Removal Contraceptive ImplantREVALID03NCT03912649
Investigation to Evaluate Performance and Safety of RemovAid ™ in Removal of Contraceptive Implants
A study testing RemovAid in people with Removal Contraceptive Implant, run by RemovAid AS at 1 site in Sweden.
Trial summary
The safety and efficacy of a subdermal implant retrieval device (RemovAid) is investigated in a population of 25 women seeking removal of their palpable contraceptive implants. The primary endpoint of the device is to evaluate the performance of the device, specifically its success rate in removing palpable… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Removal Contraceptive Implant
- What is being tested?
- RemovAid
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSweden
- Study dates
- 11 Jun 2019to 18 Nov 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Female age 18 or older
- Willing to remove a palpable subdermal Implanon/ Nexplanon CI
- Willing and able to give written informed consent for participation in the investigation
- Willing to provide follow-up information according to the Clinical Investigators brochure
Who cannot join
- Known allergy to local anaesthetic (lidocaine/lignocaine) or disinfectant (chlorhexidine).
- Active skin lesion over the CI.
- The Investigator considers the subject unlikely to comply with investigational procedures, restrictions and requirements.
- Any contraindication for removal of the PI, as judged by the Investigator.
- Any disorders or medications that might affect coagulation, as judged by the Investigator.
- Any conditions suspected to affect healing or increase risk of infection (e.g. keloid tendency, diabetes or any upper arm dermatological condition that may affect upper arm healing)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Single-centre, Non-comparative Feasibility Investigation to Evaluate Performance and Safety of RemovAid ™ Retrieval Device When Used for Removal of Palpable Subdermal Contraceptive Rod Implants
The safety and efficacy of a subdermal implant retrieval device (RemovAid) is investigated in a population of 25 women seeking removal of their palpable contraceptive implants.
The primary endpoint of the device is to evaluate the performance of the device, specifically its success rate in removing palpable contraceptive implants. The device shall be able to fixate at least 80% of palpable implants, and successfully remove at least 90% of these implants.
Read the detailed description
Similar to the REVALID and REVALID02 investigations, the REVALID03 investigation aims to recruit a total of 25 women with a palpable contraceptive implant due for removal, in order to obtain at least 20 successful fixations.
The implant retrieval device aims to standardize and simplify the implant removal procedure. There is no comparator in the investigation. Descriptive data will be recorded, all recruited subjects will be exposed to the investigational medical device (IMD) The primary endpoint is the percentage of fixated implants that are successfully removed without the use of additional tools.
- Conditions
- Removal Contraceptive Implant
- Being tested
- RemovAid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RemovAidDevice
The RemovAid device is used for removal
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| RemovAid arm | Experimental | RemovAid arm -
All subjects have their implant removed by the RemovAid device Receives: Device: RemovAid |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Successful removal of implant
The percentage of fixated implants that are successfully removed by the device without the use of additional tools
Measured: 15 minutes
Secondary outcomes (7)
Frequency, severity, causality and outcome of adverse events (AEs)
Both Anticipated and unanticipated AEs will be recorded, both immediately following the intervention and at follow-up
Measured: 1 week
Pain during procedure: Visual Analogue Scale
Mean pain score (maximum pain intensity during the procedure) indicated by the subject on a Visual Analogue Scale 0-100 mm ruler, assuming that anaesthesia has been properly administered. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Measured: 15 minutes
Success of fixation of implant
Percentage of palpable implants where the implant could be seen and/or felt on both sides of the clamp after maximum three attempts of fixation. 80% or more is considered success.
Measured: 5 minutes
Duration of procedure
Mean time from making incision until implant is removed, and first touching subject with the device until implant extracted
Measured: 25 minutes
Technical functionality of device determined by an operators questionnaire
Fulfilment of pre-defined technical requirements, as documented on an operator functionality questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of a range of yes/no questions to device functionality
Measured: 5 minutes
Operators impression of the device
The operator's global impression of the IMD will be assessed using a scale 1-5, where 5 is excellent and 1= poor
Measured: 5 minutes
Subject satisfaction: 5- point scale
The subject's global assessment of satisfaction with the procedure will be assessed using a scale of 1-5, where 5 is excellent
Measured: 5 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Apr 2019
- Study start11 Jun 2019
- Primary completion18 Nov 2020
- Study completion18 Nov 2020
Why it stopped: Although the defined success rate needed for continuation of the investigation was met, due to the overall low success rate; it was considered, particularly considering the ongoing pandemic, to discontinue the investigation prematurely.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Removal Contraceptive ImplantStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- RemovAid AS
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Karolinska University Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Karolinska Institutet
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03912649
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- REVALID03
- Acronym
- REVALID03
- Status last verified
- Jan 2021
- First submitted
- 8 Apr 2019
- Last updated
- 3 Feb 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Committee on Adolescent Health Care Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Working Group, The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee opinion no. 539: adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Oct;120(4):983-8. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182723b7d.
PubMed 22996129Mansour D, Mommers E, Teede H, Sollie-Eriksen B, Graesslin O, Ahrendt HJ, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Clinician satisfaction and insertion characteristics of a new applicator to insert radiopaque Implanon: an open-label, noncontrolled, multicenter trial. Contraception. 2010 Sep;82(3):243-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.04.007. Epub 2010 May 18.
PubMed 20705152Mommers E, Blum GF, Gent TG, Peters KP, Sordal TS, Marintcheva-Petrova M. Nexplanon, a radiopaque etonogestrel implant in combination with a next-generation applicator: 3-year results of a noncomparative multicenter trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Nov;207(5):388.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
PubMed 22939402Webb AM. Why go to Tiger Country? A report of two cases of Implanon removal. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2006 Jul;32(3):193-4. doi: 10.1783/147118906777888233. No abstract available.
PubMed 16857083Levine JP, Sinofsky FE, Christ MF; Implanon US Study Group. Assessment of Implanon insertion and removal. Contraception. 2008 Nov;78(5):409-17. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.06.016. Epub 2008 Sep 18.
PubMed 18929739Funk S, Miller MM, Mishell DR Jr, Archer DF, Poindexter A, Schmidt J, Zampaglione E; Implanon US Study Group. Safety and efficacy of Implanon, a single-rod implantable contraceptive containing etonogestrel. Contraception. 2005 May;71(5):319-26. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.11.007.
PubMed 15854630
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Feb 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Single-centre, Non-comparative Feasibility Investigation to Evaluate Performance and Safety of RemovAid ™ Retrieval Device When Used for Removal of Palpable Subdermal Contraceptive Rod Implants
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03912649
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REVALID03 / REVALID03
- Conditions
- Removal Contraceptive Implant
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Although the defined success rate needed for continuation of the investigation was met, due to the overall low success rate; it was considered, particularly considering the ongoing pandemic, to discontinue the investigation prematurely.
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- RemovAid ASIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Karolinska University Hospital
- Study start
- 11 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Nov 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The safety and efficacy of a subdermal implant retrieval device (RemovAid) is investigated in a population of 25 women seeking removal of their palpable contraceptive implants.
The primary endpoint of the device is to evaluate the performance of the device, specifically its success rate in removing palpable contraceptive implants. The device shall be able to fixate at least 80% of palpable implants, and successfully remove at least 90% of these implants.
Detailed description
Similar to the REVALID and REVALID02 investigations, the REVALID03 investigation aims to recruit a total of 25 women with a palpable contraceptive implant due for removal, in order to obtain at least 20 successful fixations.
The implant retrieval device aims to standardize and simplify the implant removal procedure. There is no comparator in the investigation. Descriptive data will be recorded, all recruited subjects will be exposed to the investigational medical device (IMD) The primary endpoint is the percentage of fixated implants that are successfully removed without the use of additional tools.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| RemovAid arm | Experimental | Device: RemovAidRemovAid arm - All subjects have their implant removed by the RemovAid device |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Female age 18 or older
- Willing to remove a palpable subdermal Implanon/ Nexplanon CI
- Willing and able to give written informed consent for participation in the investigation
- Willing to provide follow-up information according to the Clinical Investigators brochure
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Known allergy to local anaesthetic (lidocaine/lignocaine) or disinfectant (chlorhexidine).
- Active skin lesion over the CI.
- The Investigator considers the subject unlikely to comply with investigational procedures, restrictions and requirements.
- Any contraindication for removal of the PI, as judged by the Investigator.
- Any disorders or medications that might affect coagulation, as judged by the Investigator.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RemovAidThe RemovAid device is used for removal | Device | RemovAid arm |
Primary outcome
Successful removal of implant
Time frame: 15 minutes
The percentage of fixated implants that are successfully removed by the device without the use of additional tools
7 secondary outcomes
Frequency, severity, causality and outcome of adverse events (AEs)
Time frame: 1 week
Pain during procedure: Visual Analogue Scale
Time frame: 15 minutes
Success of fixation of implant
Time frame: 5 minutes
Duration of procedure
Time frame: 25 minutes
Technical functionality of device determined by an operators questionnaire
Time frame: 5 minutes
Operators impression of the device
Time frame: 5 minutes
Subject satisfaction: 5- point scale
Time frame: 5 minutes
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Although the defined success rate needed for continuation of the investigation was met, due to the overall low success rate; it was considered, particularly considering the ongoing pandemic, to discontinue the investigation prematurely.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Feb 2021.
- Background: PubMed 22996129Committee on Adolescent Health Care Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Working Group, The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee opinion no. 539: adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Oct;120(4):983-8. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182723b7d.
- Background: PubMed 20705152Mansour D, Mommers E, Teede H, Sollie-Eriksen B, Graesslin O, Ahrendt HJ, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Clinician satisfaction and insertion characteristics of a new applicator to insert radiopaque Implanon: an open-label, noncontrolled, multicenter trial. Contraception. 2010 Sep;82(3):243-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.04.007. Epub 2010 May 18.
- Background: PubMed 22939402Mommers E, Blum GF, Gent TG, Peters KP, Sordal TS, Marintcheva-Petrova M. Nexplanon, a radiopaque etonogestrel implant in combination with a next-generation applicator: 3-year results of a noncomparative multicenter trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Nov;207(5):388.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
- Background: PubMed 16857083Webb AM. Why go to Tiger Country? A report of two cases of Implanon removal. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2006 Jul;32(3):193-4. doi: 10.1783/147118906777888233. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 18929739Levine JP, Sinofsky FE, Christ MF; Implanon US Study Group. Assessment of Implanon insertion and removal. Contraception. 2008 Nov;78(5):409-17. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.06.016. Epub 2008 Sep 18.
- Background: PubMed 15854630Funk S, Miller MM, Mishell DR Jr, Archer DF, Poindexter A, Schmidt J, Zampaglione E; Implanon US Study Group. Safety and efficacy of Implanon, a single-rod implantable contraceptive containing etonogestrel. Contraception. 2005 May;71(5):319-26. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.11.007.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Removal Contraceptive Implant
Recruiting
Improvement of Symptoms After Removal of the Essure® Contraceptive Implant
Implant Complication, Contraceptive Device; Complications
Recruiting
PLACE Trial: Preserving Long-Acting Contraception Through Education
Contraception
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson, MD, PhD principal investigator
Karolinska Institutet
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing RemovAid in people with Removal Contraceptive Implant, run by RemovAid AS at 1 site in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Although the defined success rate needed for continuation of the investigation was met, due to the overall low success rate; it was considered, particularly considering the ongoing pandemic, to discontinue the investigation prematurely.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Successful removal of implant (time frame: 15 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03912649, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Feb 2021.