AzTrials
AzTrials

Complex Regional Pain SyndromesVERMONTNCT03887962

Virtual Environment Rehabilitation for Patients With Motor Neglect Trial

A study testing Virtual Environment Biofeedback and Treadmill walking with no Virtual Environment Biofeedback in people with Complex Regional Pain Syndromes and Fibromyalgia, run by Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Motor neglect describes a loss of function without a loss of strength, reflexes or sensation. Motor neglect has been described in patients with traumatic brain injury, stroke and chronic pain conditions, e.g. complex regional pain syndrome. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Virtual Environment Biofeedback and Treadmill walking with no Virtual Environment Biofeedback
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
1 May 2017to 1 Nov 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with a diagnosis of stroke (of any cause), traumatic brain injury or chronic pain condition of more than 3 months duration (e.g. back and referred leg pain; complex regional pain syndrome; fibromyalgia) who are undergoing an inpatient or out-patient rehabilitation programme
  • Motor neglect as assessed by standard clinical examination by a physiotherapist trained to detect such motor neglect (EV). This is defined as weakness and functional impairment without a loss of strength, reflexes or sensation.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with active serious medical problems that might affect their ability to participate in the exercise protocol (e.g. ongoing sepsis; recent myocardial infarction)
  • Patients who are unable to use treadmill safely as judged by the screening physiotherapist (EV).
  • Patients who are unable to give informed consent, either through issues relating to competency or to language.
  • Patients with significant previous experience of virtual reality rehabilitation.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

    Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB2 0QQ

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Trial of Virtual Reality Biofeedback in Patients With Motor Neglect From Chronic Pain or Cerebrovascular Disease

Motor neglect describes a loss of function without a loss of strength, reflexes or sensation. Motor neglect has been described in patients with traumatic brain injury, stroke and chronic pain conditions, e.g. complex regional pain syndrome. These conditions affect hundreds of thousands of patients in the UK each year and motor neglect is a significant obstacle in their rehabilitation towards a good outcome. By focussing on improving motor neglect, outcomes including function and quality of life for these groups of patients may significantly improve.

Motor neglect is potentially reversible. Rehabilitation using repetition, feedback and motivation are beneficial for optimal outcome. Current protocols use face-to-face physical therapies which can not optimise intensity due to a lack of resources. Furthermore, engagement with exercise is recognised to be poor, in part, due to a lack of attention. Innovative technologies may well improve engagement. Furthermore, telemedicine, or remote delivery of healthcare, offer opportunities in resource management, which can be delivered through the use of such innovative technologies.

Read more

Virtual reality systems have been designed and utilised in rehabilitation in various conditions, e.g post-stroke, cerebral palsy and Parkinson's disease. Studies demonstrate improved function in both upper and lower limbs. Potentially more effective treatments for motor neglect utilising such technology are therefore available but need more formal evaluation.

This protocol describes a Phase II randomised controlled trial for both in-patients and out-patients requiring rehabilitation with motor neglect from neurological causes (stroke, traumatic brain injury) and chronic pain conditions (Complex Regional Pain Syndromes, chronic low back pain and referred leg pain (sciatica)). The intervention will be a novel interactive virtual reality system using established technology and tailored software used in conjunction with a treadmill. The control group will be the same screen showing random static images whilst on the treadmill. Rehabilitation for each group will be offered in 3-4 sessions per week for 2 weeks. Each session will last about 30 minutes supervised by a physiotherapist. Follow-up will be by questionnaire at weeks 2, 6 and 12 and by face-to-face consultation at weeks 2 and 12.

Read the detailed description

To investigate whether a virtual reality biofeedback system in conjunction with a treadmill is safe and feasible for the rehabilitation of patients with motor neglect due to chronic pain conditions, traumatic brain injury and stroke compared to a control group of patients with these conditions whose rehabilitation consists of a non-virtual reality screen and treadmill.

To investigate whether a virtual reality biofeedback system in conjunction with a treadmill can improve outcome such as distance walked, pain, function, emotional well being and activity.

Study Design Randomised single-blind controlled trial

Setting The study will take place as part of the normal rehabilitation programmes at the single centre of Addenbrookes's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. The treadmill gait task will be undertaken in the Clinical Movement Laboratory in Clinic 9 (Orthotics and Prosthetics Department).

Study population Subjects will be recruited from patients attending in-patient and out-patient rehabilitation programmes for chronic pain conditions or neurological conditions. Suitable candidates will be identified by the consultants or therapists involved in the programme. With consent, potential subjects will be referred to the researchers for screening.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with a diagnosis of stroke (of any cause), traumatic brain injury or a chronic pain condition of more than 3 months duration (e.g. back and referred leg pain; complex regional pain syndrome; fibromyalgia) who are undergoing an inpatient or out-patient rehabilitation programme
  • Motor neglect as assessed by standard clinical examination by a physiotherapist trained to detect such motor neglect. This is defined as weakness and functional impairment without a loss of strength, reflexes or sensation.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with active serious medical problems that might affect their ability to participate in the exercise protocol (e.g. ongoing sepsis; recent myocardial infarction)
  • Patients who are unable to use treadmill safely as judged by the screening physiotherapist.
  • Patients who are unable to give informed consent, either through issues relating to competency or to language.
  • Patients with significant previous experience of virtual reality rehabilitation.

Sample size This will be calculated using standard models. It is unknown what the effect size will be. Alpha will be 0.05, Beta will be 0.2. It is likely that at least 20 patients will need to be recruited in each arm (40 in total). Estimating the likely recruitment target from the numbers of patients requiring inpatients rehabilitation at Addenbrooke's (n=400 per annum for stroke, traumatic brain injury, back pain and Complex Regional Pain Syndrome), this would require a 12-month window of recruitment, assuming approximately 10% successful enrolment (n=40).

Withdrawal criteria Patients who wish to withdraw will be allowed to do so with out this affecting their rehabilitation.

Randomisation Subjects will be randomised to either the study or control group using a concealed blind allocation. This will be performed by a group independent from the trial.

Subjects will be allocated to the study:control groups on a 1:1 ratio using a random number generator (e.g. www.mathgoodies.com/calculators/random_no_custom.html) to determine the order of the couplets.

The exception will be applied to the groups who are successfully screened (e.g. Back Pain Programme). For this purpose, the entire group will be randomised to either receiving control or intervention due to cross-contamination of the treatment effect within a single group receiving otherwise identical rehabilitation.

Blinding Patients and therapists can not be blinded due to the nature of the research. Data analysis will be conducted by members of the trial research group who are blinded to whether an individual patient received the experimental or control arm. This will be achieved by the use of data stripped of any patient identifiable content and divided into the two groups. This task will be performed by the senior physiotherapist supervising the project. There should be no necessity to 'unblind' subjects from the study due to the lack of any clear serious side effects associated with the intervention.

Intervention Patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: intervention or control.

Both groups will walk on a treadmill as part of the task. Walking on the treadmill will be explained and demonstrated, and the subjects will have time to practice this task before this study commences. For extra safety, the subjects will be allowed to use the handlebars of the treadmill for extra support if they wish. The therapy assistant will stand next to the Emergency stop button and is fully trained in the use of the treadmill and Virtual Environment device.

In both groups the walking cycles will be determined by their functional ability as assessed by the screening physiotherapist but the treadmill walking will not be longer than 5 minutes at each cycle. Every 30 seconds, the therapy assistant will ask whether the subject would like to change the speed of the treadmill and will make a decision based on his experience as to whether to increase the treadmill by 0.1 km/h or reduce / stop the treadmill as necessary. The next cycle will start at the speed at which the previous cycle finished. The next day's session will commence at baseline speed and increase or decrease as above. The subject will be required to complete five walking cycles and will have up to a 3 minute break between each cycle. The primary outcome will be the distance walked in the final 5-minute cycle of the session at Baseline, week 2 and at 24 weeks. This task will be performed 3 to 4 times per week for two weeks. The speed of each cycle will be set back to baseline for each day.

Intervention group:

Being tested
Virtual Environment Biofeedback, Treadmill walking with no Virtual Environment Biofeedback
Keywords
Motor Neglect
Medical subject headings
Complex Regional Pain Syndromes, Fibromyalgia, Stroke, Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Osteoarthritis, Back Pain, Sciatica

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Virtual Environment BiofeedbackDevice

    Also called Real time biofeedback

    Treadmill walking. Modified available technology for gait capture. Tailored software for virtual environment rendering and immersive qualities

  • Treadmill walking with no Virtual Environment BiofeedbackDevice

    Also called Control group

    Treadmill walking. Flat screen / no virtual environment to act as attentional control.

Study groups in NCT03887962
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Virtual Environment feedbackExperimentalSubjects will be instructed to walk on a treadmill, moving at a constant speed, following a "virtual path" displayed on a flat screen in front of them. In this group, the gait task may involve avoiding virtual obstacles on the screen in the path or stepping on targets as determined by the therapist.
Receives: Device: Virtual Environment Biofeedback
ControlActive comparatorSubjects will be instructed to walk on a treadmill, moving at a constant speed. The flat screen will play random scenes from the virtual reality environment and thus control for attentional and non-movement related clues.
Receives: Device: Treadmill walking with no Virtual Environment Biofeedback

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Distance walked (machine-reported)

    Distance walked in 5 minutes at weeks 2 compared to baseline (% change)

    Measured: Week 2

  2. Lower Extremity Functional Index

    Self-reported 20-question Functional Activity Questionnaire with minimal clinically important difference of 9 (range 0-80). Each question scored 0-4. Low scores indicate less function.

    Measured: Week 2

  3. Lower Extremity Functional Index

    Self-reported 20-question Functional Activity Questionnaire with minimal clinically important difference of 9 (range 0-80). Each question scored 0-4. Low scores indicate less function.

    Measured: Week 24

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Brief Pain Inventory

    Self-reported questionnaire - mean score (11-point analogue scale). High scores indicate more pain. % change from baseline will be calculated

    Measured: Weeks 2,12,24

  2. Human Activity Profile

    Self-reported questionnaire (0-94 points). Low scores indicate loss of function.

    Measured: Weeks 2,12,24

  3. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

    Self-reported questionnaire (0-21 on each dimension of Anxiety and Depression). High scores indicate high Anxiety or Depression

    Measured: Weeks 2,12,24

  4. Neglect Like Symptom Questionnaire

    Self-reported questionnaire (1-6). High scores indicate more Neglect-like symptoms

    Measured: Weeks 2,12,24

  5. Satisfaction questionnaire

    Self-reported questionnaire. 0-5 score. High scores indicate high satisfaction

    Measured: Weeks 2, 24

  6. Machine-reported average stride length

    Average stride length (cm)

    Measured: Week 2

  7. Machine-reported number of steps

    Number of steps (whole number)

    Measured: Week 2

  8. Machine-reported gait symmetry

    Asymmetry (left-right split presented in numerical form)

    Measured: Week 2

  9. Machine-reported gait timing

    Timing (Proportion of gait with planted foot and raised foot measured as %).

    Measured: Week 2

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Mar 2019
  2. Study start1 May 2017
  3. Primary completion1 Jul 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Nov 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Randomised single-blind controlled trial
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03887962
Sponsor's protocol ID
A092932
Other IDs
17/LO/0299, 74696
Acronym
VERMONT
Status last verified
Jan 2021
First submitted
19 Mar 2019
Last updated
13 Jan 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Acerra NE, Souvlis T, Moseley GL. Stroke, complex regional pain syndrome and phantom limb pain: can commonalities direct future management? J Rehabil Med. 2007 Mar;39(2):109-14. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0027.

    PubMed 17351691
  • Adamovich SV, Merians AS, Boian R, Tremaine M, Burdea GS, Recce M, Poizner H. A virtual reality based exercise system for hand rehabilitation post-stroke: transfer to function. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2004;2004:4936-9. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2004.1404364.

    PubMed 17271420
  • Deutsch JE, Borbely M, Filler J, Huhn K, Guarrera-Bowlby P. Use of a low-cost, commercially available gaming console (Wii) for rehabilitation of an adolescent with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther. 2008 Oct;88(10):1196-207. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080062. Epub 2008 Aug 8.

    PubMed 18689607
  • Flor H, Braun C, Elbert T, Birbaumer N. Extensive reorganization of primary somatosensory cortex in chronic back pain patients. Neurosci Lett. 1997 Mar 7;224(1):5-8. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(97)13441-3.

    PubMed 9132689
  • Holden MK. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: review. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2005 Jun;8(3):187-211; discussion 212-9. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.187.

    PubMed 15971970
  • Husain M, Rorden C. Non-spatially lateralized mechanisms in hemispatial neglect. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003 Jan;4(1):26-36. doi: 10.1038/nrn1005. No abstract available.

    PubMed 12511859
  • Mirelman A, Patritti BL, Bonato P, Deutsch JE. Effects of virtual reality training on gait biomechanics of individuals post-stroke. Gait Posture. 2010 Apr;31(4):433-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.01.016. Epub 2010 Mar 1.

    PubMed 20189810
  • Saposnik G, Levin M; Outcome Research Canada (SORCan) Working Group. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis and implications for clinicians. Stroke. 2011 May;42(5):1380-6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.605451. Epub 2011 Apr 7.

    PubMed 21474804
  • Sato K, Fukumori S, Matsusaki T, Maruo T, Ishikawa S, Nishie H, Takata K, Mizuhara H, Mizobuchi S, Nakatsuka H, Matsumi M, Gofuku A, Yokoyama M, Morita K. Nonimmersive virtual reality mirror visual feedback therapy and its application for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome: an open-label pilot study. Pain Med. 2010 Apr;11(4):622-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00819.x. Epub 2010 Mar 1.

    PubMed 20202141
  • van den Brand R, Heutschi J, Barraud Q, DiGiovanna J, Bartholdi K, Huerlimann M, Friedli L, Vollenweider I, Moraud EM, Duis S, Dominici N, Micera S, Musienko P, Courtine G. Restoring voluntary control of locomotion after paralyzing spinal cord injury. Science. 2012 Jun 1;336(6085):1182-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1217416.

    PubMed 22654062
  • Walker ML, Ringleb SI, Maihafer GC, Walker R, Crouch JR, Van Lunen B, Morrison S. Virtual reality-enhanced partial body weight-supported treadmill training poststroke: feasibility and effectiveness in 6 subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Jan;91(1):115-22. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.09.009.

    PubMed 20103405
  • Longley V, Hazelton C, Heal C, Pollock A, Woodward-Nutt K, Mitchell C, Pobric G, Vail A, Bowen A. Non-pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non-progressive brain injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 1;7(7):CD003586. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003586.pub4.

    PubMed 34196963

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Virtual Environment Biofeedback and Treadmill walking with no Virtual Environment Biofeedback in people with Complex Regional Pain Syndromes and Fibromyalgia, run by Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Distance walked (machine-reported) (time frame: Week 2). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03887962, which also lists 12 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jan 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in