FatiguePhase 1/2NCT03891667
Disulfiram: A Test of Symptom Reduction Among Patients With Previously Treated Lyme Disease
A Phase 1/2 study testing Disulfiram in people with Fatigue and Quality of Life, run by Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene, Inc. at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Approximately 10-20% of patients experience ongoing symptoms despite having received standard antibiotic therapy for Lyme disease. Possible explanations for persistent symptoms include persistent infection and/or post-infectious causes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Fatigue, Quality of Life
- What is being tested?
- Disulfiram
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 11 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 31 Jul 2019to 31 Mar 2022
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- History of Lyme Disease diagnosis within the prior 16 years History of prior diagnosis of Lyme disease that met the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) surveillance criteria case definition
- For erythema migrans (EM) rash, this has to be health-care provider diagnosed;
- For later stages of Lyme disease, this requires a diagnosis of LD by a health-care provider and laboratory testing that confirms a positive result historically.
- History of treatment for Lyme disease that consists of at least 5 weeks of antibiotics (total adding all treatment courses) within the last 16 years.
- Partial Prior Response. History of at least partial response to prior antibiotic therapy for Lyme disease.
- Antibiotic-free interval. Willingness to be off of other antibiotics during the course of this study and for at least 3 months prior to study randomization and during the 14 weeks of this study.
Show all 15Show fewer
- Current moderate to severe fatigue. The following criteria need to be met:
- at least moderate intensity at study screening and at intake (a score of 4 or more on the Fatigue Severity Scale)
- triggered or perpetuated by Lyme disease and persisting for at least 6 months after treatment
- is not better attributed to another independent medical or psychiatric condition
- current episode of Lyme disease-related fatigue is relatively persistent and has not had an intervening interval of 8 months without fatigue since diagnosis of Lyme disease.
- Current post-Lyme symptoms impair the patient's quality of life
- Keeping other current treatments stable- Patients can stay on other non-antibiotic medications as long as these medications have been stable for the 3 months prior to study onset and the dosage regimen does not change during the course of this study (unless the latter is medically or psychiatrically indicated).
- Between the ages 18-65
- Ability to read and speak English
Who cannot join
- History of cardiovascular disease (e.g., coronary artery disease or heart failure).
- History of seizure disorder, abnormal EEGs, traumatic brain injury, renal disease (e.g. nephritis), liver disease (e.g., hepatitis, CIRRHOSIS), diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism and/or psychosis. Patients with a history of large fiber neuropathy (EMG/NCS documented) will also be excluded.
- History of Substance Use Disorder (e.g., alcohol abuse, multi-drug dependence) within the past 2 years
- History in the last 6 months of heavy alcohol use which is defined as binge drinking more than 5 days in a one-month period. A binge-drinking episode refers to the consumption of 5 or more drinks for men or 4 or more drinks for women in a 2-hour period.
- Evidence of current active tick-borne illness other than Lyme disease. (Note: patients with evidence of positive antibodies for another TBI will be eligible unless there is evidence that this other TBI is currently active (eg., elevated LFTS (AST \& ALT not greater than 2 times upper limit), low platelets, low WBC, high fevers)
- Unwillingness to confirm that he/she will abstain from alcohol and products that may contain alcohol (including sauces, cough syrup, vinegar, backrub products, aftershave lotions) during the month prior to randomization, during the course of this study, and for 6 weeks after the last dose of study medication.
Show all 15Show fewer
- Inability to confirm abstinence from cannabis or CBD or THC-containing products
- Women who are breastfeeding, pregnant, or at risk of becoming pregnant during the course of the study.
- Patients who are taking or plan to take warfarin, metronidazole, paraldehyde, phenytoin, theophylline, oral anticoagulants, or isoniazid
- A concurrent or recent illness that may better account for current fatigue
- Unwillingness to not take any new non-emergency medications during the course of this study without first reviewing with the study research physician
- History of rubber-contact dermatitis or allergy to disulfiram or thiuram derivatives
- Prior history of serious adverse reaction to disulfiram
- Cognitive Impairment for patients over 60.
- Suicidal acts in the last 6 months or current suicidal thoughts with intent or plan or history of bipolar disorder.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Lyme Research Center New York State Psychiatric Institute
New York, New York, 10032
About this study
Official title: Disulfiram ("Antabuse"): A Test of Symptom Reduction Among Patients With Previously Treated Lyme Disease
Approximately 10-20% of patients experience ongoing symptoms despite having received standard antibiotic therapy for Lyme disease. Possible explanations for persistent symptoms include persistent infection and/or post-infectious causes. Recent in vitro studies indicate that disulfiram is effective at killing both the actively replicating and the more quiescent persister forms of Borrelia burgdorferi, the microbe that causes Lyme Disease. In this study, the investigators are examining the safety of disulfiram among patients with post-treatment Lyme disease symptoms. The investigators are also conducting a preliminary investigation regarding the relative benefit of 4 vs 8 weeks of treatment with disulfiram.
Read the detailed description
Lyme disease, caused by the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi, is the most common tick-borne illness in the United States. Typically, after being bitten by an infected tick, patients will notice an expanding rash and flu-like symptoms. Most patients recover fully after initial treatment with antibiotics such as doxycycline or amoxicillin. Some patients, however, do not recover fully or their symptoms return within a few months after having completed antibiotic treatment. Common persistent symptoms include fatigue, joint pain, muscle pain, numbness, tingling, burning pains, and changes in mood, memory or mental clarity. These symptoms can last months to years after treatment and, when accompanied by functional impairment, are collectively referred to by the academic community as "Post Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome (PTLDS)". Patients however typically refer to this constellation of persistent symptoms as "Chronic Lyme Disease".
There are several possible explanations for why patients may have persistent symptoms, including persistent infection and post-infectious changes triggered by the prior infection.
Scientists recently discovered that disulfiram is effective in the lab setting at killing the microbes that cause Lyme disease. Disulfiram is more commonly known as "Antabuse". It is an FDA-approved compound used to assist alcoholics in resisting alcohol consumption. Most remarkable is that disulfiram was effective at killing not only the actively replicating Lyme bacteria (ie, the ones that are typically killed by several antibiotics) but also the relatively dormant or quiescent Lyme bacteria (these are called "drug-tolerant persisters") - these latter spirochetes are the ones that may account for the development of chronic Lyme disease symptoms.
This initial pilot study will focus on patients with persistent symptoms despite having received the standard antibiotic therapy (or more) for Lyme disease. Because no one has yet studied the safety of disulfiram for patients with a history of Lyme disease and because the investigators do not know the optimal treatment duration for disulfiram, the initial effort will have the primary aims of assessing safety and determining whether a longer course of daily treatment is more effective than a shorter course of daily treatment.
The investigators propose therefore a small 14-week randomized placebo-controlled pilot study enrolling 24 patients with persistent symptoms despite prior antibiotic treatment for Lyme disease (known as Post-treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome). Among the 24 disulfiram-treated patients, half will get 8 weeks of disulfiram and the other half will get a shorter duration of disulfiram for 4 weeks followed by 4 weeks of matching placebo. After week 8, patients will be off pills for 2 weeks for the primary week 10 evaluation and then for another 4 weeks for the week 14 follow-up evaluation. This will be a double-blinded study; neither physician nor patient will know which treatment group the patient is assigned to.
With this initial study, the investigators will be able to evaluate the side effects, tolerability and initial signs of the effectiveness of disulfiram in reducing symptoms among the 24 patients assessed. The results of this study will guide the investigators regarding whether a larger definitive randomized trial should be conducted and which treatment schedule is optimal.
- Conditions
- Fatigue, Quality of Life
- Being tested
- Disulfiram
- Keywords
- Lyme Disease, Post-treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome, Disulfiram, Chronic Lyme Disease
- Medical subject headings
- Fatigue, Lyme Disease, Post-Lyme Disease Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DisulfiramDrug
Also called Antabuse
Patients will receive disulfiram for 4 weeks followed by placebo for 4 weeks or disulfiram for 8 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Week Disulfiram | Experimental | Patients in this group receive disulfiram for 8 weeks. The dosing schedule is fixed-flexible, starting at 250 mg every other day at week 1, 250 mg daily for week 2, 250 mg alternating with 500 mg for week 3, and 500 mg daily for week 4 to week 8. Dose increases are based on clinical judgment guided by patient tolerance, response, body weight, and side effects. Receives: Drug: Disulfiram |
| 4 Week Disulfiram | Active comparator | Patients in this group receive disulfiram for 4 weeks followed by placebo capsules for 4 weeks. The dosing schedule is fixed-flexible, starting at 250 mg every other day at week 1, 250 mg daily for week 2, 250 mg alternating with 500 mg during week 3, and 500 mg daily during week 4. Placebo capsules are given during weeks 5-8. Dose increases are based on clinical judgment guided by patient tolerance, response, body weight, and side effects. Receives: Drug: Disulfiram |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)
This is a psychometrically validated self-report measure of fatigue. This measure consists of 11 items inquiring about the severity of fatigue in different situations during the past week. Scores for each item range from 1 to 7, where 1 indicates strong disagreement and 7 strong agreement. Higher scores indicate higher levels of fatigue. A responder on the FSS is an individual whose FSS total score has decreased by 0.7 its when compared baseline to week 10 (or last observation carried forward); 0.7 refers to the minimally clinical significant difference (MCID) in change over time. We report the number of participants who reached a meaningful reduction in fatigue (equal or more than MCID).
Measured: Change will be assessed over a 10 week interval
Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF)
The Q-LES-Q - SF is a self-reported questionnaire, with 16 items evaluating overall enjoyment and satisfaction with physical health, mood, work, household and leisure activities, social and family relationships, daily functioning, sexual life, economic status, overall well-being and medications. Responses are scored on a 5-point scale, where higher scores indicate better enjoyment and satisfaction with life (possible range 14-70). Fourteen summated items create the total Q-LES-Q - SF score. Two last items, about medications and overall life satisfaction, are considered independently. Meaningful improvement on the Q-LES-Q to is a change score between baseline and week 10 (or last observation carried forward) of at least 6.8 points; 6.8 refers to the minimally clinical significant difference (MCID) where a score equal to or greater than 6.8 points represents an improved quality of file. We report # with meaningful improvement.
Measured: Change will be assessed over a 10 week interval
Secondary outcomes (4)
The Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS)
The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. The 8 scales are-vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning mental health. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale, the lower the score the more disability and the higher the score the less disability. We calculate the Physical Component Summary (PCS) (representing physical functioning) which represent the items in the SF-36 representing physical functioning (Ware, 2000); as in the sub scales, lower scores indicate greater disability.The norm-based estimate has a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. We report the magnitude of the score change from baseline to week 10 (or the last observation carried forward (LOCF); negative change scores indicate improvement.
Measured: Change will be assessed over a 10 week interval
General Symptom Questionnaire (GSQ-30)- Assess Multisystemic Symptom Burden
This is a psychometrically validated 30 item self-report measure of symptom burden. The measure asks participants to rate how bothered they have been with a particular symptom over a 2-week time frame. Responses are made on 5-point Likert scale ranging from "not at all" to "very much" (scored 0-4); and the total score ranges from 0-120. Higher scores indicate more symptom severity. We report the magnitude of the score change (week 10 or last observation carried forward (LOCF)) minus the baseline score; a positive change score indicates improvement.
Measured: Change will be assessed over a 10 week interval
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) Symptom Summary Score on Sleep Disturbance, Pain, Anxiety, Depression, and Low Energy/Fatigue (SPADE)
The PROMIS-29 is a psychometrically validated 29 item self-report measure covering 7 domains. The questions are ranked on a 5-point Likert Scale. The composite score on 5 symptoms of the 7 domains is known as the SPADE summary score (sleep disturbance, pain, anxiety, depression, and low energy/fatigue); this represents the most common chronic symptoms in the general population. Each domain has 5 response options (e.g., 1=not at all to 5=very much), with scale scores ranging from 4 to 20 and higher scores indicating worse symptom severity. Using the scores from these 5 domains, we calculated the average score (SPADE score); the SPADE score ranges from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating more symptom severity. We report the magnitude of the change in SPADE scores from baseline to week 10 (or the last observation carried forward (LOCF)); a positive change score indicates improvement.
Measured: Change will be assessed over a 10 week interval
The Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Mental Component Summary (MCS)
The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. The 8 scales are-vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning mental health. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale, the lower the score the more disability and the higher the score the less disability. We calculate the Mental Component Summary (MCS) (representing physical functioning) which represent the items in the SF-36 representing physical functioning (Ware, 2000); as in the sub scales, lower scores indicate greater disability.. The norm-based estimate mean is 50 with a standard deviation of 10. We report the magnitude of the change in scores from baseline to week 10 (or the last observation carried forward (LOCF)); a negative change score indicates improvement.
Measured: Change will be assessed over a 10 week interval
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Mar 2019
- Study start31 Jul 2019
- Primary completion26 Nov 2021
- Study completion31 Mar 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for FatigueStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: Treatment Group I- patients will receive Disulfiram for 8 weeks Treatment Group 2 - patients will receive Disulfiram for 4 weeks followed by 4 weeks of placebo. The dosing follows a fixed-flexible schedule. Clinical judgment guides dosing increases, based on patient tolerance, side effects, and response. Week 1: 250 mg every other day. Week 2: 250 mg daily (or continuation of lower dose based on clinical judgment). Week 3: 250 mg alternating with 500 mg/daily (or continued lower dose based on clinical judgment) Week 4: 500 mg daily (or continued lower dose based on clinical judgment) Week 5-8: 500 mg/daily (or continued lower dose based on clinical judgment) : Primary outcome is at week 10. Patients will be reassessed at week 14.
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 11 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- FDC Foundation
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Brian A Fallon, Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene, Inc.
- Investigators
- Brian A Fallon, MD, Principal investigator, Columbia University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03891667
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 7755
- Status last verified
- Dec 2024
- First submitted
- 25 Mar 2019
- Last updated
- 9 Jan 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: There no current plan for sharing participant data.
Publications
Long TE. Repurposing Thiram and Disulfiram as Antibacterial Agents for Multidrug-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Aug 24;61(9):e00898-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00898-17. Print 2017 Sep.
PubMed 28674046Pothineni VR, Wagh D, Babar MM, Inayathullah M, Solow-Cordero D, Kim KM, Samineni AV, Parekh MB, Tayebi L, Rajadas J. Identification of new drug candidates against Borrelia burgdorferi using high-throughput screening. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016 Apr 1;10:1307-22. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S101486. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 27103785Guerzoni S, Pellesi L, Pini LA, Caputo F. Drug-drug interactions in the treatment for alcohol use disorders: A comprehensive review. Pharmacol Res. 2018 Jul;133:65-76. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2018.04.024. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
PubMed 29719204Liegner KB. Disulfiram (Tetraethylthiuram Disulfide) in the Treatment of Lyme Disease and Babesiosis: Report of Experience in Three Cases. Antibiotics (Basel). 2019 May 30;8(2):72. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics8020072.
PubMed 31151194Kuvaldina M, Preston J, McClellan D, Pavlicova M, Brannagan TH, Fallon BA. A pilot study of disulfiram for individuals with persistent symptoms despite prior antibiotic treatment for Lyme disease. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 2;12:1549324. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1549324. eCollection 2025.
PubMed 40265182
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jan 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Disulfiram ("Antabuse"): A Test of Symptom Reduction Among Patients With Previously Treated Lyme Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03891667
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 7755
- Conditions
- Fatigue, Quality of Life
- Keywords
- Lyme Disease, Post-treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome, Disulfiram, Chronic Lyme Disease
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 11 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene, Inc.University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- FDC Foundation
- Study start
- 31 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 5 Jun 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Approximately 10-20% of patients experience ongoing symptoms despite having received standard antibiotic therapy for Lyme disease. Possible explanations for persistent symptoms include persistent infection and/or post-infectious causes. Recent in vitro studies indicate that disulfiram is effective at killing both the actively replicating and the more quiescent persister forms of Borrelia burgdorferi, the microbe that causes Lyme Disease. In this study, the investigators are examining the safety of disulfiram among patients with post-treatment Lyme disease symptoms. The investigators are also conducting a preliminary investigation regarding the relative benefit of 4 vs 8 weeks of treatment with disulfiram.
Detailed description
Lyme disease, caused by the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi, is the most common tick-borne illness in the United States. Typically, after being bitten by an infected tick, patients will notice an expanding rash and flu-like symptoms. Most patients recover fully after initial treatment with antibiotics such as doxycycline or amoxicillin. Some patients, however, do not recover fully or their symptoms return within a few months after having completed antibiotic treatment. Common persistent symptoms include fatigue, joint pain, muscle pain, numbness, tingling, burning pains, and changes in mood, memory or mental clarity. These symptoms can last months to years after treatment and, when accompanied by functional impairment, are collectively referred to by the academic community as "Post Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome (PTLDS)". Patients however typically refer to this constellation of persistent symptoms as "Chronic Lyme Disease".
There are several possible explanations for why patients may have persistent symptoms, including persistent infection and post-infectious changes triggered by the prior infection.
Scientists recently discovered that disulfiram is effective in the lab setting at killing the microbes that cause Lyme disease. Disulfiram is more commonly known as "Antabuse". It is an FDA-approved compound used to assist alcoholics in resisting alcohol consumption. Most remarkable is that disulfiram was effective at killing not only the actively replicating Lyme bacteria (ie, the ones that are typically killed by several antibiotics) but also the relatively dormant or quiescent Lyme bacteria (these are called "drug-tolerant persisters") - these latter spirochetes are the ones that may account for the development of chronic Lyme disease symptoms.
This initial pilot study will focus on patients with persistent symptoms despite having received the standard antibiotic therapy (or more) for Lyme disease. Because no one has yet studied the safety of disulfiram for patients with a history of Lyme disease and because the investigators do not know the optimal treatment duration for disulfiram, the initial effort will have the primary aims of assessing safety and determining whether a longer course of daily treatment is more effective than a shorter course of daily treatment.
The investigators propose therefore a small 14-week randomized placebo-controlled pilot study enrolling 24 patients with persistent symptoms despite prior antibiotic treatment for Lyme disease (known as Post-treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome). Among the 24 disulfiram-treated patients, half will get 8 weeks of disulfiram and the other half will get a shorter duration of disulfiram for 4 weeks followed by 4 weeks of matching placebo. After week 8, patients will be off pills for 2 weeks for the primary week 10 evaluation and then for another 4 weeks for the week 14 follow-up evaluation. This will be a double-blinded study; neither physician nor patient will know which treatment group the patient is assigned to.
With this initial study, the investigators will be able to evaluate the side effects, tolerability and initial signs of the effectiveness of disulfiram in reducing symptoms among the 24 patients assessed. The results of this study will guide the investigators regarding whether a larger definitive randomized trial should be conducted and which treatment schedule is optimal.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: Treatment Group I- patients will receive Disulfiram for 8 weeks Treatment Group 2 - patients will receive Disulfiram for 4 weeks followed by 4 weeks of placebo. The dosing follows a fixed-flexible schedule. Clinical judgment guides dosing increases, based on patient tolerance, side effects, and response. Week 1: 250 mg every other day. Week 2: 250 mg daily (or continuation of lower dose based on clinical judgment). Week 3: 250 mg alternating with 500 mg/daily (or continued lower dose based on clinical judgment) Week 4: 500 mg daily (or continued lower dose based on clinical judgment) Week 5-8: 500 mg/daily (or continued lower dose based on clinical judgment) : Primary outcome is at week 10. Patients will be reassessed at week 14.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Week Disulfiram | Experimental | Drug: DisulfiramPatients in this group receive disulfiram for 8 weeks. The dosing schedule is fixed-flexible, starting at 250 mg every other day at week 1, 250 mg daily for week 2, 250 mg alternating with 500 mg for week 3, and 500 mg daily for week 4 to week 8. Dose increases are based on clinical judgment guided by patient tolerance, response, body weight, and side effects. |
| 4 Week Disulfiram | Active comparator | Drug: DisulfiramPatients in this group receive disulfiram for 4 weeks followed by placebo capsules for 4 weeks. The dosing schedule is fixed-flexible, starting at 250 mg every other day at week 1, 250 mg daily for week 2, 250 mg alternating with 500 mg during week 3, and 500 mg daily during week 4. Placebo capsules are given during weeks 5-8. Dose increases are based on clinical judgment guided by patient tolerance, response, body weight, and side effects. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (15 listed)
- History of Lyme Disease diagnosis within the prior 16 years History of prior diagnosis of Lyme disease that met the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) surveillance criteria case definition
- History of treatment for Lyme disease that consists of at least 5 weeks of antibiotics (total adding all treatment courses) within the last 16 years.
- Partial Prior Response. History of at least partial response to prior antibiotic therapy for Lyme disease.
- Antibiotic-free interval. Willingness to be off of other antibiotics during the course of this study and for at least 3 months prior to study randomization and during the 14 weeks of this study.
- Current moderate to severe fatigue. The following criteria need to be met:
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- History of cardiovascular disease (e.g., coronary artery disease or heart failure).
- History of seizure disorder, abnormal EEGs, traumatic brain injury, renal disease (e.g. nephritis), liver disease (e.g., hepatitis, CIRRHOSIS), diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism and/or psychosis. Patients with a history of large fiber neuropathy (EMG/NCS documented) will also be excluded.
- History of Substance Use Disorder (e.g., alcohol abuse, multi-drug dependence) within the past 2 years
- History in the last 6 months of heavy alcohol use which is defined as binge drinking more than 5 days in a one-month period. A binge-drinking episode refers to the consumption of 5 or more drinks for men or 4 or more drinks for women in a 2-hour period.
- Evidence of current active tick-borne illness other than Lyme disease. (Note: patients with evidence of positive antibodies for another TBI will be eligible unless there is evidence that this other TBI is currently active (eg., elevated LFTS (AST \& ALT not greater than 2 times upper limit), low platelets, low WBC, high fevers)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DisulfiramAlso: AntabusePatients will receive disulfiram for 4 weeks followed by placebo for 4 weeks or disulfiram for 8 weeks. | Drug | 4 Week Disulfiram, 8 Week Disulfiram |
Primary outcome
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)
Time frame: Change will be assessed over a 10 week interval
This is a psychometrically validated self-report measure of fatigue. This measure consists of 11 items inquiring about the severity of fatigue in different situations during the past week. Scores for each item range from 1 to 7, where 1 indicates strong disagreement and 7 strong agreement. Higher scores indicate higher levels of fatigue. A responder on the FSS is an individual whose FSS total score has decreased by 0.7 its when compared baseline to week 10 (or last observation carried forward); 0.7 refers to the minimally clinical significant difference (MCID) in change over time. We report the number of participants who reached a meaningful reduction in fatigue (equal or more than MCID).
Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF)
Time frame: Change will be assessed over a 10 week interval
The Q-LES-Q - SF is a self-reported questionnaire, with 16 items evaluating overall enjoyment and satisfaction with physical health, mood, work, household and leisure activities, social and family relationships, daily functioning, sexual life, economic status, overall well-being and medications. Responses are scored on a 5-point scale, where higher scores indicate better enjoyment and satisfaction with life (possible range 14-70). Fourteen summated items create the total Q-LES-Q - SF score. Two last items, about medications and overall life satisfaction, are considered independently. Meaningful improvement on the Q-LES-Q to is a change score between baseline and week 10 (or last observation carried forward) of at least 6.8 points; 6.8 refers to the minimally clinical significant difference (MCID) where a score equal to or greater than 6.8 points represents an improved quality of file. We report # with meaningful improvement.
4 secondary outcomes
The Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS)
Time frame: Change will be assessed over a 10 week interval
General Symptom Questionnaire (GSQ-30)- Assess Multisystemic Symptom Burden
Time frame: Change will be assessed over a 10 week interval
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) Symptom Summary Score on Sleep Disturbance, Pain, Anxiety, Depression, and Low Energy/Fatigue (SPADE)
Time frame: Change will be assessed over a 10 week interval
The Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Mental Component Summary (MCS)
Time frame: Change will be assessed over a 10 week interval
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jan 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 28674046Long TE. Repurposing Thiram and Disulfiram as Antibacterial Agents for Multidrug-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Aug 24;61(9):e00898-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00898-17. Print 2017 Sep.
- Background: PubMed 27103785Pothineni VR, Wagh D, Babar MM, Inayathullah M, Solow-Cordero D, Kim KM, Samineni AV, Parekh MB, Tayebi L, Rajadas J. Identification of new drug candidates against Borrelia burgdorferi using high-throughput screening. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016 Apr 1;10:1307-22. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S101486. eCollection 2016.
- Background: PubMed 29719204Guerzoni S, Pellesi L, Pini LA, Caputo F. Drug-drug interactions in the treatment for alcohol use disorders: A comprehensive review. Pharmacol Res. 2018 Jul;133:65-76. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2018.04.024. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
- Background: PubMed 31151194Liegner KB. Disulfiram (Tetraethylthiuram Disulfide) in the Treatment of Lyme Disease and Babesiosis: Report of Experience in Three Cases. Antibiotics (Basel). 2019 May 30;8(2):72. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics8020072.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40265182Kuvaldina M, Preston J, McClellan D, Pavlicova M, Brannagan TH, Fallon BA. A pilot study of disulfiram for individuals with persistent symptoms despite prior antibiotic treatment for Lyme disease. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 2;12:1549324. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1549324. eCollection 2025.
- NIH website review of disulfiram's risk of liver toxicityLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. There no current plan for sharing participant data.
Related trials for Fatigue
Enrolling by invitation
Dance-Based Exercise for Cancer-Related Fatigue in Breast Cancer Patients
Breast Neoplasms
Not yet recruiting
Mind Body Reprogramming Therapy for Adolescents With Chronic Fatigue
Chronic Fatigue
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Functional Inspiratory Muscle Training and Combined Exercise Training in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Recruiting
Acute Effects of Post-Exercise Hyperoxia on Recovery in Cycling
Athletic Performance, Hyperbaric Oxygenation
Recruiting
Recovery After Fatigue in Young Athletes: Comparison Between TECAR Therapy and Cycle Ergometer"
Muscle Fatigue, Healthy Adult
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Brian A Fallon, MD principal investigator
Columbia University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Disulfiram in people with Fatigue and Quality of Life, run by Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene, Inc. at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Jun 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) (time frame: Change will be assessed over a 10 week interval). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03891667, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jan 2025.