PainNCT03915704
Intramuscular Injection-Related Pain and Fear
A study testing Shotblocker and Buzzy in people with Pain and Fear, run by Istanbul Saglik Bilimleri University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The study is an experimental randomized controlled study conducted to compare the effect of buzzy and shotblocker methods applied during intramuscular injection from on pain and fear level in 6-12 year-old children. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 12 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- What is being tested?
- Shotblocker and Buzzy
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 90 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2018to 8 Apr 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 12 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- being aged between 6-12,
- requiring for ceftriaxone intramuscular injection because of upper and lower respiratory tract infections,
- being cognitively able to rate pain and fear scales, and voluntariliy signing the written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- having a disease causing chronic pain,
- receiving analgesics within the last 6 hours, with pacemakers,
- having infection, rash, or detoriorated skin integrity in the site where the injection was to be made, had nerve damage in the injection site,
- having critical or unstable health status, had intellectual disability, reynaud's syndrome, and sickle cell disease
- being unwilling to participate in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effects of Two Different Methods During Intramuscular Injections On Pain, Fear, and Satisfaction in Pediatric Emergency Department Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
The study is an experimental randomized controlled study conducted to compare the effect of buzzy and shotblocker methods applied during intramuscular injection from on pain and fear level in 6-12 year-old children. The sample of the study consisted of 90 children aged between 6 and 12 years who were diagnosed with upper and lower tract respiratory infections and received intramuscular injection of ceftriaxone at the pediatric emergency department of a university hospital in İstanbul between November 2018 and April 2019. The children were divided into 3 groups of 30 people, including shotblocker, buzzy, and control groups. Each intervention and control group was matched in terms of gender. In the study, the randomization of the sample group was performed by using stratification and block randomization methods.
Read the detailed description
The study is a randomized controlled, non-blinded, experimental trial. The sample of the study consisted of 90 children aged between 6 and 12 years who were diagnosed with upper and lower tract respiratory infections and received intramuscular injection of ceftriaxone at the pediatric emergency department of a university hospital in İstanbul between November 2018 and April 2019. The children were recruited into the study on the basis of the following criteria: being aged between 6-12, requiring for ceftriaxone intramuscular injection because of upper and lower respiratory tract infections, being cognitively able to rate pain and fear scales, and voluntariliy signing the written informed consent. Children were excluded if they had a disease causing chronic pain, received analgesics within the last 6 hours, with pacemakers, had infection, rash, or detoriorated skin integrity in the site where the injection was to be made, had nerve damage in the injection site, had critical or unstable health status, had intellectual disability, reynaud's syndrome, and sickle cell disease, and were unwilling to participate in the study. Also, the parents were eligible for the participation when meeting the following inclusion criteria: 1) be healthy in terms of neurologic functions, 2) communicate verbally, 3) understand and read Turkish, and 4) voluntarily sign the written informed consent. The sample size should be determined as minimum 30 in both experimental and control groups in the experimental studies and parametric measurements. Therefore, 90 children who met the inclusion criteria of the study between specified dates were enrolled and each group included 30 children including two experimental groups and a control group. In order to prevent bias and increase the validity of the data, the pain and fear scores of the children before and after the procedure were assessed by three different groups as children participating in the study (n:90), their parents (n:90), and a researcher specialized in pediatric nursing (n:1).
The children were included in one of the 3 study groups, including buzzy, shotblocker, and control group without any intervention. In order to control the effect of gender on pain, the children were stratified into study groups based on their gender and selected by using block randomization methods in three study groups. The children were randomized to the related study group by drawing one of the study groups in the cloth bags prepared for the girls (pink) and the boys (blue). Papers with the same color and folding pattern representing the four groups (1,2,3,4) were thrown in the bags. In order to provide a randomized distribution and to reduce all negative effects, the children were asked to take randomly a paper from the bag according to the gender after making the necessary explanation to the parents and their children so that the groups became self-balancing. A total of 30 children including 15 girls and 15 boys were included in each group after intervention and control groups were matched in themselves in terms of gender.
The study followed the CONSORT guideline for reporting randomized controlled trials. The pain level of children before and after the injection was assessed using Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale. To assess the pain level of the children, the children were asked to evaluate themselves, and their parents and first researcher were requested to evaluate the children's pain level immediately before and after the injection. The responses of the children, their parents, and the first researcher were scored blindly. The fear level of children before and after the injection was assessed using Children's Fear Scale. To assess the fear level of the children, the children were asked to evaluate themselves, and their parents and first researcher were requested to evaluate the children's fear level immediately before and after the injection. The responses of the children, their parents, and the first researcher were scored blindly.
- Being tested
- Shotblocker, Control, Buzzy
- Keywords
- pain management, intramuscular injection, non-pharmacological method
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ShotblockerDevice
Injection was administered with ShotBlocker.The Shotblocker application to all children in this group was done by the second researcher. After the injection, the shotblocker was wiped with 70% alcohol.
ControlProcedure or surgery
No intervention was made in the children.
BuzzyDevice
Buzzy was placed 3-5 cm above the injection site 60 sec before the injection and used until the procedure was completed.The Buzzy application to all children in this group was done by the second researcher. After the injection, the ice pack was wiped with 70% alcohol and frozen again by freezing.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Buzzy | Experimental | Buzzy was placed 3-5 cm above the injection site 60 sec before the injection and used until the procedure was completed. The Buzzy application to all children in this group was done by the second researcher. After the injection, the ice pack was wiped with 70% alcohol and frozen again by freezing. Receives: Device: Buzzy |
| Shotblocker | Experimental | ShotBlocker is a small, flat, yellow horseshoe-shaped plastic tool that is non-invasive, appropriate for every age group, does not have the characteristics of medication or adverse effects. ShotBlocker has short, blunt points that provide contact with skin on one side, and a hole that exposes the injection site in the middle of the tool. It is used by being held on the skin surface during injection. The pointed surface of the tool is placed on the administration area right before the injection Receives: Device: Shotblocker |
| Control | Experimental | No intervention was performed to reduce pain and fear in the control group. Receives: Procedure: Control |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain severity
The pain level of children before and after the injection was assessed using Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale. To assess the pain level of the children, the children were asked to evaluate themselves, and their parents and first researcher were requested to evaluate the children's pain level immediately before and after the injection. The responses of the children, their parents, and the first researcher were scored blindly. This scale has the faces and the pain score is determined according to the numerical values given to the faces. While smiley face "0 point" shows lack of pain, crying face "10 points" refer to severe pain (Merkel \& Malviya, 2000). The validity and reliability of this scale was conducted
Measured: 5 Months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Fear Levels
The fear level of children before and after the injection was assessed using Children's Fear Scale. To assess the fear level of the children, the children were asked to evaluate themselves, and their parents and first researcher were requested to evaluate the children's fear level immediately before and after the injection. The responses of the children, their parents, and the first researcher were scored blindly.This scale has five facial expression and the fear is scored according to the numerical values given to the faces on the scale. The leftmost face "0 point" in the scale represents that the child has no fear and the rightmost face "4 points" represent that the child is frightened a lot.
Measured: 5 Months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Apr 2019
- Study start1 Nov 2018
- Primary completion29 Mar 2019
- Study completion8 Apr 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Istanbul Saglik Bilimleri University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Burcu Aykanat Girgin, Istanbul Saglik Bilimleri University
- Investigators
- Burcu Aykanat Girgin, PhD RN, Principal investigator, Saglik Bilimleri University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03915704
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 07112018139
- Status last verified
- Apr 2019
- First submitted
- 12 Apr 2019
- Last updated
- 17 Apr 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Apr 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Two Different Methods During Intramuscular Injections On Pain, Fear, and Satisfaction in Pediatric Emergency Department Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03915704
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 07112018139
- Keywords
- pain management, intramuscular injection, non-pharmacological method
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Istanbul Saglik Bilimleri UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 8 Apr 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study is an experimental randomized controlled study conducted to compare the effect of buzzy and shotblocker methods applied during intramuscular injection from on pain and fear level in 6-12 year-old children. The sample of the study consisted of 90 children aged between 6 and 12 years who were diagnosed with upper and lower tract respiratory infections and received intramuscular injection of ceftriaxone at the pediatric emergency department of a university hospital in İstanbul between November 2018 and April 2019. The children were divided into 3 groups of 30 people, including shotblocker, buzzy, and control groups. Each intervention and control group was matched in terms of gender. In the study, the randomization of the sample group was performed by using stratification and block randomization methods.
Detailed description
The study is a randomized controlled, non-blinded, experimental trial. The sample of the study consisted of 90 children aged between 6 and 12 years who were diagnosed with upper and lower tract respiratory infections and received intramuscular injection of ceftriaxone at the pediatric emergency department of a university hospital in İstanbul between November 2018 and April 2019. The children were recruited into the study on the basis of the following criteria: being aged between 6-12, requiring for ceftriaxone intramuscular injection because of upper and lower respiratory tract infections, being cognitively able to rate pain and fear scales, and voluntariliy signing the written informed consent. Children were excluded if they had a disease causing chronic pain, received analgesics within the last 6 hours, with pacemakers, had infection, rash, or detoriorated skin integrity in the site where the injection was to be made, had nerve damage in the injection site, had critical or unstable health status, had intellectual disability, reynaud's syndrome, and sickle cell disease, and were unwilling to participate in the study. Also, the parents were eligible for the participation when meeting the following inclusion criteria: 1) be healthy in terms of neurologic functions, 2) communicate verbally, 3) understand and read Turkish, and 4) voluntarily sign the written informed consent. The sample size should be determined as minimum 30 in both experimental and control groups in the experimental studies and parametric measurements. Therefore, 90 children who met the inclusion criteria of the study between specified dates were enrolled and each group included 30 children including two experimental groups and a control group. In order to prevent bias and increase the validity of the data, the pain and fear scores of the children before and after the procedure were assessed by three different groups as children participating in the study (n:90), their parents (n:90), and a researcher specialized in pediatric nursing (n:1).
The children were included in one of the 3 study groups, including buzzy, shotblocker, and control group without any intervention. In order to control the effect of gender on pain, the children were stratified into study groups based on their gender and selected by using block randomization methods in three study groups. The children were randomized to the related study group by drawing one of the study groups in the cloth bags prepared for the girls (pink) and the boys (blue). Papers with the same color and folding pattern representing the four groups (1,2,3,4) were thrown in the bags. In order to provide a randomized distribution and to reduce all negative effects, the children were asked to take randomly a paper from the bag according to the gender after making the necessary explanation to the parents and their children so that the groups became self-balancing. A total of 30 children including 15 girls and 15 boys were included in each group after intervention and control groups were matched in themselves in terms of gender.
The study followed the CONSORT guideline for reporting randomized controlled trials. The pain level of children before and after the injection was assessed using Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale. To assess the pain level of the children, the children were asked to evaluate themselves, and their parents and first researcher were requested to evaluate the children's pain level immediately before and after the injection. The responses of the children, their parents, and the first researcher were scored blindly. The fear level of children before and after the injection was assessed using Children's Fear Scale. To assess the fear level of the children, the children were asked to evaluate themselves, and their parents and first researcher were requested to evaluate the children's fear level immediately before and after the injection. The responses of the children, their parents, and the first researcher were scored blindly.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Buzzy | Experimental | Device: BuzzyBuzzy was placed 3-5 cm above the injection site 60 sec before the injection and used until the procedure was completed. The Buzzy application to all children in this group was done by the second researcher. After the injection, the ice pack was wiped with 70% alcohol and frozen again by freezing. |
| Shotblocker | Experimental | Device: ShotblockerShotBlocker is a small, flat, yellow horseshoe-shaped plastic tool that is non-invasive, appropriate for every age group, does not have the characteristics of medication or adverse effects. ShotBlocker has short, blunt points that provide contact with skin on one side, and a hole that exposes the injection site in the middle of the tool. It is used by being held on the skin surface during injection. The pointed surface of the tool is placed on the administration area right before the injection |
| Control | Experimental | Procedure: ControlNo intervention was performed to reduce pain and fear in the control group. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 12 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- being aged between 6-12,
- requiring for ceftriaxone intramuscular injection because of upper and lower respiratory tract infections,
- being cognitively able to rate pain and fear scales, and voluntariliy signing the written informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- having a disease causing chronic pain,
- receiving analgesics within the last 6 hours, with pacemakers,
- having infection, rash, or detoriorated skin integrity in the site where the injection was to be made, had nerve damage in the injection site,
- having critical or unstable health status, had intellectual disability, reynaud's syndrome, and sickle cell disease
- being unwilling to participate in the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ShotblockerInjection was administered with ShotBlocker.The Shotblocker application to all children in this group was done by the second researcher. After the injection, the shotblocker was wiped with 70% alcohol. | Device | Shotblocker |
| ControlNo intervention was made in the children. | Procedure or surgery | Control |
| BuzzyBuzzy was placed 3-5 cm above the injection site 60 sec before the injection and used until the procedure was completed.The Buzzy application to all children in this group was done by the second researcher. After the injection, the ice pack was wiped with 70% alcohol and frozen again by freezing. | Device | Buzzy |
Primary outcome
Pain severity
Time frame: 5 Months
The pain level of children before and after the injection was assessed using Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale. To assess the pain level of the children, the children were asked to evaluate themselves, and their parents and first researcher were requested to evaluate the children's pain level immediately before and after the injection. The responses of the children, their parents, and the first researcher were scored blindly. This scale has the faces and the pain score is determined according to the numerical values given to the faces. While smiley face "0 point" shows lack of pain, crying face "10 points" refer to severe pain (Merkel \& Malviya, 2000). The validity and reliability of this scale was conducted
1 secondary outcome
Fear Levels
Time frame: 5 Months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Apr 2019.
Related trials for Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Burcu Aykanat Girgin, PhD RN principal investigator
Saglik Bilimleri University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Shotblocker and Buzzy in people with Pain and Fear, run by Istanbul Saglik Bilimleri University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain severity (time frame: 5 Months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Apr 2019.