Distal Forearm FracturesNCT03835065
Long Arm Vs Short Arm Fiberglass Cast for Treatment of Displaced Distal Radius Fractures
A study testing Closed Reduction, Long Arm Fiberglass Cast and Short Arm Fiberglass Cast in people with Distal Forearm Fractures, run by Hospital for Special Surgery, New York at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The aim of the study is to determine by multicenter randomized controlled trial whether short arm fiberglass casts are as effective as long arm casts for immobilizing displaced pediatric distal third forearm fractures that have undergone closed reduction. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 4 to 12 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Distal Forearm Fractures
- What is being tested?
- Closed Reduction, Long Arm Fiberglass Cast and Short Arm Fiberglass Cast
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 12 Feb 2019to 11 Feb 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 4 to 12 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Patients 4-12 years of age
- Displaced distal third forearm fracture (physeal, metaphyseal, meta-diaphyseal) requiring closed reduction
- Displacement must be: For children 4-9: angulation >30 degrees and/or 100% translation on either AP (anteroposterior) or lateral view. For children 10-12: angulation > 15 degrees and/or >50% translation on either AP or lateral view
Who cannot join
- Patients undergoing additional orthopedic procedures at the time closed reduction of distal arm fracture
- Patient with a presenting open fracture
- A known pathologic fracture
- Patient with a refracture through pre-existing fracture lines
- Patients with compartment syndrome or neuropathy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Hospital for Special Surgery
New York, New York, 10021
About this study
Official title: Long Arm Vs Short Arm Fiberglass Cast for Treatment of Displaced Distal Radius Fractures: A Multi-Center Randomized Control Trial
The aim of the study is to determine by multicenter randomized controlled trial whether short arm fiberglass casts are as effective as long arm casts for immobilizing displaced pediatric distal third forearm fractures that have undergone closed reduction.
The primary outcome is loss of reduction requiring cast wedging, recasting, repeat reduction, or surgical intervention.
Secondary outcomes will include Patient Reported Outcome Measures for physical function, such as Pedi-FABS, PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Upper Extremities , and UCLA (University of California Los Angelos) Activity Scale, and pain/comfort levels,such as PROMIS Pediatric Pain Interference, PROMIS Pediatric Pain Intensity, and VAS ( Visual Analogue Scale) comfort in cast. In addition, secondary outcomes include complications (skin irritation, compartment syndrome, elbow stiffness, cast saw burns etc). The investigators will assess potential risk factors for loss of reduction including initial displacement, level of fracture (physeal, metaphyseal, meta-diaphyseal), initial translation, initial angulation, age, sex, cast index, padding index, adequacy of initial reduction, and provider level of training.
Read the detailed description
The most common type of fracture in pediatric patients is the distal third forearm fracture, with over 600,000 cases in the in the United States each year. Traditionally long arm casts have been used for displaced distal forearm fractures, but it may be the case that short arm casts are sufficient. Three RCTs (Randomized Control Trials) have been performed comparing the efficacy of plaster short and long arm casts for displaced distal forearm fractures; these studies have shown no significant difference in angulation or displacement. If short and long arm casts offer comparable stability, the short arm version would likely be desirable as patient satisfaction and cost effectiveness are improved with short arm casts.
Despite the results of three well-executed RCTs, it is still common practice for long arm casts to be applied for distal forearm fractures. Many surgeons continue to recommend that their residents apply long arm casts for all displaced forearm fractures, including distal third fractures. At NYP (New York Presbyterian) Cornell and NYP Queens, residents routinely apply long arm casts for all forearm fractures.
Long arm casts are more likely to result in elbow stiffness, although this is often a temporary complication. Long arm casts also require more material and take longer to apply or remove, potentially leading to higher treatment costs. Additionally, when a longer cast is worn there is a larger distance where a cast burn could occur. Skin irritation, particularly at the cubital fossa, is likely more common with a long arm cast, and they are overall less comfortable, due to elbow restriction and a heavier weight.
Short arm casts that are well molded to the arm's contours have been shown to control forearm supination and pronation. A low cast index has been shown to significantly increase the rate of fracture redisplacement. The cast index determines the quality of cast molding, and is measured by dividing the sagittal width of the cast by the coronal width. Substantial changes in cast angulation have been attributed to poor cast-molding and a low cast index. The results suggested that short arm casts when appropriately molded can be effective in treating fractures of the distal third of the forearm.
If short arm casts are equivalent in providing stability for distal third forearm fractures, providers should be using them preferentially to avoid the potential complications of elbow stiffness, cast burn, skin irritation, and patient dissatisfaction. However, surgeons persist with using long arm casts. Rationale for the persistent use of long arm cast is believed to include anecdotal concerns of residents placing inadequate short arm casts, leading to an increased risk for translation or angulation requiring recasting.
Previous RCTs, however, do not provide clear recommendations, merely demonstrating that treatment using short and long arm casts lead to similar outcomes. Additionally, these past RCTs have limitations. Previous studies were conducted with plaster casts and could not extend their findings to other casting material. Valving techniques were also not noted in these studies; it is unclear whether or not casts were bivalved, which is currently the standard of care in the United States. These previous studies also randomized patients to short or long arm cast prior to cast application. As a result, it is possible that when long arm casts were applied the portion of cast overlying the fracture site was not molded as carefully as for short arm casts. Previous studies commented on cast index, but it was not clear whether residents were trained in ideal cast application and molding prior to study initiation. Finally, the outcome measures used in previous studies were an arbitrary loss in angulation or translation, instead of a focus on whether the fracture slipped sufficiently to change the treatment required (need for cast wedging, repeat reduction and casting, or surgical intervention).
The aim of the study is to determine by multicenter randomized controlled trial whether short arm fiberglass casts are as effective as long arm casts for immobilizing displaced pediatric distal third forearm fractures that have undergone closed reduction.
- Conditions
- Distal Forearm Fractures
- Being tested
- Closed Reduction, Long Arm Fiberglass Cast, Short Arm Fiberglass Cast
- Keywords
- Displaced distal third forearm, Pediatric Patients, Closed reduction, Cast, Patient centered outcome data, RCT
- Medical subject headings
- Wrist Fractures
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Closed ReductionProcedure or surgery
The primary goal of closed reduction is to maintain appropriate bony alignment and angulation to allow for appropriate healing.
Long Arm Fiberglass CastOther
A stockingette and webril will first be applied, after which the short arm fiberglass portion of the cast will be applied. After short arm casting has been appropriately placed, randomization group will be revealed. Casting will be extended to the shoulder joint if the patient is assigned to the long arm cast group. The mold will then be applied and cast construct will be bivalved and taped.
Short Arm Fiberglass CastOther
A stockingette and webril will first be applied, after which the short arm fiberglass portion of the cast will be applied. After short arm casting has been appropriately placed, randomization group will be revealed. Casting will be complete at this point if the patient is assigned to the short arm cast group. The mold will then be applied and cast construct will be bivalved and taped.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Long Arm Fiberglass Cast | Active comparator | Conscious sedation will be provided to patient while the reduction is performed by a cast trained orthopedic resident using standard techniques under fluoroscopic guidance. The arm will be held by an assistant or finger traps in the absence thereof. The arm will not be suspended until after the manipulation is performed. A stockingette and webril will first be applied, after which the short arm fiberglass portion of the cast will be applied. After short arm casting has been appropriately placed, randomization group will be revealed. Casting will be extended to the shoulder joint if the patient is assigned to the long arm cast group. The mold will then be applied and cast construct will be bivalved and taped. Receives: Procedure: Closed Reduction; Other: Long Arm Fiberglass Cast |
| Short Arm Fiberglass Cast | Experimental | Conscious sedation will be provided to patient while the reduction is performed by a cast trained orthopedic resident using standard techniques under fluoroscopic guidance. The arm will be held by an assistant or finger traps in the absence thereof. The arm will not be suspended until after the manipulation is performed. A stockingette and webril will first be applied, after which the short arm fiberglass portion of the cast will be applied. After short arm casting has been appropriately placed, randomization group will be revealed. Casting will be complete at this point if the patient is assigned to the short arm cast group. The mold will then be applied and cast construct will be bivalved and taped. Receives: Procedure: Closed Reduction; Other: Short Arm Fiberglass Cast |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patients requiring repeat intervention due to loss of alignment
Proportion of patients requiring repeat intervention (cast wedging, recasting, or surgical intervention) following short arm vs long arm cast application.
Measured: Up to 7 months
Secondary outcomes (7)
Pain assessed by patient reported outcomes - Surveys
Patient Reported Outcome Measures for pain as assessed by PROMIS(Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Pediatric Pain Interference. Highest raw score is 32, lowest raw score is 0, it is interpreted by t-score.
Measured: 1 week +/- 5 days visit, 3 weeks +/- 1 week, 6 weeks +/- 1 week, 3 months +/- 2 weeks , 6 months +/- 4 weeks
Pain assessed by patient reported outcomes - Surveys
Patient Reported Outcome Measures for pain as assessed by PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Pediatric Pain Intensity. Highest raw score is 32, lowest raw score is 0, it is interpreted by t-score.
Measured: 1 week +/- 5 days visit, 3 weeks +/- 1 week, 6 weeks +/- 1 week, 3 months +/- 2 weeks , 6 months +/- 4 weeks
Comfort assessed by patient reported outcomes - Scale
Patient Reported Outcome Measures for pain as assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) comfort in cast. VAS measures the amount of pain that a patient feels currently and ranges across a continuum from none to an extreme amount of pain. Higher values represent more pain/ worse outcome.
Measured: 1 week +/- 5 days visit, 3 weeks +/- 1 week, 6 weeks +/- 1 week, 3 months +/- 2 weeks , 6 months +/- 4 weeks
Physical function assessed by patient reported outcomes - Surveys
Patient Reported Outcome Measures for pain as assessed by Pedi-FABS ( Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale). Scoring of the Hospital for Special Surgery PediatricFunctional Activity Brief Scale is performed by addingpoints from each question for total possible score range from1 to 30 points. For ''Running'', ''Cutting'', ''Decelerating'',''Pivoting'', ''Duration'', and ''Endurance'', each question is worth 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 points. Higher values mean that the child is more active.
Measured: 1 week +/- 5 days visit, 3 weeks +/- 1 week, 6 weeks +/- 1 week, 3 months +/- 2 weeks , 6 months +/- 4 weeks
Physical function assessed by patient reported outcomes - Surveys
Patient Reported Outcome Measures for pain as assessed by PROMIS ( Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Upper Extremity. Within the Pediatric Upper Extremity short form, there are two items (3880R2 and 3881R1) with collapsed response categories. These items have response options scored as 3=With no trouble, 2=With a little trouble, 1=With some trouble, 0=With a lot of trouble, 0=Not able to do.
Measured: 1 week +/- 5 days visit, 3 weeks +/- 1 week, 6 weeks +/- 1 week, 3 months +/- 2 weeks , 6 months +/- 4 weeks
Physical function assessed by patient reported outcomes - Surveys
Patient Reported Outcome Measures for pain as assessed by UCLA Activity Scale (University of California, Los Angeles Activity Scale). 1 is the lowest raw score, and 10 is the highest raw score. 1= 1: Wholly Inactive, dependent on others, and can not leave residence and 10= 10: Regularly participates in impact sports.
Measured: 1 week +/- 5 days visit, 3 weeks +/- 1 week, 6 weeks +/- 1 week, 3 months +/- 2 weeks , 6 months +/- 4 weeks
Number of Participants with complications
irritation, compartment syndrome, elbow stiffness, cast saw burns etc
Measured: 1 week +/- 5 days visit, 3 weeks +/- 1 week, 6 weeks +/- 1 week, 3 months +/- 2 weeks , 6 months +/- 4 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Feb 2019
- Study start12 Feb 2019
- Primary completion11 Feb 2025
- Study completion11 Feb 2025
Why it stopped: The study expired on 2/11/2025.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Distal Forearm FracturesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hospital for Special Surgery, New YorkThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Parallel Assignment
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Emiyl R Dodwell, MD MPH FRCSC, Principal investigator, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03835065
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2017-1930
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 14 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 24 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Nellans KW, Kowalski E, Chung KC. The epidemiology of distal radius fractures. Hand Clin. 2012 May;28(2):113-25. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Apr 14.
PubMed 22554654Bohm ER, Bubbar V, Yong Hing K, Dzus A. Above and below-the-elbow plaster casts for distal forearm fractures in children. A randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Jan;88(1):1-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00320.
PubMed 16391243Webb GR, Galpin RD, Armstrong DG. Comparison of short and long arm plaster casts for displaced fractures in the distal third of the forearm in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Jan;88(1):9-17. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00131.
PubMed 16391244Paneru SR, Rijal R, Shrestha BP, Nepal P, Khanal GP, Karn NK, Singh MP, Rai P. Randomized controlled trial comparing above- and below-elbow plaster casts for distal forearm fractures in children. J Child Orthop. 2010 Jun;4(3):233-7. doi: 10.1007/s11832-010-0250-1. Epub 2010 Mar 17.
PubMed 21629372Colaris JW, Allema JH, Biter LU, Reijman M, van de Ven CP, de Vries MR, Bloem RM, Kerver AJ, Verhaar JA. Conversion to below-elbow cast after 3 weeks is safe for diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures in children. Acta Orthop. 2013 Oct;84(5):489-94. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2013.850010. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
PubMed 24171685Worlock P, Stower M. Fracture patterns in Nottingham children. J Pediatr Orthop. 1986 Nov-Dec;6(6):656-60. doi: 10.1097/01241398-198611000-00003.
PubMed 3793885Webb JE, Lewallen LW, Christophersen C, Krych AJ, McIntosh AL. Clinical outcome of internal fixation of unstable juvenile osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the knee. Orthopedics. 2013 Nov;36(11):e1444-9. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20131021-30.
PubMed 24200451Kamat AS, Pierse N, Devane P, Mutimer J, Horne G. Redefining the cast index: the optimum technique to reduce redisplacement in pediatric distal forearm fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012 Dec;32(8):787-91. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318272474d.
PubMed 23147621Chess DG, Hyndman JC, Leahey JL, Brown DC, Sinclair AM. Short arm plaster cast for distal pediatric forearm fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994 Mar-Apr;14(2):211-3. doi: 10.1097/01241398-199403000-00015.
PubMed 8188836
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Long Arm Vs Short Arm Fiberglass Cast for Treatment of Displaced Distal Radius Fractures: A Multi-Center Randomized Control Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03835065
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2017-1930
- Conditions
- Distal Forearm Fractures
- Keywords
- Displaced distal third forearm, Pediatric Patients, Closed reduction, Cast, Patient centered outcome data, RCT
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: The study expired on 2/11/2025.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New YorkUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 12 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 11 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 11 Feb 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the study is to determine by multicenter randomized controlled trial whether short arm fiberglass casts are as effective as long arm casts for immobilizing displaced pediatric distal third forearm fractures that have undergone closed reduction.
The primary outcome is loss of reduction requiring cast wedging, recasting, repeat reduction, or surgical intervention.
Secondary outcomes will include Patient Reported Outcome Measures for physical function, such as Pedi-FABS, PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Upper Extremities , and UCLA (University of California Los Angelos) Activity Scale, and pain/comfort levels,such as PROMIS Pediatric Pain Interference, PROMIS Pediatric Pain Intensity, and VAS ( Visual Analogue Scale) comfort in cast. In addition, secondary outcomes include complications (skin irritation, compartment syndrome, elbow stiffness, cast saw burns etc). The investigators will assess potential risk factors for loss of reduction including initial displacement, level of fracture (physeal, metaphyseal, meta-diaphyseal), initial translation, initial angulation, age, sex, cast index, padding index, adequacy of initial reduction, and provider level of training.
Detailed description
The most common type of fracture in pediatric patients is the distal third forearm fracture, with over 600,000 cases in the in the United States each year. Traditionally long arm casts have been used for displaced distal forearm fractures, but it may be the case that short arm casts are sufficient. Three RCTs (Randomized Control Trials) have been performed comparing the efficacy of plaster short and long arm casts for displaced distal forearm fractures; these studies have shown no significant difference in angulation or displacement. If short and long arm casts offer comparable stability, the short arm version would likely be desirable as patient satisfaction and cost effectiveness are improved with short arm casts.
Despite the results of three well-executed RCTs, it is still common practice for long arm casts to be applied for distal forearm fractures. Many surgeons continue to recommend that their residents apply long arm casts for all displaced forearm fractures, including distal third fractures. At NYP (New York Presbyterian) Cornell and NYP Queens, residents routinely apply long arm casts for all forearm fractures.
Long arm casts are more likely to result in elbow stiffness, although this is often a temporary complication. Long arm casts also require more material and take longer to apply or remove, potentially leading to higher treatment costs. Additionally, when a longer cast is worn there is a larger distance where a cast burn could occur. Skin irritation, particularly at the cubital fossa, is likely more common with a long arm cast, and they are overall less comfortable, due to elbow restriction and a heavier weight.
Short arm casts that are well molded to the arm's contours have been shown to control forearm supination and pronation. A low cast index has been shown to significantly increase the rate of fracture redisplacement. The cast index determines the quality of cast molding, and is measured by dividing the sagittal width of the cast by the coronal width. Substantial changes in cast angulation have been attributed to poor cast-molding and a low cast index. The results suggested that short arm casts when appropriately molded can be effective in treating fractures of the distal third of the forearm.
If short arm casts are equivalent in providing stability for distal third forearm fractures, providers should be using them preferentially to avoid the potential complications of elbow stiffness, cast burn, skin irritation, and patient dissatisfaction. However, surgeons persist with using long arm casts. Rationale for the persistent use of long arm cast is believed to include anecdotal concerns of residents placing inadequate short arm casts, leading to an increased risk for translation or angulation requiring recasting.
Previous RCTs, however, do not provide clear recommendations, merely demonstrating that treatment using short and long arm casts lead to similar outcomes. Additionally, these past RCTs have limitations. Previous studies were conducted with plaster casts and could not extend their findings to other casting material. Valving techniques were also not noted in these studies; it is unclear whether or not casts were bivalved, which is currently the standard of care in the United States. These previous studies also randomized patients to short or long arm cast prior to cast application. As a result, it is possible that when long arm casts were applied the portion of cast overlying the fracture site was not molded as carefully as for short arm casts. Previous studies commented on cast index, but it was not clear whether residents were trained in ideal cast application and molding prior to study initiation. Finally, the outcome measures used in previous studies were an arbitrary loss in angulation or translation, instead of a focus on whether the fracture slipped sufficiently to change the treatment required (need for cast wedging, repeat reduction and casting, or surgical intervention).
The aim of the study is to determine by multicenter randomized controlled trial whether short arm fiberglass casts are as effective as long arm casts for immobilizing displaced pediatric distal third forearm fractures that have undergone closed reduction.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Parallel Assignment
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Long Arm Fiberglass Cast | Active comparator | Procedure: Closed Reduction, Other: Long Arm Fiberglass CastConscious sedation will be provided to patient while the reduction is performed by a cast trained orthopedic resident using standard techniques under fluoroscopic guidance. The arm will be held by an assistant or finger traps in the absence thereof. The arm will not be suspended until after the manipulation is performed. A stockingette and webril will first be applied, after which the short arm fiberglass portion of the cast will be applied. After short arm casting has been appropriately placed, randomization group will be revealed. Casting will be extended to the shoulder joint if the patient is assigned to the long arm cast group. The mold will then be applied and cast construct will be bivalved and taped. |
| Short Arm Fiberglass Cast | Experimental | Procedure: Closed Reduction, Other: Short Arm Fiberglass CastConscious sedation will be provided to patient while the reduction is performed by a cast trained orthopedic resident using standard techniques under fluoroscopic guidance. The arm will be held by an assistant or finger traps in the absence thereof. The arm will not be suspended until after the manipulation is performed. A stockingette and webril will first be applied, after which the short arm fiberglass portion of the cast will be applied. After short arm casting has been appropriately placed, randomization group will be revealed. Casting will be complete at this point if the patient is assigned to the short arm cast group. The mold will then be applied and cast construct will be bivalved and taped. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 4 to 12 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients 4-12 years of age
- Displaced distal third forearm fracture (physeal, metaphyseal, meta-diaphyseal) requiring closed reduction
- Displacement must be: For children 4-9: angulation >30 degrees and/or 100% translation on either AP (anteroposterior) or lateral view. For children 10-12: angulation > 15 degrees and/or >50% translation on either AP or lateral view
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients undergoing additional orthopedic procedures at the time closed reduction of distal arm fracture
- Patient with a presenting open fracture
- A known pathologic fracture
- Patient with a refracture through pre-existing fracture lines
- Patients with compartment syndrome or neuropathy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Closed ReductionThe primary goal of closed reduction is to maintain appropriate bony alignment and angulation to allow for appropriate healing. | Procedure or surgery | Long Arm Fiberglass Cast, Short Arm Fiberglass Cast |
| Long Arm Fiberglass CastA stockingette and webril will first be applied, after which the short arm fiberglass portion of the cast will be applied. After short arm casting has been appropriately placed, randomization group will be revealed. Casting will be extended to the shoulder joint if the patient is assigned to the long arm cast group. The mold will then be applied and cast construct will be bivalved and taped. | Other | Long Arm Fiberglass Cast |
| Short Arm Fiberglass CastA stockingette and webril will first be applied, after which the short arm fiberglass portion of the cast will be applied. After short arm casting has been appropriately placed, randomization group will be revealed. Casting will be complete at this point if the patient is assigned to the short arm cast group. The mold will then be applied and cast construct will be bivalved and taped. | Other | Short Arm Fiberglass Cast |
Primary outcome
Patients requiring repeat intervention due to loss of alignment
Time frame: Up to 7 months
Proportion of patients requiring repeat intervention (cast wedging, recasting, or surgical intervention) following short arm vs long arm cast application.
7 secondary outcomes
Pain assessed by patient reported outcomes - Surveys
Time frame: 1 week +/- 5 days visit, 3 weeks +/- 1 week, 6 weeks +/- 1 week, 3 months +/- 2 weeks , 6 months +/- 4 weeks
Pain assessed by patient reported outcomes - Surveys
Time frame: 1 week +/- 5 days visit, 3 weeks +/- 1 week, 6 weeks +/- 1 week, 3 months +/- 2 weeks , 6 months +/- 4 weeks
Comfort assessed by patient reported outcomes - Scale
Time frame: 1 week +/- 5 days visit, 3 weeks +/- 1 week, 6 weeks +/- 1 week, 3 months +/- 2 weeks , 6 months +/- 4 weeks
Physical function assessed by patient reported outcomes - Surveys
Time frame: 1 week +/- 5 days visit, 3 weeks +/- 1 week, 6 weeks +/- 1 week, 3 months +/- 2 weeks , 6 months +/- 4 weeks
Physical function assessed by patient reported outcomes - Surveys
Time frame: 1 week +/- 5 days visit, 3 weeks +/- 1 week, 6 weeks +/- 1 week, 3 months +/- 2 weeks , 6 months +/- 4 weeks
Physical function assessed by patient reported outcomes - Surveys
Time frame: 1 week +/- 5 days visit, 3 weeks +/- 1 week, 6 weeks +/- 1 week, 3 months +/- 2 weeks , 6 months +/- 4 weeks
Number of Participants with complications
Time frame: 1 week +/- 5 days visit, 3 weeks +/- 1 week, 6 weeks +/- 1 week, 3 months +/- 2 weeks , 6 months +/- 4 weeks
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Mar 2025.
- Background: PubMed 22554654Nellans KW, Kowalski E, Chung KC. The epidemiology of distal radius fractures. Hand Clin. 2012 May;28(2):113-25. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Apr 14.
- Background: PubMed 16391243Bohm ER, Bubbar V, Yong Hing K, Dzus A. Above and below-the-elbow plaster casts for distal forearm fractures in children. A randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Jan;88(1):1-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00320.
- Background: PubMed 16391244Webb GR, Galpin RD, Armstrong DG. Comparison of short and long arm plaster casts for displaced fractures in the distal third of the forearm in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Jan;88(1):9-17. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00131.
- Background: PubMed 21629372Paneru SR, Rijal R, Shrestha BP, Nepal P, Khanal GP, Karn NK, Singh MP, Rai P. Randomized controlled trial comparing above- and below-elbow plaster casts for distal forearm fractures in children. J Child Orthop. 2010 Jun;4(3):233-7. doi: 10.1007/s11832-010-0250-1. Epub 2010 Mar 17.
- Background: PubMed 24171685Colaris JW, Allema JH, Biter LU, Reijman M, van de Ven CP, de Vries MR, Bloem RM, Kerver AJ, Verhaar JA. Conversion to below-elbow cast after 3 weeks is safe for diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures in children. Acta Orthop. 2013 Oct;84(5):489-94. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2013.850010. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
- Background: PubMed 3793885Worlock P, Stower M. Fracture patterns in Nottingham children. J Pediatr Orthop. 1986 Nov-Dec;6(6):656-60. doi: 10.1097/01241398-198611000-00003.
- Background: PubMed 24200451Webb JE, Lewallen LW, Christophersen C, Krych AJ, McIntosh AL. Clinical outcome of internal fixation of unstable juvenile osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the knee. Orthopedics. 2013 Nov;36(11):e1444-9. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20131021-30.
- Background: PubMed 23147621Kamat AS, Pierse N, Devane P, Mutimer J, Horne G. Redefining the cast index: the optimum technique to reduce redisplacement in pediatric distal forearm fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012 Dec;32(8):787-91. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318272474d.
- Background: PubMed 8188836Chess DG, Hyndman JC, Leahey JL, Brown DC, Sinclair AM. Short arm plaster cast for distal pediatric forearm fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994 Mar-Apr;14(2):211-3. doi: 10.1097/01241398-199403000-00015.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Distal Forearm Fractures
RecruitingObservational study
Radiological Criteria for Instability in Distal Radius Fractures
Distal Radius Fractures
RecruitingPhase 4
A Clinical Trial on the Use of Lidocaine Infusion During Surgery for Pediatric Upper Extremity Fractures and Its Impact on Total Perioperative Opioid Requirements
Fracture Arm, Fracture Closed of Lower End of Forearm, Unspecified
Recruiting
Short and Long-arm Fiberglass Cast Immobilization for Distal Salter Harris I and II Forearm Fractures in Children
Fracture Forearm
RecruitingObservational study
EASY Algorithm Trial (Elbow Trauma Assessment Using Sonography in Children and Youth) Diagnostic Accuracy and Safety of Point-of-care Ultrasound as a Screening Tool for Suspected Elbow Fractures in Children Aged 5 to 15 Years: a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study
Elbow Fractures, Distal Humerus Fracture
Recruiting
Casting Versus Percutaneus Pinning Treatment of Pediatric Overriding Distal Forearm Fractures
Pediatric Overriding Distal Metaphyseal Radius Fractures
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Emiyl R Dodwell, MD MPH FRCSC principal investigator
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Closed Reduction, Long Arm Fiberglass Cast and Short Arm Fiberglass Cast in people with Distal Forearm Fractures, run by Hospital for Special Surgery, New York at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patients requiring repeat intervention due to loss of alignment (time frame: Up to 7 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03835065, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Mar 2025.