Pain ManagementNCT03868787
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Pain Control During Cervical Dilator Placement Prior to Dilation and Evacuation
A study testing TENS in people with Pain Management, run by Ashley Turner, MD at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study evaluates the use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) as a method of pain control during osmotic dilator insertion prior to dilation and evacuation. Half the group will have an active TENS unit and half will have a sham or placebo TENS unit. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain Management
- What is being tested?
- TENS
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 74 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 May 2019to 1 Apr 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Women ≥ 18 years of age
- Gestational age between 14 weeks and 23 weeks 6 days
- Willing and able to sign an informed consent in English
- No contraindications to TENS
Who cannot join
- Incarceration
- Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes or evidence of intra-amniotic infection
- Presence of implanted cardiac device
- Lack of sensation to touch on area of electrode placement
- Prior TENS use
- Opioid dependence
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Northwestern Center for Family Planning and Contraception
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
About this study
Official title: Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Pain Control During Cervical Dilator Placement Prior to Dilation and Evacuation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
This study evaluates the use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) as a method of pain control during osmotic dilator insertion prior to dilation and evacuation. Half the group will have an active TENS unit and half will have a sham or placebo TENS unit.
Read the detailed description
Dilation and Evacuation is the most common method of second trimester abortion. Studies have shown that adequate cervical preparation is necessary for the procedure to be performed safely and reduce the risk of complications. However, in the majority of cases the placement of these dilators is done with minimal pain management options.
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) has been used in pain relief since 1965, when Melzack and Walls proposed using electrical stimulation as analgesia based on the gate control theory of pain relief. TENS units are small, inexpensive, portable, battery-powered devices which deliver mild, alternating electrical currents via electrodes positioned on the skin near the anticipated dermatomal distribution of pain. The parameters of pulse frequency and pulse intensity are adjustable and linked to TENS efficacy. They overall have a favorable safety profile. Contraindications include electronic implants, such as cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators.
Two main theories have been proposed regarding how TENS provides analgesia. According to the "gate control" theory, neuromodulation may activate large myelinated afferent nerve fibers in the dorsal horn to inhibit transmission in primary afferent nociceptive fibers. The inhibitory input from the large myelinated afferent fibers is thought to be able to "close the gate" to prevent transmission of pain sensation. The endorphin-mediated theory of pain relief states that a stimulus outside the central nervous system can raise the level of endogenous endorphins and therefore provide analgesia.
The proposed study is a single-blinded randomized controlled trial studying use of TENS for pain control during initial dilator insertion prior to dilation and evacuation. The participants will be randomized in a 1:1 randomization scheme using opaque, sequentially numbered envelopes following consent. The experimental group will have an active TENS unit - Chattanooga Primera - and the control group will have a sham TENS unit. The sham TENS will be the same unit without the true TENS electrical connections. The true TENS unit consists of the active unit and electrode pads connected to the unit via direct wires. The sham group will be given the active unit and have electrode pads placed but without wire connections. These participants will be told the device is a wireless device. They will also be told they may or may not feel sensation from the TENS. This will allow the device to be powered on and run in the same manner as the active group, but will not allow for electrical transmission between the unit and electrodes.
Based on power calculations, 56 participants are needed to detect a 20mm difference in VAS score with a standard deviation of 30mm. This is based on both minimum clinically significant difference in pain scores as well as previous studies regarding pain during dilator insertion. We will attempt to recruit 70 patients to account for possible TENS unit misuse or study dropout.
Eligible patients will have two electrodes will be placed in the suprapubic area in the bilateral lower quadrants. The program that will be used is a high frequency (80Hz) program that runs for an hour in duration. It will be initiated 5 minutes prior to speculum placement. Participants will be instructed to increase the amplitude of the current as needed to provide analgesia but avoiding discomfort from the TENS stimulation. All participants will receive a paracervical block of 20mL 1% lidocaine with sodium bicarbonate followed by rigid dilation and dilator placement per standard cervical preparation protocol. Participants will complete 100mm VAS immediately following dilator placement. VAS is a 100mm line on sheet of paper with 0 being no pain and 100mm being worst pain of their life. The number of dilators, type of dilators, and use of adjunctive mifepristone/misoprostol will be according to providers' clinical judgement. Dilator placement will be performed by either Family Planning Fellow, PGY-3 OB/GYN resident, or Nurse Practitioner. All participants will receive prescriptions for twenty tablets of ibuprofen (600mg) and twelve tablets of hydrocodone/acetaminophen 5/325, which is the standard post-dilator insertion pain protocol for this clinic site. Participants will be allowed to leave prior to the end of the initial one-hour program. They will be sent home with instructions of how to run the TENS unit as needed for pain control.
Following the initial hour of use patients can re-activate the TENS unit as often as desired, using the same program. Participants will be given a log to record when TENS unit was used and whether additional pain medications were taken. They will return their completed log and bring pill bottles on the day of surgery to confirm medications used.
Of note, in our practice a second set of cervical dilators is often placed 6 hours after first set in patients over 20 weeks gestation. During this placement the first set is removed, further rigid dilation is performed, and new dilators are placed per standard cervical preparation protocol. Pain score on 100mm VAS will be recorded following this dilator placement as well as a secondary outcome. Participants will run the TENS unit in the same manner as the initial dilator placement for dilator exchange.
On the day of surgery participants will record their highest interval pain score on 100mm VAS. They will also be asked their satisfaction with the TENS device. The TENS unit will be returned on the day of surgery.
- Conditions
- Pain Management
- Being tested
- TENS, Sham TENS
- Medical subject headings
- Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TENSDevice
TENS units are small, inexpensive, portable, battery-powered devices which deliver mild, alternating electrical currents via electrodes positioned on the skin near the anticipated dermatomal distribution of pain.
Sham TENSDevice
Non-active TENS unit
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active TENS | Experimental | The active TENS unit consists of the active unit and electrode pads connected to the unit via direct wires. The program that will be used is a high frequency (80Hz) program that runs for an hour in duration. It will be initiated 5 minutes prior to speculum placement. Participants will be instructed to increase the amplitude of the current as needed to provide analgesia but avoiding discomfort from the TENS stimulation Receives: Device: TENS |
| Sham TENS | Sham comparator | The sham TENS will be the same unit without the true TENS electrical connections. The sham group will be given the active unit and have electrode pads placed but without wire connections. These participants will be told the device is a wireless device. They will also be told they may or may not feel sensation from the TENS. This will allow the device to be powered on and run in the same manner as the active group, but will not allow for electrical transmission between the unit and electrodes Receives: Device: Sham TENS |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain Following Dilator Placement
Self-reported pain on 100mm visual analog scale (VAS) immediately following dilator placement. Range is from 0mm to 100mm, with 0mm being the least amount of pain (minimum score) and 100mm being the greatest (maximum score). Higher values are considered a worse outcome.
Measured: within 5 mins after dilator placement procedure
Secondary outcomes (2)
Interval Pain
Self-reported highest level of pain between dilator placement and D\&E on 100mm visual analog scale (VAS). Range is from 0mm to 100mm, with 0mm being the least amount of pain (minimum score) and 100mm being the greatest (maximum score). Higher values are considered a worse outcome.
Measured: 5 mins after dilator placement to 36 hours after dilator placement
Patient Satisfaction
Patient satisfaction with device based on 4 questions with 5 point Likert scale. Minimum value is 1, maximum is 5. Higher score is a better outcome.
Measured: 24-36 hours after dilator placement, immediately prior to D&E
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Mar 2019
- Study start1 May 2019
- Primary completion1 Nov 2020
- Study completion1 Apr 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pain ManagementStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 74 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ashley Turner, MD
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Society of Family Planning
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Ashley Turner, MD, Northwestern University
- Investigators
- Leanne McCloskey, MD, MPH, Principal investigator, Northwestern University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03868787
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STU00209157
- Status last verified
- Jul 2023
- First submitted
- 6 Mar 2019
- Last updated
- 25 Jul 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Binder P, Gustafsson A, Uvnas-Moberg K, Nissen E. Hi-TENS combined with PCA-morphine as post caesarean pain relief. Midwifery. 2011 Aug;27(4):547-52. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.05.002. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
PubMed 20615594De Angelis C, Perrone G, Santoro G, Nofroni I, Zichella L. Suppression of pelvic pain during hysteroscopy with a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation device. Fertil Steril. 2003 Jun;79(6):1422-7. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00363-7.
PubMed 12798892ELECTROPHYSICAL AGENTS - Contraindications And Precautions: An Evidence-Based Approach To Clinical Decision Making In Physical Therapy. Physiother Can. 2010 Fall;62(5):1-80. doi: 10.3138/ptc.62.5. Epub 2011 Jan 5. No abstract available.
PubMed 21886384Olsen MF, Elden H, Janson ED, Lilja H, Stener-Victorin E. A comparison of high- versus low-intensity, high-frequency transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation for painful postpartum uterine contractions. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(3):310-4. doi: 10.1080/00016340601040928.
PubMed 17364305Johnson MI, Paley CA, Howe TE, Sluka KA. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for acute pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 15;2015(6):CD006142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006142.pub3.
PubMed 26075732Kayman-Kose S, Arioz DT, Toktas H, Koken G, Kanat-Pektas M, Kose M, Yilmazer M. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for pain control after vaginal delivery and cesarean section. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Oct;27(15):1572-5. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.870549. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
PubMed 24283391Mercier RJ, Liberty A. Intrauterine lidocaine for pain control during laminaria insertion: a randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2014 Dec;90(6):594-600. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.008. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
PubMed 25139724Platon B, Andrell P, Raner C, Rudolph M, Dvoretsky A, Mannheimer C. High-frequency, high-intensity transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation as treatment of pain after surgical abortion. Pain. 2010 Jan;148(1):114-119. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.10.023. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
PubMed 19959293Proctor ML, Smith CA, Farquhar CM, Stones RW. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and acupuncture for primary dysmenorrhoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;2002(1):CD002123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002123.
PubMed 11869624Soon R, Tschann M, Salcedo J, Stevens K, Ahn HJ, Kaneshiro B. Paracervical Block for Laminaria Insertion Before Second-Trimester Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;130(2):387-392. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002149.
PubMed 28697113de Sousa L, Gomes-Sponholz FA, Nakano AM. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the relief of post-partum uterine contraction pain during breast-feeding: a randomized clinical trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014 May;40(5):1317-23. doi: 10.1111/jog.12345. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
PubMed 24750301Vance CG, Dailey DL, Rakel BA, Sluka KA. Using TENS for pain control: the state of the evidence. Pain Manag. 2014 May;4(3):197-209. doi: 10.2217/pmt.14.13.
PubMed 24953072
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jul 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Pain Control During Cervical Dilator Placement Prior to Dilation and Evacuation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03868787
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STU00209157
- Conditions
- Pain Management
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 74 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ashley Turner, MDUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Society of Family Planning
- Study start
- 1 May 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Apr 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 25 Jul 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluates the use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) as a method of pain control during osmotic dilator insertion prior to dilation and evacuation. Half the group will have an active TENS unit and half will have a sham or placebo TENS unit.
Detailed description
Dilation and Evacuation is the most common method of second trimester abortion. Studies have shown that adequate cervical preparation is necessary for the procedure to be performed safely and reduce the risk of complications. However, in the majority of cases the placement of these dilators is done with minimal pain management options.
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) has been used in pain relief since 1965, when Melzack and Walls proposed using electrical stimulation as analgesia based on the gate control theory of pain relief. TENS units are small, inexpensive, portable, battery-powered devices which deliver mild, alternating electrical currents via electrodes positioned on the skin near the anticipated dermatomal distribution of pain. The parameters of pulse frequency and pulse intensity are adjustable and linked to TENS efficacy. They overall have a favorable safety profile. Contraindications include electronic implants, such as cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators.
Two main theories have been proposed regarding how TENS provides analgesia. According to the "gate control" theory, neuromodulation may activate large myelinated afferent nerve fibers in the dorsal horn to inhibit transmission in primary afferent nociceptive fibers. The inhibitory input from the large myelinated afferent fibers is thought to be able to "close the gate" to prevent transmission of pain sensation. The endorphin-mediated theory of pain relief states that a stimulus outside the central nervous system can raise the level of endogenous endorphins and therefore provide analgesia.
The proposed study is a single-blinded randomized controlled trial studying use of TENS for pain control during initial dilator insertion prior to dilation and evacuation. The participants will be randomized in a 1:1 randomization scheme using opaque, sequentially numbered envelopes following consent. The experimental group will have an active TENS unit - Chattanooga Primera - and the control group will have a sham TENS unit. The sham TENS will be the same unit without the true TENS electrical connections. The true TENS unit consists of the active unit and electrode pads connected to the unit via direct wires. The sham group will be given the active unit and have electrode pads placed but without wire connections. These participants will be told the device is a wireless device. They will also be told they may or may not feel sensation from the TENS. This will allow the device to be powered on and run in the same manner as the active group, but will not allow for electrical transmission between the unit and electrodes.
Based on power calculations, 56 participants are needed to detect a 20mm difference in VAS score with a standard deviation of 30mm. This is based on both minimum clinically significant difference in pain scores as well as previous studies regarding pain during dilator insertion. We will attempt to recruit 70 patients to account for possible TENS unit misuse or study dropout.
Eligible patients will have two electrodes will be placed in the suprapubic area in the bilateral lower quadrants. The program that will be used is a high frequency (80Hz) program that runs for an hour in duration. It will be initiated 5 minutes prior to speculum placement. Participants will be instructed to increase the amplitude of the current as needed to provide analgesia but avoiding discomfort from the TENS stimulation. All participants will receive a paracervical block of 20mL 1% lidocaine with sodium bicarbonate followed by rigid dilation and dilator placement per standard cervical preparation protocol. Participants will complete 100mm VAS immediately following dilator placement. VAS is a 100mm line on sheet of paper with 0 being no pain and 100mm being worst pain of their life. The number of dilators, type of dilators, and use of adjunctive mifepristone/misoprostol will be according to providers' clinical judgement. Dilator placement will be performed by either Family Planning Fellow, PGY-3 OB/GYN resident, or Nurse Practitioner. All participants will receive prescriptions for twenty tablets of ibuprofen (600mg) and twelve tablets of hydrocodone/acetaminophen 5/325, which is the standard post-dilator insertion pain protocol for this clinic site. Participants will be allowed to leave prior to the end of the initial one-hour program. They will be sent home with instructions of how to run the TENS unit as needed for pain control.
Following the initial hour of use patients can re-activate the TENS unit as often as desired, using the same program. Participants will be given a log to record when TENS unit was used and whether additional pain medications were taken. They will return their completed log and bring pill bottles on the day of surgery to confirm medications used.
Of note, in our practice a second set of cervical dilators is often placed 6 hours after first set in patients over 20 weeks gestation. During this placement the first set is removed, further rigid dilation is performed, and new dilators are placed per standard cervical preparation protocol. Pain score on 100mm VAS will be recorded following this dilator placement as well as a secondary outcome. Participants will run the TENS unit in the same manner as the initial dilator placement for dilator exchange.
On the day of surgery participants will record their highest interval pain score on 100mm VAS. They will also be asked their satisfaction with the TENS device. The TENS unit will be returned on the day of surgery.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active TENS | Experimental | Device: TENSThe active TENS unit consists of the active unit and electrode pads connected to the unit via direct wires. The program that will be used is a high frequency (80Hz) program that runs for an hour in duration. It will be initiated 5 minutes prior to speculum placement. Participants will be instructed to increase the amplitude of the current as needed to provide analgesia but avoiding discomfort from the TENS stimulation |
| Sham TENS | Sham comparator | Device: Sham TENSThe sham TENS will be the same unit without the true TENS electrical connections. The sham group will be given the active unit and have electrode pads placed but without wire connections. These participants will be told the device is a wireless device. They will also be told they may or may not feel sensation from the TENS. This will allow the device to be powered on and run in the same manner as the active group, but will not allow for electrical transmission between the unit and electrodes |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Women ≥ 18 years of age
- Gestational age between 14 weeks and 23 weeks 6 days
- Willing and able to sign an informed consent in English
- No contraindications to TENS
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Incarceration
- Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes or evidence of intra-amniotic infection
- Presence of implanted cardiac device
- Lack of sensation to touch on area of electrode placement
- Prior TENS use
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TENSTENS units are small, inexpensive, portable, battery-powered devices which deliver mild, alternating electrical currents via electrodes positioned on the skin near the anticipated dermatomal distribution of pain. | Device | Active TENS |
| Sham TENSNon-active TENS unit | Device | Sham TENS |
Primary outcome
Pain Following Dilator Placement
Time frame: within 5 mins after dilator placement procedure
Self-reported pain on 100mm visual analog scale (VAS) immediately following dilator placement. Range is from 0mm to 100mm, with 0mm being the least amount of pain (minimum score) and 100mm being the greatest (maximum score). Higher values are considered a worse outcome.
2 secondary outcomes
Interval Pain
Time frame: 5 mins after dilator placement to 36 hours after dilator placement
Patient Satisfaction
Time frame: 24-36 hours after dilator placement, immediately prior to D&E
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jul 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 20615594Binder P, Gustafsson A, Uvnas-Moberg K, Nissen E. Hi-TENS combined with PCA-morphine as post caesarean pain relief. Midwifery. 2011 Aug;27(4):547-52. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.05.002. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
- Background: PubMed 12798892De Angelis C, Perrone G, Santoro G, Nofroni I, Zichella L. Suppression of pelvic pain during hysteroscopy with a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation device. Fertil Steril. 2003 Jun;79(6):1422-7. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00363-7.
- Background: PubMed 21886384ELECTROPHYSICAL AGENTS - Contraindications And Precautions: An Evidence-Based Approach To Clinical Decision Making In Physical Therapy. Physiother Can. 2010 Fall;62(5):1-80. doi: 10.3138/ptc.62.5. Epub 2011 Jan 5. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 17364305Olsen MF, Elden H, Janson ED, Lilja H, Stener-Victorin E. A comparison of high- versus low-intensity, high-frequency transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation for painful postpartum uterine contractions. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(3):310-4. doi: 10.1080/00016340601040928.
- Background: PubMed 26075732Johnson MI, Paley CA, Howe TE, Sluka KA. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for acute pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 15;2015(6):CD006142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006142.pub3.
- Background: PubMed 24283391Kayman-Kose S, Arioz DT, Toktas H, Koken G, Kanat-Pektas M, Kose M, Yilmazer M. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for pain control after vaginal delivery and cesarean section. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Oct;27(15):1572-5. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.870549. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
- Background: PubMed 25139724Mercier RJ, Liberty A. Intrauterine lidocaine for pain control during laminaria insertion: a randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2014 Dec;90(6):594-600. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.008. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
- Background: PubMed 19959293Platon B, Andrell P, Raner C, Rudolph M, Dvoretsky A, Mannheimer C. High-frequency, high-intensity transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation as treatment of pain after surgical abortion. Pain. 2010 Jan;148(1):114-119. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.10.023. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
- Background: PubMed 11869624Proctor ML, Smith CA, Farquhar CM, Stones RW. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and acupuncture for primary dysmenorrhoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;2002(1):CD002123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002123.
- Background: PubMed 28697113Soon R, Tschann M, Salcedo J, Stevens K, Ahn HJ, Kaneshiro B. Paracervical Block for Laminaria Insertion Before Second-Trimester Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;130(2):387-392. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002149.
- Background: PubMed 24750301de Sousa L, Gomes-Sponholz FA, Nakano AM. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the relief of post-partum uterine contraction pain during breast-feeding: a randomized clinical trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014 May;40(5):1317-23. doi: 10.1111/jog.12345. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
- Background: PubMed 24953072Vance CG, Dailey DL, Rakel BA, Sluka KA. Using TENS for pain control: the state of the evidence. Pain Manag. 2014 May;4(3):197-209. doi: 10.2217/pmt.14.13.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pain Management
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Active, not recruiting
Efficacy of Laparoscopic-Assisted TAP Block in Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Appendectomy, Laparoscopic, Blockades Neuromuscular
Recruiting
Photobiomodulation for Management of Temporomandibular Disorder Pain
Pain Related to TMD
Recruiting
SIRI Levels Following PENG Block in Pediatric Hip Surgery
Hip Dysplasia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Leanne McCloskey, MD, MPH principal investigator
Northwestern University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing TENS in people with Pain Management, run by Ashley Turner, MD at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Jul 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain Following Dilator Placement (time frame: within 5 mins after dilator placement procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03868787, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jul 2023.