AzTrials
AzTrials

Psoriasis VulgarisPhase 3NCT03806790

Efficacy and Safety of LEO 90100 Foam in Japanese Subjects With Psoriasis Vulgaris

A Phase 3 study testing LEO 90100 foam and Dovobet® ointment in people with Psoriasis Vulgaris, run by LEO Pharma at 16 sites in Japan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Comparison of the efficacy of LEO 90100 foam with Dovobet® ointment in the treatment of psoriasis in Japanese subjects. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Psoriasis Vulgaris
What is being tested?
LEO 90100 foam and Dovobet® ointment
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
182 participants
Where
16 sitesJapan
Study dates
24 Jan 2019to 10 Jun 2019
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Signed and dated informed consent obtained
  • Japanese subjects
  • Aged 20 years or above
  • Clinical diagnosis of psoriasis vulgaris amenable to topical treatment of less than or equal to 30% BSA (excluding psoriasis on the face/genitals/skin folds).
  • A target psoriasis lesion of at least mild severity on the body of a minimum size of 10 cm2 and scoring at least 2 (mild) for each of the clinical signs). The lesion must not be on the scalp, face, genitals or skin folds.
  • Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at Day 1 and agree to use an adequate methods of birth control during the trial.
  • Able to communicate with the (sub)investigator and understand and comply with the requirements of the trial.

Who cannot join

  • Systemic use of biological treatments with a potential effect on psoriasis vulgaris within the specified time periods prior to randomisation (depending on treatment)
  • Systemic treatments with all therapies other than biological treatments with a potential effect on psoriasis vulgaris within 4 weeks prior to randomisation
  • PUVA therapy, UVB therapy or UVA therapy on the full body or on the target lesion within 4 weeks prior to randomisation
  • Topical treatment of psoriasis on the areas to be treated with trial medication within 2 weeks prior to randomisation
  • Topical treatment of psoriasis on the face, genitals or skin folds with vitamin D3 analogues, potent corticosteroids or immunosuppressants within 2 weeks prior to randomisation
  • Topical treatment of conditions other than psoriasis with vitamin D3 analogues, potent corticosteroids or immunosuppressants within 2 weeks prior to randomisation
Show all 22Show fewer
  • Initiation or changes of medication that may affect psoriasis vulgaris during the trial
  • Patients with certain disorders or symptoms present on the areas to be treated with trial medication: viral lesions of the skin, infections, skin manifestations, or fragility of skin veins
  • Other inflammatory skin diseases that may confound the evaluation of psoriasis vulgaris
  • Erythrodermic, exfoliative or pustular psoriasis on the areas to be treated with trial medication
  • Planned excessive exposure of areas to be treated with trial medication to either natural or artificial sunlight during the trial.
  • Disorders of calcium metabolism
  • Severe renal insufficiency, severe hepatic disorders or severe heart disease
  • Hypersensitivity to any components of the investigational medicinal products.
  • Cushing's disease or Addison's disease
  • Subjects who have received treatment with any non-marketed drug substance within the 4 weeks prior to randomisation, or longer if for certain biological treatments
  • History of cancer within the last 5 years (except completely cured skin cancer)
  • Current participation in any other interventional clinical trial
  • Previously randomised in this trial
  • Women who are pregnant, wishing to become pregnant or are breast-feeding
  • Chronic alcohol or drug abuse within 12 months prior to screening, or any condition associated with poor compliance
  • Employees of the trial site or any other individuals directly involved with the planning or conduct of the trial, or immediate family members of such individuals

Trial locations and contacts

16 sites in 1 country.

16 sites in 1 country

Japan16 sites
  • Leo Pharma Investigational Site

    Fukutsu, Fukuoka, 811-3217

  • Leo Pharma Investigational Site

    Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 213-0001

  • Leo Pharma Investigational Site

    Kita-ku, Tokyo, 115-0045

  • Leo Pharma Investigational Site

    Koto-Ku, Tokyo, 136-0074

  • Leo Pharma Investigational Site

    Minato-Ku, Tokyo, 108-0014

  • Leo Pharma Investigational Site

    Nonoichi, Ishikawa-ken, 921-8801

  • Leo Pharma Investigational Site

    Obihiro, Hokkaido, 080-0013

  • Leo Pharma Investigational Site

    Saitama-shi, Saitama, 330-0854

  • Leo Pharma Investigational Site

    Sapporo, Hokkaido, 004-0063

  • Leo Pharma Investigational Site

    Sapporo, Hokkaido, 006-0814

  • Leo Pharma Investigational Site

    Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0807

  • Leo Pharma Investigational Site

    Sendai, Miyagi, 981-3133

  • Leo Pharma Investigational Site

    Setagaya City, Tokyo, 158-0094

  • Leo Pharma Investigational Site

    Setagaya City, Tokyo, 158-0097

  • Leo Pharma Investigational Site

    tabashi City, Tokyo, 173-8605

  • Leo Pharma Investigational Site

    Yokohama, Kanagawa, 220-6208

Other trials in Japan

About this study

Comparison of the efficacy of LEO 90100 foam with Dovobet® ointment in the treatment of psoriasis in Japanese subjects.

Read the detailed description

A phase 3, national, multi-centre, 4-week, prospective, randomised, controlled, parallel-group, open trial of LEO 90100 foam versus Dovobet® ointment (both treatments containing calcipotriol hydrate plus betamethasone dipropionate) in Japanese subjects with psoriasis vulgaris.

Being tested
LEO 90100 foam, Dovobet® ointment

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • LEO 90100 foamDrug

    Also called Enstilar® Foam

    Once daily topical application of foam from a can to psoriasis lesions. Dose depends on size of lesion.

  • Dovobet® ointmentDrug

    Once daily topical application of ointment from a tube to psoriasis lesions. Dose depends on size of lesion.

Study groups in NCT03806790
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
LEO 90100 foamExperimentalcalcipotriol hydrate 52.2 µg/g [equivalent to 50.0 µg/g calcipotriol] plus betamethasone dipropionate 0.643 mg/g
Receives: Drug: LEO 90100 foam
Dovobet® ointmentActive comparatorcalcipotriol hydrate 52.2 µg/g [equivalent to 50.0 µg/g calcipotriol] plus betamethasone dipropionate 0.643 mg/g
Receives: Drug: Dovobet® ointment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall Improvement Rate for the Target Lesion

    Overall improvement defined as 'Substantial Resolution' of Clinical Signs or at Least 'Moderately Improved' in the General Change in the Lesion.

    Substantial resolution' is defined as a clinical score for thickness and scaliness of 0 and a clinical score for redness of 1 or less in the severity of clinical signs of the target lesion. The details of the clinical scores are presented in secondary outcome measure description for 'Change in the total sign score'.

    Change in the Lesion is a 5 point scale below:

    • Markedly improved (best outcome)
    • Moderately improved
    • Slightly improved
    • Unchanged
    • Aggravated (worst outcome)

    Measured: End of Week 4

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Overall Improvement Rate for the Target Lesion at Weeks 1 and 2

    Substantial resolution of clinical signs or at least 'moderately improved' in the general change in the target lesion.

    Change in the Lesion is a 5 point scale below:

    • Markedly improved (best outcome)
    • Moderately improved
    • Slightly improved
    • Unchanged
    • Aggravated (worst outcome)

    Measured: End of Weeks 1 and 2

  2. Change in the Total Sign Score for the Target Lesion From Week 0 to Week 4

    The change in the total sign score from Week 0 to Week 4; total sign score is defined as the sum of the scores from the 3 clinical signs (redness, thickness, and scaliness) assessing severity in the target lesion.

    The severity for each of the 3 clinical signs was recorded according to a 9-point scale that ranges from a score of 0 to 4 in increments of 0.5; the severities are scored from low to high with 0 = none and 4 = severe. The sum of the 3 total sign scores could range from 0 (best) to 12 (worse). The greater the negative value for the change means a better outcome.

    Negative change denotes a decrease in the score and therefore a decrease in disease severity.

    Measured: End of Week 4

  3. Number of Adverse Events

    Number of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs). 14-day follow-up of TEAEs was only required if the TEAE was present at the last visit, and was of possible or probable relationship to trial medication.

    Measured: Treatment Emergent Adverse Events were assessed from Day 1 to end of Week 4, if Treatment Emergent Adverse Events were noted, they were followed for an additional 14 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Jan 2019
  2. Study start24 Jan 2019
  3. Primary completion10 Jun 2019
  4. Study completion10 Jun 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
182 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03806790
Sponsor's protocol ID
LP0053-1422
Status last verified
Nov 2020
First submitted
15 Jan 2019
Last updated
10 Mar 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing LEO 90100 foam and Dovobet® ointment in people with Psoriasis Vulgaris, run by LEO Pharma at 16 sites in Japan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 22 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 16 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Dec 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall Improvement Rate for the Target Lesion (time frame: End of Week 4). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Mar 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in