HIV/AIDSPOC-EIDNCT03824067
Impact of Point-of-Care EID for HIV-Exposed Infants
A study testing Point of Care Early Infant Diagnosis in people with HIV/AIDS and Infant Morbidity, run by Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation at 2 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
This mixed methods study will utilize a randomized step-wedge design to assess the impact of point-of-care (POC) versus conventional early infant diagnosis (EID) on key outcomes including timely return of results to caregivers and time to initiation on treatment for HIV-infected infants. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV/AIDS, Infant Morbidity, Pediatric HIV Infection
- What is being tested?
- Point of Care Early Infant Diagnosis
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 9,539 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2017to 31 Oct 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Any infant who receives an EID test, either conventional or POC, for the 4-6 week EID indication at one of the study sites (which were randomly selected from project sites in country)
- HEI under 12 weeks of age or their parents/caregivers
- Some methods will only include HEI who test positive (medical chart extraction and longitudinal follow up)
- Purposively selected caregivers of HEI for in-depth interviews
- Focus groups with community members will not require participants to have sought testing for EID
Who cannot join
- Participants not at selected study sites
- For some methods (medical chart extraction and longitudinal follow-up), HEI who test negative
- For qualitative component, excluded if unable to consent due to age, competence, or inability to speak any of the study languages
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 2 countries.
2 sites in 2 countries
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the Impact of Point-of-Care Early Infant Diagnostic (EID) Testing on Timely Receipt of EID Results and Treatment Initiation in HIV-Exposed Children in Kenya and Zimbabwe
This mixed methods study will utilize a randomized step-wedge design to assess the impact of point-of-care (POC) versus conventional early infant diagnosis (EID) on key outcomes including timely return of results to caregivers and time to initiation on treatment for HIV-infected infants. Data will be collected through longitudinal clinical follow-up and medical chart extraction of routine records and lab forms. Feasibility and acceptability data will be collected through interviews with mothers/caregivers of HIV-exposed infants, and community focus groups.
Read the detailed description
This study seeks to evaluate the impact of point of care (POC) early infant HIV diagnosis (EID) on turn-around time from sample collection until notification of parents/caregivers of test result, linkage to care, and time to initiation of treatment, and early retention in HIV care (3-6 months) for those infected.
The study will take place in two countries, Zimbabwe and Kenya, with high HIV prevalence, and where EGPAF-supported POC EID platforms are being implemented as part of a Unitaid-funded POC EID project. As part of POC program implementation activities, in each country up to 50 EGPAF-supported sites will implement POC EID platforms. These sites may be prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) of HIV clinics, HIV clinics or multidisciplinary health facilities. Project sites have been selected as part of the program implementation. In each country, 18 sites will be randomly selected as study sites for the impact evaluation.
Using a stepped wedge design, the intervention (the POC EID platforms) will be rolled out sequentially to the study facilities over three randomly-assigned time periods. Quantitative data will be derived from routine medical and laboratory charts and longitudinal tracking and follow-up of HIV-infected infants.
Qualitative data on feasibility and acceptability of POC will be derived from in-depth interviews with mothers/caregivers of HIV-exposed infants at the beginning and end of the study and community focus group discussions at the end of the study.
- Being tested
- Point of Care Early Infant Diagnosis, Standard of Care Early Infant Diagnosis
- Keywords
- HIV/AIDS, Point of Care, Early infant diagnosis, Health systems, Diagnostic tools, LMIC
- Medical subject headings
- Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Point of Care Early Infant DiagnosisDiagnostic test
Also called POC EID
HIV testing where the blood sample is processed at either the facility itself or a nearby site that is closer to the facility than a laboratory. With POC EID, blood samples do not have to travel to the laboratory for processing.
Standard of Care Early Infant DiagnosisDiagnostic test
Also called SOC EID
Conventional laboratory based EID testing
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard of Care Early Infant Diagnosis | Active comparator | Conventional laboratory based (standard of care - SOC) early infant diagnosis (EID) testing: SOC EID Receives: Diagnostic Test: Standard of Care Early Infant Diagnosis |
| Point of Care Early Infant Diagnosis | Experimental | The intervention is Point of Care (POC) early infant diagnosis (EID) testing, where the blood sample is processed at either the facility itself or a nearby site that is closer to the facility than a laboratory. With POC EID, blood samples do not have to travel to the laboratory for processing. Receives: Diagnostic Test: Point of Care Early Infant Diagnosis |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of HIV exposed infants (HEI) who have received the 4-6 week EID test result by 12 weeks
The number of children for whom a sample was drawn for the 4-6-week indication receiving EID result by 12 weeks, divided by the number of HEI who presented to the clinic and had an indication for 4-6 week EID testing
Measured: 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (6)
Testing coverage for the 4-6 week indication
Number of EID samples collected for 4-6 week indication divided by the number of HEI who presented to the clinic and had an indication for 4-6 week EID testing
Measured: 18 months
Time from sample collection for 4-6 week EID test indication to parent's/ caregiver notification
Date of sample collection to the date that results were given to care giver
Measured: 18 months
Age of patient at test result notification for 4-6 week EID test indication
HEIs date of birth, date of sample collection and date of result notification to care giver
Measured: 18 months
Time from test result received for 4-6 week EID test to initiation of ART, for HIV-infected infants
Date positive result received at facility to the date the result was communicated to mother and date of ART initiation
Measured: 18 months
Percentage of HIV positive infants diagnosed during 4-6 week EID testing initiated on ART
Number of HIV-infected infants initiated on ART after 4-6 week EID test divided by the number of HIV-infected infants identified after 4-6 week EID test
Measured: 18 months
Number of HIV-infected infants diagnosed at the 4-6 week EID with retention in care at 6 months
Total number of infants initiated on ART 6 months ago and number of active on ART at 6 months
Measured: 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Jan 2019
- Study start1 Aug 2017
- Primary completion30 Oct 2019
- Study completion31 Oct 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HIV/AIDSStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The design of this study is a cluster-randomized stepped wedge trial. This is whereby an intervention is rolled out sequentially to the study facilities over a number of time periods. The order in which the different clusters receive the intervention is determined at random and by the end of random allocation, all facilities will have received the intervention. Testing sites (determined from the list of all project facilities excluding pilot sites) will be randomized regarding timing of POC implementation; sites that serve as "hub" sites and their associated "spoke" sites will be given the same designation. The study will use a mixed method approach in data collection, and a qualitative component will also be conducted, including interviews and focus groups.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 9,539 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- UNITAID
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Emma Sacks, PhD, Principal investigator, George Washington University School of Public HealthCollins Odhiambo, MD, Principal investigator, Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric Aids Foundation - KenyaAgnes Mahomva, MD, Principal investigator, Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric Aids Foundation - ZimbabweJennifer Cohn, MD MPH, Study director, Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03824067
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EG0170
- Acronym
- POC-EID
- Status last verified
- Dec 2019
- First submitted
- 25 Jan 2019
- Last updated
- 5 Feb 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Feb 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Impact of Point-of-Care Early Infant Diagnostic (EID) Testing on Timely Receipt of EID Results and Treatment Initiation in HIV-Exposed Children in Kenya and Zimbabwe
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03824067
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- POC-EID / EG0170
- Keywords
- HIV/AIDS, Point of Care, Early infant diagnosis, Health systems, Diagnostic tools, LMIC
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 9,539 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS FoundationUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- UNITAID
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Oct 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This mixed methods study will utilize a randomized step-wedge design to assess the impact of point-of-care (POC) versus conventional early infant diagnosis (EID) on key outcomes including timely return of results to caregivers and time to initiation on treatment for HIV-infected infants. Data will be collected through longitudinal clinical follow-up and medical chart extraction of routine records and lab forms. Feasibility and acceptability data will be collected through interviews with mothers/caregivers of HIV-exposed infants, and community focus groups.
Detailed description
This study seeks to evaluate the impact of point of care (POC) early infant HIV diagnosis (EID) on turn-around time from sample collection until notification of parents/caregivers of test result, linkage to care, and time to initiation of treatment, and early retention in HIV care (3-6 months) for those infected.
The study will take place in two countries, Zimbabwe and Kenya, with high HIV prevalence, and where EGPAF-supported POC EID platforms are being implemented as part of a Unitaid-funded POC EID project. As part of POC program implementation activities, in each country up to 50 EGPAF-supported sites will implement POC EID platforms. These sites may be prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) of HIV clinics, HIV clinics or multidisciplinary health facilities. Project sites have been selected as part of the program implementation. In each country, 18 sites will be randomly selected as study sites for the impact evaluation.
Using a stepped wedge design, the intervention (the POC EID platforms) will be rolled out sequentially to the study facilities over three randomly-assigned time periods. Quantitative data will be derived from routine medical and laboratory charts and longitudinal tracking and follow-up of HIV-infected infants.
Qualitative data on feasibility and acceptability of POC will be derived from in-depth interviews with mothers/caregivers of HIV-exposed infants at the beginning and end of the study and community focus group discussions at the end of the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The design of this study is a cluster-randomized stepped wedge trial. This is whereby an intervention is rolled out sequentially to the study facilities over a number of time periods. The order in which the different clusters receive the intervention is determined at random and by the end of random allocation, all facilities will have received the intervention. Testing sites (determined from the list of all project facilities excluding pilot sites) will be randomized regarding timing of POC implementation; sites that serve as "hub" sites and their associated "spoke" sites will be given the same designation. The study will use a mixed method approach in data collection, and a qualitative component will also be conducted, including interviews and focus groups.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard of Care Early Infant Diagnosis | Active comparator | Diagnostic Test: Standard of Care Early Infant DiagnosisConventional laboratory based (standard of care - SOC) early infant diagnosis (EID) testing: SOC EID |
| Point of Care Early Infant Diagnosis | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Point of Care Early Infant DiagnosisThe intervention is Point of Care (POC) early infant diagnosis (EID) testing, where the blood sample is processed at either the facility itself or a nearby site that is closer to the facility than a laboratory. With POC EID, blood samples do not have to travel to the laboratory for processing. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Any infant who receives an EID test, either conventional or POC, for the 4-6 week EID indication at one of the study sites (which were randomly selected from project sites in country)
- HEI under 12 weeks of age or their parents/caregivers
- Some methods will only include HEI who test positive (medical chart extraction and longitudinal follow up)
- Purposively selected caregivers of HEI for in-depth interviews
- Focus groups with community members will not require participants to have sought testing for EID
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Participants not at selected study sites
- For some methods (medical chart extraction and longitudinal follow-up), HEI who test negative
- For qualitative component, excluded if unable to consent due to age, competence, or inability to speak any of the study languages
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Point of Care Early Infant DiagnosisAlso: POC EIDHIV testing where the blood sample is processed at either the facility itself or a nearby site that is closer to the facility than a laboratory. With POC EID, blood samples do not have to travel to the laboratory for processing. | Diagnostic test | Point of Care Early Infant Diagnosis |
| Standard of Care Early Infant DiagnosisAlso: SOC EIDConventional laboratory based EID testing | Diagnostic test | Standard of Care Early Infant Diagnosis |
Primary outcome
Percentage of HIV exposed infants (HEI) who have received the 4-6 week EID test result by 12 weeks
Time frame: 12 weeks
The number of children for whom a sample was drawn for the 4-6-week indication receiving EID result by 12 weeks, divided by the number of HEI who presented to the clinic and had an indication for 4-6 week EID testing
6 secondary outcomes
Testing coverage for the 4-6 week indication
Time frame: 18 months
Time from sample collection for 4-6 week EID test indication to parent's/ caregiver notification
Time frame: 18 months
Age of patient at test result notification for 4-6 week EID test indication
Time frame: 18 months
Time from test result received for 4-6 week EID test to initiation of ART, for HIV-infected infants
Time frame: 18 months
Percentage of HIV positive infants diagnosed during 4-6 week EID testing initiated on ART
Time frame: 18 months
Number of HIV-infected infants diagnosed at the 4-6 week EID with retention in care at 6 months
Time frame: 24 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Feb 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for HIV/AIDS
Enrolling by invitation
ORCHID: An Online Intervention for Persons With HIV (Miami)
HIV/AIDS, HPV Infection
Recruiting
Enhancing the Organizational Social Context to Improve Viral Suppression and Retention in HIV Care
HIV/AIDS
RecruitingPhase 1/2
SV2A & TSPO PET Imaging Measures to Reveal Mechanisms of HIV Neuropathogenesis During Antiretroviral Therapy
HIV Associated Neurocognitive Disorder, HIV Dementia
Recruiting
Peer-led Dynamic Choice HIV Prevention for Women: The Peer-led DCP Randomized Trial
HIV/AIDS, HIV/AIDS Prevention
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Therapy Adapted for High Risk and Low Risk HIV-Associated Anal Cancer
AIDS-Related Anal Carcinoma, Anal Margin Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Emma Sacks, PhD principal investigator
George Washington University School of Public Health
Collins Odhiambo, MD principal investigator
Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric Aids Foundation - Kenya
Agnes Mahomva, MD principal investigator
Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric Aids Foundation - Zimbabwe
2 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Point of Care Early Infant Diagnosis in people with HIV/AIDS and Infant Morbidity, run by Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation at 2 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Kenya, Zimbabwe. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of HIV exposed infants (HEI) who have received the 4-6 week EID test result by 12 weeks (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Feb 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.