AzTrials
AzTrials

Developmental DisabilityPEM-PlusNCT03820011

Participation and Environment Measure-Plus (PEM-Plus) Care Planning Intervention

A study testing PEM+ in people with Developmental Disability and Early Intervention (Education), run by Mary A Khetani.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of the proposed research is to achieve a major advance in promoting effective and efficient delivery of pediatric rehabilitation services for young children with developmental disabilities and delays. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
PEM+
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
28 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Jul 2016to 1 Aug 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Aim 1 Inclusion Criteria:

  • at least 18 years old
  • reads, writes, and speaks English
  • has access to broadband internet
  • resides in the U.S
  • has a child between 0 and 3 years old who is receiving services for developmental delay.

Aim 1 Exclusion Criteria:

  • has a child over 3 years old
  • does not have internet access
  • has a child who is not receiving rehabilitation services for developmental delay
  • does not reside in the U.S.

Aim 2 Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years or older
  • reads, writes, and speaks in English
  • has a child aged 0-5 years old who was receiving rehabilitation services
  • has broadband internet access
  • denotes at least one area of desired change during participation assessment.

Aim 2 Exclusion Criteria:

  • has a child over 5 years old
  • does not have internet access
  • has a child who is not receiving rehabilitation services for developmental delay
  • does not reside in the U.S.

About this study

Official title: Feasibility Test of a Pediatric Web-Based Care Planning Guide

The goal of the proposed research is to achieve a major advance in promoting effective and efficient delivery of pediatric rehabilitation services for young children with developmental disabilities and delays. The investigative team will examine the usability, feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of PEM+, an innovative web-based (mobile friendly) guide for care planning by parents of young children with developmental disabilities and delays. PEM+ is designed in partnership with parents and providers to support more collaborative and efficient clinical care planning with individual families who typically access pediatric occupational therapy services. Specifically, PEM+ enables parents to build on their baseline assessment of their child using the Young Children's Participation and Environment Measure (YC-PEM) to design specific solutions to their young child's participation-related problems. PEM+ affords parents the opportunity to do this in their own space and on their own schedule, as well as electronically share their proposed written solutions with their child's provider(s) and/or other important individuals in their young child's life.

Read the detailed description

Participation and Environment Measure Plus (PEM+) is a new electronic health application that facilitates family-centered and participation-focused intervention planning for young children receiving rehabilitation therapies. PEM+ design was informed by caregiver and provider input. It is a web-based intervention planning application that is designed for use by caregivers of young children receiving rehabilitation therapies. Caregivers who complete the Young Children's Participation and Environment Measure (YC-PEM), an electronic patient-reported outcome measure, evaluate their child's participation and then can click on a weblink to begin the PEM+ application, whereby they build on their YC-PEM responses for the purpose of creating a participation-focused care plan to share with their child's rehabilitation team. PEM+ is a five-step recursive process (i.e., the caregiver can repeat the five-step process to create as many care plans for their child as needed), and it offers tiered support to the user during completion (tier 1: frequently asked questions available in the application, tier 2: support provided by email, tier 3: support provided by phone). For the first aim of this study, caregivers completed one iteration of PEM+ to complete user tasks for the purpose of evaluating PEM+ usability. For the second aim of this study, caregivers were instructed to complete the PEM+ over a two-week (14 day) period. This time frame was selected by the research team as it mimics what would be provided in the routine care planning processes of early intervention and early childhood education.

Being tested
PEM+
Keywords
participation, environment, goal setting
Medical subject headings
Developmental Disabilities

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PEM+Other

    PEM+ is a five-step recursive process (i.e., the caregiver can repeat the five-step process to create as many intervention plans for their child as needed, relative to the number of activities in which change is desired based on the YC-PEM e-PRO, and it offers tiered support to the user during completion (tier 1: frequently asked questions available in the application, tier 2: support provided by email, tier 3: support provided by phone).

Study groups in NCT03820011
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PEM-Plus GroupExperimentalFor Aim 1, 6 parents of young children were recruited to perform tasks related to navigating the PEM+ interface. Data on completion rate and time, as well as user satisfaction, were analyzed to guide PEM+ improvements. For Aim 2, we recruited 27 participants to enroll in a feasibility trial of PEM+. Caregivers who completed the YC-PEM e-PRO to evaluate their child's participation clicked on a weblink to begin PEM+, whereby they built on their YC-PEM responses for the purpose of creating a participation-focused care plan to share with their child's rehabilitation team. Caregivers were instructed to complete the PEM+ over a two-week (14 day) period because it mimics what would be provided in routine care.
Receives: Other: PEM+

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mean Retention Rates

    As an indicator of PEM+ feasibility, we used web analytics to obtain estimates of the percentage of caregivers who enrolled completed the trial.

    Measured: Following completion of two-week trial

  2. Median PEM+ Completion Time

    As an indicator of PEM+ feasibility, we used web analytics to estimate the median time for completing the first and subsequent iterations within a two-week trial period

    Measured: Following completion of PEM+ iteration (Aim 1) and two weeks (Aim 2)

  3. Percentage of Caregivers Completing PEM+ Independently

    As an indicator of PEM+ feasibility, we used web analytics to estimate proportion of care plans created

    Measured: Following completion of two-week trial

  4. Median Number of PEM+ Care Plans Created

    As an indicator of PEM+ feasibility, we used web analytics estimate the number of care plans created over a two-week trial period.

    Measured: Following completion of two-week trial

  5. Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use Questionnaire (USE)

    As an indicator of PEM+ acceptability, the USE is a questionnaire that evaluates usefulness, ease of use, ease of learning, and satisfaction. Items are on a 7-point scale, from from [1] strongly disagree, to [7] strongly agree. There were multiple items for each domain, which were summed together and divided by the total number of items to generate a summary score for that domain. Higher scores indicate a better outcome.

    Measured: Following completion of two-week trial

  6. Caregiver Self-Efficacy to Promote Child's Participation in Activities

    As an indicator of preliminary effects, we developed two items for this project to estimate caregiver self-efficacy in caring for their child, according to "what I will do next [to support child's participation]" and "how I think [about my child's participation]". Each item was rated on a 7-point scale, from [1] strongly disagree, to [7] strongly agree. Higher scores indicate a better outcome.

    Measured: Following completion of two-week trial

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Jan 2019
  2. Study start1 Jul 2016
  3. Primary completion1 Feb 2018
  4. Study completion1 Aug 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
28 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03820011
Sponsor's protocol ID
2016-0600
Acronym
PEM-Plus
Status last verified
Apr 2024
First submitted
22 Jan 2019
Last updated
18 Apr 2024
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing PEM+ in people with Developmental Disability and Early Intervention (Education), run by Mary A Khetani.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Apr 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mean Retention Rates (time frame: Following completion of two-week trial). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Apr 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in