Testing Protocol With Healthy Individuals for FeasibilityNCT03929263
Parent-Adolescent Training on Neurofeedback and Synchrony
A study testing Real-time fMRI neurofeedback in people with Testing Protocol With Healthy Individuals for Feasibility, run by Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The study will test a real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) hyperscanning neurofeedback protocol for feasibility with ten mothers and their psychiatrically healthy adolescent daughters, with the eventual goal to test this in a sample of depressed adolescents in a future study. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 13 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Testing Protocol With Healthy Individuals for Feasibility
- What is being tested?
- Real-time fMRI neurofeedback
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 24 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 25 Sep 2019to 27 Feb 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 13 years and older
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Eligible for fMRI
- Sufficient English fluency to complete tasks
- BMI ≦ 40.0
- Right-handed
- Biological female
- Co-residing at least 4 days/week
Show all 11Show fewer
- Adult participants: Biological mother of adolescent participant
- Adult participants:Primary caregiver > 50% of child's lifespan
- Adult participants:BMI ≧ 18.0
- Adolescent participants: Age 13-17 years
- Adolescent participants: BMI ≧ 16.0
Who cannot join
- Current psychiatric diagnosis
- Medications influencing fMRI
- Medical conditions influencing fMRI
- Alcohol or psychoactive drug on scan day
- Adolescent participants: Neurodevelopmental delay
- Adolescent participants: History of mood or psychotic disorder
- Adolescent participants: History of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Laureate Institute for Brain Research
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74136
About this study
Official title: The Dyadic Inter-Brain Signaling (DIBS) Project With Parent-Adolescent Training on Neurofeedback and Synchrony
The study will test a real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) hyperscanning neurofeedback protocol for feasibility with ten mothers and their psychiatrically healthy adolescent daughters, with the eventual goal to test this in a sample of depressed adolescents in a future study.
Read the detailed description
This study will utilize a rigorous multi-method, multi-informant design to examine the effects of dyadic neurofeedback (dnf) on adolescent brain activation with fMRI hyperscanning. Parents and adolescents will also report on emotion regulation, depressive symptoms, and parenting practices. Data collection procedures will take place at the Laureate Institute for Brain Research (LIBR), which is equipped with two identical scanners that have advanced real-time fMRI systems capable of conducting parallel fMRI hyperscanning, including the capacity for neurofeedback. Parents will complete a phone screen to determine initial eligibility. If initial study criteria are met, a 2-hour in-person lab visit will be scheduled where mothers and daughters will complete consent/assent; diagnostic interviews; surveys on emotion regulation, parenting practices, depression, and anxiety; and additional screening. Survey data will be used for preliminary exploratory analyses. Based on data collected from the screening visit, participants will be invited to participate in the full study: a 4-hour visit where mothers and daughters will complete emotion ratings, mock scanner training, and fMRI tasks individually and together using hyperscanning (scan time = 16 min resting-state [2 runs], 7 min structural MRI, 40 min fMRI tasks, 10 min clinical MRI scans).
- Being tested
- Real-time fMRI neurofeedback
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Real-time fMRI neurofeedbackBehavioural
Participants will attempt to regulate own and/or their partner's brain activation in a specified brain region via real-time fMRI neurofeedback.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Real-time fMRI neurofeedback | Experimental | All participants will receive neurofeedback from the target region (no sham condition). Receives: Behavioral: Real-time fMRI neurofeedback |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Neurofeedback Rating Scale
Rating scale of perceived effectiveness in completing the task and changing brain activation. Likert scale ranging from 0-10, with higher numbers indicating greater perceived effectiveness.
Measured: Baseline (Acquired during scan session)
Emotion Rating Scale
Rating scale asking about current experience of various emotions (happy, sad, angry, etc.). Scale ranges from 0-10, with higher numbers indicating more intense emotions.
Measured: Baseline (Acquired during scan session)
Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent (BOLD) Signal Changes (Brain Activation)
Activation in the brain region targeted for neurofeedback and associated regions; resting-state network activity
Measured: Baseline (Acquired during scan session)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Apr 2019
- Study start25 Sep 2019
- Primary completion27 Feb 2021
- Study completion27 Feb 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Testing Protocol With Healthy Individuals for FeasibilityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Oklahoma State University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Kara L Kerr, PhD, Principal investigator, Oklahoma State University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03929263
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CHS2017011
- Status last verified
- Jun 2024
- First submitted
- 22 Apr 2019
- Last updated
- 24 Sep 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Kerr KL, Ratliff EL, Cohen ZP, Fuller S, Cosgrove KT, DeVille DC, Misaki M, Morris AS, Bodurka J. Real-Time Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Dyadic Neurofeedback for Emotion Regulation: A Proof-of-Concept Study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 May 26;16:910951. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.910951. eCollection 2022.
PubMed 35721350
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Sep 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Dyadic Inter-Brain Signaling (DIBS) Project With Parent-Adolescent Training on Neurofeedback and Synchrony
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03929263
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CHS2017011
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Oklahoma State University Center for Health SciencesUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Oklahoma State University
- Study start
- 25 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Feb 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 24 Sep 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study will test a real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) hyperscanning neurofeedback protocol for feasibility with ten mothers and their psychiatrically healthy adolescent daughters, with the eventual goal to test this in a sample of depressed adolescents in a future study.
Detailed description
This study will utilize a rigorous multi-method, multi-informant design to examine the effects of dyadic neurofeedback (dnf) on adolescent brain activation with fMRI hyperscanning. Parents and adolescents will also report on emotion regulation, depressive symptoms, and parenting practices. Data collection procedures will take place at the Laureate Institute for Brain Research (LIBR), which is equipped with two identical scanners that have advanced real-time fMRI systems capable of conducting parallel fMRI hyperscanning, including the capacity for neurofeedback. Parents will complete a phone screen to determine initial eligibility. If initial study criteria are met, a 2-hour in-person lab visit will be scheduled where mothers and daughters will complete consent/assent; diagnostic interviews; surveys on emotion regulation, parenting practices, depression, and anxiety; and additional screening. Survey data will be used for preliminary exploratory analyses. Based on data collected from the screening visit, participants will be invited to participate in the full study: a 4-hour visit where mothers and daughters will complete emotion ratings, mock scanner training, and fMRI tasks individually and together using hyperscanning (scan time = 16 min resting-state [2 runs], 7 min structural MRI, 40 min fMRI tasks, 10 min clinical MRI scans).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Real-time fMRI neurofeedback | Experimental | Behavioral: Real-time fMRI neurofeedbackAll participants will receive neurofeedback from the target region (no sham condition). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 13 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Eligible for fMRI
- Sufficient English fluency to complete tasks
- BMI ≦ 40.0
- Right-handed
- Biological female
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Current psychiatric diagnosis
- Medications influencing fMRI
- Medical conditions influencing fMRI
- Alcohol or psychoactive drug on scan day
- Adolescent participants: Neurodevelopmental delay
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Real-time fMRI neurofeedbackParticipants will attempt to regulate own and/or their partner's brain activation in a specified brain region via real-time fMRI neurofeedback. | Behavioural | Real-time fMRI neurofeedback |
Primary outcome
Neurofeedback Rating Scale
Time frame: Baseline (Acquired during scan session)
Rating scale of perceived effectiveness in completing the task and changing brain activation. Likert scale ranging from 0-10, with higher numbers indicating greater perceived effectiveness.
Emotion Rating Scale
Time frame: Baseline (Acquired during scan session)
Rating scale asking about current experience of various emotions (happy, sad, angry, etc.). Scale ranges from 0-10, with higher numbers indicating more intense emotions.
Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent (BOLD) Signal Changes (Brain Activation)
Time frame: Baseline (Acquired during scan session)
Activation in the brain region targeted for neurofeedback and associated regions; resting-state network activity
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Sep 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35721350Kerr KL, Ratliff EL, Cohen ZP, Fuller S, Cosgrove KT, DeVille DC, Misaki M, Morris AS, Bodurka J. Real-Time Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Dyadic Neurofeedback for Emotion Regulation: A Proof-of-Concept Study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 May 26;16:910951. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.910951. eCollection 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kara L Kerr, PhD principal investigator
Oklahoma State University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Real-time fMRI neurofeedback in people with Testing Protocol With Healthy Individuals for Feasibility, run by Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Sep 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Neurofeedback Rating Scale (time frame: Baseline (Acquired during scan session)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03929263, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Sep 2024.