AzTrials
AzTrials

Pulp DisorderPhase 3NCT03839485

Endodontic Treatment of Primary Teeth With Guedes-Pinto Paste Without Antibiotic

A Phase 3 study testing Endodontic treatment using Guedes-Pinto Paste and Endodontic using Guedes-Pinto Paste without antibiotic in people with Pulp Disorder, run by University of Sao Paulo at 1 site in Brazil.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The pulp therapy in primary teeth is still necessary even with all odontopediatrics evolution in prevention and minimal intervention, aiming to keep the tooth free of inflammation or infection and in a functional state until its exfoliation. Several materials are used as filling paste of primary teeth. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 4 to 8 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Pulp Disorder
What is being tested?
Endodontic treatment using Guedes-Pinto Paste and Endodontic using Guedes-Pinto Paste without antibiotic
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
8 Jun 2018to 10 Apr 2021
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 4 to 8 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Primary molar teeth with necessity of endodontic treatment.
  • Patients whose parents or guardians consent to their participation in the study

Who cannot join

  • Systemic health problems, congenital facial deformities, facial tumors or syndromes
  • Teeth presenting one of the following:
  • Resorption of more than 2/3 of the root
  • Destruction of the crypt of the permanent successor
  • Pulp chamber floor drilling.
  • Presence of internal resorption

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Brazil1 site
  • School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo

    São Paulo, 05508-000

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: Endodontic Treatment of Primary Teeth With Guedes-Pinto Paste Without Antibiotic: Randomized Non-inferiority Clinical Trial

The pulp therapy in primary teeth is still necessary even with all odontopediatrics evolution in prevention and minimal intervention, aiming to keep the tooth free of inflammation or infection and in a functional state until its exfoliation. Several materials are used as filling paste of primary teeth. In Brazil, the Guedes-Pinto Paste (PGP), an association of iodofórmio, camphorated paramonochlorophenol, prednisolone and rifamycin, has been widely used for some decades. However, current Brazilian legislation has made it difficult to commercialize antibiotics, which has made it difficult to obtain the ointment that is the association between prednisolone and rifamycin. Therefore, the objective of this clinical trial will be to test PGP without rifamycin in the pulpectomy of primary teeth, and to compare it with the treatment performed with conventional PGP.

Read the detailed description

A randomized triple-blind non-inferiority clinical study with two parallel arms, with a 12-month follow-up, will be performed. The experimental group will be PGP formulated without the antibiotic, while the control group is the conventional PGP, containing rifamycin. The conventional pulpectomy will be performed using manual files, performing the instrumentation aided by Endo-PTC and 1% sodium hypochlorite. At the end of the instrumentation, just before the obturation, the groups will be drawn, with the strategy of randomization in permuted blocks and stratified by the initial condition of the tooth (with or without periapical lesion). The main outcome will be the clinical and radiographic success of endodontic treatment after 12 months. Patients who seek the dental service of the municipality and require endodontic treatment will be invited to participate in the study. The data will be statistically analyzed using the statistical package Stata 12.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA). The longevity of the treatments will be evaluated by estimating survival rates using the Kaplan-Meier method. The differences between survival rates according to the type of endodontic treatment proposed will be analyzed through the Log-rank test.

Conditions
Pulp Disorder
Being tested
Endodontic treatment using Guedes-Pinto Paste, Endodontic using Guedes-Pinto Paste without antibiotic
Keywords
pulpectomy, primary teeth, root canal filling materials
Medical subject headings
Dental Pulp Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Endodontic treatment using Guedes-Pinto PasteDrug

    Also called Pulpectomy with Guedes-Pinto paste

    Dental procedure in which the entire pulp chamber is removed from the crown and roots of a tooth and the root filling material Guedes-Pinto paste is applied

  • Endodontic using Guedes-Pinto Paste without antibioticDrug

    Also called Pulpectomy with Guedes-Pinto paste without antibiotic

    Dental procedure in which the entire pulp chamber is removed from the crown and roots of a tooth and the root filling material Guedes-Pinto paste without antibiotic is applied

Study groups in NCT03839485
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Pasta Guedes-PintoActive comparatorEndodontic treatment using Guedes-Pinto Paste
Receives: Drug: Endodontic treatment using Guedes-Pinto Paste
Pasta Guedes-Pinto without antibioticExperimentalEndodontic using Guedes-Pinto paste without antibiotic
Receives: Drug: Endodontic using Guedes-Pinto Paste without antibiotic

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Success or failure of treatment

    The success or failure of endodontic treatments evaluated by the time spent in the tooth arch in clinical conditions of normality. Clinical criteria for determining success are: absence of fistula, absence of painful symptoms and pathological absence of adequate mobility and gingival contour. Radiographically, the success criteria are: no occurrence of a periapical rarefaction in the furcation area; reduction or maintenance of an already present bone rarefaction in the furcation area of posterior teeth, maintaining the periradicular space, root resorption compatible with the eruptive phase and absence of pathological bone resorption. To evaluate the reduction of lesions or appearance of new lesions, we will compare the initial and final radiographs.

    Despite the anticipated time frame of 1 year, some participants were evaluated after this period due to the pandemic. The follow-up periods were until 24 months, and the final analysis were adjusted for this protocol deviation.

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Post-operative fistula

    Report of fistula or presence of pus on the area of the endodontic treatment. This variable was recorded through a phone call to the children\'s guardians, who answered if they had noticed any purulent secretion in the area of the endodontically treated tooth (yes or no - dichotomous variable).

    Measured: 7 days

  2. Post-operative pain

    Report of post-operative pain until 7 days after the procedure. This outcome was collected through a phone call with the children\'s guardians, who asked if their child had reported any pain in the area of the procedure and if the participant had taken an analgesic (yes or no - dichotomous variable).

    Measured: 7 days

  3. Post-operatve oedema

    Report of post-operative oedema on the area of the endodontic treatment. This variable was recorded through a phone call to the children's guardians, who answered if they had noticed any oedema or swelling in the area of the endodontically treated tooth (yes or no - dichotomous variable).

    Measured: 7 days

  4. Quality of root canal filling

    This variable was evaluated in the radiographs taken immediately after the endodontic treatment. An external observer, blinded to the allocated group, classified the quality of the root canal filling in adequate (filling to within 1 mm of the radiographic apex), before the apex (more than 1 mm of the radiographic apex) or with filling material overflow. This is a nominal qualitative variable (3 categories).

    Measured: Imediatelly after the treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Feb 2019
  2. Study start8 Jun 2018
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2019
  4. Study completion10 Apr 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03839485
Sponsor's protocol ID
FouspPGP
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
11 Feb 2019
Last updated
28 Mar 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Endodontic treatment using Guedes-Pinto Paste and Endodontic using Guedes-Pinto Paste without antibiotic in people with Pulp Disorder, run by University of Sao Paulo at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Success or failure of treatment (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Mar 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in