AzTrials
AzTrials

Male CircumcisionNCT03914365

Pudendal Nerve Block vs Penile Nerve Block for Analgesia During Pediatric Circumcision

A study testing Ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block (PNB) and Ultrasound-guided penile nerve block (DPNB) in people with Male Circumcision and Regional Anesthesia, run by CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval at 1 site in Canada.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Pediatric circumcision has been realized since the beginning of human civilization. In the United States, a 2014 review revealed a 81% prevalence of men 14-59 years old being circumcised. Circumcision surgery is mostly performed on an ambulatory basis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 year to 12 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Male Circumcision, Regional Anesthesia
What is being tested?
Ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block (PNB) and Ultrasound-guided penile nerve block (DPNB)
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
300 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
1 Jul 2019to Jun 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 year to 12 years
  • Men only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Male 1-12 yo undergoing elective circumcision for medical reasons

Who cannot join

  • Allergy to local anaesthetics or medication used in the study Coagulopathy Infection at the injection site Neurologic or neuromuscular disease ASA classification ≥ 4

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • CHU de Québec

    Québec, G1V 4G2

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Ultrasound-guided Pudendal Nerve Block to Ultrasound-guided Penile Nerve Block for Analgesia Following Pediatric Circumcision

Pediatric circumcision has been realized since the beginning of human civilization. In the United States, a 2014 review revealed a 81% prevalence of men 14-59 years old being circumcised.

Circumcision surgery is mostly performed on an ambulatory basis. The best analgesia technique for this procedure has yet to be determined. Local, regional, general anaesthesia or even combinations have been described. The Dorsal Penile Nerve Block (DPNB) has been shown to be superior to topical analgesia in neonatal circumcision. A 2008 Cochrane review showed no difference in pain scores between caudal block and DPNB, but described more motor block with caudal block. For this reason, the 2017 Canadian Urological Association guidelines review recommends using DPNB with a ring block as a standard of care for neonatal circumcision with-out general anaesthesia. However, DPNB does not provide reliable coverage of the ventral surface of the penis and frenulum. Pudendal nerve block (PNB) is another regional anaesthesia technique gaining in popularity with the now widespread use of ultrasound guidance. However, it is still unclear if PNB can give better outcomes than DPNB. The ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block has only been recently described and was not reviewed as an option at the time of the guidelines writing.

Read more

PNB can be performed using surface landmarks, with nerve stimulation or with ultra-sound-guidance. It has already been proven to have lower surgical complication rates than caudal block for hypospadias surgeries. Regarding DPNB, a variety of techniques have been described using either surface landmarks or ultrasound guidance. In the past ten years, two RCTs in Lebanon and Turkey compared PNB and DPNB for penile surgeries, showing lower pain scores and lower narcotics consumption in the pudendal nerve block group. None of these studies used ultrasound-guidance.

The investigators perform more than a hundred pediatric circumcisions yearly for medical indications. The surgery is done under general anaesthesia in association with either PNB or DPNB, depending on the anesthesiologist's preference. The primary objective is to compare analgesia between the two blocks during and after pediatric circumcisions to minimize post-operative pain. The research team will compare peri and postoperative pain in children receiving either ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block or ultrasound-guided dorsal penile nerve block for circumcision surgery.

Read the detailed description

All patients will receive inhalational anaesthesia induction with a mixture of oxygen/nitrous oxide and 6% sevoflurane. Nitrous oxide will be discontinued after loss of consciousness. Standard monitoring will be applied including electrocardiography, pulse oxymetry, capnography and non-invasive blood pressure monitoring. After establishing intravenous access, anaesthesia will be deepened using propofol 1 to 3 mg/kg and fentanyl 1 mcg/kg before laryngeal mask airway insertion or intubation. Neuromuscular blockade will not be administered. Maintenance of anaesthesia will be provided with sevoflurane with an end tidal sevoflurane between 1 and 1,5 MAC.

Five regional anesthesia experienced anesthesiologists not involved in the subsequent intraoperative or postoperative care of the patient will perform blocks.

Pudendal nerve block patients will be positioned dorsally with the legs in the " frog " position (hips in abduction, knees flexed and sole of the feet together). An ultrasound-guided technique will be used as described previously. A linear probe will be positioned horizontally between the ischiatic tuberosity and the rectum. The ischiorectal fossa is then located between these two landmarks. Using a sterile technique, an echogenic 22 gauge, 50 mm block needle will be inserted out of plane on the superior edge of the probe, midline between the ischiatic tuberosity and the rectum. After feeling two distinct fascial " clics " and confirmation of correct needle positioning in the ischiorectal fossa under ultrasound, 0,2 mL/kg (max 10mL) of ropivacaine 0,25% will be injected under real-time ultrasound-guidance after negative aspiration. The same technique will be repeated on the contralateral side.

Penile nerve block patients will be positioned in the supine position. An ultrasound-guided technique will be used as described previously. A linear probe will be placed transversely at the base of the penis while an assistant applies caudal traction to the penis. The penile neurovascular sheath is then located just above the corpus cavernosum. The dorsal penile nerve, dorsal penile artery and penile deep dorsal vein are visualized deep to Buck's fascia. Using a sterile technique, a 25 gauge, 1,5 inch needle will be inserted in-plane from lateral to medial so that the needle tip is placed into the penile neurovascular sheath, 0,1 mL/kg (max 4 mL) of ropivacaine 0,25% will be injected under real-time ultrasound guidance while retracting the needle so that the local anaesthetic solution spreads bilaterally filling the neurovascular space.

The heart rate and blood pressure will be recorded before the block and every 5 minutes after block completion by the anaesthesiologist unaware of block assignment involved in the intraoperative and postoperative care of the patient. Surgical incision will be delayed for a minimum of 15 minutes after block completion. Three surgeons will perform all circumcisions using the same surgical technique. Any in-crease in blood pressure or heart rate of more than 20% above baseline within 20 minutes of block completion will be treated with an additional propofol bolus (1mg/kg) or by increasing end-tidal sevoflurane to allow for onset of the block. Any increase in blood pressure or heart rate of more than 20% above baseline 20 minutes or more after the block will be considered inadequate analgesia and will be supplemented with fentanyl 1 mcg/kg. All patients will receive dexamethasone 0,1 mg/kg (max 8 mg) and ondansetron 0,1 mg/kg (max 4 mg). Ketorolac 0,5 mg/kg (max 30 mg) will also be administered at the end of the surgery.

Pain scores using the FLACC score(16) will be recorded in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and ambulatory step down unit at 5, 30, 60 and 120 minutes postoperatively by trained and blinded nurses. A pain score of 4 or higher in the PACU will lead to analgesic administration. A first dose of nalbuphine 0,1 mg/kg will be administered. If inadequate, incremental doses of morphine 0,05 mg/kg will be given until adequate analgesia is achieved. Pain will also be evaluated by parents at home using the parent postoperative pain measure (PPPM) scale at 6, 12 and 24 hours postoperatively. The parents will be instructed by a trained nurse on how to assess the child's pain using this pain measure. Patients will be prescribed acetaminophen 15 mg/kg q 4h regularly (maximum 5 doses/24 hours), ibuprofen 10 mg/kg q 8h regularly and morphine 0,1 mg/kg q 4h as needed.

Being tested
Ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block (PNB) and Ultrasound-guided penile nerve block (DPNB)
Keywords
Circumcision, Penile block, Pudendal block, Pediatric

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block (PNB) and Ultrasound-guided penile nerve block (DPNB)Procedure or surgery

    Our primary objective is to compare analgesia between the two blocks during and after pediatric circumcisions to minimize post-operative pain.

Study groups in NCT03914365
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block (PNB)Active comparatorStandard circumcision under general anaesthesia with ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block.Pudendal nerve block patients will be positioned dorsally with the legs in the " frog " position (hips in abduction, knees flexed, sole of the feet together). An ultrasound-guided technique will be used as described previously. A linear probe will be positioned horizontally between the ischiatic tuberosity and the rectum. The ischiorectal fossa is then located between these two landmarks. Using a sterile tech-nique, an echogenic 22 gauge, 50 mm block needle will be inserted out of plane on the superior edge of the probe, midline between the ischiatic tuberosity and the rectum. After feeling two distinct fascial " clics " and confirmation of correct needle posi-tioning in the ischiorectal fossa under ultrasound, 0,2 mL/kg (max 10mL) of ropiva-caine 0,25% will be injected under real-time ultrasound-guidance after negative aspiration. The same technique will be repeated on the contralateral side.
Receives: Procedure: Ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block (PNB) and Ultrasound-guided penile nerve block (DPNB)
Ultrasound-guided penile nerve block (DPNB)Active comparatorStandard circumcision under general anaes-thesia with ultrasound-guided penile nerve block.Penile nerve block patients will be positioned in the supine position. An ultrasound-guided technique will be used as described previously. A linear probe will be placed transversely at the base of the penis while an assistant applies caudal traction to the penis. The penile neurovascular sheath is then located just above the corpus cavernosum. The dorsal penile nerve, dorsal penile artery and penile deep dorsal vein are visualized deep to Buck's fascia. Using a sterile technique, a 25 gauge, 1,5 inch needle will be inserted in-plane from lateral to medial so that the needle tip is placed into the penile neurovascular sheath, 0,1 mL/kg (max 4 mL) of ropivacaine 0,25% will be injected under real-time ultrasound guidance while retracting the needle so that the local anaesthetic solution spreads bilaterally filling the neurovascular space.
Receives: Procedure: Ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block (PNB) and Ultrasound-guided penile nerve block (DPNB)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Impact of regional block on FLACC pain scores after circumcision

    Impact of regional block on pain scores (FLACC score) during the 24 h post-operative period: at 5-30-60-120 minutes postoperative in hospital. The FLACC score (The Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale) The scale is scored in a range of 0-10 with 0 representing no pain. Will be used in the hospital at 5-30-60 and 120 minutes postop.

    Measured: 24 hours

  2. Impact of regional block on PPPM pain scores after circumcision

    Impact of regional block on PPPM pain scores (parent's postoperative pain measure) during the 24 h post-operative period at 6-12-24h postop at home.

    PPPM score (parents' postoperative pain measure). The scale is scored in a range of 0-15 with 0 representing no pain. Scores 6 and higher represent significant pain. Will be used at home at 6-12-and 24h postop.

    Measured: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Impact of regional block on analgesic consumption after circumcision

    Impact of regional block on analgesic consumption during the first 24h post-operative period.

    Measured: 24 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Apr 2019
  2. Study start1 Jul 2019
  3. Primary completionMay 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Randomized blinded parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
300 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03914365
Sponsor's protocol ID
2018-4132
Status last verified
Aug 2021
First submitted
9 Apr 2019
Last updated
5 Aug 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Dave S, Afshar K, Braga LH, Anderson P. Canadian Urological Association guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision in Canadian infants (full version). Can Urol Assoc J. 2018 Feb;12(2):E76-E99. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.5033. Epub 2017 Dec 1. No abstract available.

    PubMed 29381458
  • Morris BJ, Bailis SA, Wiswell TE. Circumcision rates in the United States: rising or falling? What effect might the new affirmative pediatric policy statement have? Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 May;89(5):677-86. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.01.001. Epub 2014 Apr 2.

    PubMed 24702735
  • Sorokan ST, Finlay JC, Jefferies AL; Canadian Paediatric Society, Fetus and Newborn Committee, Infectious Diseases and Immunization Committee. Newborn male circumcision. Paediatr Child Health. 2015 Aug-Sep;20(6):311-20. doi: 10.1093/pch/20.6.311.

    PubMed 26435672
  • Brady-Fryer B, Wiebe N, Lander JA. Pain relief for neonatal circumcision. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18;2004(4):CD004217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004217.pub2.

    PubMed 15495086
  • Howard CR, Howard FM, Fortune K, Generelli P, Zolnoun D, tenHoopen C, deBlieck E. A randomized, controlled trial of a eutectic mixture of local anesthetic cream (lidocaine and prilocaine) versus penile nerve block for pain relief during circumcision. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Dec;181(6):1506-11. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70397-2.

    PubMed 10601936
  • Cyna AM, Middleton P. Caudal epidural block versus other methods of postoperative pain relief for circumcision in boys. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;2008(4):CD003005. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003005.pub2.

    PubMed 18843636
  • Kendigelen P, Tutuncu AC, Emre S, Altindas F, Kaya G. Pudendal Versus Caudal Block in Children Undergoing Hypospadias Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):610-5. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000447.

    PubMed 27501015
  • Hecht S, Pineda J, Bayne A. Ultrasound-guided Pudendal Block Is a Viable Alternative to Caudal Block for Hypospadias Surgery: A Single-Surgeon Pilot Study. Urology. 2018 Mar;113:192-196. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 16.

    PubMed 29155191
  • Tutuncu AC, Kendigelen P, Ashyyeralyeva G, Altintas F, Emre S, Ozcan R, Kaya G. Pudendal Nerve Block Versus Penile Nerve Block in Children Undergoing Circumcision. Urol J. 2018 May 3;15(3):109-115. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4292.

    PubMed 29299888
  • Naja Z, Al-Tannir MA, Faysal W, Daoud N, Ziade F, El-Rajab M. A comparison of pudendal block vs dorsal penile nerve block for circumcision in children: a randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia. 2011 Sep;66(9):802-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06753.x. Epub 2011 Jul 25.

    PubMed 21790518
  • Gaudet-Ferrand I, De La Arena P, Bringuier S, Raux O, Hertz L, Kalfa N, Sola C, Dadure C. Ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block in children: A new technique of ultrasound-guided transperineal approach. Paediatr Anaesth. 2018 Jan;28(1):53-58. doi: 10.1111/pan.13286. Epub 2017 Dec 5.

    PubMed 29205687
  • Suleman MI, Akbar Ali AN, Kanarek V, Li M, Patel A. Ultrasound Guided In-Plane Penile Nerve Block for Circumcision: A New, Modified Technique Suggests Lower Anesthetic Volume and Narcotic Use. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Oct;23(6):647-53.

    PubMed 29939703
  • McGrath PJ, Walco GA, Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Brown MT, Davidson K, Eccleston C, Finley GA, Goldschneider K, Haverkos L, Hertz SH, Ljungman G, Palermo T, Rappaport BA, Rhodes T, Schechter N, Scott J, Sethna N, Svensson OK, Stinson J, von Baeyer CL, Walker L, Weisman S, White RE, Zajicek A, Zeltzer L; PedIMMPACT. Core outcome domains and measures for pediatric acute and chronic/recurrent pain clinical trials: PedIMMPACT recommendations. J Pain. 2008 Sep;9(9):771-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.04.007. Epub 2008 Jun 17.

    PubMed 18562251
  • Boric K, Jelicic Kadic A, Boric M, Zarandi-Nowroozi M, Jakus D, Cavar M, Dosenovic S, Jeric M, Batinic M, Vukovic I, Puljak L. Outcome domains and pain outcome measures in randomized controlled trials of interventions for postoperative pain in children and adolescents. Eur J Pain. 2019 Feb;23(2):389-396. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1313. Epub 2018 Sep 21.

    PubMed 30179284
  • Berde CB, Walco GA, Krane EJ, Anand KJ, Aranda JV, Craig KD, Dampier CD, Finkel JC, Grabois M, Johnston C, Lantos J, Lebel A, Maxwell LG, McGrath P, Oberlander TF, Schanberg LE, Stevens B, Taddio A, von Baeyer CL, Yaster M, Zempsky WT. Pediatric analgesic clinical trial designs, measures, and extrapolation: report of an FDA scientific workshop. Pediatrics. 2012 Feb;129(2):354-64. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-3591. Epub 2012 Jan 16.

    PubMed 22250028

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block (PNB) and Ultrasound-guided penile nerve block (DPNB) in people with Male Circumcision and Regional Anesthesia, run by CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Impact of regional block on FLACC pain scores after circumcision (time frame: 24 hours). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03914365, which also lists 21 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Aug 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in