Female Breast CancerNCT03836872
Acupuncture for Joint Symptoms in Patients With Breast Cancer
A study testing Acupuncture in people with Female Breast Cancer, run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Joint symptoms including stiffness, local pain and aches are common adverse reactions among breast cancer (BC) patients undergoing hormone treatments, while effective interventions for managing such symptoms have not been well explored so far. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Female Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Acupuncture
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 64 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2019to 31 Jan 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- BC patients with a confirmed diagnosis of hormone receptor-positive BC at the stage of I, II or IIIa;
- Patients who have completed taxane-based chemotherapy and are currently undergoing hormone treatments for at least three months;
- Patients indicate ongoing joint symptoms, including joint pain and/or stiffness, at one or more sites of body;
- Patients started to experience the joint symptoms after the commencement of the hormone treatments;
- Patients indicate the intensity of their worst pain during the past seven days of greater than 4 points at a 0-10 NRS scale where 0 represents no pain and 10 indicates most severe pain;
- Patients have at least a primary school education and are able to communicate in Chinese Mandarin or Sichuanese; and
- Patients agree to participate in the trial and are willing to give written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Patients who had needle phobia and a low count of platelet of less than 50,000;
- Patients with conditions which are not appropriate for acupuncture including pregnancy, bleeding disorders, local or systematic inflammation, and other neuropathic and/or metabolic problems of the joints;
- Patients who had received joint surgery or had bone fracture during the past six months;
- Patients who had received any types of acupoint stimulation (e.g. body acupuncture or acupressure and auricular therapy) during the past six months; and
- Patients are currently treated with narcotic analgesia or steroids.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Acupuncture for Joint Symptoms in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Randomised Controlled Trial
Joint symptoms including stiffness, local pain and aches are common adverse reactions among breast cancer (BC) patients undergoing hormone treatments, while effective interventions for managing such symptoms have not been well explored so far. Acupuncture can be a promising approach to controlling joint symptoms in BC patients but current research evidence generated from several small-scale clinical studies have not been robust enough to support the use of acupuncture for cancer symptom management in routine practice.
The overall aim of the research project is to examine the effectiveness of a 6-week acupuncture protocol for the management of joint symptoms in Chinese female BC patients who are currently undergoing hormone treatments following the completion of taxane-based chemotherapy. Given the lack of available data regarding the prevalence of joint symptoms in BC patients in mainland China, a large cross-sectional survey will also be performed to examine the incidence of joint symptoms among Chinese BC patients in mainland China and the impact of joint symptoms on patients' quality of life.
Read the detailed description
A three-group trial design is proposed, with an experimental group receiving true acupuncture at specific acupuncture points, a sham control group receiving sham acupuncture at non-acupuncture Acupoints with superficial needling, both in addition to routine methods of care, and a group receiving usual care only.
Participants and Settings BC patients who have completed taxane-based chemotherapy and are currently receiving hormone treatments with the experience of joint pain will be the targeted study population. The study will take place in the Southwest Medical University Hospital, a large medical centre in Sichuan, China.
Sample Size 55 per group (165 in total).
The Intervention Protocol
- True Acupuncture Protocol will be used in the True Acupuncture Group (Experimental Group) The acupuncture intervention is described below based on the STRICTA recommendations for reporting acupuncture trials. Patients in the experimental group will receive, in addition to standard care, a standardised 30-minute acupuncture session needling specific acupoints although there will be flexibility in case some points cannot be punctured (e. g. in case of lymphoedema), and alternative points (as in routine practice) may be selected by the acupuncture practitioner using their discretion to maintain an equal dose of treatment to all patients. Bilateral acupoints will be stimulated. These points will include Waiguan (SJ5), Jianjing (GB21), Yanglingquan (GB34), Hegu (LI4), Jiexi (ST41) and Taixi (K3). In addition, joint specific acupoints will also be used, depending on where the joint symptoms are present. The additional acupoints will be:
- Shoulder (Bilateral Acupoints): Jianyu (LI15), Jianliao (SJ14), and Naoshu (SI10); The following alternative acupoints would be considered in case of some patients may have lymphoedema or other problem at particular sites where the above proposed acupoints cannot be stimulated: Quchi (LI11), Shousanli (LI10), Tianzong (SI11) and Taichong (LR3).
- Wrist (Bilateral Acupoints): Yangchi (SJ4), Yangxi (LI5), and Daling (PC7); The following alternative acupoints would be considered in case of some patients may have lymphoedema or other problem at particular sites where the above proposed acupoints cannot be stimulated: Zhigou (SJ6), Jianshi (PC5) and Wailaogong (EX-UE8).
- Fingers (Bilateral Acupoints): Yanggu (SI5), Houxi (SI3), and Sanjian (LI3); Alternative acupoints located on the wrist or forearm would be considered in case of some patients may have lymphoedema or other problem at particular sites where the above proposed acupoints cannot be stimulated.
- Lumbar Area (Bilateral Acupoints): Yaoyangguan (DU3), Jingsuo (DU8), and Shenyu (BL23); Alternative acupoint Weizhong (BL40) located on the wrist or forearm would be considered in case of some patients may have lymphoedema or other problem at particular sites where the above proposed acupoints cannot be stimulated.
- Hip (Bilateral Acupoints): Huantiao (GB30), Xuanzhong (GB39), and Juliao (GB29); The following alternative acupoints would be considered in case of some patients may have lymphoedema or other problem at particular sites where the above proposed acupoints cannot be stimulated: Fengshi (GB31) and Biguan (ST31).
- Knee (Bilateral Acupoints): Yinlingquan (SP9), Xuehai (SP10), and Liangqiu (ST34). The following alternative acupoints would be considered in case of some patients may have lymphoedema or other problem at particular sites where the above proposed acupoints cannot be stimulated: Heding (EX-LE2), Futu (ST32), Baichongwo (EX-LE3), and Xiyan (EX-LE5). Acupuncture will be twice a week for consecutive 6 weeks, thus a total of 12 sessions of acupuncture will be carried out.
- Sham Acupuncture Protocol will be used in the Sham Acupuncture Group (Sham Control Group) In addition to the routine methods of care, patients allocated to the sham control group will receive sham acupuncture treatment at sham acupoints with superficial needling to avoid the generation of specific treatment effects. The sham acupoints selected for stimulation will be those located 1-3 cm near the true acupoints used in the true acupuncture group. The number of the selected sham acupoints will be the same as those used in the true acupuncture group. Meanwhile, to maintain the homogeneity of the routine methods of care used across groups, the conventional care for all the participants in this study will include at least written education materials in terms of the knowledge of joint symptoms and instructions of the use of painkillers and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). During the whole study period, the study investigators will also record any other treatments, including other complementary and alternative approaches, that participants may receive and view as potential confounders in the data analysis stage. Given the design of true and sham acupuncture groups, participants, study investigators and outcome assessors will not know the actual group assignment of the true and sham acupuncture group, and a partial blinding design is therefore utilized for this proposed study.
- Usual care wil be used in the waiting-list control group (Waiting-list Control Group) Participants in this group will only receive the usual care for the period that they are on the waiting list. But the waiting-list control group will offer acupuncture intervention after the completion of the RCT.
Study Duration and Outcome Assessment The total acupuncture treatment duration will be six weeks, and the duration of study involvement for each participant will be around 20 weeks including baseline assessment, immediate post-treatment assessment after the 6-week acupuncture, and two follow-up assessment at 12 weeks and 20 weeks, respectively.
Ethical Considerations A written informed consent will be obtained from every eligible person agreeing to participate after the risks and benefits of the study have been explained to them verbally and in writing. Participation in the study is on a voluntary basis, and all potential participants will be informed and assured that they have the right to refuse or withdraw from the study at any time. Personal information and data will remain confidential and anonymous. Side effects arising from acupuncture are rare. However, abnormal phenomena such as local tenderness, fainting, stuck needle, bent needle, broken needle, and haematoma during or after the procedure may be possible. Such conditions will be resolved quickly when the needles are removed, and the client's conditions will be monitored closely and recorded. Application for ethical approval from the Human Research Ethics Review Committee has been obtained from The Hong Kong Polytechnic University and the hospital where the trial will be carried out.
Data Analysis Analyses will include descriptive statistics to summarise the data, analysis of variance to assess between-groups differences, and regression analysis (such as ANCOVA) using the baseline pain score as covariate. 95% CIs will also be calculated. In more detail, while a t-test is adequate for analysis, analysis of covariance will be used with the baseline pain score as a covariate and centre and trial arm as grouping factors. Equivalent analyses will be performed for the week 20 data (although it is acknowledged that such analyses would not be independent of the 12-week scores, as it is likely the week-12 and week-20 values will be correlated). Drop-out cases and non-respondents will be asked to complete 1 item about their pain levels from the BPI scale to capture outcomes in as many patients as possible in the intention to treat analysis.
Significance and Implications Using robust methodology the study will investigate and interpret the use, delivery and outcomes of acupuncture in the management of a debilitating symptom of cancer therapies in order to inform decision-making and policy-making, and contribute to the evidence base for the treatment of hormone treatment-related joint symptoms. This study will provide information that can lead to improvements in the care of cancer patients, have a positive impact on quality of life and may increase the number of patients successfully completing hormone treatments. The project is about complementary therapies that many cancer patients frequently use, and has the potential to translate into benefits for patients fairly quickly. An information booklet on managing joint pains in breast cancer patients would also be a key outcome of the study.
- Conditions
- Female Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- Acupuncture
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AcupunctureDevice
Patients in the experimental group will receive, in addition to standard care, a standardised 30-minute acupuncture session needling specific acupoints although there will be flexibility in case some points cannot be punctured (e. g. in case of lymphoedema), and alternative points (as in routine practice) may be selected by the acupuncture practitioner using their discretion to maintain an equal dose of treatment to all patients. Bilateral acupoints will be stimulated. These points will include Waiguan (SJ5), Jianjing (GB21), Yanglingquan (GB34), Hegu (LI4), Jiexi (ST41) and Taixi (K3). In addition, joint specific acupoints will also be used, depending on where the joint symptoms are present.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| True Acupuncture | Experimental | Patients in the experimental group will receive, in addition to standard care, a standardised 30-minute acupuncture session needling specific acupoints. Bilateral acupoints will be stimulated including Waiguan (SJ5), Jianjing (GB21), Yanglingquan (GB34), Hegu (LI4), Jiexi (ST41) and Taixi (K3). In addition, joint specific acupoints will also be used, depending on where the joint symptoms are present. Receives: Device: Acupuncture |
| Sham Acupuncture | Sham comparator | In addition to the routine methods of care, patients allocated to the sham control group will receive sham acupuncture treatment at sham acupoints with superficial needling Receives: Device: Acupuncture |
| Standard Control Group | No intervention | The third arm will be a standard care control arm. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Brief Pain Inventory
Pain assessment measuring intensity of pain and impact of pain on daily functions. All items on a 0-10 numerical rating scale. Higher scores indicate worse pain and worse impact in daily lives.
Measured: 6-week assessment
Secondary outcomes (20)
Manchester Foot Pain Disability Questionnaire
Measures foot pain with 19 items and three dimensions (functioning limitations with 12 items; pain intensity with 4 items; personal appearance with 3 items). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Measured: 6-week assessment
Manchester Foot Pain Disability Questionnaire
Measures foot pain with 19 items and three dimensions (functioning limitations with 12 items; pain intensity with 4 items; personal appearance with 3 items). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Measured: 12-week assessment
Manchester Foot Pain Disability Questionnaire
Measures foot pain with 19 items and three dimensions (functioning limitations with 12 items; pain intensity with 4 items; personal appearance with 3 items). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Measured: 20-week assessment
Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire
Assesses hand function with 37 items, and has 6 dimensions of hand functioning
Measured: 6-week assessment
Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire
Assesses hand function with 37 items, and has 6 dimensions of hand functioning
Measured: 12-week assessment
Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire
Assesses hand function with 37 items, and has 6 dimensions of hand functioning
Measured: 20-week assessment
Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index
Assesses 3 dimensions of osteoarthritis symptoms with 24 items, including joint pain, stiffness and disability. Higher scores are indicative of worse functioning and higher symptom burden.
Measured: 6-week assessment
Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index
Assesses 3 dimensions of osteoarthritis symptoms with 24 items, including joint pain, stiffness and disability. Higher scores are indicative of worse functioning and higher symptom burden.
Measured: 12-week assessment
Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index
Assesses 3 dimensions of osteoarthritis symptoms with 24 items, including joint pain, stiffness and disability. Higher scores are indicative of worse functioning and higher symptom burden.
Measured: 20-week assessment
Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale 2-Short Form
Assesses arthritis-related quality of life with 26 items in 5 domains (physical functioning, symptoms, impact, social and functional dimensions), with higher scores indicating worse quality of life.
Measured: 6-week assessment
Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale 2-Short Form
Assesses arthritis-related quality of life with 26 items in 5 domains (physical functioning, symptoms, impact, social and functional dimensions), with higher scores indicating worse quality of life.
Measured: 12-week assessment
Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale 2-Short Form
Assesses arthritis-related quality of life with 26 items in 5 domains (physical functioning, symptoms, impact, social and functional dimensions), with higher scores indicating worse quality of life.
Measured: 20-week assessment
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast
This is a disease specific quality of life assessment scale. Higher scores indicate better quality of life outcomes.
Measured: 6-week assessment
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast
This is a disease specific quality of life assessment scale. Higher scores indicate better quality of life outcomes.
Measured: 12-week assessment
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast
This is a disease specific quality of life assessment scale. Higher scores indicate better quality of life outcomes.
Measured: 20-week assessment
Medical Outcomes Survey 36-item short form version
It measures quality of life with 36 items assessing eight health concepts, including bodily pain, role limitations and emotional well-being. Higher scores indicate worse quality of life outcomes.
Measured: 6-week assessment
Medical Outcomes Survey 36-item short form version
It measures quality of life with 36 items assessing eight health concepts, including bodily pain, role limitations and emotional well-being. Higher scores indicate worse quality of life outcomes.
Measured: 12-week assessment
Medical Outcomes Survey 36-item short form version
It measures quality of life with 36 items assessing eight health concepts, including bodily pain, role limitations and emotional well-being. Higher scores indicate worse quality of life outcomes.
Measured: 20-week assessment
Brief Pain Inventory
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) measuring intensity of pain and impact of pain on daily functions. All items on a 0-10 numerical rating scale. Higher scores indicate worse pain and worse impact in daily lives.
Measured: 12 weeks assessment
Brief Pain Inventory
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) measuring intensity of pain and impact of pain on daily functions. All items on a 0-10 numerical rating scale. Higher scores indicate worse pain and worse impact in daily lives.
Measured: 20 weeks assessment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Feb 2019
- Study start1 Mar 2019
- Primary completion10 Jan 2022
- Study completion31 Jan 2022
Why it stopped: China has experienced new waves of COVID-19 since January 2021, and the Chinese government has adopted strict COVID-19 policies to control the occasional outbreaks of COVID-19.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (20)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Female Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Affiliated Hospital Of Southwest Medical University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Professor Alex MOLASIOTIS, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
- Investigators
- Alex Molassiotis, PhD, Study chair, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03836872
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HSEARS20180509004
- Status last verified
- Aug 2022
- First submitted
- 1 Feb 2019
- Last updated
- 25 Aug 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Cleeland, C.S., Pain assessment in cancer. In: D. Osoba (Ed.), Effect of Cancer on Quality of Life, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1991, 293-305.
Cleeland, C. S. (2014). The brief pain inventory user guide. 2009. Cleeland Charles S, Houston, TX Google Scholar.
Wang XS, Mendoza TR, Gao SZ, Cleeland CS. The Chinese version of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-C): its development and use in a study of cancer pain. Pain. 1996 Oct;67(2-3):407-16. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(96)03147-8.
PubMed 8951936Brady MJ, Cella DF, Mo F, Bonomi AE, Tulsky DS, Lloyd SR, Deasy S, Cobleigh M, Shiomoto G. Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Mar;15(3):974-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.3.974.
PubMed 9060536Chung KC, Pillsbury MS, Walters MR, Hayward RA. Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am. 1998 Jul;23(4):575-87. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(98)80042-7.
PubMed 9708370Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M; Medical Research Council Guidance. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655.
PubMed 18824488Crew KD, Capodice JL, Greenlee H, Apollo A, Jacobson JS, Raptis G, Blozie K, Sierra A, Hershman DL. Pilot study of acupuncture for the treatment of joint symptoms related to adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. J Cancer Surviv. 2007 Dec;1(4):283-91. doi: 10.1007/s11764-007-0034-x. Epub 2007 Oct 12.
PubMed 18648963Crew KD, Capodice JL, Greenlee H, Brafman L, Fuentes D, Awad D, Yann Tsai W, Hershman DL. Randomized, blinded, sham-controlled trial of acupuncture for the management of aromatase inhibitor-associated joint symptoms in women with early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1154-60. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4708. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
PubMed 20100963Crew KD, Greenlee H, Capodice J, Raptis G, Brafman L, Fuentes D, Sierra A, Hershman DL. Prevalence of joint symptoms in postmenopausal women taking aromatase inhibitors for early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Sep 1;25(25):3877-83. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.10.7573.
PubMed 17761973de Barros EN, Alexandre NM. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Nordic musculoskeletal questionnaire. Int Nurs Rev. 2003 Jun;50(2):101-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1466-7657.2003.00188.x.
PubMed 12752909Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998 Jan;80(1):63-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.80b1.7859.
PubMed 9460955Dunbar MJ, Robertsson O, Ryd L, Lidgren L. Translation and validation of the Oxford-12 item knee score for use in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000 Jun;71(3):268-74. doi: 10.1080/000164700317411861.
PubMed 10919298Fan CY, Jiang J, Zeng BF, Jiang PZ, Cai PH, Chung KC. Reconstruction of thumb loss complicated by skin defects in the thumb-index web space by combined transplantation of free tissues. J Hand Surg Am. 2006 Feb;31(2):236-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.10.021.
PubMed 16473684Li L, Wang H, Shen Y. Development and psychometric tests of a Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2002 Mar;36(2):109-13.
PubMed 12410965Hill J, Bird HA, Lawton CW, Wright V. The arthritis impact measurement scales: an anglicized version to assess the outcome of British patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol. 1990 Jun;29(3):193-6. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/29.3.193.
PubMed 2357501
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Aug 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Acupuncture for Joint Symptoms in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Randomised Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03836872
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HSEARS20180509004
- Conditions
- Female Breast Cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: China has experienced new waves of COVID-19 since January 2021, and the Chinese government has adopted strict COVID-19 policies to control the occasional outbreaks of COVID-19.
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Affiliated Hospital Of Southwest Medical University
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Joint symptoms including stiffness, local pain and aches are common adverse reactions among breast cancer (BC) patients undergoing hormone treatments, while effective interventions for managing such symptoms have not been well explored so far. Acupuncture can be a promising approach to controlling joint symptoms in BC patients but current research evidence generated from several small-scale clinical studies have not been robust enough to support the use of acupuncture for cancer symptom management in routine practice.
The overall aim of the research project is to examine the effectiveness of a 6-week acupuncture protocol for the management of joint symptoms in Chinese female BC patients who are currently undergoing hormone treatments following the completion of taxane-based chemotherapy. Given the lack of available data regarding the prevalence of joint symptoms in BC patients in mainland China, a large cross-sectional survey will also be performed to examine the incidence of joint symptoms among Chinese BC patients in mainland China and the impact of joint symptoms on patients' quality of life.
Detailed description
A three-group trial design is proposed, with an experimental group receiving true acupuncture at specific acupuncture points, a sham control group receiving sham acupuncture at non-acupuncture Acupoints with superficial needling, both in addition to routine methods of care, and a group receiving usual care only.
Participants and Settings BC patients who have completed taxane-based chemotherapy and are currently receiving hormone treatments with the experience of joint pain will be the targeted study population. The study will take place in the Southwest Medical University Hospital, a large medical centre in Sichuan, China.
Sample Size 55 per group (165 in total).
The Intervention Protocol
- True Acupuncture Protocol will be used in the True Acupuncture Group (Experimental Group) The acupuncture intervention is described below based on the STRICTA recommendations for reporting acupuncture trials. Patients in the experimental group will receive, in addition to standard care, a standardised 30-minute acupuncture session needling specific acupoints although there will be flexibility in case some points cannot be punctured (e. g. in case of lymphoedema), and alternative points (as in routine practice) may be selected by the acupuncture practitioner using their discretion to maintain an equal dose of treatment to all patients. Bilateral acupoints will be stimulated. These points will include Waiguan (SJ5), Jianjing (GB21), Yanglingquan (GB34), Hegu (LI4), Jiexi (ST41) and Taixi (K3). In addition, joint specific acupoints will also be used, depending on where the joint symptoms are present. The additional acupoints will be:
- Shoulder (Bilateral Acupoints): Jianyu (LI15), Jianliao (SJ14), and Naoshu (SI10); The following alternative acupoints would be considered in case of some patients may have lymphoedema or other problem at particular sites where the above proposed acupoints cannot be stimulated: Quchi (LI11), Shousanli (LI10), Tianzong (SI11) and Taichong (LR3).
- Wrist (Bilateral Acupoints): Yangchi (SJ4), Yangxi (LI5), and Daling (PC7); The following alternative acupoints would be considered in case of some patients may have lymphoedema or other problem at particular sites where the above proposed acupoints cannot be stimulated: Zhigou (SJ6), Jianshi (PC5) and Wailaogong (EX-UE8).
- Fingers (Bilateral Acupoints): Yanggu (SI5), Houxi (SI3), and Sanjian (LI3); Alternative acupoints located on the wrist or forearm would be considered in case of some patients may have lymphoedema or other problem at particular sites where the above proposed acupoints cannot be stimulated.
- Lumbar Area (Bilateral Acupoints): Yaoyangguan (DU3), Jingsuo (DU8), and Shenyu (BL23); Alternative acupoint Weizhong (BL40) located on the wrist or forearm would be considered in case of some patients may have lymphoedema or other problem at particular sites where the above proposed acupoints cannot be stimulated.
- Hip (Bilateral Acupoints): Huantiao (GB30), Xuanzhong (GB39), and Juliao (GB29); The following alternative acupoints would be considered in case of some patients may have lymphoedema or other problem at particular sites where the above proposed acupoints cannot be stimulated: Fengshi (GB31) and Biguan (ST31).
- Knee (Bilateral Acupoints): Yinlingquan (SP9), Xuehai (SP10), and Liangqiu (ST34). The following alternative acupoints would be considered in case of some patients may have lymphoedema or other problem at particular sites where the above proposed acupoints cannot be stimulated: Heding (EX-LE2), Futu (ST32), Baichongwo (EX-LE3), and Xiyan (EX-LE5). Acupuncture will be twice a week for consecutive 6 weeks, thus a total of 12 sessions of acupuncture will be carried out.
- Sham Acupuncture Protocol will be used in the Sham Acupuncture Group (Sham Control Group) In addition to the routine methods of care, patients allocated to the sham control group will receive sham acupuncture treatment at sham acupoints with superficial needling to avoid the generation of specific treatment effects. The sham acupoints selected for stimulation will be those located 1-3 cm near the true acupoints used in the true acupuncture group. The number of the selected sham acupoints will be the same as those used in the true acupuncture group. Meanwhile, to maintain the homogeneity of the routine methods of care used across groups, the conventional care for all the participants in this study will include at least written education materials in terms of the knowledge of joint symptoms and instructions of the use of painkillers and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). During the whole study period, the study investigators will also record any other treatments, including other complementary and alternative approaches, that participants may receive and view as potential confounders in the data analysis stage. Given the design of true and sham acupuncture groups, participants, study investigators and outcome assessors will not know the actual group assignment of the true and sham acupuncture group, and a partial blinding design is therefore utilized for this proposed study.
- Usual care wil be used in the waiting-list control group (Waiting-list Control Group) Participants in this group will only receive the usual care for the period that they are on the waiting list. But the waiting-list control group will offer acupuncture intervention after the completion of the RCT.
Study Duration and Outcome Assessment The total acupuncture treatment duration will be six weeks, and the duration of study involvement for each participant will be around 20 weeks including baseline assessment, immediate post-treatment assessment after the 6-week acupuncture, and two follow-up assessment at 12 weeks and 20 weeks, respectively.
Ethical Considerations A written informed consent will be obtained from every eligible person agreeing to participate after the risks and benefits of the study have been explained to them verbally and in writing. Participation in the study is on a voluntary basis, and all potential participants will be informed and assured that they have the right to refuse or withdraw from the study at any time. Personal information and data will remain confidential and anonymous. Side effects arising from acupuncture are rare. However, abnormal phenomena such as local tenderness, fainting, stuck needle, bent needle, broken needle, and haematoma during or after the procedure may be possible. Such conditions will be resolved quickly when the needles are removed, and the client's conditions will be monitored closely and recorded. Application for ethical approval from the Human Research Ethics Review Committee has been obtained from The Hong Kong Polytechnic University and the hospital where the trial will be carried out.
Data Analysis Analyses will include descriptive statistics to summarise the data, analysis of variance to assess between-groups differences, and regression analysis (such as ANCOVA) using the baseline pain score as covariate. 95% CIs will also be calculated. In more detail, while a t-test is adequate for analysis, analysis of covariance will be used with the baseline pain score as a covariate and centre and trial arm as grouping factors. Equivalent analyses will be performed for the week 20 data (although it is acknowledged that such analyses would not be independent of the 12-week scores, as it is likely the week-12 and week-20 values will be correlated). Drop-out cases and non-respondents will be asked to complete 1 item about their pain levels from the BPI scale to capture outcomes in as many patients as possible in the intention to treat analysis.
Significance and Implications Using robust methodology the study will investigate and interpret the use, delivery and outcomes of acupuncture in the management of a debilitating symptom of cancer therapies in order to inform decision-making and policy-making, and contribute to the evidence base for the treatment of hormone treatment-related joint symptoms. This study will provide information that can lead to improvements in the care of cancer patients, have a positive impact on quality of life and may increase the number of patients successfully completing hormone treatments. The project is about complementary therapies that many cancer patients frequently use, and has the potential to translate into benefits for patients fairly quickly. An information booklet on managing joint pains in breast cancer patients would also be a key outcome of the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| True Acupuncture | Experimental | Device: AcupuncturePatients in the experimental group will receive, in addition to standard care, a standardised 30-minute acupuncture session needling specific acupoints. Bilateral acupoints will be stimulated including Waiguan (SJ5), Jianjing (GB21), Yanglingquan (GB34), Hegu (LI4), Jiexi (ST41) and Taixi (K3). In addition, joint specific acupoints will also be used, depending on where the joint symptoms are present. |
| Sham Acupuncture | Sham comparator | Device: AcupunctureIn addition to the routine methods of care, patients allocated to the sham control group will receive sham acupuncture treatment at sham acupoints with superficial needling |
| Standard Control Group | No intervention | –The third arm will be a standard care control arm. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- BC patients with a confirmed diagnosis of hormone receptor-positive BC at the stage of I, II or IIIa;
- Patients who have completed taxane-based chemotherapy and are currently undergoing hormone treatments for at least three months;
- Patients indicate ongoing joint symptoms, including joint pain and/or stiffness, at one or more sites of body;
- Patients started to experience the joint symptoms after the commencement of the hormone treatments;
- Patients indicate the intensity of their worst pain during the past seven days of greater than 4 points at a 0-10 NRS scale where 0 represents no pain and 10 indicates most severe pain;
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients who had needle phobia and a low count of platelet of less than 50,000;
- Patients with conditions which are not appropriate for acupuncture including pregnancy, bleeding disorders, local or systematic inflammation, and other neuropathic and/or metabolic problems of the joints;
- Patients who had received joint surgery or had bone fracture during the past six months;
- Patients who had received any types of acupoint stimulation (e.g. body acupuncture or acupressure and auricular therapy) during the past six months; and
- Patients are currently treated with narcotic analgesia or steroids.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AcupuncturePatients in the experimental group will receive, in addition to standard care, a standardised 30-minute acupuncture session needling specific acupoints although there will be flexibility in case some points cannot be punctured (e. g. in case of lymphoedema), and alternative points (as in routine practice) may be selected by the acupuncture practitioner using their discretion to maintain an equal dose of treatment to all patients. Bilateral acupoints will be stimulated. These points will include Waiguan (SJ5), Jianjing (GB21), Yanglingquan (GB34), Hegu (LI4), Jiexi (ST41) and Taixi (K3). In addition, joint specific acupoints will also be used, depending on where the joint symptoms are present. | Device | Sham Acupuncture, True Acupuncture |
Primary outcome
Brief Pain Inventory
Time frame: 6-week assessment
Pain assessment measuring intensity of pain and impact of pain on daily functions. All items on a 0-10 numerical rating scale. Higher scores indicate worse pain and worse impact in daily lives.
20 secondary outcomes
Manchester Foot Pain Disability Questionnaire
Time frame: 6-week assessment
Manchester Foot Pain Disability Questionnaire
Time frame: 12-week assessment
Manchester Foot Pain Disability Questionnaire
Time frame: 20-week assessment
Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire
Time frame: 6-week assessment
Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire
Time frame: 12-week assessment
Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire
Time frame: 20-week assessment
Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index
Time frame: 6-week assessment
Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index
Time frame: 12-week assessment
Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index
Time frame: 20-week assessment
Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale 2-Short Form
Time frame: 6-week assessment
Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale 2-Short Form
Time frame: 12-week assessment
Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale 2-Short Form
Time frame: 20-week assessment
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast
Time frame: 6-week assessment
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast
Time frame: 12-week assessment
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast
Time frame: 20-week assessment
Medical Outcomes Survey 36-item short form version
Time frame: 6-week assessment
Medical Outcomes Survey 36-item short form version
Time frame: 12-week assessment
Medical Outcomes Survey 36-item short form version
Time frame: 20-week assessment
Brief Pain Inventory
Time frame: 12 weeks assessment
Brief Pain Inventory
Time frame: 20 weeks assessment
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: China has experienced new waves of COVID-19 since January 2021, and the Chinese government has adopted strict COVID-19 policies to control the occasional outbreaks of COVID-19.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Aug 2022.
- BackgroundCleeland, C.S., Pain assessment in cancer. In: D. Osoba (Ed.), Effect of Cancer on Quality of Life, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1991, 293-305.
- BackgroundCleeland, C. S. (2014). The brief pain inventory user guide. 2009. Cleeland Charles S, Houston, TX Google Scholar.
- Background: PubMed 8951936Wang XS, Mendoza TR, Gao SZ, Cleeland CS. The Chinese version of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-C): its development and use in a study of cancer pain. Pain. 1996 Oct;67(2-3):407-16. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(96)03147-8.
- Background: PubMed 9060536Brady MJ, Cella DF, Mo F, Bonomi AE, Tulsky DS, Lloyd SR, Deasy S, Cobleigh M, Shiomoto G. Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Mar;15(3):974-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.3.974.
- Background: PubMed 9708370Chung KC, Pillsbury MS, Walters MR, Hayward RA. Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am. 1998 Jul;23(4):575-87. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(98)80042-7.
- Background: PubMed 18824488Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M; Medical Research Council Guidance. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655.
- Background: PubMed 18648963Crew KD, Capodice JL, Greenlee H, Apollo A, Jacobson JS, Raptis G, Blozie K, Sierra A, Hershman DL. Pilot study of acupuncture for the treatment of joint symptoms related to adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. J Cancer Surviv. 2007 Dec;1(4):283-91. doi: 10.1007/s11764-007-0034-x. Epub 2007 Oct 12.
- Background: PubMed 20100963Crew KD, Capodice JL, Greenlee H, Brafman L, Fuentes D, Awad D, Yann Tsai W, Hershman DL. Randomized, blinded, sham-controlled trial of acupuncture for the management of aromatase inhibitor-associated joint symptoms in women with early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1154-60. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4708. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
- Background: PubMed 17761973Crew KD, Greenlee H, Capodice J, Raptis G, Brafman L, Fuentes D, Sierra A, Hershman DL. Prevalence of joint symptoms in postmenopausal women taking aromatase inhibitors for early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Sep 1;25(25):3877-83. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.10.7573.
- Background: PubMed 12752909de Barros EN, Alexandre NM. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Nordic musculoskeletal questionnaire. Int Nurs Rev. 2003 Jun;50(2):101-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1466-7657.2003.00188.x.
- Background: PubMed 9460955Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998 Jan;80(1):63-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.80b1.7859.
- Background: PubMed 10919298Dunbar MJ, Robertsson O, Ryd L, Lidgren L. Translation and validation of the Oxford-12 item knee score for use in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000 Jun;71(3):268-74. doi: 10.1080/000164700317411861.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Female Breast Cancer
Recruiting
Decision Support for Chemoprevention
Breast Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Geriatric Oncology Assessment and Coping Skills Training for Older Women on Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy
Breast Cancer, Hormone Receptor Positive, Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Arthralgia
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Phase 1 Study of XL309 (ISM3091) Alone and in Combination in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced Solid Tumor
RecruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Study of CG-7321 Monotherapy or Combination Therapy in Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced Solid Tumors, Breast Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alex Molassiotis, PhD study chair
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Acupuncture in people with Female Breast Cancer, run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Aug 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: China has experienced new waves of COVID-19 since January 2021, and the Chinese government has adopted strict COVID-19 policies to control the occasional outbreaks of COVID-19.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Brief Pain Inventory (time frame: 6-week assessment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03836872, which also lists 20 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Aug 2022.