PeriodontitisNCT03928080
Diagnostic Accuracy of Rapid Non-clinical Screening Tests for Early Detection of Periodontitis
An observational study of Periodontitis and Gingivitis, run by The European Research Group on Periodontology (ERGOPerio) at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Gum disease is the 6th most prevalent disease of mankind. It is a non-communicable non-resolving inflammation; if untreated it leads to tooth loss and inability to chew properly. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Periodontitis, Gingivitis
- What is being tested?
- Bleeding on brushing
- How many people
- 408 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2019to 31 Dec 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: a convenience sample of consecutive untreated subjects seeking dental care at Prince Philip Dental Hospital
Who may be able to join
- Aged 18 and above.
- Having the ability to learn the standard toothbrushing method with artificial intelligence powered toothbrush.
- Ability and willingness to give written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Edentulous mouth.
- Pregnant females.
- Having received professional periodontal treatment (other than supragingival cleaning) within the previous 12 months.
- Having received antibiotic medication within the previous 3 months.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
Prince Philip Dental Hospital, the Univerisity of Hong Kong
Hong Kong
About this study
Official title: Self-detection and Professional Screening Strategies for Early Detection of Periodontitis: Diagnostic Accuracy of Bleeding on Brushing, Salivary Activated Matrix Metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) and CDC/AAP Screening Questionnaire
Gum disease is the 6th most prevalent disease of mankind. It is a non-communicable non-resolving inflammation; if untreated it leads to tooth loss and inability to chew properly. It is one of the top 80 human disease contributing 3.5 million years lived with disability and the major cause of increasing oral health costs. Addressing this major public health problem requires greater attention to prevention and early detection.
Gum disease cases in the population remain largely undetected because an affected individual does not feel the presence of gum disease and as a consequence people seek attention in the later stages of the disease once tooth loss has occurred.
Read more
In this study the investigators will compare different methods of screening for gum disease and compare them against a full professional examination. The investigators hope to be able to propose simple and effective methods for self-assessment that will allow people to suspect the presence of the disease before tooth loss occurs and thus allow early diagnosis and better treatment.
The whole study procedures consist 3 screening tests and the standard clinical examination. The screening tests involves:(1) a screening questionnaire; (2) a saliva test; (3) a toothbrushing test. Thereafter the participants will receive a standard clinical examination which is regarded as the gold standard for diagnosis of gum disease. Results of these tests will be compared with the standard clinical examination to assess the diagnostic accuracy of these tests.
The general aim of this program is to improve early detection of periodontitis in the population using a self-detection approach based on a toothbrush test as an early sign and a self-performed saliva test as a screening test for an individual to seek professional dental care early in the gum disease process.
The general hypothesis is that combining self-assessment of toothbrush test with a saliva test as an assessment of key inflammatory process underlying gum disease will increase the diagnostic accuracy of a screening approach in the population.
Read the detailed description
Introduction:
Severe periodontitis is the 6th most prevalent disease of mankind. It is a non-communicable non-resolving inflammation and biofilm dysbiosis; if untreated it leads to tooth loss and masticatory dysfunction. It is: i) one of the top 80 human disease contributing 3.5 million years lived with disability, ii) a source of social inequality, iii) together with its major sequel - tooth loss - it is responsible for 88% of lost productivity from oral diseases (estimated at 54 billion USD), and iv) it is the major cause of escalating oral health costs ( 442 billion USD/year) that in advanced economies represent up to 10% of total medical expenses. Addressing this major public health problem requires greater attention to prevention and early detection.
Periodontitis cases in the population remain largely undetected due to lack of knowledge of early warning signs that can be self detected and to the fact that affected individuals adapt to life with increased degrees of disability as the disease progresses from an early stage (stage I) towards increasingly severe and invalidating stages (III-IV). Not unexpectedly, treatment outcomes improve with early detection while costs increase for later diagnosis due to the need for surgical intervention and rehabilitation of the teeth that have been lost. In partnership with the American Academy of Periodontology (AAP), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the United states, has validated a questionnaire (CDC/AAP questionnaire) for first step is important but its focus on more advanced disease, while appropriate to address individuals with more advanced disease, while appropriate to address individuals with more advanced disease towards specialist care, is unlikely to produce cost-effective health gains.
Spontaneous gingival bleeding or gingival bleeding upon tooth brushing (BoB) is a key sign of periodontitis with the potential to become a useful sentinel sign for self-detection. Surprisingly little is known about BoB and its relationship to professional assessment and diagnosis. Few studies have shown that it is highly sensitive to detect gingival inflammation but it has low to moderate specificity for periodontitis as it is shared by both gingivitis (superficial gum inflammation) and periodontitis. Its diagnostic performance, however, may be improved by combining it with salivary test able to discriminate between gingivitis and periodontitis. Salivary activated matrix metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) is a biomarker associated with the inflammatory driven destruction of the periodontal ligament and alveolar characteristic of periodontitis; it has been shown to be able to discriminate between gingivitis and periodontitis in a point of care, professional setting.
The general aim of this program is to improve early detection of periodontitis in the population using a self-detection approach based on BoB as a sentinel sign and a consumer version of a point of care aMMP-8 test as a screening test for an individual to seek professional attention early in the periodontitis disease process.
Aims and Hypotheses to be Tested The aims of this diagnostic trial are to assess the diagnostic performance of: i) bleeding on brushing (BoB) as a sentinel sign, ii) salivary aMMP-8 as a biomarker, iii) a validated questionnaire alone and/or in combination for the early detection of periodontitis.
The general hypothesis is that combining self-assessment of a sentinel sign with a biomarker assessment of key inflammatory process underlying periodontitis will increase the diagnostic accuracy of a screening approach in the population.
Plan of Investigation (i) Subjects The study will involve two populations: i) a convenience sample of adult and elderly subjects reporting for oral health care at Prince Philip Dental Hospital and ii) a validation sample drawn from the Hong Kong adult and elderly population.
Study 1. Consecutive patients reporting to Prince Philip Dental Hospital reception clinic (screening and admission clinic) will be invited to participate.
Study 2. A validation sample will be drawn from a population of Hong Kong adult and elderly population in community and primary care settings. Subjects will be invited to participate and will be examined at the Clinical Research Center of the Prince Philip Dental Hospital.
The prevalence of different stages of periodontitis in the population is estimated at 8-12% for stage III-IV periodontitis and 28-32% for stage I-II periodontitis.
A sample size of 332 subjects has been estimated based on previous studies evaluating the area under the receiving operating curve (ROC curve) of the CDC/AAP questionnaire (0.68) and the ability to detect a 0.07 improvement with 80% power and p<0.05. A total of 400 subjects will be recruited in each trial to compensate for missing data.
(ii) Methods Consenting subjects will be subject to 3 sequential index tests in a specified sequence: i) they will be administered a validated Cantonese version of CDC/AAP questionnaire; ii) subjects will be instructed to perform a 30 second mouthwash with a standard buffer in order to collect a full mouth sample for aMMP-8 analysis. This will be quantitatively assessed with a point of care test. iii) Subjects will then be instructed to brush their teeth for 2 minutes and the obtained slurry (saliva) quantitatively analyzed for the presence of blood with a spectrophotometric test.
Positive CDC/AAP test will be defined based on the pattern of response to 5 questions according to the criteria specified by a previous study.
Positive BoB test will be defined by the subject's identification of traces of blood in the brushing slurry and later validated quantitatively with a spectrophotometric method based on hemoglobin concentrations.
Positive aMMP-8 test for periodontitis will be defined as a concentration of aMMP-8 > 20 ng/ml as determined with quantitative point of care lateral flow immunoassay.
After completion of the 3 experimental tests, subjects will undergo a full-mouth periodontal examination conducted by a trained and calibrated periodontal specialist who will determine the clinical diagnosis based on the 2017 international classification and case definition of periodontitis and gingivitis.
(iii) Study design Cross sectional diagnostic trial with independent blind comparison of experimental tests with a reference standard (professional diagnosis of periodontitis by a registered specialist in a clinical setting). First trial on a convenience sample of subjects reporting to Prince Philip Dental Hospital for oral health care, validation trial in a representative sample of the Hong Kong population.
- Conditions
- Periodontitis, Gingivitis
- Being tested
- Bleeding on brushing
- Keywords
- diagnostic accuracy, early detection, self-assessment, periodontitis
- Medical subject headings
- Periodontitis, Gingivitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Bleeding on brushingDiagnostic test
Also called aMMP-8
Index tests are bleeding on brushing and aMMP-8 Gold standard: clinical diagnosis performed by specialist
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental cohort | Primary study to assess diagnostic accuracy Receives: Diagnostic Test: Bleeding on brushing | |
| Confirmation cohort | Second cohort to confirm results from the first study on independent population Receives: Diagnostic Test: Bleeding on brushing |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Sensitivity measure
Sensitivity of BoB, aMMP-8 and CDC/AAP screening questionnaires alone and in combination to correctly identify periodontitis cases at the time of completion of clinical examination
Measured: 1day
Specificity measure
Specificity of BoB, aMMP-8 and CDC/AAP screening questionnaires alone and in combination to correctly identify periodontitis cases at the time of completion of clinical examination
Measured: 1day
The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) measure
The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of BoB, aMMP-8 and CDC/AAP screening questionnaires alone and in combination to correctly identify periodontitis cases at the time of completion of clinical examination
Measured: 1day
The post-test probability measure
The post-test probability of BoB, aMMP-8 and CDC/AAP screening questionnaires alone and in combination to correctly identify periodontitis cases at the time of completion of clinical examination
Measured: 1day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Apr 2019
- Study start1 Sep 2019
- Primary completion30 Jun 2020
- Study completion31 Dec 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (15)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PeriodontitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 408 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The European Research Group on Periodontology (ERGOPerio)
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- The University of Hong Kong
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Maurizio Tonetti, The University of Hong Kong
- Investigators
- Maurizio Tonetti, DMD,PhD,MMSc, Principal investigator, The University of Hong Kong
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03928080
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PhD20190130
- Other IDs
- HKUCTR-2631
- Status last verified
- Jan 2022
- First submitted
- 14 Apr 2019
- Last updated
- 11 Jan 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Blicher B, Joshipura K, Eke P. Validation of self-reported periodontal disease: a systematic review. J Dent Res. 2005 Oct;84(10):881-90. doi: 10.1177/154405910508401003.
PubMed 16183785Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig L, Lijmer JG, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HC, Kressel HY, Rifai N, Golub RM, Altman DG, Hooft L, Korevaar DA, Cohen JF; STARD Group. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ. 2015 Oct 28;351:h5527. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5527.
PubMed 26511519Carra MC, Gueguen A, Thomas F, Pannier B, Caligiuri G, Steg PG, Zins M, Bouchard P. Self-report assessment of severe periodontitis: Periodontal screening score development. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jul;45(7):818-831. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12899. Epub 2018 May 16.
PubMed 29611224Eke PI, Dye BA, Wei L, Slade GD, Thornton-Evans GO, Beck JD, Taylor GW, Borgnakke WS, Page RC, Genco RJ. Self-reported measures for surveillance of periodontitis. J Dent Res. 2013 Nov;92(11):1041-7. doi: 10.1177/0022034513505621. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
PubMed 24065636Hajian-Tilaki K. Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics. J Biomed Inform. 2014 Apr;48:193-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.02.013. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
PubMed 24582925Izadi Borujeni S, Mayer M, Eickholz P. Activated matrix metalloproteinase-8 in saliva as diagnostic test for periodontal disease? A case-control study. Med Microbiol Immunol. 2015 Dec;204(6):665-72. doi: 10.1007/s00430-015-0413-2. Epub 2015 Apr 5.
PubMed 25841875Kallio P, Ainamo J, Dusadeepan A. Self-assessment of gingival bleeding. Int Dent J. 1990 Aug;40(4):231-6.
PubMed 2397955Kallio P. Self-assessed bleeding in monitoring gingival health among adolescents. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1996 Apr;24(2):128-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1996.tb00829.x.
PubMed 8654034Leppilahti JM, Ahonen MM, Hernandez M, Munjal S, Netuschil L, Uitto VJ, Sorsa T, Mantyla P. Oral rinse MMP-8 point-of-care immuno test identifies patients with strong periodontal inflammatory burden. Oral Dis. 2011 Jan;17(1):115-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2010.01716.x.
PubMed 20659259Tonetti MS, Greenwell H, Kornman KS. Staging and grading of periodontitis: Framework and proposal of a new classification and case definition. J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89 Suppl 1:S159-S172. doi: 10.1002/JPER.18-0006.
PubMed 29926952Trombelli L, Farina R, Silva CO, Tatakis DN. Plaque-induced gingivitis: Case definition and diagnostic considerations. J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89 Suppl 1:S46-S73. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0576.
PubMed 29926936Bi M, Xie Y, Yu X, Li H, Pelekos G, Jin L, Li Y, Tonetti MS. Clinical Features Associated With Periodontal Case Misclassification by an Active Matrix Metalloproteinase-8 Point-of-Care Oral Rinse Test. J Clin Periodontol. 2025 Sep;52(9):1276-1287. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.14189. Epub 2025 Jun 3.
PubMed 40462486Deng K, Zonta F, Yang H, Pelekos G, Tonetti MS. Development of a machine learning multiclass screening tool for periodontal health status based on non-clinical parameters and salivary biomarkers. J Clin Periodontol. 2024 Dec;51(12):1547-1560. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13856. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
PubMed 37697491Uy SNMR, Deng K, Fok CTC, Fok MR, Pelekos G, Tonetti MS. Food intake, masticatory function, tooth mobility, loss of posterior support, and diminished quality of life are associated with more advanced periodontitis stage diagnosis. J Clin Periodontol. 2022 Mar;49(3):240-250. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13588. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
PubMed 34935175Deng K, Pelekos G, Jin L, Tonetti MS. Gingival bleeding on brushing as a sentinel sign of gingival inflammation: A diagnostic accuracy trial for the discrimination of periodontal health and disease. J Clin Periodontol. 2021 Dec;48(12):1537-1548. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13545. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
PubMed 34494292
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Jan 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Self-detection and Professional Screening Strategies for Early Detection of Periodontitis: Diagnostic Accuracy of Bleeding on Brushing, Salivary Activated Matrix Metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) and CDC/AAP Screening Questionnaire
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03928080
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PhD20190130
- Conditions
- Periodontitis, Gingivitis
- Keywords
- diagnostic accuracy, early detection, self-assessment, periodontitis
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 408 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The European Research Group on Periodontology (ERGOPerio)Research network
- Collaborators
- The University of Hong Kong
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Gum disease is the 6th most prevalent disease of mankind. It is a non-communicable non-resolving inflammation; if untreated it leads to tooth loss and inability to chew properly. It is one of the top 80 human disease contributing 3.5 million years lived with disability and the major cause of increasing oral health costs. Addressing this major public health problem requires greater attention to prevention and early detection.
Gum disease cases in the population remain largely undetected because an affected individual does not feel the presence of gum disease and as a consequence people seek attention in the later stages of the disease once tooth loss has occurred.
In this study the investigators will compare different methods of screening for gum disease and compare them against a full professional examination. The investigators hope to be able to propose simple and effective methods for self-assessment that will allow people to suspect the presence of the disease before tooth loss occurs and thus allow early diagnosis and better treatment.
The whole study procedures consist 3 screening tests and the standard clinical examination. The screening tests involves:(1) a screening questionnaire; (2) a saliva test; (3) a toothbrushing test. Thereafter the participants will receive a standard clinical examination which is regarded as the gold standard for diagnosis of gum disease. Results of these tests will be compared with the standard clinical examination to assess the diagnostic accuracy of these tests.
The general aim of this program is to improve early detection of periodontitis in the population using a self-detection approach based on a toothbrush test as an early sign and a self-performed saliva test as a screening test for an individual to seek professional dental care early in the gum disease process.
The general hypothesis is that combining self-assessment of toothbrush test with a saliva test as an assessment of key inflammatory process underlying gum disease will increase the diagnostic accuracy of a screening approach in the population.
Detailed description
Introduction:
Severe periodontitis is the 6th most prevalent disease of mankind. It is a non-communicable non-resolving inflammation and biofilm dysbiosis; if untreated it leads to tooth loss and masticatory dysfunction. It is: i) one of the top 80 human disease contributing 3.5 million years lived with disability, ii) a source of social inequality, iii) together with its major sequel - tooth loss - it is responsible for 88% of lost productivity from oral diseases (estimated at 54 billion USD), and iv) it is the major cause of escalating oral health costs ( 442 billion USD/year) that in advanced economies represent up to 10% of total medical expenses. Addressing this major public health problem requires greater attention to prevention and early detection.
Periodontitis cases in the population remain largely undetected due to lack of knowledge of early warning signs that can be self detected and to the fact that affected individuals adapt to life with increased degrees of disability as the disease progresses from an early stage (stage I) towards increasingly severe and invalidating stages (III-IV). Not unexpectedly, treatment outcomes improve with early detection while costs increase for later diagnosis due to the need for surgical intervention and rehabilitation of the teeth that have been lost. In partnership with the American Academy of Periodontology (AAP), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the United states, has validated a questionnaire (CDC/AAP questionnaire) for first step is important but its focus on more advanced disease, while appropriate to address individuals with more advanced disease, while appropriate to address individuals with more advanced disease towards specialist care, is unlikely to produce cost-effective health gains.
Spontaneous gingival bleeding or gingival bleeding upon tooth brushing (BoB) is a key sign of periodontitis with the potential to become a useful sentinel sign for self-detection. Surprisingly little is known about BoB and its relationship to professional assessment and diagnosis. Few studies have shown that it is highly sensitive to detect gingival inflammation but it has low to moderate specificity for periodontitis as it is shared by both gingivitis (superficial gum inflammation) and periodontitis. Its diagnostic performance, however, may be improved by combining it with salivary test able to discriminate between gingivitis and periodontitis. Salivary activated matrix metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) is a biomarker associated with the inflammatory driven destruction of the periodontal ligament and alveolar characteristic of periodontitis; it has been shown to be able to discriminate between gingivitis and periodontitis in a point of care, professional setting.
The general aim of this program is to improve early detection of periodontitis in the population using a self-detection approach based on BoB as a sentinel sign and a consumer version of a point of care aMMP-8 test as a screening test for an individual to seek professional attention early in the periodontitis disease process.
Aims and Hypotheses to be Tested The aims of this diagnostic trial are to assess the diagnostic performance of: i) bleeding on brushing (BoB) as a sentinel sign, ii) salivary aMMP-8 as a biomarker, iii) a validated questionnaire alone and/or in combination for the early detection of periodontitis.
The general hypothesis is that combining self-assessment of a sentinel sign with a biomarker assessment of key inflammatory process underlying periodontitis will increase the diagnostic accuracy of a screening approach in the population.
Plan of Investigation (i) Subjects The study will involve two populations: i) a convenience sample of adult and elderly subjects reporting for oral health care at Prince Philip Dental Hospital and ii) a validation sample drawn from the Hong Kong adult and elderly population.
Study 1. Consecutive patients reporting to Prince Philip Dental Hospital reception clinic (screening and admission clinic) will be invited to participate.
Study 2. A validation sample will be drawn from a population of Hong Kong adult and elderly population in community and primary care settings. Subjects will be invited to participate and will be examined at the Clinical Research Center of the Prince Philip Dental Hospital.
The prevalence of different stages of periodontitis in the population is estimated at 8-12% for stage III-IV periodontitis and 28-32% for stage I-II periodontitis.
A sample size of 332 subjects has been estimated based on previous studies evaluating the area under the receiving operating curve (ROC curve) of the CDC/AAP questionnaire (0.68) and the ability to detect a 0.07 improvement with 80% power and p<0.05. A total of 400 subjects will be recruited in each trial to compensate for missing data.
(ii) Methods Consenting subjects will be subject to 3 sequential index tests in a specified sequence: i) they will be administered a validated Cantonese version of CDC/AAP questionnaire; ii) subjects will be instructed to perform a 30 second mouthwash with a standard buffer in order to collect a full mouth sample for aMMP-8 analysis. This will be quantitatively assessed with a point of care test. iii) Subjects will then be instructed to brush their teeth for 2 minutes and the obtained slurry (saliva) quantitatively analyzed for the presence of blood with a spectrophotometric test.
Positive CDC/AAP test will be defined based on the pattern of response to 5 questions according to the criteria specified by a previous study.
Positive BoB test will be defined by the subject's identification of traces of blood in the brushing slurry and later validated quantitatively with a spectrophotometric method based on hemoglobin concentrations.
Positive aMMP-8 test for periodontitis will be defined as a concentration of aMMP-8 > 20 ng/ml as determined with quantitative point of care lateral flow immunoassay.
After completion of the 3 experimental tests, subjects will undergo a full-mouth periodontal examination conducted by a trained and calibrated periodontal specialist who will determine the clinical diagnosis based on the 2017 international classification and case definition of periodontitis and gingivitis.
(iii) Study design Cross sectional diagnostic trial with independent blind comparison of experimental tests with a reference standard (professional diagnosis of periodontitis by a registered specialist in a clinical setting). First trial on a convenience sample of subjects reporting to Prince Philip Dental Hospital for oral health care, validation trial in a representative sample of the Hong Kong population.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental cohort | – | Diagnostic Test: Bleeding on brushingPrimary study to assess diagnostic accuracy |
| Confirmation cohort | – | Diagnostic Test: Bleeding on brushingSecond cohort to confirm results from the first study on independent population |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- a convenience sample of consecutive untreated subjects seeking dental care at Prince Philip Dental Hospital
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Aged 18 and above.
- Having the ability to learn the standard toothbrushing method with artificial intelligence powered toothbrush.
- Ability and willingness to give written informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Edentulous mouth.
- Pregnant females.
- Having received professional periodontal treatment (other than supragingival cleaning) within the previous 12 months.
- Having received antibiotic medication within the previous 3 months.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Bleeding on brushingAlso: aMMP-8Index tests are bleeding on brushing and aMMP-8 Gold standard: clinical diagnosis performed by specialist | Diagnostic test | Confirmation cohort, Experimental cohort |
Primary outcome
Sensitivity measure
Time frame: 1day
Sensitivity of BoB, aMMP-8 and CDC/AAP screening questionnaires alone and in combination to correctly identify periodontitis cases at the time of completion of clinical examination
Specificity measure
Time frame: 1day
Specificity of BoB, aMMP-8 and CDC/AAP screening questionnaires alone and in combination to correctly identify periodontitis cases at the time of completion of clinical examination
The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) measure
Time frame: 1day
The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of BoB, aMMP-8 and CDC/AAP screening questionnaires alone and in combination to correctly identify periodontitis cases at the time of completion of clinical examination
The post-test probability measure
Time frame: 1day
The post-test probability of BoB, aMMP-8 and CDC/AAP screening questionnaires alone and in combination to correctly identify periodontitis cases at the time of completion of clinical examination
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Jan 2022.
- Results publication: PubMed 16183785Blicher B, Joshipura K, Eke P. Validation of self-reported periodontal disease: a systematic review. J Dent Res. 2005 Oct;84(10):881-90. doi: 10.1177/154405910508401003.
- Results publication: PubMed 26511519Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig L, Lijmer JG, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HC, Kressel HY, Rifai N, Golub RM, Altman DG, Hooft L, Korevaar DA, Cohen JF; STARD Group. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ. 2015 Oct 28;351:h5527. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5527.
- Results publication: PubMed 29611224Carra MC, Gueguen A, Thomas F, Pannier B, Caligiuri G, Steg PG, Zins M, Bouchard P. Self-report assessment of severe periodontitis: Periodontal screening score development. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jul;45(7):818-831. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12899. Epub 2018 May 16.
- Results publication: PubMed 24065636Eke PI, Dye BA, Wei L, Slade GD, Thornton-Evans GO, Beck JD, Taylor GW, Borgnakke WS, Page RC, Genco RJ. Self-reported measures for surveillance of periodontitis. J Dent Res. 2013 Nov;92(11):1041-7. doi: 10.1177/0022034513505621. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
- Results publication: PubMed 24582925Hajian-Tilaki K. Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics. J Biomed Inform. 2014 Apr;48:193-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.02.013. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
- Results publication: PubMed 25841875Izadi Borujeni S, Mayer M, Eickholz P. Activated matrix metalloproteinase-8 in saliva as diagnostic test for periodontal disease? A case-control study. Med Microbiol Immunol. 2015 Dec;204(6):665-72. doi: 10.1007/s00430-015-0413-2. Epub 2015 Apr 5.
- Results publication: PubMed 2397955Kallio P, Ainamo J, Dusadeepan A. Self-assessment of gingival bleeding. Int Dent J. 1990 Aug;40(4):231-6.
- Results publication: PubMed 8654034Kallio P. Self-assessed bleeding in monitoring gingival health among adolescents. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1996 Apr;24(2):128-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1996.tb00829.x.
- Results publication: PubMed 20659259Leppilahti JM, Ahonen MM, Hernandez M, Munjal S, Netuschil L, Uitto VJ, Sorsa T, Mantyla P. Oral rinse MMP-8 point-of-care immuno test identifies patients with strong periodontal inflammatory burden. Oral Dis. 2011 Jan;17(1):115-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2010.01716.x.
- Results publication: PubMed 29926952Tonetti MS, Greenwell H, Kornman KS. Staging and grading of periodontitis: Framework and proposal of a new classification and case definition. J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89 Suppl 1:S159-S172. doi: 10.1002/JPER.18-0006.
- Results publication: PubMed 29926936Trombelli L, Farina R, Silva CO, Tatakis DN. Plaque-induced gingivitis: Case definition and diagnostic considerations. J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89 Suppl 1:S46-S73. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0576.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40462486Bi M, Xie Y, Yu X, Li H, Pelekos G, Jin L, Li Y, Tonetti MS. Clinical Features Associated With Periodontal Case Misclassification by an Active Matrix Metalloproteinase-8 Point-of-Care Oral Rinse Test. J Clin Periodontol. 2025 Sep;52(9):1276-1287. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.14189. Epub 2025 Jun 3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Periodontitis
Recruiting
Effect of Cryotherapeutic and Nanotherapeutic Sodium Hypochlorite on Post-Operative Endodontic Pain.
Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis, Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A Retrospective Comparative Evaluation of Omega-3 and Resveratrol Supplementation in Patients With Periodontitis
Periodontitis
Recruiting
Probiotics Versus Antibiotics as an Adjuvant to Non-surgical Periodontal Treatment Among Smokers With Stage II, Grade B Periodontitis
Probiotics, Antibiotics
Recruiting
Effects of Different Activation Techniques on Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy in Apical Periodontitis
Apical Periodontitis, Endodontic Retreatment
Recruiting
Ozone Gel Versus Chlorohexidine Gel as an Adjunct to Non-Surgical Treatment of Stage II Periodontitis Grade B Among Smokers Patients
Ozone Gel, Chlorohexidine Gel
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Maurizio Tonetti, DMD,PhD,MMSc principal investigator
The University of Hong Kong
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Periodontitis and Gingivitis, run by The European Research Group on Periodontology (ERGOPerio) at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jan 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Sensitivity measure (time frame: 1day). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03928080, which also lists 15 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jan 2022; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.