AzTrials
AzTrials

Psoriatic ArthritisPhase 3BE COMPLETENCT03896581

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in the Treatment of Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis

A Phase 3 study testing Bimekizumab in people with Psoriatic Arthritis, run by UCB Biopharma SRL at 92 sites in 11 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a study to demonstrate the clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of bimekizumab administered subcutaneously (sc) compared with placebo in the treatment of tumor necrosis factor alpha-inadequate responders (TNFα-IR) subjects with active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Psoriatic Arthritis
What is being tested?
Bimekizumab
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
400 participants
Where
92 sitesin 11 countries
Study dates
28 Mar 2019to 14 Feb 2022
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subject is male or female at least 18 years of age
  • Female subjects must be postmenopausal, permanently sterilized or willing to use a highly effective method of contraception
  • Documented diagnosis of adult-onset Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) meeting the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) for at least 6 months prior to Screening with active PsA and must have at Baseline tender joint count (TJC) >=3 out of 68 and swollen joint count (SJC) >=3 out of 66
  • Subject must be negative for rheumatoid factor and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibodies
  • Subject must have at least 1 active psoriatic lesion(s) and/or a documented history of psoriasis (PSO)
  • Subject has a history of inadequate response (lack of efficacy after at least 3 months of therapy at an approved dose) or intolerance to treatment with 1 or 2 tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF(α)) inhibitors for either PsA or PSO
  • Subjects currently taking NSAIDs, cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) inhibitors, analgesics (including mild opioids), corticosteroids, methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide (LEF), sulfasalazine (SSZ), hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) AND/OR apremilast can be allowed if they fulfill specific requirements prior to study entry

Who cannot join

  • Female subjects who are breastfeeding, pregnant, or plan to become pregnant during the study
  • Subjects with current or prior exposure to any biologics except tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors for the treatment of PsA or PSO
  • Subject has an active infection or a history of recent serious infections
  • Subject has known tuberculosis (TB) infection, is at high risk of acquiring TB infection, or has current or history of nontuberculous mycobacterium (NTMB) infection
  • Subject has a diagnosis of inflammatory conditions other than PSO or PsA. Subjects with a diagnosis of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, or other inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are allowed as long as they have no active symptomatic disease at Screening or Baseline
  • Subject had acute anterior uveitis within 6 weeks of Baseline
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Subject has any active malignancy or history of malignancy within 5 years prior to the Screening Visit EXCEPT treated and considered cured cutaneous squamous or basal cell carcinoma, or in situ cervical cancer
  • Subject has a form of PSO other than chronic plaque-type (eg, pustular, erythrodermic and guttate PSO, or drug-induced PSO)
  • Presence of active suicidal ideation, or moderately severe major depression or severe major depression
  • Subject has a history of chronic alcohol or drug abuse within 6 months prior to Screening

Trial locations and contacts

92 sites in 11 countries.

92 sites in 11 countries

United States33 sites
  • Pa0011 50029

    Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102

  • Pa0011 50039

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30342

  • Pa0011 50002

    Austin, Texas, 78731

  • Pa0011 50023

    Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70836

  • Pa0011 50050

    Beckley, West Virginia, 25801

  • Pa0011 50024

    Boise, Idaho, 83702

  • Pa0011 50047

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115-5817

  • Pa0011 50010

    Brooklyn, New York, 11201

  • Pa0011 50125

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210

  • Pa0011 50020

    Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635

  • Pa0011 50005

    Freehold, New Jersey, 07728

  • Pa0011 50015

    Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740

  • Pa0011 50001

    Jackson, Tennessee, 38305

  • Pa0011 50008

    Johnston, Rhode Island, 02919

  • Pa0011 50019

    Lansing, Michigan, 48911

  • Pa0011 50028

    Lexington, Kentucky, 40504

  • Pa0011 50012

    Memphis, Tennessee, 38119-5214

  • Pa0011 50036

    Mesquite, Texas, 75150

  • Pa0011 50011

    New York, New York, 10003

  • Pa0011 50033

    Palm Harbor, Florida, 34684

  • Pa0011 50064

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

  • Pa0011 50017

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85037

  • Pa0011 50034

    Rochester, New York, 14642

  • Pa0011 50031

    Salisbury, North Carolina, 28144

  • Pa0011 50035

    San Diego, California, 92128

  • Pa0011 50016

    St Louis, Missouri, 63141

  • Pa0011 50021

    Summerville, South Carolina, 29486

  • Pa0011 50037

    Tampa, Florida, 33613

  • Pa0011 50004

    Tustin, California, 92780

  • Pa0011 50040

    Vandalia, Ohio, 45377

  • Pa0011 50009

    Waco, Texas, 76710

  • Pa0011 50026

    Wheaton, Maryland, 20902

  • Pa0011 50006

    Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, 19610

Other trials in United States

Poland12 sites
  • Pa0011 40119

    Bydgoszcz

  • Pa0011 40038

    Elblag

  • Pa0011 40037

    Lublin

  • Pa0011 40091

    Nowa Sól

  • Pa0011 40044

    Poznan

  • Pa0011 40090

    Poznan

  • Pa0011 40118

    Torun

  • Pa0011 40041

    Warsaw

  • Pa0011 40097

    Warsaw

  • Pa0011 40098

    Warsaw

  • Pa0011 40039

    Wroclaw

  • Pa0011 40043

    Wroclaw

Other trials in Poland

Japan11 sites
  • Pa0011 20030

    Chūōku

  • Pa0011 20036

    Kawachi-Nagano

  • Pa0011 20045

    Kita-gun

  • Pa0011 20049

    Kitakyushu

  • Pa0011 20044

    Minatoku

  • Pa0011 20041

    Osaka

  • Pa0011 20046

    Osaka

  • Pa0011 20031

    Sapporo

  • Pa0011 20042

    Sasebo

  • Pa0011 20032

    Suita

  • Pa0011 20043

    tabashi City

Other trials in Japan

Russia11 sites
  • Pa0011 20005

    Korolyov

  • Pa0011 20010

    Moscow

  • Pa0011 20013

    Petrozavodsk

  • Pa0011 20001

    Saint Petersburg

  • Pa0011 20004

    Saint Petersburg

  • Pa0011 20009

    Saint Petersburg

  • Pa0011 20007

    Saratov

  • Pa0011 20014

    Ulyanovsk

  • Pa0011 20006

    Vladimir

  • Pa0011 20008

    Yaroslavl

  • Pa0011 20015

    Yaroslavl

Other trials in Russia

Germany7 sites
  • Pa0011 40076

    Cottbus

  • Pa0011 40023

    Erlangen

  • Pa0011 40117

    Frankfurt

  • Pa0011 40029

    Hamburg

  • Pa0011 40071

    Hamburg

  • Pa0011 40078

    Leipzig

  • Pa0011 40026

    Ratingen

Other trials in Germany

Czechia4 sites
  • Pa0011 40009

    Pardubice

  • Pa0011 40063

    Prague

  • Pa0011 40066

    Prague

  • Pa0011 40012

    Zlín

Other trials in Czechia

Australia3 sites
  • Pa0011 30005

    Camberwell

  • Pa0011 30007

    Victoria Park

  • Pa0011 30006

    Woodville South

Other trials in Australia

Canada3 sites
  • Pa0011 50042

    Rimouski

  • Pa0011 50043

    Sydney

  • Pa0011 50044

    Trois-Rivières

Other trials in Canada

Italy3 sites
  • Pa0011 40084

    Catania

  • Pa0011 40087

    Milan

  • Pa0011 40086

    Reggio Emilia

Other trials in Italy

United Kingdom3 sites
  • Pa0011 40111

    Bradford

  • Pa0011 40109

    Oxford

  • Pa0011 40116

    Stamford

Other trials in United Kingdom

Hungary2 sites
  • Pa0011 40083

    Budapest

  • Pa0011 40079

    Szentes

Other trials in Hungary

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter, Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in the Treatment of Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis

This is a study to demonstrate the clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of bimekizumab administered subcutaneously (sc) compared with placebo in the treatment of tumor necrosis factor alpha-inadequate responders (TNFα-IR) subjects with active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA).

Being tested
Bimekizumab, Placebo
Keywords
Psoriatic Arthritis, PsA, Bimekizumab
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Psoriatic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BimekizumabDrug

    Also called BKZ, UCB4940

    Subjects will receive bimekizumab at pre-specified time-points.

  • PlaceboOther

    Also called PBO

    Subjects will receive placebo at pre-specified time-points.

Study groups in NCT03896581
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Bimekizumab dosage regimenExperimentalSubjects randomized to this arm will receive assigned bimekizumab dosage regimen.
Receives: Drug: Bimekizumab
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorSubjects randomized to this arm will receive placebo.
Receives: Other: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) Response

    The ACR50 response rate was based on a 50% or greater improvement of arthritis relative to Baseline. Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR50 response criteria: 1.≥ 50% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2.≥ 50% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3.≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Physician global assessment of disease activity [100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) (0=no symptoms;100=severe symptoms)], Patient global assessment of disease activity [100 mm VAS (0=no limitation of normal activities;100=very poor], Patient assessment of pain [100 mm VAS (0=no pain;100=most severe pain)], Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), its score (0-3) computed from item scores, lower scores indicated less disability and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 16

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Total Score at Week 16

    The HAQ-DI contains 20 items that measured the degree of difficulty experienced in the following 8 categories of the daily living activities: dressing and grooming (2 items), arising (2 items), eating (3 items), walking (2 items), hygiene (3 items), reach (2 items), grip (3 items), and common daily activities (3 items). Each question was scored 0-3 (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do). The overall HAQ-DI total score was calculated by dividing the sum of the highest category scores (0 to 24) by the number of categories with at least 1 question answered. The HAQ-DI score ranges from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (maximum difficulty). A lower HAQ-DI score indicated an improvement in function. Change from baseline was computed as the value at Week 16 minus the baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicated an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  2. Psoriasis Area Severity Index 90 Response (PASI90) at Week 4 in the Subgroup of Participants With Psoriasis (PSO) Involving at Least 3% Body Surface Area (BSA) at Baseline

    The PASI90 response assessments are based on at least 90% improvement in PASI score from Baseline. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 4

  3. Psoriasis Area Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response at Week 16 in the Subgroup of Participants With Psoriasis (PSO) Involving at Least 3% Body Surface Area at Baseline

    The PASI90 response assessments are based on at least 90% improvement in PASI score from Baseline. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 16

  4. Change From Baseline in the Short Form 36-item Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 16

    The SF-36 (version 2, standard recall) is a 36-item generic HRQoL instrument that uses a recall period of 4 weeks. The questionnaire has 36 questions composing the scale that represent 8 domains: 1) physical functioning, 2) role physical, 3) bodily pain, 4) general health, 5) vitality, 6) social functioning, 7) role emotional, and 8) mental health. The scores for the 8 domains were combined into two summary scores: the physical component summary (PCS) score and the mental component summary (MCS) score. Domains 1 to 4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Domains 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. Each of the 8 domain scores and the component summary score range from 0=worst to 100=best. Higher scores represent better health status. A positive change in value indicated improvement from baseline.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  5. Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) at Week 16

    MDA is a measure to indicate disease remission, and is based on a composite score of 7 domains. A participant is considered as having achieved the MDA if the participant fulfills at least 5 of the following 7 criteria: Tender joint count (0-68 joints) <=1; Swollen joint count (0-66 joints) <=1; PASI <=1 for participants with psoriasis covering BSA <=3% [PASI evaluates the severity and extent of psoriasis. In PASI, body is divided into four parts, head and neck, upper limb, trunk and lower limbs. Each area is assessed for erythema, induration and scaling, each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The total score ranges from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease)]; Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain <=15 [using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain)]; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity <=20 [using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor)]; HAQ-DI score <=0.5; Leeds Enthesitis Index score <=1 for participants with enthesitis at baseline.

    Measured: Week 16

  6. Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response

    The ACR20 response rate was based on a 20% or greater improvement of arthritis relative to Baseline. Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: 1.≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2.≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3.≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Physician global assessment of disease activity [100 mm VAS (0=no symptoms;100=severe symptoms)], Patient global assessment of disease activity [100 mm VAS (0=no limitation of normal activities;100=very poor], Patient assessment of pain [100 mm VAS (0=no pain;100=most severe pain)], HAQ-DI assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), its score (0-3) computed from item scores, lower scores indicated less disability, hsCRP.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 16

  7. Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70 (ACR70) Response

    The ACR70 response rate was based on a 70% or greater improvement of arthritis relative to Baseline. Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: 1.≥ 70% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2.≥ 70% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3.≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Physician global assessment of disease activity [100 mm VAS (0=no symptoms;100=severe symptoms)], Patient global assessment of disease activity [100 mm VAS (0=no limitation of normal activities;100=very poor], Patient assessment of pain [100 mm VAS (0=no pain;100=most severe pain)], HAQ-DI assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), its score (0-3) computed from item scores, lower scores indicated less disability, hsCRP.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 16

  8. Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Response Defined as Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) and at Least a 2-grade Reduction From Baseline at Week 4 in the Subset of Participants With Psoriatic Skin Lesions at Baseline

    IGA measured the overall severity of PSO using the following 5-point scale and score was rated as 0=clear (No signs of PSO; post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation may be present), 1=almost clear (No thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling), 2=mild (Just detectable to mild thickening; pink to light red coloration; predominately fine scaling), 3=moderate (Clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, moderate scaling), and 4=severe (Severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions). The IGA response is defined as score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) with at least a 2-category improvement relative to Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 4

  9. Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Response Defined as Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) and at Least a 2-grade Reduction From Baseline at Week 16 in the Subset of Participants With Psoriatic Skin Lesions at Baseline

    IGA measured the overall severity of PSO using the following 5-point scale and score was rated as 0=clear (No signs of PSO; post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation may be present), 1=almost clear (No thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling), 2=mild (Just detectable to mild thickening; pink to light red coloration; predominately fine scaling), 3=moderate (Clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, moderate scaling), and 4=severe (Severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions). The IGA response is defined as score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) with at least a 2-category improvement relative to Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  10. Change From Baseline in the Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP) at Week 16

    The PtAAP Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is part of the American College of Rheumatology core set of measures in arthritis. Participants assessed their arthritis pain using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  11. Change From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease-12 (PsAID-12) Total Score at Week 16

    The PsAID-12 is a patient-reported outcome measure for assessing the impact of Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) in 12 physical and psychological domains, including pain, fatigue, skin problems, work and/or leisure activities, functional capacity, discomfort, sleep disturbance, coping, anxiety/fear/uncertainty, embarrassment and/or shame, social participation, and depression. Each domain is assessed with a single question using a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale. Each domain score was multiplied by a weighting factor and the results were then summed to provide the total score. The total score ranged from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating a worse status. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  12. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Study

    An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. TEAEs were defined as any AEs with an onset date on or after the date of first IMP administration and up to 20 weeks after the last (most recent) dose of IMP.

    Measured: From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up (up to 37 weeks)

  13. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Study

    A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: Results in death, Is life-threatening, Requires in patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; Is a congenital anomaly or birth defect; Is an infection that requires treatment parenteral antibiotics, Other important medical events which based on medical or scientific judgement may jeopardize the patients, or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above. TEAEs were defined as any AEs with an onset date on or after the date of first IMP administration and up to 20 weeks after the last (most recent) dose of IMP.

    Measured: From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up (up to 37 weeks)

  14. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Leading to Withdrawal From Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) During the Study

    An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. TEAEs were defined as any AEs with an onset date on or after the date of first IMP administration and up to 20 weeks after the last (most recent) dose of IMP.

    Measured: From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up (up to 37 weeks)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Apr 2019
  2. Study start28 Mar 2019
  3. Primary completion8 Dec 2021
  4. Study completion14 Feb 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
400 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03896581
Sponsor's protocol ID
PA0011
Other IDs
2017-002804-29, 2017
Acronym
BE COMPLETE
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
21 Mar 2019
Last updated
25 Sep 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Data from this trial may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the US and/or Europe, or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion. Investigators may request access to anonymized individual patient-level data and redacted trial documents which may include: analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications, and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.Vivli.org and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. All documents are available in English only, for a pre-specified time, typically 12 months, on a password protected portal. This plan may change if the risk of re-identifying trial participants is determined to be too high after the trial is completed; in this case and to protect participants, individual patient-level data would not be made available.

Publications

  • Mease PJ, Warren RB, Nash P, Grouin JM, Lyris N, Willems D, Taieb V, Eells J, McInnes IB. Comparative Effectiveness of Bimekizumab and Secukinumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis at 52 Weeks Using a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Jun;11(3):817-828. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00652-7. Epub 2024 Mar 6.

    PubMed 38446397
  • Warren RB, McInnes IB, Nash P, Grouin JM, Lyris N, Willems D, Taieb V, Eells J, Mease PJ. Comparative Effectiveness of Bimekizumab and Guselkumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis at 52 Weeks Assessed Using a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Jun;11(3):829-839. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00659-0. Epub 2024 Mar 15.

    PubMed 38488975
  • Mease PJ, Warren RB, Nash P, Grouin JM, Lyris N, Willems D, Taieb V, Eells J, McInnes IB. Comparative Effectiveness of Bimekizumab and Risankizumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis at 52 Weeks Assessed Using a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Oct;11(5):1403-1412. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00706-w. Epub 2024 Aug 9.

    PubMed 39120849
  • Kristensen LE, Tillett W, Nash P, Coates LC, Mease PJ, Ogdie A, Gisondi P, Ink B, Prickett AR, Bajracharya R, Taieb V, Lyris N, Lambert J, Walsh JA. Association of achieving clinical disease control criteria and patient-reported outcomes in bimekizumab-treated patients with active psoriatic arthritis: results from two phase III studies. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2024 Nov 11;16:1759720X241288071. doi: 10.1177/1759720X241288071. eCollection 2024.

    PubMed 39534481
  • Mease PJ, Merola JF, Tanaka Y, Gossec L, McInnes IB, Ritchlin CT, Landewe RBM, Asahina A, Ink B, Heinrichs A, Bajracharya R, Shende V, Coarse J, Coates LC. Summary of Research: Safety and Efficacy of Bimekizumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: 2-Year Results from Two Phase 3 Studies. Rheumatol Ther. 2025 Aug;12(4):609-612. doi: 10.1007/s40744-025-00764-8. Epub 2025 May 10.

    PubMed 40347389
  • Thaci D, Asahina A, Boehncke WH, Gottlieb AB, Lebwohl M, Warren RB, Edens H, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Coarse J, Merola JF. Bimekizumab Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis with Substantial Skin and Nail Psoriasis to 1 Year. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Feb;16(2):953-976. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01599-5. Epub 2025 Dec 12.

    PubMed 41381988
  • Gossec L, Coates LC, Landewe RBM, Mease PJ, Merola JF, Ritchlin CT, Tanaka Y, Asahina A, Proft F, Goldammer N, Manente M, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Coarse J, McInnes IB. Bimekizumab safety and efficacy in patients with psoriatic arthritis: 3-year results from two phase 3 studies. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2026 May 5;65(5):keag118. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keag118.

    PubMed 41838419
  • Gossec L, Tillett W, Coates LC, Mease PJ, de Wit M, Gladman DD, Orbai AM, Proft F, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Lambert J, Healy P, Husni ME. Control of Inflammation and Sustained Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: Bimekizumab Two-Year Results From Two Phase 3 Studies. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2026 May;8(5):e90053. doi: 10.1002/acr2.90053.

    PubMed 42152504
  • Nikiphorou E, Tillett W, Deodhar A, Dubreuil M, Gossec L, Hwang M, Lubrano E, Machado PM, Rudwaleit M, de Wit M, Kavanagh S, de la Loge C, Ink B, Lambert J, Morup M, Boonen A, Walsh J. Effect of Bimekizumab Treatment on Health Status, Work Productivity, and Productivity Costs Through 3 Years in Axial Spondyloarthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2026 Aug 1:jrheum.2026-0104. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2026-0104. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42386286
  • Deodhar A, Gottlieb AB, Merola JF, Soriano ER, Coates LC, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Healy P, Mease PJ. Bimekizumab efficacy across GRAPPA domains to 3 years in patients with psoriatic arthritis: a post hoc analysis of two phase 3 studies. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2026 Oct 10:keag557. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keag557. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42860055
  • Mease PJ, Merola JF, Magrey M, Nash P, Poddubnyy D, Lebwohl M, Bajracharya R, Ink B, Marten A, Manente M, Peterson L, White K, Gensler LS. Bimekizumab longer-term safety profile in adult patients with axial spondyloarthritis or psoriatic arthritis: an updated analysis of six phase IIb/III clinical studies. RMD Open. 2026 Mar 10;12(1):e006174. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-006174.

    PubMed 41807031
  • Mease PJ, Gensler LS, Orbai AM, Warren RB, Bajracharya R, Ink B, Marten A, Massow U, Shende V, Manente M, Peterson L, White K, Landewe R, Poddubnyy D. Long-term safety of bimekizumab in adult patients with axial spondyloarthritis or psoriatic arthritis: pooled results from integrated phase IIb/III clinical studies. RMD Open. 2025 Apr 6;11(2):e005026. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-005026.

    PubMed 40194794
  • Gladman DD, Mease PJ, Gossec L, Husni ME, Gottlieb AB, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Coarse J, Lyris N, Lambert J, Tillett W. Effect of Bimekizumab on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Work Productivity in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: 1-Year Results From 2 Phase III Studies. J Rheumatol. 2025 May 1;52(5):466-478. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2024-0923.

    PubMed 39892885
  • Husni ME, Mease PJ, Merola JF, Tillett W, Goldammer N, Ink B, Coarse J, Lambert J, Taieb V, Gladman DD. Bimekizumab provided rapid improvements in patient-reported symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: pooled 16-week results from two phase 3 studies. RMD Open. 2024 Sep 23;10(3):e004464. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004464.

    PubMed 39313302
  • Mease PJ, Merola JF, Tanaka Y, Gossec L, McInnes IB, Ritchlin CT, Landewe RBM, Asahina A, Ink B, Heinrichs A, Bajracharya R, Shende V, Coarse J, Coates LC. Safety and Efficacy of Bimekizumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: 2-Year Results from Two Phase 3 Studies. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Oct;11(5):1363-1382. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00708-8. Epub 2024 Aug 31.

    PubMed 39215949

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Bimekizumab in people with Psoriatic Arthritis, run by UCB Biopharma SRL at 92 sites in 11 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 92 sites in United States, Poland, Japan, Russia, Germany and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Oct 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) Response (time frame: From Baseline to Week 16). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03896581, which also lists 19 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in