AzTrials
AzTrials

Marginal Zone LymphomaPhase 2MAGNOLIANCT03846427

Study of Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111) in Participants With Marginal Zone Lymphoma

A Phase 2 study testing Zanubrutinib in people with Marginal Zone Lymphoma and MZL, run by BeiGene at 31 sites in 9 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a single arm study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of zanubrutinib (BGB-3111) in participants with relapsed/refractory marginal zone lymphoma (R/R MZL). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Marginal Zone Lymphoma, MZL
What is being tested?
Zanubrutinib
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
68 participants
Where
31 sitesin 9 countries
Study dates
19 Feb 2019to 4 May 2022
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Histologically confirmed diagnosis of MZL including splenic, nodal, and extranodal subtypes
  • Previously received one or more lines of therapy including at least one CD20-directed regimen (either as monotherapy or as chemoimmunotherapy) with documented failure to achieve at least partial response or documented progressive disease (PD) after, the most recent systemic treatment
  • Current need for systemic therapy for MZL
  • Measurable disease by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) of 0-2
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Life expectancy ≥ 6 months
  • Adequate bone marrow function
  • Adequate organ function
  • Male and female participants must use highly effective methods of contraception

Who cannot join

  • Known transformation to aggressive lymphoma, eg, large cell lymphoma
  • Clinically significant cardiovascular disease
  • Prior malignancy within the past 2 years, except for curatively treated basal or squamous cell skin cancer, superficial bladder cancer, carcinoma in situ of the cervix or breast, or localized Gleason score 6 prostate cancer
  • History of severe bleeding disorder such as hemophilia A, hemophilia B, von Willebrand disease, or history of spontaneous bleeding requiring blood transfusion or other medical intervention
  • History of stroke or intracranial hemorrhage
  • Severe or debilitating pulmonary disease
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Active fungal, bacterial and/or viral infection requiring systemic therapy
  • Known central nervous system involvement by lymphoma
  • Known infection with HIV, or serologic status reflecting active viral hepatitis B (HBV) or viral hepatitis C (HCV) infection
  • Major surgery within 4 weeks of the first dose of study drug
  • Prior treatment with a Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Requires ongoing treatment with a strong Cytochrome P4503A (CYP3A) inhibitor or inducer
  • Concurrent participation in another therapeutic clinical trial
  • NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

Trial locations and contacts

31 sites in 9 countries.

31 sites in 9 countries

Australia8 sites
  • Flinders Medical Centre

    Bedford PK, South Australia, 5042

  • Box Hill Hospital

    Box Hill, Victoria, 3128

  • Princess Alexandra Hospital

    Brisbane, Queensland, 4102

  • Monash Health

    Clayton, Victoria, 3168

  • Concord Repatriation General Hospital

    Concord, New South Wales, 2139

  • Peninsula Private Hospital

    Frankston, Victoria, 3199

  • Canberra Hospital

    Garran, Australian Capital Territory, 2605

  • The Saint George Hospital Kogarah

    Kogarah, New South Wales, 2217

Other trials in Australia

Italy5 sites
  • Policlinico Sorsola Malpighi, Aou Di Bologna

    Bologna, 40138

  • Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda

    Milan, 20162

  • Universita Degli Studi Di Modena Azienda Ospedaliere Policlinco

    Modena, 41124

  • Azienda Ospedaliera S Maria Di Terni

    Terni, 05100

  • Ao Citta Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino Presidio O

    Torino, 10126

Other trials in Italy

China4 sites
  • Peking University Third Hospital

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100000

  • The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003

  • Institute of Hematology and Hospital of Blood Disease

    Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, 300020

  • Henan Cancer Hospital

    Zhengzhou, Henan, 450000

Other trials in China

France4 sites
  • Centre de Lutte Contre Le Cancer Institut Bergonie

    Bordeaux, 33076

  • Hopital de La Conception Aphm

    Marseille, 13005

  • Hopital Saint Louis

    Paris, 75010

  • Chu Hopital Lyon Sud

    PierreBenite, 69495

Other trials in France

United Kingdom4 sites
  • Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre

    Glasgow, G12 0YN

  • The Christie Hospital

    Greater Manchester, M20 4BX

  • University College Hospital

    London, NW1 2PG

  • Royal Marsden Hospital

    London, SW3 6JJ

Other trials in United Kingdom

United States2 sites
  • The Charlotte Mecklenburg Hospital Authority

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203

  • Clinical Research Alliance, Inc

    Westbury, New York, 11590

Other trials in United States

New Zealand2 sites
  • Auckland City Hospital

    Auckland, 1023

  • North Shore Hospital

    Takapuna, 0622

Other trials in New Zealand

Czechia1 site
  • University Hospital Vinohrady Hematology Department

    Prague, 10034

Other trials in Czechia

South Korea1 site
  • Severance Hospital Yonsei University Health System

    Seoul, Seoul Teugbyeolsi, 03722

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: A Phase 2, Open-label Study of Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Marginal Zone Lymphoma

This is a single arm study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of zanubrutinib (BGB-3111) in participants with relapsed/refractory marginal zone lymphoma (R/R MZL).

Being tested
Zanubrutinib
Keywords
BGB-3111, Zanubrutinib
Medical subject headings
Lymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal Zone

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ZanubrutinibDrug

    Also called BGB-3111, Brukinsa

    Zanubrutinib at a dose of 160 mg orally twice a day (BID)

Study groups in NCT03846427
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ZanubrutinibExperimentalZanubrutinib 160 mg (two 80-mg capsules) orally twice daily with or without food until progressive disease, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent
Receives: Drug: Zanubrutinib

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessment

    ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with complete or partial response as the best overall response, as determined by an IRC using the Lugano Classification

    Measured: Up to approximately 3 years and 2.5 months

Secondary outcomes (25)
  1. ORR by Investigator Assessment

    ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with complete or partial response as the best overall response, as determined by the investigator using the Lugano Classification.

    Measured: Up to approximately 3 years and 2.5 months

  2. ORR by IRC Assessment Using Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (PET-CT)

    ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with complete and partial response as the best overall response, as determined by an IRC using PET-CT assessment data for participants with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid disease

    Measured: Up to approximately 3 years and 2.5 months

  3. Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Investigator Assessment

    PFS is defined as the time from first dose until first documentation of progression or death, whichever comes first, as assessed by the investigator using Lugano Classification

    Measured: Up to approximately 3 years and 2.5 months

  4. PFS Event-Free Rate by Investigator Assessment

    PFS is defined as the time from first dose until first documentation of progression or death, whichever comes first, as assessed by the investigator using Lugano Classification. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the percentage of participants who were event-free for PFS at 24 months with 95% confidence intervals estimated using Greenwood's formula.

    Measured: Up to 3 years and 2.5 months after first participant enrolled; Month 24 reported

  5. PFS by IRC Assessment

    PFS is defined as the time from first dose until first documentation of progression or death, whichever comes first, as assessed by an IRC using Lugano Classification

    Measured: Up to approximately 3 years and 2.5 months

  6. PFS Event-Free Rate by IRC Assessment

    PFS is defined as the time from first dose until first documentation of progression or death, whichever comes first, as assessed by the IRC using Lugano Classification. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the percentage of participants who were event-free for PFS at 24 months with 95% confidence intervals estimated using Greenwood's formula.

    Measured: Up to 3 years and 2.5 months after first participant enrolled; Month 24 reported

  7. Overall Survival (OS)

    OS is defined as the time from first study drug administration to the date of death due to any cause

    Measured: Up to approximately 3 years and 2.5 months

  8. OS Event-Free Rate

    OS is defined as the time from first study drug administration to the date of death due to any cause. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the percentage of participants who were event-free for OS at 24 months with 95% confidence intervals estimated using Greenwood's formula.

    Measured: Up to 3 years and 2.5 months after first participant enrolled; Month 24 reported

  9. Duration of Response (DOR) by Investigator Assessment

    DOR is defined as the time from the date that response criteria are first met to the date that progressive disease is objectively documented or death, whichever comes first, as assessed by the investigator using Lugano Classification.

    Measured: Up to approximately 3 years and 2.5 months

  10. DOR Event-Free Rate by Investigator Assessment

    DOR is defined as the time from the date that response criteria are first met to the date that progressive disease is objectively documented or death, whichever comes first, as assessed by the investigator using Lugano Classification. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the percentage of participants who were event-free for progression or death at 24 months with 95% confidence intervals estimated using Greenwood's formula.

    Measured: Up to 3 years and 2.5 months after first participant enrolled; Month 24 reported

  11. DOR by IRC Assessment

    DOR is defined as the time from the date that response criteria are first met to the date that progressive disease is objectively documented or death, whichever comes first, as assessed by the IRC using Lugano Classification.

    Measured: Up to approximately 3 years and 2.5 months

  12. DOR Event-Free Rate by IRC Assessment

    DOR is defined as the time from the date that response criteria are first met to the date that progressive disease is objectively documented or death, whichever comes first, as assessed by the IRC using Lugano Classification. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the percentage of participants who were event-free for progression or death at 24 months with 95% confidence intervals estimated using Greenwood's formula.

    Measured: Up to 3 years and 2.5 months after first participant enrolled; Month 24 reported

  13. Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)

    TTF is defined as the time from study treatment start to the date of discontinuation of study drug due to any reason.

    Measured: Up to approximately 3 years and 2.5 months

  14. TTF Event-Free Rate

    TTF is defined as the time from study treatment start to the date of discontinuation of study drug due to any reason. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the percentage of participants who were event-free for TTF at 24 months with 95% confidence intervals estimated using Greenwood's formula.

    Measured: Up to 3 years and 2.5 months after first participant enrolled; Month 24 reported

  15. Time to Next Line of Therapy

    Time to next line of therapy is defined as the time from study treatment start to the start of the first subsequent therapy for MZL

    Measured: Up to approximately 3 years and 2.5 months

  16. Time to Next Line of Therapy Event-Free Rate

    Time to next line of therapy is defined as the time from study treatment start to the start of the first subsequent therapy for MZL. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the percentage of participants who were event-free for time to next line of therapy at 24 months with 95% confidence intervals estimated using Greenwood's formula.

    Measured: Up to 3 years and 2.5 months after first participant enrolled; Month 24 reported

  17. Time to Response (TTR) by Investigator Assessment

    TTR is defined as the time from study treatment start to date of the earliest qualifying response (partial response or better) as assessed by the investigator using Lugano Classification

    Measured: Up to approximately 3 years and 2.5 months

  18. TTR by IRC Assessment

    TTR is defined as the time from study treatment start to date of the earliest qualifying response (partial response or better), as assessed by the IRC using Lugano Classification.

    Measured: Up to approximately 3 years and 2.5 months

  19. Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Score (VAS)

    Mean change from baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS. The EQ-5D-5L measures health outcomes using a VAS to record a participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0 to 100, where 100 is 'the best health you can imagine' and 0 is 'the worst health you can imagine.' Positive change from baseline indicates improved health.

    Measured: Baseline to Cycle 30 (28 days per cycle)

  20. Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status

    Mean change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/Quality of Life score. The EORTC QLQ-C30 v3.0 is a questionnaire that assesses quality of life of cancer patients and includes global health status and quality of life questions related to their overall health in which participants respond based on a 7-point scale, where 1 is very poor and 7 is excellent. Answers are converted to a score of 0 to 100, with a positive score from baseline indicating improved health.

    Measured: Baseline to Cycle 30 (28 days per cycle)

  21. Number of Participants With Adverse Events

    Number of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs), including laboratory tests, physical exams, and vital signs

    Measured: From first dose to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to approximately 3 years and 2.5 months)

  22. Area Under the Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC0-6)

    Measured: Predose (within 30 min prior to dose) and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 hours postdose on Cycle 1 Day 1 (28 days per cycle)

  23. Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of Zanubrutinib

    Measured: Predose (within 30 min prior to dose) and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 hours postdose on Cycle 1 Day 1 (28 days per cycle)

  24. Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax)

    Measured: Predose (within 30 min prior to dose) and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 hours postdose on Cycle 1 Day 1 (28 days per cycle)

  25. Elimination Half Life (t1/2)

    Measured: Predose (within 30 min prior to dose) and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 hours postdose on Cycle 1 Day 1 (28 days per cycle)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Feb 2019
  2. Study start19 Feb 2019
  3. Primary completion4 May 2022
  4. Study completion4 May 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
68 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03846427
Sponsor's protocol ID
BGB-3111-214
Other IDs
2018-001284-24, CTR20180823, 2018
Acronym
MAGNOLIA
Status last verified
Oct 2024
First submitted
11 Oct 2018
Last updated
26 Oct 2024
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Publications

  • Stephen Opat, Robert Marcus, MA, FRCP, FRCPath, Craig A. Portell, MD, William Reed, MD, Chris Tankersley, Jane Huang, MD, Judith Trotman, MBChB, FRACP, FRCPA. Phase 2 Study of Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Marginal Zone Lymphoma. Blood. 2019; 134(1):5256. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2019-122629

  • Stephen Opat, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Zanubrutinib in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Marginal Zone Lymphoma: Initial Results of the MAGNOLIA (BGB-3111-214) Trial. Presented at the 62nd American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting, December 5-8, 2020. Abstract 339.

  • Opat S, Tedeschi A, Linton K, McKay P, Hu B, Chan H, Jin J, Sobieraj-Teague M, Zinzani PL, Coleman M, Thieblemont C, Browett P, Ke X, Sun M, Marcus R, Portell CA, Ardeshna K, Bijou F, Walker P, Hawkes EA, Mapp S, Ho SJ, Talaulikar D, Zhou KS, Co M, Li X, Zhou W, Cappellini M, Tankersley C, Huang J, Trotman J. The MAGNOLIA Trial: Zanubrutinib, a Next-Generation Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, Demonstrates Safety and Efficacy in Relapsed/Refractory Marginal Zone Lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2021 Dec 1;27(23):6323-6332. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1704. Epub 2021 Sep 15.

    PubMed 34526366
  • Opat S, Tedeschi A, Hu B, et al: Long-term efficacy and safety of zanubrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory marginal zone lymphoma. 2022 ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition. Abstract 234. Presented December 10, 2022.

  • Moslehi JJ, Furman RR, Tam CS, Salem JE, Flowers CR, Cohen A, Zhang M, Zhang J, Chen L, Ma H, Brown JR. Cardiovascular events reported in patients with B-cell malignancies treated with zanubrutinib. Blood Adv. 2024 May 28;8(10):2478-2490. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023011641.

    PubMed 38502198
  • Opat S, Tedeschi A, Hu B, Linton KM, McKay P, Leitch S, Coleman M, Zinzani PL, Jin J, Sun M, Sobieraj-Teague M, Browett P, Ke X, Thieblemont C, Ardeshna K, Bijou F, Walker P, Hawkes EA, Ho SJ, Zhou K, Liang Z, Xu J, Tankersley C, Delarue R, Co M, Trotman J. Safety and efficacy of zanubrutinib in relapsed/refractory marginal zone lymphoma: final analysis of the MAGNOLIA study. Blood Adv. 2023 Nov 28;7(22):6801-6811. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010668.

    PubMed 37682792

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Zanubrutinib in people with Marginal Zone Lymphoma and MZL, run by BeiGene at 31 sites in 9 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 31 sites in Australia, Italy, China, France, United Kingdom and 4 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Mar 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessment (time frame: Up to approximately 3 years and 2.5 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03846427, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Oct 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in