Asthma ChronicPhase 3NCT03879590
Efficacy Of Doxophylline As A Sparing Treatment For Inhaled Corticosteroids In Mexican Children With Asthma
A Phase 3 study testing Doxophylline and Budesonide in people with Asthma Chronic and Asthma in Children, run by Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon.
Trial summary
This study evaluated the efficacy of doxophylline as a steroid sparing treatment in Mexican children with asthma treated with medium ir high doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 16 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Asthma Chronic, Asthma in Children
- What is being tested?
- Doxophylline and Budesonide
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- May 2019to Dec 2019
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 16 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Mexican patients between 6 and 16 years old.
- Clinical diagnosis of asthma according to the current guidelines of the Global Asthma Initiative (GINA) 2018.
- Patients with asthma treated with budesonide at medium or high doses during (GINA guidelines´ steps 3 or 4) at least two months before the first study visit. Budesonide medium dose: 200-400 mcg / day (6-11 years) and 400-800 mcg / day (> 12 years). Budesonide high dose: > 400 mcg / day (6-11 years) and > 800 mcg / day (> 12 years).
Who cannot join
- Patients <6 or ≥16 years of age.
- Patients with <16 kg of body weight.
- Patients who have had an asthma exacerbation that required treatment with systemic corticosteroids (oral, intramuscular or intravenous) during the 2 months prior to the first study visit.
- Patients who have presented an asthma exacerbation that required hospitalization during the 2 months prior to the first study visit.
- Any other chronic lung disease that could impair lung function evaluation.
- Cardiovascular, infectious, metabolic or neoplastic disease that could interfere with the evaluation of the patient.
- Current use of drugs that interact with doxophylline: other xanthines, ephedrine or other sympathomimetics, erythromycin, troleandomycin, lincomycin, clindamycin, allopurinol, cimetidine, two months prior vaccination, propranolol, phenytoin or other anticonvulsants.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
This study evaluated the efficacy of doxophylline as a steroid sparing treatment in Mexican children with asthma treated with medium ir high doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). It is a cross over study in which both groups of patients will receive doxophylline plus a lower steroid dose maintaining the same treatment step according to GINA guidelines, one group will maintain the same treatment dose while the other will start with doxophylline with the lower ICS dose, and by the middle of the study both groups will interchange treatment schemes.
Read the detailed description
Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are first-line drugs for the treatment of persistent asthma. The effectiveness of existing ICS is excellent; however, a number of questions remain regarding its possible adverse effects, despite the fact that the use of the inhalation route has allowed the minimization of the systemic exposure to these drugs. Methylxanthines are widely used in the treatment of asthma. It is one of the few medications for asthma that can be administered orally. They are useful especially in patients who cannot adapt to inhaled medications. Methylxanthines are unique in exhibiting dual-function properties by inducing bronchodilation and having anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects. Theophylline is the oldest methylxanthine and non-specifically inhibits phosphodiesterase, it is a little used drug because it has many adverse effects with lower therapeutic index. Doxophylline is a drug of the family of methylxanthines, with a similar efficacy compared to theophylline when applied in the treatment of various respiratory diseases, but with better tolerability profile. Doxophylline has been shown to be a bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory drug with a wider therapeutic window than other methylxanthines. Clinical studies have reported that doxophylline is more effective in improving lung function tests in adults and children, as well as in decreasing clinical symptoms, reducing the incidence of adverse effects and the need of emergency bronchodilators, with a better profile in terms of safety and it has been demonstrated that doxophylline potentially reduces the need for corticosteroids.
- Conditions
- Asthma Chronic, Asthma in Children
- Being tested
- Doxophylline, Budesonide
- Keywords
- doxophylline, asthma, steroid sparing
- Medical subject headings
- Asthma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DoxophyllineDrug
Also called There is no other intervention names
Both groups will receive doxophylline one group will maintain the ICS dose and the other group will receive a reduced ICS dose (Maintaining the same GINA treatment step). After 4 weeks both groups will interchange treatment scheme.
BudesonideDrug
Also called There is no other intervention names
Both groups will receive doxophylline one group will maintain the ICS dose and the other group will receive a reduced ICS dose (Maintaining the same GINA treatment step). After 4 weeks both groups will interchange treatment scheme.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Budesonide and Doxophylline | Experimental | Budesonide at the same dose in which the subject is currently treated (GINA step 3 or 4) plus doxophylline at a dose of 18 mg / kg per day Receives: Drug: Doxophylline; Drug: Budesonide |
| Low budesonide and Doxophylline | Active comparator | Reduced dose of inhaled budesonide (GINA step down) plus doxophylline to a dose of 18 mg / kg per day, maximum of 800 mg / day (Group B) Receives: Drug: Doxophylline; Drug: Budesonide |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Changes in the values of the forced expiratory volume on the first second
Changes in the values of FEV1 (FEV1 in percent predicted) by comparing the baseline to subsequent evaluations.
Measured: 4 weeks
Secondary outcomes (5)
Use of rescue therapy
The use of rescue therapy defined as daily average of inhalations per day according to the data collected in the patient's diaries.
Measured: 4 weeks
Clinical asthma control assessment
Differences in clinical asthma control assessment with a visual analogue scale (minimum score is 1, maximum score is 10,) comparing the baseline to follow-up evaluations.
Measured: 4 weeks
Asthma exacerbations
Number of asthma exacerbations defined as acute episodes of progressively worsening shortness of breath, coughing, wheezing, and chest tightness or any combination thereof for at least 3 days, reported on the patient´s symptoms log.
Measured: 4 weeks
Use of systemic corticosteroids
- The use of systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 days for the treatment of an asthma exacerbation according to the data collected in the patient's diaries.
Measured: 4 weeks
Changes on the exhaled breath temperature
-Differences in values exhaled breath temperature measured in Celsius degrees with the X-halo device, comparing the baseline to follow-up evaluations.
Measured: 4 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Mar 2019
- Study startMay 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completionSep 2019 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2019 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Asthma ChronicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sandra Nora Gonzalez Diaz, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon
- Investigators
- Sandra Nora González-Díaz, PhD, Principal investigator, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03879590
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DOXO
- Status last verified
- Mar 2019
- First submitted
- 25 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 19 Mar 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Lal D, Manocha S, Ray A, Vijayan VK, Kumar R. Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of theophylline and doxofylline in patients with bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2015 Sep;26(5):443-51. doi: 10.1515/jbcpp-2015-0006.
PubMed 25894641Margay SM, Farhat S, Kaur S, Teli HA. To study the efficacy and safety of doxophylline and theophylline in bronchial asthma. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Apr;9(4):FC05-8. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/12438.5743. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
PubMed 26023566Rajanandh MG, Nageswari AD, Ilango K. Assessment of various second-line medications in addition to inhaled corticosteroid in asthma patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2014 Jul;41(7):509-13. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.12239.
PubMed 24738981Riffo-Vasquez Y, Venkatasamy R, Page CP. Steroid sparing effects of doxofylline. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Feb;48:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
PubMed 29031617Rajanandh MG, Nageswari AD, Ilango K. Pulmonary function assessment in mild to moderate persistent asthma patients receiving montelukast, doxofylline, and tiotropium with budesonide: a randomized controlled study. Clin Ther. 2014 Apr 1;36(4):526-33. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.02.006. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
PubMed 24650447
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Mar 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy Of Doxophylline As A Sparing Treatment For Inhaled Corticosteroids In Mexican Children With Asthma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03879590
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DOXO
- Conditions
- Asthma Chronic, Asthma in Children
- Keywords
- doxophylline, asthma, steroid sparing
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo LeonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Sep 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2019 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluated the efficacy of doxophylline as a steroid sparing treatment in Mexican children with asthma treated with medium ir high doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). It is a cross over study in which both groups of patients will receive doxophylline plus a lower steroid dose maintaining the same treatment step according to GINA guidelines, one group will maintain the same treatment dose while the other will start with doxophylline with the lower ICS dose, and by the middle of the study both groups will interchange treatment schemes.
Detailed description
Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are first-line drugs for the treatment of persistent asthma. The effectiveness of existing ICS is excellent; however, a number of questions remain regarding its possible adverse effects, despite the fact that the use of the inhalation route has allowed the minimization of the systemic exposure to these drugs. Methylxanthines are widely used in the treatment of asthma. It is one of the few medications for asthma that can be administered orally. They are useful especially in patients who cannot adapt to inhaled medications. Methylxanthines are unique in exhibiting dual-function properties by inducing bronchodilation and having anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects. Theophylline is the oldest methylxanthine and non-specifically inhibits phosphodiesterase, it is a little used drug because it has many adverse effects with lower therapeutic index. Doxophylline is a drug of the family of methylxanthines, with a similar efficacy compared to theophylline when applied in the treatment of various respiratory diseases, but with better tolerability profile. Doxophylline has been shown to be a bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory drug with a wider therapeutic window than other methylxanthines. Clinical studies have reported that doxophylline is more effective in improving lung function tests in adults and children, as well as in decreasing clinical symptoms, reducing the incidence of adverse effects and the need of emergency bronchodilators, with a better profile in terms of safety and it has been demonstrated that doxophylline potentially reduces the need for corticosteroids.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Budesonide and Doxophylline | Experimental | Drug: Doxophylline, Drug: BudesonideBudesonide at the same dose in which the subject is currently treated (GINA step 3 or 4) plus doxophylline at a dose of 18 mg / kg per day |
| Low budesonide and Doxophylline | Active comparator | Drug: Doxophylline, Drug: BudesonideReduced dose of inhaled budesonide (GINA step down) plus doxophylline to a dose of 18 mg / kg per day, maximum of 800 mg / day (Group B) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 16 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Mexican patients between 6 and 16 years old.
- Clinical diagnosis of asthma according to the current guidelines of the Global Asthma Initiative (GINA) 2018.
- Patients with asthma treated with budesonide at medium or high doses during (GINA guidelines´ steps 3 or 4) at least two months before the first study visit. Budesonide medium dose: 200-400 mcg / day (6-11 years) and 400-800 mcg / day (> 12 years). Budesonide high dose: > 400 mcg / day (6-11 years) and > 800 mcg / day (> 12 years).
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients <6 or ≥16 years of age.
- Patients with <16 kg of body weight.
- Patients who have had an asthma exacerbation that required treatment with systemic corticosteroids (oral, intramuscular or intravenous) during the 2 months prior to the first study visit.
- Patients who have presented an asthma exacerbation that required hospitalization during the 2 months prior to the first study visit.
- Any other chronic lung disease that could impair lung function evaluation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DoxophyllineAlso: There is no other intervention namesBoth groups will receive doxophylline one group will maintain the ICS dose and the other group will receive a reduced ICS dose (Maintaining the same GINA treatment step). After 4 weeks both groups will interchange treatment scheme. | Drug | Budesonide and Doxophylline, Low budesonide and Doxophylline |
| BudesonideAlso: There is no other intervention namesBoth groups will receive doxophylline one group will maintain the ICS dose and the other group will receive a reduced ICS dose (Maintaining the same GINA treatment step). After 4 weeks both groups will interchange treatment scheme. | Drug | Budesonide and Doxophylline, Low budesonide and Doxophylline |
Primary outcome
Changes in the values of the forced expiratory volume on the first second
Time frame: 4 weeks
Changes in the values of FEV1 (FEV1 in percent predicted) by comparing the baseline to subsequent evaluations.
5 secondary outcomes
Use of rescue therapy
Time frame: 4 weeks
Clinical asthma control assessment
Time frame: 4 weeks
Asthma exacerbations
Time frame: 4 weeks
Use of systemic corticosteroids
Time frame: 4 weeks
Changes on the exhaled breath temperature
Time frame: 4 weeks
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Mar 2019.
- Background: PubMed 25894641Lal D, Manocha S, Ray A, Vijayan VK, Kumar R. Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of theophylline and doxofylline in patients with bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2015 Sep;26(5):443-51. doi: 10.1515/jbcpp-2015-0006.
- Background: PubMed 26023566Margay SM, Farhat S, Kaur S, Teli HA. To study the efficacy and safety of doxophylline and theophylline in bronchial asthma. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Apr;9(4):FC05-8. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/12438.5743. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
- Background: PubMed 24738981Rajanandh MG, Nageswari AD, Ilango K. Assessment of various second-line medications in addition to inhaled corticosteroid in asthma patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2014 Jul;41(7):509-13. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.12239.
- Results publication: PubMed 29031617Riffo-Vasquez Y, Venkatasamy R, Page CP. Steroid sparing effects of doxofylline. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Feb;48:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
- Results publication: PubMed 24650447Rajanandh MG, Nageswari AD, Ilango K. Pulmonary function assessment in mild to moderate persistent asthma patients receiving montelukast, doxofylline, and tiotropium with budesonide: a randomized controlled study. Clin Ther. 2014 Apr 1;36(4):526-33. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.02.006. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Asthma Chronic
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Local Antibiotic Delivery for Community Acquired Pneumonia
Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP)
Recruiting
THERMotherapy Against Persistent Bacterial LUNG Infections
Lung Diseases, Obstructive, Bronchiectasis
Not yet recruiting
Reducing Exposure With Air Cleaners and Technology
Asthma, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)
RecruitingPhase 2
Rademikibart IV for Acute Asthma and COPD Exacerbation
Asthma Acute, COPD Exacerbation Acute
Not yet recruiting
Asthma Ctrl SMART Trial
Asthma in Children, Asthma Chronic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sandra Nora González-Díaz, PhD principal investigator
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Doxophylline and Budesonide in people with Asthma Chronic and Asthma in Children, run by Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Carlos Macouzet-Sánchez, Dr. (+528183462515, dr.macouzet@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Changes in the values of the forced expiratory volume on the first second (time frame: 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03879590, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Mar 2019.