AzTrials
AzTrials

Neonatal SEPSISNCT03896893

Neonatal Bacterial Colonization Study

A study testing Skin antisepsis and Emollient in people with Neonatal SEPSIS and Prematurity, run by University of Stellenbosch at 1 site in South Africa.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will evaluate the effect of skin antisepsis and/or emollient therapy on bacterial colonization dynamics in very low birth weight, hospitalized infants. Bacterial swabs from 5 body sites will be collected at baseline, day 3, day 8 and day 13 following study arm assignment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 3 days
What is being tested?
Skin antisepsis and Emollient
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Africa
Study dates
4 Mar 2019to 30 Sep 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 3 days
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Birth weight ≥1000g and ≤ 1500g (equivalent to gestational age 28 - 32 weeks)
  • Day 1 or 2 or 3 of life
  • Anticipated length of hospital stay > 7 days.

Who cannot join

  • Birth weight <1000g or >1500g
  • Mother not present, unable or unwilling to provide consent for enrolment
  • Any skin condition or congenital defect that could potentially result in enhanced CHG absorption (skin blistering/bullae, congenital anomalies e.g. gastroschisis, spina bifida)
  • Anticipated length of hospital stay < 7 days.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Angela Dramowski, MD, PhD contact

+27219389506

dramowski@sun.ac.za

South Africa1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Tygerberg Hospital

    Cape Town, Western Cape, 7503

    Angela Dramowski, MD, PhD, +27219389506, dramowski@sun.ac.za

    dramowski@sun.ac.za

    Recruiting

Other trials in South Africa

About this study

Official title: Impact of 1% Chlorhexidine Gluconate and/or Emollient on Neonatal Bacterial Colonization Dynamics

This study will evaluate the effect of skin antisepsis and/or emollient therapy on bacterial colonization dynamics in very low birth weight, hospitalized infants. Bacterial swabs from 5 body sites will be collected at baseline, day 3, day 8 and day 13 following study arm assignment. Study outcomes include changes in bacterial colony counts, burden of gram-negative and gram-positive pathogens and overall skin score.

Read the detailed description

Despite substantial global decline in childhood mortality rates, equivalent progress in neonatal mortality reduction has not been achieved. Severe bacterial infection affects approximately 6.9 million neonates and causes an estimated 750 000 deaths in low-middle income countries (LMIC) annually. The neonatal period extends from birth to 28 days of life, although neonatal hospitalization episodes (and therefore infection risk) are often substantially prolonged in preterm infants. In South Africa, infections account for 13.8% of neonatal mortality (following prematurity and intrapartum hypoxia). The South African Perinatal Problem Identification Programme (PPIP) cites nosocomial infection as the second most prevalent avoidable factor in neonatal deaths. Developing new approaches to prevent infection in hospitalized and preterm newborns in LMIC is key to achieving the Sustainable Development targets for under-five child survival.

The risk for hospital-onset sepsis in African neonates is disproportionately high and influenced by many factors including: high rates of prematurity and low birth weight; increasing in-hospital births, understaffing of maternity and neonatal services and limited implementation of infection prevention practices. Of infections among hospitalized neonates in high-income settings, hospital-acquired bloodstream infections (HA-BSI) predominate, accounting for 57% of infections. Research addressing the problem of hospital-onset neonatal infection should therefore focus on BSI prevention. A key target for sepsis reduction is prevention of intrapartum and post-delivery acquisition of bacterial colonization. Although the pathogenesis of bacterial colonization preceding invasive infection is well-accepted, there is limited data describing neonatal bacterial colonization dynamics in low-resource settings. Full characterization of timing, source and route of bacterial acquisition, flora/pathogen distribution, balance and changes over time is needed to identify all potential targets for neonatal BSI prevention.

Emollient therapy and reduction of pathogen colonization through skin antisepsis, are potentially useful targets for reducing risk of hospital-acquired BSI in neonates. Emollients (oils, creams and ointments) have been applied daily or bi-daily in neonatal research and routine practice settings, to promote skin integrity in preterm infants <37 weeks' gestation. The postulated mechanism of effect is improved skin barrier function and promotion of normal flora colonization, which may prevent pathogen ingress and subsequent invasive infection. A 2016 Cochrane review of emollient therapy for sepsis prevention in preterm infants found no evidence of reduced mortality or bloodstream infection rates, but the authors concluded that further studies in low-resource settings were warranted.

Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) is a bisbiguanide molecule with broad-spectrum antiseptic activity producing membrane disruption through increased cell permeability and bacterial lysis. Efficacy and safety of daily CHG bathing to prevent pediatric bacteremia was established in a multicenter, cluster-randomized trial for infants >2 months in intensive care (ICU) using 2% CHG-impregnated cloths. Three high-quality studies of newborn CHG skin or cord cleansing showed reduced neonatal mortality and omphalitis in community-based neonates. Safety of topical CHG application for neonates has been established at concentrations ≤1%, although there is little data available on its use in premature, hospitalized neonates.

CHG skin cleansing and emollient therapy are potentially useful interventions for prevention of hospital-acquired BSI in neonates from low-resource settings. In addition, these interventions are suitable for inclusion in a neonatal sepsis prevention care bundle, should they be found to be effective, safe and feasible. In addition these interventions would be low-cost, easily scalable and potentially, a maternally-administered intervention. This study will evaluate the effect of skin antisepsis and/or emollient therapy on bacterial colonization dynamics in very low birth weight, hospitalized infants. Bacterial swabs from 5 body sites will be collected at baseline, day 3, day 8 and day 13 following study arm assignment. Study outcomes include changes in bacterial colony counts, burden of gram-negative and gram-positive pathogens and overall skin score.

Being tested
Skin antisepsis, Emollient
Medical subject headings
Neonatal Sepsis, Premature Birth, Sepsis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Skin antisepsisOther

    1% aqueous chlorhexidine gluconate

  • EmollientOther

    Aquaphor skin cream

Study groups in NCT03896893
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard of CareNo interventionRoutine bathing and skin care as per hospital practice
1% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)Experimental1% aqueous CHG applied from the neck down with cotton swabs daily on weekdays (total of 8 days CHG application)
Receives: Other: Skin antisepsis
Emollient therapyExperimentalAquaphor skin cream applied from the neck down daily on weekdays (total of 8 days emollient application)
Receives: Other: Emollient
1% CHG plus emollient therapyExperimental1% aqueous CHG applied from the neck down with cotton swabs daily on weekdays followed immediately by Aquaphor skin cream (total of 8 days CHG application plus emollient application)
Receives: Other: Skin antisepsis; Other: Emollient

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in median bacterial colony counts by body site over time

    Measured: baseline, day 3, day 8 and day 13 post enrolment

  2. Change in Gram negative pathogen burden by body site over time

    Measured: baseline, day 3, day 8 and day 13 post enrolment

  3. Change in Gram positive pathogen burden by body site over time

    Measured: baseline, day 3, day 8 and day 13 post enrolment

  4. Change in median skin condition score over time (Grading scale adapted by Darmstadt from Lane at al)

    Darmstadt skin score uses a 9-point scale (calculated as the sum of points for each of 3 items: skin eythema, dryness and breakdown, with a minimum score of 1 and maximum score of 3, representing worst possible skin condition for each sub-scale, total sum of points is a minimum score of 3 and maximum score of 9 for worst possible skin condition)

    Measured: Daily from enrolment to day 13 post enrolment

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Incidence of laboratory-confirmed sepsis

    pathogen identified on sterile site specimen (blood, urine, cerebrospinal fluid)

    Measured: up until day 28 of life

  2. Incidence of clinically-suspected sepsis

    culture-negative episode of infection with at least 5 days broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy

    Measured: up until day 28 of life

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Apr 2019
  2. Study start4 Mar 2019
  3. Primary completion30 Sep 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Sep 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Sequential
Model description
Enrolled babies will be sequentially recruited to one of 4 study arms (see below).
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03896893
Sponsor's protocol ID
N18/07/068
Other IDs
5K43TW010682
Status last verified
Mar 2019
First submitted
25 Mar 2019
Last updated
1 Apr 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Publications

  • Dramowski A, Pillay S, Bekker A, Abrahams I, Cotton MF, Coffin SE, Whitelaw AC. Impact of 1% chlorhexidine gluconate bathing and emollient application on bacterial pathogen colonization dynamics in hospitalized preterm neonates - A pilot clinical trial. EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Jun 18;37:100946. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100946. eCollection 2021 Jul.

    PubMed 34195575

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Skin antisepsis and Emollient in people with Neonatal SEPSIS and Prematurity, run by University of Stellenbosch at 1 site in South Africa.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Africa. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Angela Dramowski, MD, PhD (+27219389506, dramowski@sun.ac.za), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in median bacterial colony counts by body site over time (time frame: baseline, day 3, day 8 and day 13 post enrolment). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03896893, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Apr 2019.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in