AzTrials
AzTrials

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2NCT03921242

Comparative Effectiveness of Metformin for Type 2 Diabetes With Chronic Kidney Disease

An observational study of Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 and Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a proposal for a retrospective observational study of the safety of metformin use in patients with chronic kidney disease, compared to other commonly used diabetes drugs. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Metformin, Sulfonylurea and DPP-4 inhibitor
How many people
4,888 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
1 Aug 2019to 1 Aug 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: EHR data from two data sources (NYC and Mid-South CDRN's) will be linked to insurance claims data to identify adult patients (age > 18) with T2DM and CKD, who are initiating metformin or one of the comparator drugs. Also, participants will further be required to have at least one prescription for metformin, sulfonylurea, or DPP-4 inhibitor; at least 6 months preceding that prescription in which none of those drugs are used; and an eGFR within 1 month prior to the index date (the date on which the drug of interest is started) of < 60 mL/min

Who may be able to join

  • A coded inpatient or outpatient T2DM diagnosis (ICD9/ICD10) and an antidiabetic medication prescription within the 90 days following the diagnosis date (CP1); a coded T2DM diagnosis and an outpatient glycolated hemoglobin (HbA1C) value≥6.5% within 90 days before or after the diagnosis date (CP2); or any antidiabetic medication prescription within 90 days before or after an outpatient HbA1C value ≥6.5% (CP3).
  • New use of a medication of interest (metformin, sulfonylurea, DPP4 inhibitor, SGLT2 inhibitor, or GLP1 receptor agonist
  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of less than 60 ml/min within the month prior to the new medication

Who cannot join

  • Coded diagnoses of gestational diabetes
  • Coded diagnoses of prediabetes
  • Coded diagnoses of type 1 diabetes
  • Evidence of a positive beta human chorionic gonadotropin test as a marker for pregnancy during the 90 days before or after the index date

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • University of North Carolina

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599

  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37232

Other trials in United States

About this study

This is a proposal for a retrospective observational study of the safety of metformin use in patients with chronic kidney disease, compared to other commonly used diabetes drugs. It will be conducted using retrospective data from the New York City CDRN, Medicare administrate files, and New York State Medicaid administrative files, which will be linked and then deidentified prior to analysis.

Read the detailed description

Specific aims are as follows:

Aim 1. For patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus(T2DM) and Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), compare metformin to alternative non-insulin diabetes drugs (sulfonylureas, DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, and SGLT-2 inhibitors)) with respect to the key safety outcome of severe hypoglycemia. The primary hypothesis is that metformin will be superior to sulfonylurea in terms of severe hypoglycemia rates, and non-inferior to DPP-4 inhibitors. Secondary outcomes will include hospitalization for acidosis, hospitalization for hyperglycemia, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure hospitalization, and heart failure emergency room visit.

Aim 2. For patients with T2DM and CKD, compare metformin to alternative non-insulin diabetes drugs with respect to HbA1c reduction. The primary hypothesis is that metformin will be superior to DPP-4 inhibitors and non-inferior to sulfonylureas for HbA1c reduction (i.e., improvement in blood sugar). Secondary outcomes will include change in body-mass index (BMI) and kidney function, non-persistence to treatment, and progression to insulin use.

Aim 3. Examine the heterogeneity of treatment effects on hypoglycemia risk and HbA1c response across patient subgroups. The primary hypothesis is that metformin's advantages will be more pronounced in more severe CKD.

Aim 4 (data completeness): Using the linked Medicare-CDRN dataset, assess completeness of CDRN data for drugs and hospitalization among Medicare recipients. Specifically, we will use Medicare data from 2013-2016 as a gold standard and assess the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) of INSIGHT CDRN data from those years in identifying hospitalizations and prevalent diabetes drug use among Medicare patients with T2DM (type 2 diabetes mellitus), and develop and validate an algorithm to identify patients for whom NPV and PPV for hospitalizations and all major diabetes drug classes exceed 80%. We hypothesize that such an algorithm will identify a population of a quarter of eligible Medicare patients in the CDRN who meet or exceed these standards for completeness of data.

Aim 5. Conduct a cohort study to test the hypothesis that poorly controlled baseline HbA1c is not independently associated with the primary outcome (hospitalization with COVID). Primary analysis will be restricted to Medicare patients identified by aim 1 as likely to surpass 80% NPV and PPV for the primary outcome. A finding that HbA1c is not associated with worse outcomes would support relaxing glycemic targets during the pandemic when this allows patients to avoid unnecessary risks associated with aggressive treatment, monitoring, and exposure to the health care system.

Aim 6: Conduct a comparative cohort study to test the null hypothesis that metformin, SGLT-2 inhibitors, DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, and sulfonylureas do not have class-specific effects on the primary outcome. Primary analysis will be restricted to Medicare patients identified by aim 1 as likely to surpass 80% NPV and PPV both for the primary outcome and exposure to the drug of interest. Two sub-hypotheses would be of special interest: if SGLT-2 inhibitors are associated with increased risk, this would support suggestions that they be temporarily stopped in high risk patients; if DPP-4 inhibitors are associated with decreased risk, this would argue for prospective research into this class as protective agents.

Being tested
Metformin, Sulfonylurea, DPP-4 inhibitor, SGLT2 inhibitor, GLP1 receptor agonist
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MetforminDrug

    Newly Initiated and regular metformin dosage as prescribed by each patient's medical care provider

  • SulfonylureaDrug

    Newly initiated and regular sulfonylurea dosage as prescribed by each patient's medical care provider

  • DPP-4 inhibitorDrug

    Newly initiated and regular DPP-4 inhibitor dosage as prescribed by each patient's medical care provider

  • SGLT2 inhibitorDrug

    Newly initiated and regular SGLT2 inhibitor dosage as prescribed by each patient's medical care provider

  • GLP1 receptor agonistDrug

    Newly initiated and regular GLP1 receptor agonist dosage as prescribed by each patient's medical care provider

Study groups in NCT03921242
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Metformin CohortGroup of study participants having both Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney disease and meeting the study's inclusion criteria for whom metformin was prescribed at baseline for this first time in each patient's medical history.
Receives: Drug: Metformin
Sulfonylurea CohortGroup of study participants having both Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney disease and meeting the study's inclusion criteria for whom sulfonylurea was prescribed at baseline for this first time in each patient's medical history.
Receives: Drug: Sulfonylurea
DPP4 Inhibitor CohortGroup of study participants having both Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney disease and meeting the study's inclusion criteria for whom a DPP4 Inhibitor was prescribed at baseline for this first time in each patient's medical history.
Receives: Drug: DPP-4 inhibitor
SGLT2 Inhibitor CohortGroup of study participants having both Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney disease and meeting the study's inclusion criteria for whom an SGLT2 Inhibitor was prescribed at baseline for this first time in each patient's medical history.
Receives: Drug: SGLT2 inhibitor
GLP1 Receptor Agonist CohortGroup of study participants having both Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney disease and meeting the study's inclusion criteria for whom a GLP1 receptor agonist was prescribed at baseline for this first time in each patient's medical history.
Receives: Drug: GLP1 receptor agonist

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incidence of Severe Hypoglycemia Assessed from EMR

    Comparing the time-to event outcomes between metformin and other index exposures. Severe Hypoglycemic events are defined as events resulting in emergency room, observation, or inpatient visits where hypoglycemia is the primary diagnosis

    Measured: 18 Months

  2. Difference in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) level (mmol/mol)

    Comparing the change in HbA1c in the metformin-initiator cohort to the changes reported in the sulfonylurea- and DPP4-I-initiator cohorts at 3-9 months following baseline. HbA1c will be measured in mmol/mol.

    Measured: 24 Months

  3. Heterogeneity of Treatment Effect Via Pre-specified Sub-Group Analyses

    Determine the extent of heterogeneity in treatment effect through the stratification of the sample population by covariate subgroups (age, sex, BMI, race; baseline history of CVD, liver disease, and heart failure; specific sulfonylurea or DPP-4 inhibitor, and levels of renal function and metformin dose as time-varying covariates) and through the use of machine learning techniques.

    Measured: 25 Months

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Incidence of acidosis, hospitalization for hyperglycemia, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure hospitalization, and heart failure emergency room visits

    Comparing the time-to event outcomes between the metformin and other index exposure cohorts in terms of occurrences of acidosis, hospitalizations for hyperglycemia, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure hospitalizations, and heart failure emergency room visits

    Measured: 18 Months

  2. Difference in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) level (mmol/mol)

    Comparing the change in HbA1c in the metformin-initiator cohort to the changes reported in the sulfonylurea- and DPP4-I-initiator cohorts at 12-24 months following baseline. HbA1c will be measured in mmol/mol.

    Measured: 24 Months

  3. Difference in Body-Mass Index Assessed From EMR (BMI) (kg/m2)

    Comparing the change in body-mass index (BMI) in the metformin-initiator cohort to the changes reported in the sulfonylurea- and DPP4-I-initiator cohorts. BMI will be measured in kg/m2.

    Measured: 24 Months

  4. Difference in Laboratory-Measured eGFR (mL/min)

    Comparing the change in eGFR in the metformin-initiator cohort to the changes reported in the sulfonylurea- and DPP4-I-initiator cohorts. eGFR will be measured in mL/min.

    Measured: 24 Months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Apr 2019
  2. Study start1 Aug 2019
  3. Primary completion1 Aug 2023
  4. Study completion1 Aug 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
4,888 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03921242
Sponsor's protocol ID
1809019555
Status last verified
Nov 2023
First submitted
8 Apr 2019
Last updated
9 Nov 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 and Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Incidence of Severe Hypoglycemia Assessed from EMR (time frame: 18 Months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Nov 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in