Blood PressureOPTIBPNCT03875248
Optical Blood Pressure Monitoring Via Mobile Application, 3 Arms Swiss Clinical Study
A study testing Blood pressure measurement in people with Blood Pressure, run by Biospectal at 2 sites in Switzerland.
Trial summary
Validation of an existing algorithm designed to estimate blood pressure based on collected optical signals on patients against two reference methods, which are the arterial catheter (arm 1) and the ausculatory sphygmomanometer (arm 2). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Blood Pressure
- What is being tested?
- Blood pressure measurement
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 350 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 18 Mar 2019to 14 Jun 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Arm 1, Inclusion Criteria:
- Informed Consent as documented by signature
- Men or women older than 18 years old
- Good understanding of written and oral speaking used at the centre where the study will be carried out
- American Society of Anesthesiology clinical classification Risk (ASA) Class 1-3
- Scheduled for a general anesthesia
- Necessitating an arterial catheters for the anesthesia and surgery.
Arm 1, Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients that cannot sign informed consent
- Patients in emergency situation, are not legally competent, cannot understand the situation
- ASA Risk class 4
- Dyshythmia like bigeminy, trigeminy, isolated Ventricular Premature Beats (VPB), atrial fibrillation
- Lesion or deficiency on hand, preventing index obstruction of smartphone's camera
- Known contact dermatitis to nickel/chromium
Arm 2, Inclusion Criteria:
- Informed Consent as documented by signature
- Men or women older than 18 years old
- Good understanding of written and oral speaking used at the centre where the study will be carried out
Arm 2,Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients that cannot sign informed consent
- Patients in emergency situation, are not legally competent, cannot understand the situation
- Known or suspected non-compliance (e.g. drug or alcohol abuse, language problems, psychological disorders, dementia)
- Known pregnancy
- Systolic blood pressure difference between two arms >15mmHg or, diastolic blood pressure difference between two arms >10mmHg
- Unstable cardiac condition (myocardial infarction < 1 week, pulmonary embolism, ventricular arrhythmia, decompensated heart failure)
- Dysrhythmia like bigeminy, trigeminy, isolated Ventricular Premature Beats (VPB), atrial fibrillation
- Lesion or deficiency on hand, preventing index obstruction of smartphone's camera
- Known contact dermatitis to nickel/chromium.
Arm 3, Inclusion Criteria:
- Informed Consent as documented by signature
- Pregnant women older than 18 years old
- Good understanding of written and oral speaking used at the centre where the study will be carried out
- Scheduled for a prepartum anesthesia consultation at the hospital maternity unit
Arm 3,Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients that cannot sign informed consent
- Patients in emergency situation, are not legally competent, cannot understand the situation
- Known or suspected non-compliance (e.g. drug or alcohol abuse, language problems, psychological disorders, dementia)
- Systolic blood pressure difference between two arms >15mmHg or, diastolic blood pressure difference between two arms >10mmHg
- Unstable cardiac condition (myocardial infarction < 1 week, pulmonary embolism, ventricular arrhythmia, decompensated heart failure)
- Dysrhythmia like bigeminy, trigeminy, isolated Ventricular Premature Beats (VPB), atrial fibrillation
- Lesion or deficiency on hand, preventing index obstruction of smartphone's camera
- Known contact dermatitis to nickel/chromium.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Switzerland2 sites, 1 recruiting
- Completed
Hôpital Universitaire de Genève (HUG)
Geneva, 1205
- Recruiting
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV)
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, 1011
Patrick Schoettker, Patrick.Schoettker@chuv.ch
Patrick Schoettker
About this study
Official title: Arm 1: Optical Blood Pressure Monitoring (OptiBP Mobile App), An Accurate Blood Pressure Measurement Compared to Invasive Blood Pressure Measurement. Arm 2 and Arm 3: Improvement and Validation of the Smartphone Blood Pressure Measurement (OptiBP Mobile App). A Prospective, Method Comparison, Proof of Concept Study in a Swiss Population.
Validation of an existing algorithm designed to estimate blood pressure based on collected optical signals on patients against two reference methods, which are the arterial catheter (arm 1) and the ausculatory sphygmomanometer (arm 2).
Read the detailed description
The purpose of the study is to compare the blood pressure values measured by a mobile application used with a smartphone and the values measured by reference equipments, which are the arterial line and the ausculatory sphygmomanometer .
In the arm 1 of the study, patients scheduled for general anesthesia at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) and at the Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève (HUG) will be recruited and their pressure will be measured with both mesurement methods. General anesthesia is known to generate significant variations in blood pressure at the time of induction. During the first minutes of anesthesia, the patient's blood pressure will be measured in parallel with the mobile application and with the reference equipment. After the intervention, the values obtained by the two methods will be compared to confirm the reliability of the data obtained with the mobile application.
In the arm 2, patients scheduled for a medical appointment at the hypertension unit of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) will be recruited. Their pressure will be measured with the mobile application and with the reference equipment at various time points. After the intervention, the values obtained by the two methods will be compared to confirm the reliability of the data obtained with the mobile application.
In the arm 3, patients scheduled for a medical appointment at the maternity unit of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) will be recruited. Their pressure will be measured with the mobile application and with the reference equipment at various time points. After the intervention, the values obtained by the two methods will be compared to confirm the reliability of the data obtained with the mobile application.
- Conditions
- Blood Pressure
- Being tested
- Blood pressure measurement
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Blood pressure measurementDevice
Measure optically the blood pressure through the use of a smartphone
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1. Blood pressure measurement compared to arterial line | Other | Comparative blood pressure measurement with the investigational device and the invasive reference method (arterial line). Receives: Device: Blood pressure measurement |
| Arm 2. Blood pressure measurement compared to manual cuff | Other | Comparative blood pressure measurement in hypertensive patients with the investigational device and the non-invasive reference method (manual cuff). Receives: Device: Blood pressure measurement |
| Arm 3. Blood pressure measurement compared to manual cuff | Other | Comparative blood pressure measurement in pregnant women with the investigational device and the non-invasive reference method (manual cuff). Receives: Device: Blood pressure measurement |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Confirmation of measurement done with the investigational device
Arm 1: Comparision of values to invasive reference method (arterial line)
Measured: First 20 minutes
Confirmation of measurement done with the investigational device
Arm 2: Comparision of values to non-invasive reference method (ausculatory sphygmomanometer)
Measured: First 20 minutes
Confirmation of measurement done with the investigational device
Arm 3: Comparision of values to non-invasive reference method (ausculatory sphygmomanometer)
Measured: First 20 minutes
Secondary outcomes (2)
Usability assessment
Identification of possible use error in the manipulation of the device and in the performance of the measure
Measured: First 20 minutes
Safety of procedure by assessing inconvenience and adverse events
Safety by assessing inconvenience and adverse events.
Measured: First 20 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Mar 2019
- Study start18 Mar 2019
- Primary completion14 Jun 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion14 Jun 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Blood PressureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- The arm 1 of the study has been designed as a multicentric prospective pilot study. The arm 2 of the study has been designed as a monocentric prospective pilot study. The arm 3 of the study has been designed as a monocentric prospective pilot study.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 350 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Biospectal
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- CSEM Centre Suisse d'Electronique et de Microtechnique SA - Recherche et Developpement
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Patrick Schoettker, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03875248
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BSP 2018/01
- Acronym
- OPTIBP
- Status last verified
- Jun 2020
- First submitted
- 13 Mar 2019
- Last updated
- 23 Jun 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Almeida P, Cuenoud A, Hoang H, Othenin-Girard A, Salhi N, Kothe A, Christen U, Schoettker P. Accuracy of the smartphone blood pressure measurement solution OptiBP to track blood pressure changes in pregnant women. J Hypertens. 2025 Apr 1;43(4):665-672. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003956. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
PubMed 39927734Degott J, Ghajarzadeh-Wurzner A, Hofmann G, Proenca M, Bonnier G, Lemkaddem A, Lemay M, Christen U, Knebel JF, Durgnat V, Burnier M, Wuerzner G, Schoettker P. Smartphone based blood pressure measurement: accuracy of the OptiBP mobile application according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO universal validation protocol. Blood Press Monit. 2021 Dec 1;26(6):441-448. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000556.
PubMed 34139747
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jun 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Arm 1: Optical Blood Pressure Monitoring (OptiBP Mobile App), An Accurate Blood Pressure Measurement Compared to Invasive Blood Pressure Measurement. Arm 2 and Arm 3: Improvement and Validation of the Smartphone Blood Pressure Measurement (OptiBP Mobile App). A Prospective, Method Comparison, Proof of Concept Study in a Swiss Population.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03875248
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OPTIBP / BSP 2018/01
- Conditions
- Blood Pressure
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 350 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- BiospectalIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- CSEM Centre Suisse d'Electronique et de Microtechnique SA - Recherche et Developpement
- Study start
- 18 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Jun 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 14 Jun 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Validation of an existing algorithm designed to estimate blood pressure based on collected optical signals on patients against two reference methods, which are the arterial catheter (arm 1) and the ausculatory sphygmomanometer (arm 2).
Detailed description
The purpose of the study is to compare the blood pressure values measured by a mobile application used with a smartphone and the values measured by reference equipments, which are the arterial line and the ausculatory sphygmomanometer .
In the arm 1 of the study, patients scheduled for general anesthesia at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) and at the Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève (HUG) will be recruited and their pressure will be measured with both mesurement methods. General anesthesia is known to generate significant variations in blood pressure at the time of induction. During the first minutes of anesthesia, the patient's blood pressure will be measured in parallel with the mobile application and with the reference equipment. After the intervention, the values obtained by the two methods will be compared to confirm the reliability of the data obtained with the mobile application.
In the arm 2, patients scheduled for a medical appointment at the hypertension unit of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) will be recruited. Their pressure will be measured with the mobile application and with the reference equipment at various time points. After the intervention, the values obtained by the two methods will be compared to confirm the reliability of the data obtained with the mobile application.
In the arm 3, patients scheduled for a medical appointment at the maternity unit of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) will be recruited. Their pressure will be measured with the mobile application and with the reference equipment at various time points. After the intervention, the values obtained by the two methods will be compared to confirm the reliability of the data obtained with the mobile application.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- The arm 1 of the study has been designed as a multicentric prospective pilot study. The arm 2 of the study has been designed as a monocentric prospective pilot study. The arm 3 of the study has been designed as a monocentric prospective pilot study.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1. Blood pressure measurement compared to arterial line | Other | Device: Blood pressure measurementComparative blood pressure measurement with the investigational device and the invasive reference method (arterial line). |
| Arm 2. Blood pressure measurement compared to manual cuff | Other | Device: Blood pressure measurementComparative blood pressure measurement in hypertensive patients with the investigational device and the non-invasive reference method (manual cuff). |
| Arm 3. Blood pressure measurement compared to manual cuff | Other | Device: Blood pressure measurementComparative blood pressure measurement in pregnant women with the investigational device and the non-invasive reference method (manual cuff). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Blood pressure measurementMeasure optically the blood pressure through the use of a smartphone | Device | Arm 1. Blood pressure measurement compared to arterial line, Arm 2. Blood pressure measurement compared to manual cuff, Arm 3. Blood pressure measurement compared to manual cuff |
Primary outcome
Confirmation of measurement done with the investigational device
Time frame: First 20 minutes
Arm 1: Comparision of values to invasive reference method (arterial line)
Confirmation of measurement done with the investigational device
Time frame: First 20 minutes
Arm 2: Comparision of values to non-invasive reference method (ausculatory sphygmomanometer)
Confirmation of measurement done with the investigational device
Time frame: First 20 minutes
Arm 3: Comparision of values to non-invasive reference method (ausculatory sphygmomanometer)
2 secondary outcomes
Usability assessment
Time frame: First 20 minutes
Safety of procedure by assessing inconvenience and adverse events
Time frame: First 20 minutes
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jun 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39927734Almeida P, Cuenoud A, Hoang H, Othenin-Girard A, Salhi N, Kothe A, Christen U, Schoettker P. Accuracy of the smartphone blood pressure measurement solution OptiBP to track blood pressure changes in pregnant women. J Hypertens. 2025 Apr 1;43(4):665-672. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003956. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34139747Degott J, Ghajarzadeh-Wurzner A, Hofmann G, Proenca M, Bonnier G, Lemkaddem A, Lemay M, Christen U, Knebel JF, Durgnat V, Burnier M, Wuerzner G, Schoettker P. Smartphone based blood pressure measurement: accuracy of the OptiBP mobile application according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO universal validation protocol. Blood Press Monit. 2021 Dec 1;26(6):441-448. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000556.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Blood Pressure
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase III Renal Outcomes and Cardiovascular Mortality Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Baxdrostat in Combination With Dapagliflozin in Participants With Chronic Kidney Disease and High Blood Pressure
Chronic Kidney Disease and Hypertension
Recruiting
Guiding Optimal Blood Pressure Management in Peritoneal Dialysis Pilot Trial
End Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD), Hypertension (HTN)
RecruitingPhase 4
Hematological Safety of Dipyrone Versus Paracetamol After Dental Extractions
Hematologic Test, Agranulocytosis
Not yet recruiting
Acute Effects of Mat Pilates on Blood Pressure Response to Mental Stress in Higher Education Teachers
Behavior
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Blood pressure measurement in people with Blood Pressure, run by Biospectal at 2 sites in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Patrick Schoettker (+41 79 556 10 43, Patrick.Schoettker@chuv.ch), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Confirmation of measurement done with the investigational device (time frame: First 20 minutes). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03875248, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jun 2020.