Compartment Syndrome of LegPhase 1/2NCT03922139
Botox for the Treatment of Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome
A Phase 1/2 study testing OnabotulinumtoxinA Injection in people with Compartment Syndrome of Leg, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
After diagnosis of Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome (CECS), the participants will be referred to both physical therapy and Botox injection. In physical therapy, the therapist will perform strength measurements of the lower leg (ankle plantarflexion and dorsiflexion) which will be repeated 2 months following the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Compartment Syndrome of Leg
- What is being tested?
- OnabotulinumtoxinA Injection
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 7 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 8 Oct 2019to 15 Dec 2021
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Willing to provide written informed consent
- Willing to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study including reliable use of telephone for communication
- Male or female, at least 18 years of age
- Documented diagnosis of CECS
- Females of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test prior to enrollment and agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control; abstinence) prior to enrollment and for the duration of study participation. A female of child-bearing potential is any woman (regardless of sexual orientation, having undergone a tubal ligation, or remaining celibate by choice) who meets the following criteria: Has not undergone a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy; or has not been naturally postmenopausal for at least 12 consecutive months (i.e., has had menses at any time in the preceding 12 consecutive months).
- Be involved, either competitively or non-competitively, in an activity requiring significant running as determined by the PI
Who cannot join
- History of hypersensitivity or allergy to any of the study drugs or drugs of similar chemical classes
- Known neuromuscular disease
- Known pulmonary disease including but not limited to asthma, pneumonia, or upper respiratory tract infection
- Dysphagia
- Known cardiac disease including but not limited to congestive heart failure, arrhythmia, or history of myocardial infarction
- History of lower extremity fasciotomy
Show all 11Show fewer
- Enrolled in another clinical trial or has used any investigational drugs, biologics, or devices within 30 days prior to enrollment
- Currently or have taken in the past medications that affect neuromuscular function: aminoglycosides, muscle relaxants, or other botulinum neurotoxin agents
- Women who are pregnant or breast-feeding
- Vulnerable populations
- Not suitable for study participation due to other reasons at the discretion of the investigator
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: OnabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) Effect on Pain and Return to Sport in Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome of the Anterior Leg: A Pilot Study
After diagnosis of Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome (CECS), the participants will be referred to both physical therapy and Botox injection. In physical therapy, the therapist will perform strength measurements of the lower leg (ankle plantarflexion and dorsiflexion) which will be repeated 2 months following the injection. An ultrasound-guided injection of 50 units of Botox will be administered into the tibialis anterior. 25 units will be injected into two different spots in the muscle one being more proximal and the other distal. This will be a one-time injection and will be observed as to how it effects participant symptoms over the next 6 months at either a clinic visit (at 2 months) or telephone call (at 4 and 6 months after injection) via the University of Wisconsin Running Index. Two months following the injection, the participant will undergo repeat measurements of strength using the Kiio Force Sensor.
Should potential participants of childbearing potential wish to enroll in the study, a urine pregnancy test will be performed prior to enrollment; participants will not be enrolled if test is positive.
Read the detailed description
Chronic exertional compartment syndrome (CECS) is an overuse injury first described by Mavor in 1956 that typically affects young endurance athletes, classically distance runners. CECS occurs primarily in the lower leg, predominantly in the anterior compartment, although it has been reported elsewhere in the body.
The pathophysiology of CECS is not completely understood. Similar to acute compartment syndrome, it is thought to result from increased pressure within the restrictions of the fascial planes of a muscle compartment. Exercise increases blood flow to active muscles causing them to expand. If constricted by surrounding noncompliant fascia, such swelling increases pressure within the muscle compartment. Ultimately, pressure within the compartment reduces blood flow leading to muscle ischemia and pain when metabolic demands cannot be met. Several studies have demonstrated decreased blood flow and oxygenation in the legs of symptomatic patients with CECS.
Cessation of inciting activities resolves symptoms in most cases of CECS. Without this cessation, the prognosis for CECS is poor if treated non-operatively. Should symptoms continue, patients are referred for possible muscle compartment release, currently the most widely accepted treatment approach despite a significant number of treatment failures. To date, no alternative non-operative approach has successfully treated refractory symptoms.
Recently, it has been hypothesized that botulinum toxin could reduce intramuscular pressure in CECS . Isner-Horoboti et al, performed abobotulinum toxin A injections into the anterior and anterior/lateral compartments in 16 individuals with a mean follow up of 4.4 months (range 3-6 months). Fifteen (95%) patients were asymptomatic after intervention with fourteen (88%) exhibiting normalized post-exercise compartment pressures. Using manual muscle testing, they determined that 11 patients displayed decreased strength though did not produce noticeable subjective weakness. A later case report by Baria and Sellon presented the first long-term follow up (14 months) of a CECS case treated with botulinum toxin injections (Botox) in which the patient reported continued pain relief and had resumed her active lifestyle without adverse effects.
The proposed investigation will aim to build upon the results of existing studies. The novelty of this approach involves a differing dosage of the toxin (Botox) into a more targeted muscle group, specifically the tibialis anterior, while also utilizing a smaller dosage than in previous studies. Further, while previous studies have used manual muscle testing to test strength, many studies have found this method unreliable. As such, a Kiio force sensor will be used at multiple time points to determine weakness quantitatively. Lastly, the reliable and validated University of Wisconsin Running Index will be used to evaluate return to sport.
After diagnosis of CECS, the participants will be referred to both physical therapy and Botox injection. In physical therapy, the therapist will perform strength measurements of the lower leg (ankle plantarflexion and dorsiflexion) which will be repeated 2 months following the injection. An ultrasound-guided injection of 50 units of Botox into the tibialis anterior will be performed. 25 units will be injected into two different spots in the muscle, one being more proximal and the other distal. This will be a one-time injection that will be monitored to see how it effects participant symptoms over the next 6 months at either a clinic visit (at 2 months) or telephone call (at 4 and 6 months after injection) via the University of Wisconsin Running Index. Two months following the injection, the participant will undergo repeat measurements of strength using the Kiio Force Sensor.
Should potential participants be of childbearing potential wish to enroll in the study, a urine pregnancy test will be performed prior to enrollment; participants will not be enrolled if test is positive.
- Conditions
- Compartment Syndrome of Leg
- Being tested
- OnabotulinumtoxinA Injection
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
OnabotulinumtoxinA InjectionDrug
Also called Botox
Ultrasound guided 1 mg/1 mL injection.
25 units of Botox will be injected 2 cm proximal and 2 cm distal to the midpoint of the tibialis anterior muscle.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Botox | Experimental | Ultrasound guided 1 mg/1 mL injection.
25 units of Botox will be injected 2 cm proximal and 2 cm distal to the midpoint of the tibialis anterior muscle. Receives: Drug: OnabotulinumtoxinA Injection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Relief of Pain
Percentage of Relief of Pain will be assessed at each time point (2,4,6 months) using Friedman's ANOVA.
Measured: Baseline, 2 months, 4 months and 6 months
Number of Participants With Lower Extremity Weakness
A primary safety endpoint is the incidence of lower extremity weakness
Measured: up to 6 months
Incidence of Adverse Events
A primary safety endpoint is the incidence of adverse events, such as bruising, bleeding, pain, redness, or swelling where the injection was given.
Measured: up to 6 months
Secondary outcomes (12)
Change in Ankle Dorisflexsion Strength Using Kiio Force Sensor
A Kiio Force Sensor will be used to measure the change in ankle strength. Change in strength outcomes at baseline and 2 months will be assessed using Wilcoxon signed rank tests or, if necessary, linear mixed effects models for repeated measures, to account for intra-subject correlation (left and right legs).
Measured: baseline and month 2
Change in Ankle Plantarflexion Strength Using Kiio Force Sensor
A Kiio Force Sensor will be used to measure the change in ankle strength. Change in strength outcomes at baseline and 2 months will be assessed using Wilcoxon signed rank tests or, if necessary, linear mixed effects models for repeated measures, to account for intra-subject correlation (left and right legs).
Measured: baseline and month 2
Change in Ankle Inversion Strength Using Kiio Force Sensor
A Kiio Force Sensor will be used to measure the change in ankle strength. Change in strength outcomes at baseline and 2 months will be assessed using Wilcoxon signed rank tests or, if necessary, linear mixed effects models for repeated measures, to account for intra-subject correlation (left and right legs).
Measured: baseline and month 2
Change in Ankle Eversion Strength Using Kiio Force Sensor
A Kiio Force Sensor will be used to measure the change in ankle strength. Change in strength outcomes at baseline and 2 months will be assessed using Wilcoxon signed rank tests or, if necessary, linear mixed effects models for repeated measures, to account for intra-subject correlation (left and right legs).
Measured: baseline and month 2
Change in Ability to Perform Activities of Daily Living
A question on the UWRI asks the participant to indicate how their running injury impacts their ability to perform daily activities: No Impact, Slightly Impact, Moderately Impact, Significantly Impact, Unable to Perform.
Measured: baseline, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months
Participant Frustration With Injury
A question on the UWRI asks the participant to indicate how frustrated they are by their running injury: Not frustrated, Mildly frustrated, Moderately frustrated, Significantly frustrated, or Extremely frustrated.
Measured: baseline, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months
Participant Perception of Recovery From Injury
A question on the UWRI asks the participant to indicate how much recovery have they made from their running injury: Complete Recovery, Significant Recovery, Moderate Recovery, Minimal Recovery, No Recovery.
Measured: baseline, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months
Pain in the 24 Hours Following Running
A question on the UWRI asks the participant to indicate how much pain they experience during the 24 hours following a run: No pain, Minimal pain, Moderate pain, Significant pain, Unable to Run.
Measured: baseline, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months
Change in Running Duration: Weekly
A question on the UWRI asks the participant to indicate if their weekly mileage or weekly running time changed as a result of their injury: Same or greater than before injury, Minimally reduced, Moderately reduced, Significantly reduced, Unable to Run.
Measured: baseline, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months
Change in Running Duration: Longest Run
A question on the UWRI asks the participant to indicate if the distance of their longest weekly run has changed as a result of their injury: Same or longer than before my injury, Minimally reduced, Moderately reduced, Significantly reduced, Unable to Run.
Measured: baseline, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months
Change in Running Speed
A question on the UWRI asks the participant to indicate if the distance of the longest weekly run has changed as a result of their injury: Same or faster than before my injury, Minimally reduced, Moderately reduced, Significantly reduced, Unable to Run.
Measured: baseline, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months
Participant Confidence in Increasing the Duration and Intensity of Running
A question on the UWRI asks the participant to indicate how their injury affects their confidence to increase the duration or intensity of their running: Confident to increase my running, If I increase I might be fine, Neutral, If I increase I might get worse, I cannot increase my running.
Measured: baseline, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Apr 2019
- Study start8 Oct 2019
- Primary completion15 Dec 2021
- Study completion15 Dec 2021
Why it stopped: due to COVID-19
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Compartment Syndrome of LegStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Wisconsin, MadisonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 7 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Wisconsin, Madison
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Michael Suer, MD, Principal investigator, UW Madison - SMPH, Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03922139
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2017-1061
- Other IDs
- Ortho Rehab, Protocol Version 6/15/2020, A536760, SMPH\PEDIATRICS\GPAM
- Status last verified
- Feb 2023
- First submitted
- 16 Apr 2019
- Last updated
- 14 Feb 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Feb 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- OnabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) Effect on Pain and Return to Sport in Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome of the Anterior Leg: A Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03922139
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2017-1061
- Conditions
- Compartment Syndrome of Leg
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: due to COVID-19
- Enrolment
- 7 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Wisconsin, MadisonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 8 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Dec 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 14 Feb 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
After diagnosis of Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome (CECS), the participants will be referred to both physical therapy and Botox injection. In physical therapy, the therapist will perform strength measurements of the lower leg (ankle plantarflexion and dorsiflexion) which will be repeated 2 months following the injection. An ultrasound-guided injection of 50 units of Botox will be administered into the tibialis anterior. 25 units will be injected into two different spots in the muscle one being more proximal and the other distal. This will be a one-time injection and will be observed as to how it effects participant symptoms over the next 6 months at either a clinic visit (at 2 months) or telephone call (at 4 and 6 months after injection) via the University of Wisconsin Running Index. Two months following the injection, the participant will undergo repeat measurements of strength using the Kiio Force Sensor.
Should potential participants of childbearing potential wish to enroll in the study, a urine pregnancy test will be performed prior to enrollment; participants will not be enrolled if test is positive.
Detailed description
Chronic exertional compartment syndrome (CECS) is an overuse injury first described by Mavor in 1956 that typically affects young endurance athletes, classically distance runners. CECS occurs primarily in the lower leg, predominantly in the anterior compartment, although it has been reported elsewhere in the body.
The pathophysiology of CECS is not completely understood. Similar to acute compartment syndrome, it is thought to result from increased pressure within the restrictions of the fascial planes of a muscle compartment. Exercise increases blood flow to active muscles causing them to expand. If constricted by surrounding noncompliant fascia, such swelling increases pressure within the muscle compartment. Ultimately, pressure within the compartment reduces blood flow leading to muscle ischemia and pain when metabolic demands cannot be met. Several studies have demonstrated decreased blood flow and oxygenation in the legs of symptomatic patients with CECS.
Cessation of inciting activities resolves symptoms in most cases of CECS. Without this cessation, the prognosis for CECS is poor if treated non-operatively. Should symptoms continue, patients are referred for possible muscle compartment release, currently the most widely accepted treatment approach despite a significant number of treatment failures. To date, no alternative non-operative approach has successfully treated refractory symptoms.
Recently, it has been hypothesized that botulinum toxin could reduce intramuscular pressure in CECS . Isner-Horoboti et al, performed abobotulinum toxin A injections into the anterior and anterior/lateral compartments in 16 individuals with a mean follow up of 4.4 months (range 3-6 months). Fifteen (95%) patients were asymptomatic after intervention with fourteen (88%) exhibiting normalized post-exercise compartment pressures. Using manual muscle testing, they determined that 11 patients displayed decreased strength though did not produce noticeable subjective weakness. A later case report by Baria and Sellon presented the first long-term follow up (14 months) of a CECS case treated with botulinum toxin injections (Botox) in which the patient reported continued pain relief and had resumed her active lifestyle without adverse effects.
The proposed investigation will aim to build upon the results of existing studies. The novelty of this approach involves a differing dosage of the toxin (Botox) into a more targeted muscle group, specifically the tibialis anterior, while also utilizing a smaller dosage than in previous studies. Further, while previous studies have used manual muscle testing to test strength, many studies have found this method unreliable. As such, a Kiio force sensor will be used at multiple time points to determine weakness quantitatively. Lastly, the reliable and validated University of Wisconsin Running Index will be used to evaluate return to sport.
After diagnosis of CECS, the participants will be referred to both physical therapy and Botox injection. In physical therapy, the therapist will perform strength measurements of the lower leg (ankle plantarflexion and dorsiflexion) which will be repeated 2 months following the injection. An ultrasound-guided injection of 50 units of Botox into the tibialis anterior will be performed. 25 units will be injected into two different spots in the muscle, one being more proximal and the other distal. This will be a one-time injection that will be monitored to see how it effects participant symptoms over the next 6 months at either a clinic visit (at 2 months) or telephone call (at 4 and 6 months after injection) via the University of Wisconsin Running Index. Two months following the injection, the participant will undergo repeat measurements of strength using the Kiio Force Sensor.
Should potential participants be of childbearing potential wish to enroll in the study, a urine pregnancy test will be performed prior to enrollment; participants will not be enrolled if test is positive.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Botox | Experimental | Drug: OnabotulinumtoxinA InjectionUltrasound guided 1 mg/1 mL injection. 25 units of Botox will be injected 2 cm proximal and 2 cm distal to the midpoint of the tibialis anterior muscle. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Willing to provide written informed consent
- Willing to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study including reliable use of telephone for communication
- Male or female, at least 18 years of age
- Documented diagnosis of CECS
- Females of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test prior to enrollment and agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control; abstinence) prior to enrollment and for the duration of study participation. A female of child-bearing potential is any woman (regardless of sexual orientation, having undergone a tubal ligation, or remaining celibate by choice) who meets the following criteria: Has not undergone a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy; or has not been naturally postmenopausal for at least 12 consecutive months (i.e., has had menses at any time in the preceding 12 consecutive months).
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- History of hypersensitivity or allergy to any of the study drugs or drugs of similar chemical classes
- Known neuromuscular disease
- Known pulmonary disease including but not limited to asthma, pneumonia, or upper respiratory tract infection
- Dysphagia
- Known cardiac disease including but not limited to congestive heart failure, arrhythmia, or history of myocardial infarction
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| OnabotulinumtoxinA InjectionAlso: BotoxUltrasound guided 1 mg/1 mL injection. 25 units of Botox will be injected 2 cm proximal and 2 cm distal to the midpoint of the tibialis anterior muscle. | Drug | Botox |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Relief of Pain
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months, 4 months and 6 months
Percentage of Relief of Pain will be assessed at each time point (2,4,6 months) using Friedman's ANOVA.
Number of Participants With Lower Extremity Weakness
Time frame: up to 6 months
A primary safety endpoint is the incidence of lower extremity weakness
Incidence of Adverse Events
Time frame: up to 6 months
A primary safety endpoint is the incidence of adverse events, such as bruising, bleeding, pain, redness, or swelling where the injection was given.
12 secondary outcomes
Change in Ankle Dorisflexsion Strength Using Kiio Force Sensor
Time frame: baseline and month 2
Change in Ankle Plantarflexion Strength Using Kiio Force Sensor
Time frame: baseline and month 2
Change in Ankle Inversion Strength Using Kiio Force Sensor
Time frame: baseline and month 2
Change in Ankle Eversion Strength Using Kiio Force Sensor
Time frame: baseline and month 2
Change in Ability to Perform Activities of Daily Living
Time frame: baseline, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months
Participant Frustration With Injury
Time frame: baseline, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months
Participant Perception of Recovery From Injury
Time frame: baseline, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months
Pain in the 24 Hours Following Running
Time frame: baseline, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months
Change in Running Duration: Weekly
Time frame: baseline, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months
Change in Running Duration: Longest Run
Time frame: baseline, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months
Change in Running Speed
Time frame: baseline, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months
Participant Confidence in Increasing the Duration and Intensity of Running
Time frame: baseline, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Feb 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Compartment Syndrome of Leg
Recruiting
Physiotherapy or Fasciotomy as Treatment for Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome in the Lower Leg?
Compartment Syndrome Nontraumatic Lower Leg
Recruiting
Treatment of Lower Leg Anterolateral Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome With Intra-muscular Botulinum Injections.
Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome
Recruiting
Continuous Compartment Pressure Monitoring for Compartment Syndrome in VA-ECMO Patients
Compartment Syndrome of Leg, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Complication
Recruiting
Evaluation of the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Value of Tissue Ultrafiltration in Patients at Risk of Acute Compartment Syndrome (ACS)
Acute Compartment Syndrome, Fracture, Bone
RecruitingObservational study
Can Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) or Intramuscular Glucose Levels Detect Impaired Leg Compartment' Perfusion?
Compartment Syndromes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michael Suer, MD principal investigator
UW Madison - SMPH, Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing OnabotulinumtoxinA Injection in people with Compartment Syndrome of Leg, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Feb 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Relief of Pain (time frame: Baseline, 2 months, 4 months and 6 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Feb 2023.