecognized intraoperatively. This study seeks to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous IS-001 injection to improve surgeon ureter visualization during robotic-assisted surgery with the da Vinci® Surgical System and Firefly® imaging. Stage A will be a dose-escalation to determine the optimal dose for ureter visualization and Stage B will be an expanded safety and efficacy evaluation of the optimal dose. Stage B will include a no-drug safety control to evaluate the effects of surgery alone on the safety parameters of the study.

Conditions
Ureter Injury
Being tested
IS-001, No treatment
Keywords
robotic-assisted surgery, minimally invasive surgery

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • IS-001Drug

    intravenous injection of IS-001 investigational drug

  • No treatmentDrug

    no drug injection

Study groups in NCT03937505
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Dose-escalationExperimentalDose-cohort escalation of single intravenous injection of IS-001 starting with 20 mg (n=8), escalating in 20 mg increments until optimal dose is determined.
Receives: Drug: IS-001
Optimal dose-characterizationExperimentalSingle intravenous injection of IS-001 at the optimal dose will be administered to subjects assigned to the treatment group. Safety control subjects will not receive any study drug but will undergo robotic surgery and all associated safety assessment clinical trial procedures.
Receives: Drug: IS-001; Drug: No treatment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Evaluate fluorescent intensity of ureter by signal to background analysis

    Fluorescent intensity of ureter evaluated as signal to background

    Measured: 10 minutes

  2. Evaluate fluorescent intensity of ureter by signal to background analysis

    Fluorescent intensity of ureter evaluated as signal to background

    Measured: 30 minutes

  3. Evaluate fluorescent intensity of ureter by signal to background analysis

    Fluorescent intensity of ureter evaluated as signal to background

    Measured: 60 minutes

Secondary outcomes (25)
  1. Safety 12-Lead EKG Change from Baseline

    12-Lead EKG change from baseline in QTc

    Measured: 6 hours

  2. Incidence of abnormal blood work in tests results

    Safety hematology complete blood count laboratory assessments Change from Baseline

    Measured: 24 hours

  3. Incidence of abnormal blood work in tests results

    Safety hematology complete blood count laboratory assessments Change from Baseline

    Measured: 14 days

  4. Incidence of abnormal blood work in tests results

    Safety hematology comprehensive metabolic panel laboratory assessments Change from Baseline

    Measured: 24 hours

  5. Incidence of abnormal blood work in tests results

    Safety hematology comprehensive metabolic panel laboratory assessments Change from Baseline

    Measured: 14 days

  6. Incidence of abnormal urinalysis results

    Routine urinalysis laboratory assessment change from baseline

    Measured: 14 days

  7. Safety Adverse Events Monitoring

    Drug related adverse events monitoring through 14-days

    Measured: 14 days

  8. Pharmacokinetics Maximal Concentration (Cmax) of Drug Plasma Levels

    Maximal concentration of investigational drug-plasma levels (Cmax)

    Measured: 0, 1-2 hours and 2-3 hours

  9. Pharmacokinetics Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve from Time Zero to Last Sampling (AUClast)

    Area under the plasma curve from t(0) to last plasma sample

    Measured: 0, 1-2 hours and 2-3 hours

  10. Pharmacokinetics Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve from Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUCinf)

    Area under the plasma curve from t(0) extrapolated to infinity

    Measured: 0, 1-2 hours and 2-3 hours

  11. Pharmacokinetics Drug Plasma Clearance (CL)

    Clearance of the investigational drug from plasma

    Measured: 0, 1-2 hours and 2-3 hours

  12. Pharmacokinetics Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2)

    Half-life of the investigational drug in plasma

    Measured: 0, 1-2 hours and 2-3 hours

  13. Pharmacokinetics Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz)

    The apparent volume of distribution of the investigational drug

    Measured: 0, 1-2 hours and 2-3 hours

  14. Ureter Identification Efficacy on a Nominal Scale

    Independent reader assessment of ureter visibility of a 5 second video segment of the surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode on a nominal scale where 0=No and 1=Yes

    Measured: 10 minutes

  15. Ureter Identification Efficacy on a Nominal Scale

    Independent reader assessment of ureter visibility of a 5 second video segment of the surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode on a nominal scale where 0=No and 1=Yes

    Measured: 30 minutes

  16. Ureter Identification Efficacy on a Nominal Scale

    Independent reader assessment of ureter visibility of a 5 second video segment of the surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode on a nominal scale where 0=No and 1=Yes.

    Measured: 60 minutes

  17. Ureter Delineation Efficacy as Length of Line Drawn in Millimeters

    Independent reader assessment of ureter delineation on a still frame of the surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode. Length of line drawn on still frame where ureter is visible to independent reader is compared between imaging conditions.

    Measured: 10 minutes

  18. Ureter Delineation Efficacy as Length of Line Drawn

    Independent reader assessment of ureter delineation on a still frame of the surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode. Length of line drawn on still frame where ureter is visible to independent reader is compared between imaging conditions.

    Measured: 30 minutes

  19. Ureter Delineation Efficacy as Length of Line Drawn

    Independent reader assessment of ureter delineation on a still frame of the surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode. Length of line drawn on still frame where ureter is visible to independent reader is compared between imaging conditions.

    Measured: 60 minutes

  20. Surgeon Confidence of Ureter Visibility Assessed Post-Dose by Three-point Likert-type Scale

    Intra-operative surgeon rating of ureter visibility in surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode on a three point Likert-type scale where 0=No, 1=Uncertain and 2=Yes. Surgeon ureter visibility score will be compared between the two imaging conditions.

    Measured: 10 minutes post-dose

  21. Surgeon Confidence of Ureter Visibility Assessed Post-Dose by Three-point Likert-type Scale

    Intra-operative surgeon rating of ureter visibility in surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode on a three point Likert-type scale where 0=No, 1=Uncertain and 2=Yes. Surgeon ureter visibility score will be compared between the two imaging conditions.

    Measured: 30 minutes post-dose

  22. Surgeon Confidence of Ureter Visibility Assessed Post-Dose by Three-point Likert-type Scale

    Intra-operative surgeon rating of ureter visibility in surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode on a three point Likert-type scale where 0=No, 1=Uncertain and 2=Yes. Surgeon ureter visibility score will be compared between the two imaging conditions.

    Measured: 60 minutes post-dose

  23. Surgeon Assessment of Relative Ureter Contrast Post-Dose on a Five-point Likert-type Scale

    Intra-operative surgeon rating of relative ureter contrast in surgical field in Firefly® light mode on a five point Likert-type scale where 0=No Fluorescence, 1=Iso-Fluorescence, 2=Mild Fluorescence, 3= Moderate Fluorescence and 4=Strong Fluorescence. Surgeon contrast score will be compared to contrast scores at other time-points.

    Measured: 10 minutes post-dose

  24. Surgeon Assessment of Relative Ureter Contrast Post-Dose on a Five-point Likert-type Scale

    Intra-operative surgeon rating of relative ureter contrast in surgical field in Firefly® light mode on a five point Likert-type scale where 0=No Fluorescence, 1=Iso-Fluorescence, 2=Mild Fluorescence, 3= Moderate Fluorescence and 4=Strong Fluorescence. Surgeon contrast score will be compared to contrast scores at other time-points

    Measured: 30 minutes post-dose

  25. Surgeon Assessment of Relative Ureter Contrast Post-Dose on a Five-point Likert-type Scale

    Intra-operative surgeon rating of relative ureter contrast in surgical field in Firefly® light mode on a five point Likert-type scale where 0=No Fluorescence, 1=Iso-Fluorescence, 2=Mild Fluorescence, 3= Moderate Fluorescence and 4=Strong Fluorescence. Surgeon contrast score will be compared to contrast scores at other time-points.

    Measured: 60 minutes post-dose

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 May 2019
  2. Study start28 May 2019
  3. Primary completion8 Jul 2021
  4. Study completion22 Jul 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Sequential
Model description
Stage A is a dose-cohort escalation to determine optimal efficacious dose, Stage B is an expanded safety and efficacy evaluation of the optimal dose with a no-drug safety control group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
94 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03937505
Sponsor's protocol ID
ISI-124804-2
Status last verified
Aug 2021
First submitted
29 Apr 2019
Last updated
5 Aug 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing IS-001 and No treatment in people with Ureter Injury, run by Intuitive Surgical at 3 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Evaluate fluorescent intensity of ureter by signal to background analysis (time frame: 10 minutes). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Aug 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in