AzTrials
AzTrials

Dental Implant Failed(PSG)NCT03796494

Peri-implant Tissues on Aesthetic Slim Abutment Galimplant (PSG)

A study testing Straight abutment and Slim abutment in people with Dental Implant Failed and Dental Prosthesis Failure, run by University of Santiago de Compostela at 1 site in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a randomized, single-blind, split-mouth clinical trial to evaluate the performance of peri-implant tissues (bone and soft tissues) in conventionally loaded Galimplant implants, using a classic multi-position, anti-rotational abutment, comparing it to the new multi-abutment aesthetic slim anti-rotational placed… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Straight abutment and Slim abutment
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
1 Mar 2019to 8 Jan 2020
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients without systemic pathology that are grounds for absolute contraindication
  • Older adults who agree to be part of the study and sign the informed consent
  • Consumption of tobacco less than 5 cigarettes / day
  • Do not be completely toothless
  • Absences of at least two pieces in posterior area with or without free ends to distal, maxillary or mandibular that do not require regenerative techniques. In case of odd absences (3,5,7), a Slim pillar will be placed, being the group to always be the majority.
  • Area of mature bone healed at least 6 months post-extraction.
  • Patients with a sufficient amount of bone to place implants 4 mm in diameter and 10 mm long

Who cannot join

  • Immunosuppressed
  • Aesthetic edentulous areas of 13-23 and 33-43
  • Smokers of more than 5 cigarettes
  • Index of bleeding greater than 30%
  • Patients with less than 2 mm of keratinized gingiva
  • Implants with primary stability with ISQ <55
  • Implants with ISQ index <55 at 8 weeks
  • When a margin of safety can not be assumed to the inferior dental nerve of at least 1 mm

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • Mario Pérez Sayáns

    Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, 15785

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Behavior of the Peri-implant Tissues on the Multiposition Abutment Straight Aesthetic Slim Anti-rotational Galimplant

This is a randomized, single-blind, split-mouth clinical trial to evaluate the performance of peri-implant tissues (bone and soft tissues) in conventionally loaded Galimplant implants, using a classic multi-position, anti-rotational abutment, comparing it to the new multi-abutment aesthetic slim anti-rotational placed both at the time of the implant surgery. To this end, 80 Galimplant implants with a diameter of 4 mm and 10 mm in length will be placed in areas of mature scarred post-extraction bone. Patients be divided into 2 study groups, group C: straight pillar; Group T: Slim pillar. The bone and clinical radiological stability of the peri-implant tissues will be evaluated at 6 weeks post-surgery and at 6-12-24 months post-prosthetic loading.

Being tested
Straight abutment, Slim abutment
Keywords
dental implant, periimplant tissues

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Straight abutmentProcedure or surgery

    This is the classic abutment, straight and anti-rotational for dental implants which have been tested before

  • Slim abutmentProcedure or surgery

    This is the new concept of the prostheses abutment, slim and anti-rotational to improve the width of biologic space

Study groups in NCT03796494
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control GroupActive comparatorThe control group is considered, using the company's classic multi-position straight anti-rotational abutment
Receives: Procedure: Straight abutment
Test groupExperimentalThe test group is considered, where the new multi-position straight esthetic anti-rotational slim abutment is used
Receives: Procedure: Slim abutment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Primary stability of implants and peri-implant tissues

    Randomly and following the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the implants will be placed with the normal preparation protocol. Investigators will evaluate the immediate post-surgical stability of implants and peri-implant tissues through the Ostell system, based on the resonance frequency analysis (RFA). The implant stability quotient (ISQ) is the value on a scale that indicates the level of stability and osseointegration in dental implants. The scale ranges from 1 to 100, with higher values indicating greater stability. The acceptable stability range lies between 55-85 ISQ

    Measured: 10 months

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Basal Peri-implant tissue level: implant stability

    Randomly and following the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the implants will be placed with the normal preparation protocol. We will load the crowns 8 weeks after implant surgery. Investigators will evaluate the stability at different moments, 8 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months. The implant stability quotient (ISQ) is the value on a scale that indicates the level of stability and osseointegration in dental implants. The scale ranges from 1 to 100, with higher values indicating greater stability. The acceptable stability range lies between 55-85 ISQ. ISQ values are obtained using resonance frequency analysis (RFA).

    Measured: 1 day

  2. Basal Radiological Bone Implant level

    At the moment of placing the implant, clinical variables will be evaluated: depth of probing (distance from the peri-implant margin to the most depth of the peri-implant sulcus). This will be the basal measure of the implant stability and peri-implant tissue levels. Investigators will calculate the difference between the basal measure and the future measurements.

    Measured: 1 day

  3. Basal Peri-implant tissue level: probing depth

    At the moment of placing the implant, clinical variables will be evaluated: depth of probing (distance from the peri-implant margin to the most depth of the peri-implant sulcus). This will be the basal measure of the implant stability and peri-implant tissue levels. Investigators will calculate the difference between the basal measure and the future measurements.

    Measured: 1 day

  4. Radiological bone implant stability

    After the implantation, we´ll load the temporary 8 weeks after the implantation. Investigators will evaluate the bone level stability at 6 weeks in both groups, through a dental X-ray radiography. The bone stability will be measured as a difference between de basal bone level and the actual one in mm.

    Measured: 8 weeks

  5. Peri-implant tissue stability: probing depth

    After the implantation, we´ll load the definitive prostheses in 8 weeks. Investigators will evaluate the peri-implant tissue stability by measuring the probing depth or just in case, the recession of the gingival margin. The stability will be given by the differences between both measures, basal and actual in mm.

    Measured: 8 weeks

  6. Peri-implant tissue stability: ISQ

    After the implantation, we´ll load the temporary prostheses in 8 weeks. Investigators will evaluate the peri-implant tissue stability by measuring the ISQ through RFA. The stability will be given by the differences between both measures, basal and actual.

    Measured: 8 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jan 2019
  2. Study start1 Mar 2019
  3. Primary completion1 Apr 2019
  4. Study completion8 Jan 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
80 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03796494
Sponsor's protocol ID
CT-2019-01
Acronym
(PSG)
Status last verified
Mar 2020
First submitted
3 Jan 2019
Last updated
2 Dec 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: We will anonymize and categorize the clinical and radiological data of the patients to share the information with the other researchers of the group

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in