Lumbar Disc HerniationNCT03854240
Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Classic And Lateral Approach Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block
A study testing Classic block (Group C) and modified block (Group M) groups in people with Lumbar Disc Herniation, run by Medipol University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
US-guided peripheral nerve blocks have been used increasingly due to the advantages of ultrasound in anesthesia practice. TLIP block is one of these nerve blocks performed under US guidance. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Lumbar Disc Herniation
- What is being tested?
- Classic block (Group C) and modified block (Group M) groups
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2018to 31 Jan 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-II
- scheduled for lumbar laminectomy surgery
Who cannot join
- bleeding diathesis
- receiving anticoagulant treatment
- known local anesthetics and opioid allergy
- infection of the skin at the site of the needle puncture
- pregnancy or lactation
- patients who do not accept the procedure
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Istanbul Medipol University Hospital
Istanbul, Bagcilar, 34070
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Classic And Lateral Approach Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block For Pain Management Following Lumbar Laminectomy Surgery
US-guided peripheral nerve blocks have been used increasingly due to the advantages of ultrasound in anesthesia practice. TLIP block is one of these nerve blocks performed under US guidance. In this technique, local anesthetic solution is injected between the multifidus and longissimus muscles nearly at the level of the 3rd lumbar vertebra and targets the dorsal rami of the thoracolumbar nerves. However, the visualisation of this technique may be difficult under ultrasound (US) guidance. Therefore, Ahiskalioglu et al. defined modified lateral technique of TLIP block as a new approach. The aim of this study is to compare US-guided classic and modified (lateral) techniques of TLIP block for postoperative analgesia management after lumbar laminectomy surgery .
Read the detailed description
Spine surgery in thoracolumbar region is one of the most common surgeries performed for the treatment of leg and back pain 1. Pain management is especially important for these patients since chronic pain often occurs after surgery. Severe pain may occur at postoperative period in patients following lumbar disc herniation (LDH) operation. Postoperative effective pain treatment provides early mobilization and shorter hospital stay, thus complications due to hospitalization such as infection and thromboembolism may be reduced 1,2.
Regional anesthesia techniques may be preferred for postoperative analgesia management.Thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block is a novel ultrasound guided regional analgesia technique.
Several techniques such as intravenous-intramuscular injections, and patient-controlled analgesia devices are usually performed for postoperative pain management. However, these methods may be ineffective in the pain treatment due to they are generally performed after pain has occurred. The analgesic agent may not reach a treatment concentration in the blood due to administrating doses intermittently 2.Opioids are one of the most preferred drugs among the analgesic agents. Parenteral opioids are generally performed for patients after surgery. However opioids have undesirable adverse events such as nausea, vomiting, itching, sedation and respiratory depression (opioid-related adverse events) 3.
Various methods may be performed to reduce the use of systemic opioids and for effective pain treatment. US-guided peripheral nerve blocks have been used increasingly due to the advantages of ultrasound in anesthesia practice. TLIP block is one of these nerve blocks performed under US guidance and defined by Hand et al. in 2015 2. In a retrospective study, it has been reported that this technique can provide effective analgesia after lumbar laminoplasty surgery by Ueshima et al 4. In this technique, local anesthetic solution is injected between the multifidus and longissimus muscles nearly at the level of the 3rd lumbar vertebra and targets the dorsal rami of the thoracolumbar nerves. However, the visualisation of this technique may be difficult under ultrasound (US) guidance. Therefore, Ahiskalioglu et al. defined modified lateral technique of TLIP block as a new approach 5. Ahiskalioglu et al. have reported that this approach has some advantages. Firstly, sonographic visualisation is more easily than the classical technique. Secondly, insertion of the needle from medial to lateral direction reduces the risk of possible neuraxial injection 5.
The aim of this study is to compare US-guided classic and modified (lateral) techniques of TLIP block for postoperative analgesia management after lumbar laminectomy surgery . The primary aim is to compare perioperative and postoperative opioid consumption and the secondary aim is to evaluate postoperative pain scores (VAS), adverse effects related with opioids (allergic reaction, nausea, vomiting) and complications due to blocks.
- Conditions
- Lumbar Disc Herniation
- Being tested
- Classic block (Group C) and modified block (Group M) groups
- Keywords
- Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block, Pain Management, Lumbar Laminectomy Surgery
- Medical subject headings
- Intervertebral Disc Displacement, Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Classic block (Group C) and modified block (Group M) groupsOther
Classic block (Group C) and modified block (Group M) will be performed following induction of general anesthesia, with patients in the prone position by using ultrasound device
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Classic block (Group C) | Active comparator | In group C, classic technique will be performed. US probe will be placed vertically at the L3 vertebrae level. After visualizing the hyperechoic shadow of the spinous process and interspinous muscles as an anatomical guide point, the probe will be moved forward to the lateral to visualize the longissimus and multifidus muscles. Between these muscles, block needle will be inserted within in plane technique in a lateral-to-medial direction in the interfascial plane. Once the needle tip will be placed within the interfacial plane and after careful aspiration to rule out intravascular needle placement, 2 mL of saline will be injected to confirm the proper injection site, and then a dose of 0.25% bupivacaine 20 mL will be injected in each side (total 40 mL) Receives: Other: Classic block (Group C) and modified block (Group M) groups |
| Modified block (Group M) | Active comparator | In group M, modified technique will be performed. US probe will be placed vertically at the L3 vertebrae level. After visualizing the hyperechoic shadow of the spinous process and interspinous muscles as an anatomical guide point, the probe will be moved forward to the lateral to visualize the longissimus and iliocostal muscles. Between these muscles, block needle will be inserted within in plane technique in a medial-to-lateral direction in the interfascial plane. Once the needle tip will be placed within the interfacial plane and after careful aspiration to rule out intravascular needle placement, 2 mL of saline will be injected to confirm the proper injection site, and then a dose of 0.25% bupivacaine 20 mL will be injected in each side (total 40 mL) Receives: Other: Classic block (Group C) and modified block (Group M) groups |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
opioid consumption
The primary aim is to compare perioperative and postoperative opioid consumption
Measured: up to 3 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Visual analogue scores (VAS)
Postoperative pain assessment will be performed using the VAS score (0 = no pain, 10 = the most severe pain felt).
Measured: up to 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Feb 2019
- Study start1 Nov 2018
- Primary completion30 Jan 2020
- Study completion31 Jan 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lumbar Disc HerniationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Medipol UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Classic block (Group C) and modified block (Group M) will be performed following induction of general anesthesia, with patients in the prone position
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medipol University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Bahadir Ciftci, Medipol University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03854240
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Medipol University
- Status last verified
- Feb 2020
- First submitted
- 23 Feb 2019
- Last updated
- 5 Feb 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: We will not share IPD
Publications
Ahiskalioglu A, Alici HA, Selvitopi K, Yayik AM. Ultrasonography-guided modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane block: a new approach. Can J Anaesth. 2017 Jul;64(7):775-776. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-0851-y. Epub 2017 Feb 27. No abstract available.
PubMed 28243853Hand WR, Taylor JM, Harvey NR, Epperson TI, Gunselman RJ, Bolin ED, Whiteley J. Thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block: a pilot study in volunteers. Can J Anaesth. 2015 Nov;62(11):1196-200. doi: 10.1007/s12630-015-0431-y. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
PubMed 26149600Ueshima H, Ozawa T, Toyone T, Otake H. Efficacy of the Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block for Lumbar Laminoplasty: A Retrospective Study. Asian Spine J. 2017 Oct;11(5):722-725. doi: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.5.722. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
PubMed 29093781
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Feb 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Classic And Lateral Approach Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block For Pain Management Following Lumbar Laminectomy Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03854240
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Medipol University
- Conditions
- Lumbar Disc Herniation
- Keywords
- Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block, Pain Management, Lumbar Laminectomy Surgery
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medipol UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
US-guided peripheral nerve blocks have been used increasingly due to the advantages of ultrasound in anesthesia practice. TLIP block is one of these nerve blocks performed under US guidance. In this technique, local anesthetic solution is injected between the multifidus and longissimus muscles nearly at the level of the 3rd lumbar vertebra and targets the dorsal rami of the thoracolumbar nerves. However, the visualisation of this technique may be difficult under ultrasound (US) guidance. Therefore, Ahiskalioglu et al. defined modified lateral technique of TLIP block as a new approach. The aim of this study is to compare US-guided classic and modified (lateral) techniques of TLIP block for postoperative analgesia management after lumbar laminectomy surgery .
Detailed description
Spine surgery in thoracolumbar region is one of the most common surgeries performed for the treatment of leg and back pain 1. Pain management is especially important for these patients since chronic pain often occurs after surgery. Severe pain may occur at postoperative period in patients following lumbar disc herniation (LDH) operation. Postoperative effective pain treatment provides early mobilization and shorter hospital stay, thus complications due to hospitalization such as infection and thromboembolism may be reduced 1,2.
Regional anesthesia techniques may be preferred for postoperative analgesia management.Thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block is a novel ultrasound guided regional analgesia technique.
Several techniques such as intravenous-intramuscular injections, and patient-controlled analgesia devices are usually performed for postoperative pain management. However, these methods may be ineffective in the pain treatment due to they are generally performed after pain has occurred. The analgesic agent may not reach a treatment concentration in the blood due to administrating doses intermittently 2.Opioids are one of the most preferred drugs among the analgesic agents. Parenteral opioids are generally performed for patients after surgery. However opioids have undesirable adverse events such as nausea, vomiting, itching, sedation and respiratory depression (opioid-related adverse events) 3.
Various methods may be performed to reduce the use of systemic opioids and for effective pain treatment. US-guided peripheral nerve blocks have been used increasingly due to the advantages of ultrasound in anesthesia practice. TLIP block is one of these nerve blocks performed under US guidance and defined by Hand et al. in 2015 2. In a retrospective study, it has been reported that this technique can provide effective analgesia after lumbar laminoplasty surgery by Ueshima et al 4. In this technique, local anesthetic solution is injected between the multifidus and longissimus muscles nearly at the level of the 3rd lumbar vertebra and targets the dorsal rami of the thoracolumbar nerves. However, the visualisation of this technique may be difficult under ultrasound (US) guidance. Therefore, Ahiskalioglu et al. defined modified lateral technique of TLIP block as a new approach 5. Ahiskalioglu et al. have reported that this approach has some advantages. Firstly, sonographic visualisation is more easily than the classical technique. Secondly, insertion of the needle from medial to lateral direction reduces the risk of possible neuraxial injection 5.
The aim of this study is to compare US-guided classic and modified (lateral) techniques of TLIP block for postoperative analgesia management after lumbar laminectomy surgery . The primary aim is to compare perioperative and postoperative opioid consumption and the secondary aim is to evaluate postoperative pain scores (VAS), adverse effects related with opioids (allergic reaction, nausea, vomiting) and complications due to blocks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Classic block (Group C) and modified block (Group M) will be performed following induction of general anesthesia, with patients in the prone position
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Classic block (Group C) | Active comparator | Other: Classic block (Group C) and modified block (Group M) groupsIn group C, classic technique will be performed. US probe will be placed vertically at the L3 vertebrae level. After visualizing the hyperechoic shadow of the spinous process and interspinous muscles as an anatomical guide point, the probe will be moved forward to the lateral to visualize the longissimus and multifidus muscles. Between these muscles, block needle will be inserted within in plane technique in a lateral-to-medial direction in the interfascial plane. Once the needle tip will be placed within the interfacial plane and after careful aspiration to rule out intravascular needle placement, 2 mL of saline will be injected to confirm the proper injection site, and then a dose of 0.25% bupivacaine 20 mL will be injected in each side (total 40 mL) |
| Modified block (Group M) | Active comparator | Other: Classic block (Group C) and modified block (Group M) groupsIn group M, modified technique will be performed. US probe will be placed vertically at the L3 vertebrae level. After visualizing the hyperechoic shadow of the spinous process and interspinous muscles as an anatomical guide point, the probe will be moved forward to the lateral to visualize the longissimus and iliocostal muscles. Between these muscles, block needle will be inserted within in plane technique in a medial-to-lateral direction in the interfascial plane. Once the needle tip will be placed within the interfacial plane and after careful aspiration to rule out intravascular needle placement, 2 mL of saline will be injected to confirm the proper injection site, and then a dose of 0.25% bupivacaine 20 mL will be injected in each side (total 40 mL) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-II
- scheduled for lumbar laminectomy surgery
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- bleeding diathesis
- receiving anticoagulant treatment
- known local anesthetics and opioid allergy
- infection of the skin at the site of the needle puncture
- pregnancy or lactation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Classic block (Group C) and modified block (Group M) groupsClassic block (Group C) and modified block (Group M) will be performed following induction of general anesthesia, with patients in the prone position by using ultrasound device | Other | Classic block (Group C), Modified block (Group M) |
Primary outcome
opioid consumption
Time frame: up to 3 months
The primary aim is to compare perioperative and postoperative opioid consumption
1 secondary outcome
Visual analogue scores (VAS)
Time frame: up to 3 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Feb 2020.
- Background: PubMed 28243853Ahiskalioglu A, Alici HA, Selvitopi K, Yayik AM. Ultrasonography-guided modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane block: a new approach. Can J Anaesth. 2017 Jul;64(7):775-776. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-0851-y. Epub 2017 Feb 27. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 26149600Hand WR, Taylor JM, Harvey NR, Epperson TI, Gunselman RJ, Bolin ED, Whiteley J. Thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block: a pilot study in volunteers. Can J Anaesth. 2015 Nov;62(11):1196-200. doi: 10.1007/s12630-015-0431-y. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
- Background: PubMed 29093781Ueshima H, Ozawa T, Toyone T, Otake H. Efficacy of the Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block for Lumbar Laminoplasty: A Retrospective Study. Asian Spine J. 2017 Oct;11(5):722-725. doi: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.5.722. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. We will not share IPD
Related trials for Lumbar Disc Herniation
Not yet recruiting
Cortical Surface Functional Changes After Lever Positioning Manipulation for Lumbar Disc Herniation
Lumbar Disc Herniation
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Spinal Mobilization With and Without Clinical Pilates in Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniationc Herniation
Disc Herniation
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Intradiscal Ozone/Oxygen Injection for Treatment of Contained Lumbar Disc Herniation
Lumbar Disc Herniation
Not yet recruiting
Selective Nerve Root Block Versus Sham to Reduce Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation
Lumbar Disc Herniation, Lumbar Radiculopathy
Not yet recruiting
H-Reflex-Guided Direction-Sensitive Exercise Versus Standard Extension Exercise for Functional Recovery in Patients With Lumbar Disc Prolapse
Lumber Disc Prolapse
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Classic block (Group C) and modified block (Group M) groups in people with Lumbar Disc Herniation, run by Medipol University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Feb 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
opioid consumption (time frame: up to 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03854240, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Feb 2020.